April 4, 2008

Google Reveals Spectrum Auction Strategy

Erick Schonfeld

42 comments »

spectrum.jpgDuring the recent wireless spectrum auctions that just brought the FCC $19.6 billion in license fees, there was a lot of speculation about what drove each of the different corporate bidders. But the bidders themselves were barred from speaking publicly about their auction strategies. Now that Verizon has been declared the biggest overall winner, and the auction is over, the participants are free to speak. Google was potentially the big spoiler in the auction, but as it explains, the main motivation behind its participation was simply to ensure that some of the open rules it had lobbied for would be enforced on whoever won.

From the Google Public Policy Blog:

Google’s top priority heading into the auction was to make sure that bidding on the so-called “C Block” reached the $4.6 billion reserve price that would trigger the important “open applications” and “open handsets” license conditions. We were also prepared to gain the nationwide C Block licenses at a price somewhat higher than the reserve price; in fact, for many days during the early course of the auction, we were the high bidder. But it was clear, then and now, that Verizon Wireless ultimately was motivated to bid higher (and had far more financial incentive to gain the licenses).

In fact, Google raised its own bid in ten rounds without any counter bids, which implies that Verizon was doing everything it could to make sure that the open device and open application rules were not triggered. Ultimately, that strategy was not successful, and it must now abide by the open rules. It remains to be seen whether Verizon will abide only to the letter of the rules or to their spirit.

(Photo by Steve Jurvetson)

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Google Reveals Spectrum Auction Strategy | Code4DotNet
  2. Google no quería las frecuencias inalámbricas
  3. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » Google、携帯周波数オークションの戦略を明かす
  4. Techzor.net » Google Posts Auction Strategy For Spectrum
  5. geyq.com
  6. Maroon Ventures Blog » Blog Archive » Hey Garmin, ya you, I’m talking to you

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. ujjawal

    Google has good PR strategy!! They are making it look like as if they were doing it as part of social service by bidding.

  2. Sunil

    yes, true

  3. Samidh Chakrabarti

    At some point, all of the big consumer electronics and internet companies should come together and form a consortium that is a counterweight to the wireless carriers. The consortium could buy out large swaths of the spectrum and declare them open access. Only then will we see radical innovation in the wireless space.

    The tale of WiFi shows us that this can be done. WiFi liberated that region of the spectrum from the grips of the wireless carriers. No one needed to pay a carrier to use WiFi. As a result, innovation flourished– both consumers and companies got incredible value from WiFi. If only we could open up more of the spectrum in this way!

  4. laloj

    http://www.tech-exposed.com

    I think they drove the bid up to squeeze out other competitors. Perhaps made a side deal with Verizon in a collabortive move.

  5. Crazyglues

    and from the clouds comes the sun… as a song comes to mind- “I can see clearly now the rain is gone..”

    Kudos to you Google, Pure Genius..

  6. Michael B

    http://mikesmoneyclub.blogspot.com

    Nice.

  7. Holly from mobiEnthusiast.mobi

    Things should get interesting all around. I’m looking to see what the implications turn out to be for the mobile webspace. Android is just around the corner, so let’s see what happens. Thank you for an informative article.

  8. Sebastian

    @ujjawal
    They probably get PR, too. But for the internet (and therefore for them) it’s important to have these open standards. Before, mobile internet was a sub-net that had to be sanctioned by the respective network companies. Remember what happened back when Apple, Commodore and others each developed their own, proprietary OS that worked just with their hardware? You’re right, not much happened - the real business started when somebody created an OS that was open for any hardware vendor. (The company that made that possible is rightfully the by any account biggest OS company.)
    Google not only got some positive PR through that, they forced Verizon to open up their networks, at least a bit. This is potentially huge for Google, but also for every other internet company.

  9. panefsky

    If this is true, then Verizon would have total information over Google’s intentions from the very start, since all this were circulating for months in the web. I don’t think Verizon is so stupid to fall into common-secret-traps.

  10. rodriguete

    http://www.xolaclub.com

    google strategy ^^

  11. theregoesdave

    Triggering the open device strategy also means that Android with Skype can cut off Verizon’s monthly minutes plans at the knees!

    http://theregoesdave.com/2008/.....and-skype/

  12. Rob

    I think it’s another example of Google’s pure arrogance… they just think they are smarter than everyone else, and they are acting like that on all fronts at the moment.

    If they continue that road, they will alienate all their partners and the industry. They are on the best way…

  13. Jose Miguel Cansado

    Google is quite smart, and smarter than many companies.
    The objective of forcing “openness” to wireless operators has been achieved (at least from a legal standpoint).

    This openness can only be beneficial to the end user and it definitively fosters innovation vs. oligopolistic practices.

    On the other side the high price paid for Spectrum, somehow legitimates the need for Wireless operators to behave as oligopolies.

    Nonetheless, bravo for Google and its “openness” cause.

  14. Brick Marketing

    While one could argue that Google’s arrogance will lead them to alienate others in the industry, what they did overall DID help our economy to some extent. It’s not as if they fooled poor beggars. They simply upped the price Verizon would pay. Verizon HAS the money…let ‘em spend!

  15. velioncho

    Google is pushing “openness” not to help public or the industry , just so it can make more money. Just so that the share holders make even more money. That is the bottom line.

    I dont like the fact that they project themselves as “internet” Saviour but the intention has always been to clear the hurdles so that it can make more money. Pity!!!

  16. whoopie

    google’s free ride is over, no one is buying these vapor initiatives anymore

    stock still headed under $400

  17. BionicPimp

    Sounds like someone remembers their Sun Tsu.

    “To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill”

    Open access without having to pay a dime.

  18. Brady

    Erik or someone, can you please explain the following in a little more detail?

    “In fact, Google raised its own bid in ten rounds without any counter bids, which implies that Verizon was doing everything it could to make sure that the open device and open application rules were not triggered.”

  19. Brady

    sorry, *Erick*

  20. James

    Brady, I was wondering the same thing.

    One would think that being the only bidder would mean you won the ‘auction’, at least when the reserve price is met.

  21. Sunil

    Google is very smart.

    http://feedshub.blogspot.com

  22. telepilot

    Brick Marketing:
    “They simply upped the price Verizon would pay. Verizon HAS the money…let ‘em spend!”

    Not to be overly negative, but where do you think Verizons money comes from? The increase in the bidding price will be cascaded into higher fees, representing an indirect governmental tax on Verizon consumers. Economics is messy.

  23. Everett

    I agree with #12 not only are bullying people but they are not succeeding. Hence people jumping ship to other companies.

  24. nitsuj

    /random hijack

    Are you guys killing off your forums? I swear there was a topnav link there yesterday, and I tried to register twice but never got the confirmation email.

  25. nitsuj

    I should know better than to post before I’ve finished the 2nd cuppa joe. Saw Nick’s post in the forums…

  26. logosamurai

    Interesting.

  27. VentureDeal

    I’m sure Verizon is going to try to get the rules re-written!

  28. ALLAIN JULES C@MMUNICATION

    Yes we can !

  29. MrCashyCash

    Don’t forget Google is a monopoly now.

    They will creep into everything and push their agenda;
    Wall Street will push their trajectory.

  30. quote.unquote.us

    Savvy business move. Great PR strategy. Just brilliant!

  31. Coffee_men

    Any one wanna take a coffee break between auction rounds.

    Google wants to monetize the wireless spectrum. Harder to do in 2×2 window when the automated operator only understands hindi.

  32. Denis

    Yes, Google use perfect strategy!!

  33. greedy_google

    Let’s see.

    Google screws Verizon customers (who will have to pay for this increa$ed cost of acquisition).
    Google offers “open” phone service via skype.
    Consumers are happy for “free” phone service paid for by annoying Ad$ense.

    I’m happy living in a “free” interweb world (and now phone!) surrounded by non$ense ads just so the googlegirls can buy more chihuly chandeliers.

    No. I’m not bitter.

  34. web hosting

    I think Google will go on raising its own bid and will not leave any chance to bid others.

  35. Pooptooth

    That’s what I would say too if I lost. I don’t doubt that they did everything they could to get the open rules, but they wanted it.

  36. accent

    Not saavy in these matters, but seems like at least a segment of spectrum should be a commons, open to all, perhaps with some basic rules. Seems like that would incubate new ideas, for everyone’s benefit (except perhaps the billion dollar corporationss).