April 9, 2008

Yahoo Refugee Tim Cadogan Lands at OpenX As CEO

Erick Schonfeld

14 comments »

openx.pngExecutive recruiters are still loving Yahoo. Another former Yahoo executive has landed as the CEO of a startup. This time it is Tim Cadogan, an advertising senior vice president who left Yahoo in February. He is taking the helm at OpenX, a startup which distributes an increasingly popular open-source ad server. More details from TechCrunch UK:


London-based open-source ad server startup OpenX is biting the bullet and moving to Los Angeles. In addition, former Yahoo senior vice president Tim Cadogan will take the CEO job at the startup funded by Index Ventures, Accel Partners and others, reports Kara Swisher. OpenX has about 30 employees, including 10 developers in Poland, but not all will head to the US. This is probably a necessary strategic move for the ad company, heading to the capital of media and entertainment, but it’s a shame to see it move out of London.

Cadogan was with Yahoo for five years in its search unit and was later SVP for ad products. OpenX (which recently and controversially changed its name from OpenAds) serves about 30,000 Web publishers on 100,000 Web sites in more than 100 countries. OpenX has raised about $21 million in funding since 2007. Besides Index and Accel, other investors include First Round Capital, Mangrove Capital and O’Reilly AlphaTech Ventures. Former AOL head Jon Miller also recently joined its board as chairman.

Current CEO James Bilefield, another former Yahoo exec and British national, will stay with them “through the transition and as an adviser to the company” - which doesn’t exactly sound like a long term arrangement.

His first act should be to change the name back to OpenAds. OpenX is simply too vague and awful (although it does signal that the company may try to expand beyond simply serving ads).

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Ryan Merket

    Erick, I agree. OpenX sounds so — Sci-fi. Why not OpenMedia or something a bit less vague?

  2. Jeremy

    Tim was a GREAT guy when I was at Yahoo, one of the more talented VPs (he became SVP after I left) that was there.

    Interestingly enough, he was on Jeff Weiner’s staff at the time, as was Andrew Braccia, who has since landed at Accel, one of the backers of Openx. If they weren’t a company worth watching before, they definitely are now :)

  3. Alan Wilensky

    “OpenX is simply too vague and awful..”

    That, Schonfeld, is the kind of vivid word smithing that will get you a Pulitzer, one day, if you keep it up.

  4. Steve

    absolutely love - and use - openads.

    quick questions: how do these guys make any money? what the hell is the biz model? at some point are we going to see their advertisers ads running across our networks? or are they just getting us to love it and then charge us license fees? whatever, but it’d be nice to know.

  5. Jeff - buzzmyblog.com

    I was wondering the same thing as Steve. What is their business model? I thought I saw something about a hosted OpenAds (sorry….OpenX) solution. Maybe they’ll take a cut?

  6. Bam Azizi

    i think every website should have it’s own ad management platform and connect it to other companies like google and FM and etc.

    what i’m skeptical is that there many many ad companies openning doors, if advertising blog by blog is very difficult for advertiser what benefit another ad platform serves!

    Ads on sites just like Ads on TV are having a big problem of conversion. unfortunately Ads are too interruptive i hope the direction that openads is going to take is to solve this issue for all of us blogger and site owners as well as for the users of our sites.

  7. Ericson Smith

    I would imagine that they could go the Wordpress route and setup the ad serving engine as a service. Then charge for it for higher volumes.

    I would imagine that Google could enter that business later as well :-(

    We do pretty well with our tiny product RevSense:
    http://www.revsense.com

    Its advertiser self serve, you install it on your server, setup your rates and zones, and advertisers can go to town without you having to field a sales team or upload ads yourself.

  8. yongfook

    “I would imagine that Google could enter that business later as well”

    They already have, dude.

    https://www.google.com/admanager

  9. John

    @jeff - There’s a reason why they hired a GoTo/Overture/YSM guy to be their CEO. There’s money to be made in aggregating publishers. Ad networks and others will pay to get easy access to the remnant inventory. Same reason Google is giving you Ad Manager for free.

    Tim is awesome. Good hire.

  10. whoopie

    the 2009 implosion in the online ad space is going to be awesome

    its amusing watching refugees crawl back to the mothership after their startup vacation ends

  11. jake

    yea, biz model plz.

  12. randy

    Google Ad Manager is far superior, but it’s clearly benefited from somebody’s careful study of (or own frustration with) OpenAds’ seven years of shortcomings. In my opinion, Google’s entire approach to just seems to have been so immaculately conceived from the very core (the hierarchy of products->placements->slots, the inventory/orders management, and the user roles are just perfect!), I almost sense that Google never even made a single footstep in the wrong direction. But hey, who knows what products were tried and failed behind Google’s iron curtain before the beta launch of today’s Ad Manger.

    Anyway, what was wrong with the AOL guy? And what happened to this $20,000,000 TechCrunch keeps mentioning?

  13. Irene Smith

    How does this make sense? Yahoo has been in a slow decline for a long time and is not longer a “successful” company yet the people responsible for this are been head hunted for top positions. Seems like a recipe for recruiting poor talent.
    Irene
    Green lasers rulz

  14. Jon

    What Randy fails to mention is the ‘biggest’ advantage OpenX has over Google Ad Manager is the network negotiated PPC rate. By joining the OpenX network you get the benefit of a major traffic upscaling of payment royalty. Google by just providing the system has not learned that it’s ‘charity’ payment model to smaller publishers is tantamount to offensive. Go with OpenX and earn a higher return, I’ve seen incomes double, tripple. The Yahoo guru joining OpenX could well be just what the doctor ordered.