<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current News: An Even Easier Way For Web Audiences To Get On TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:29:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Podcast Brothers 2008-04-03 Podcast Brothers &#8212; Social Media University</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2487256</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast Brothers 2008-04-03 Podcast Brothers &#8212; Social Media University</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2487256</guid>
		<description>[...] listener question about the &#8220;free&#8221; model from Gus Caveda, get exposure for your work by submitting it to Current TV, Slashdot comments on twitter and podcasting being on &#8220;sidelines&#8221;, using MySpace to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] listener question about the &#8220;free&#8221; model from Gus Caveda, get exposure for your work by submitting it to Current TV, Slashdot comments on twitter and podcasting being on &#8220;sidelines&#8221;, using MySpace to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current TV domande e risposte &#124; Wolly Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2276004</link>
		<dc:creator>Current TV domande e risposte &#124; Wolly Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2276004</guid>
		<description>[...] ci pagano spiegamo loro come creare circa 10 milioni di USD di perdite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ci pagano spiegamo loro come creare circa 10 milioni di USD di perdite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current tv, un&#8217;analisi preziosa &#171; Journalize!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2178567</link>
		<dc:creator>Current tv, un&#8217;analisi preziosa &#171; Journalize!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2178567</guid>
		<description>[...] QUI il post su [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QUI il post su [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sassmo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2131359</link>
		<dc:creator>Sassmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2131359</guid>
		<description>Charles,

While I agree with the premise of your argument, I&#039;ve also seen a similar model used over at Threadless.com. At first they only offered a tiny pittance for designers who&#039;s art they printed on t-shirts. Now they offer $2000 per design plus bonuses for reprinting, etc. Over the years it has also produced several designers who used Threadless as a place to garner attention and build their resume. 
Just like Threadless, I don&#039;t see Current hanging onto really great producers for long. However, I can imagine a lot of underprivileged, underfunded, producer savants that don&#039;t have the means of going to a J-School, getting their break at Current in the coming years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>While I agree with the premise of your argument, I&#8217;ve also seen a similar model used over at Threadless.com. At first they only offered a tiny pittance for designers who&#8217;s art they printed on t-shirts. Now they offer $2000 per design plus bonuses for reprinting, etc. Over the years it has also produced several designers who used Threadless as a place to garner attention and build their resume.<br />
Just like Threadless, I don&#8217;t see Current hanging onto really great producers for long. However, I can imagine a lot of underprivileged, underfunded, producer savants that don&#8217;t have the means of going to a J-School, getting their break at Current in the coming years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2127821</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2127821</guid>
		<description>Current exploits young professional producers by paying next to nothing for content...they realized &quot;viewer generated content&quot; what they call VC2 didn&#039;t work because very few people can actually produce good little TV segments.  So they hire young people eager to get in the business for peanuts and retain all the rights to their pieces, making money by selling it on multiple platforms.  So maybe with Current News creating more content, they can pay their producers a living wage.

Just the two cents of a disgruntled professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current exploits young professional producers by paying next to nothing for content&#8230;they realized &#8220;viewer generated content&#8221; what they call VC2 didn&#8217;t work because very few people can actually produce good little TV segments.  So they hire young people eager to get in the business for peanuts and retain all the rights to their pieces, making money by selling it on multiple platforms.  So maybe with Current News creating more content, they can pay their producers a living wage.</p>
<p>Just the two cents of a disgruntled professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2121353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2121353</guid>
		<description>Awful content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2120825</link>
		<dc:creator>laurar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2120825</guid>
		<description>This is really cool... anyone know how it works?  It would be great to know how they can produce video clips and audio overlay on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really cool&#8230; anyone know how it works?  It would be great to know how they can produce video clips and audio overlay on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Current News：ウェブ視聴者がもっと簡単にテレビに出られる方法</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2120803</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Current News：ウェブ視聴者がもっと簡単にテレビに出られる方法</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2120803</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank Church</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2119426</link>
		<dc:creator>frank Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2119426</guid>
		<description>I think this is great: online uploading of content with TV-based (non-interactive/ relaxing) consumption. 

It should be pretty cheap to get a TV channel on the satellite cable networks and Dish should think about making it easier. They should just add revenue sharing where the percentage starts at 90% in their favor and ges down with volume. For example, the livestreaming players could use this for their popular broadcasters.

@5, Very cool. Never heard of them before


@8, shut up, dude flies around in leer jets. Take your exaggerations back to drudge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is great: online uploading of content with TV-based (non-interactive/ relaxing) consumption. </p>
<p>It should be pretty cheap to get a TV channel on the satellite cable networks and Dish should think about making it easier. They should just add revenue sharing where the percentage starts at 90% in their favor and ges down with volume. For example, the livestreaming players could use this for their popular broadcasters.</p>
<p>@5, Very cool. Never heard of them before</p>
<p>@8, shut up, dude flies around in leer jets. Take your exaggerations back to drudge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2119215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2119215</guid>
		<description>You can have the best vehicle in the world, but if the fuel is this bad, it won&#039;t be successful.

Maybe Gore doesn&#039;t know his audience? The truly faithful should know that the Goreacle commands them to stop using their CO2-emitting TV set and get back to subsistence farming... or better yet, stop exhaling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have the best vehicle in the world, but if the fuel is this bad, it won&#8217;t be successful.</p>
<p>Maybe Gore doesn&#8217;t know his audience? The truly faithful should know that the Goreacle commands them to stop using their CO2-emitting TV set and get back to subsistence farming&#8230; or better yet, stop exhaling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles Locksmith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2118971</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles Locksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2118971</guid>
		<description>http://locksmithhome.com/default.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://locksmithhome.com/default.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://locksmithhome.com/default.aspx'>http://locksmit...om/default.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raskin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2118849</link>
		<dc:creator>Raskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2118849</guid>
		<description>Just for the record folks:

Miss Universe - Current TV was out in May 2004, YouTube didn&#039;t come around until a full year later. Current created the ripples! 

Ryan Merket - see above ... Current wants its logo back from Dancejam more like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record folks:</p>
<p>Miss Universe &#8211; Current TV was out in May 2004, YouTube didn&#8217;t come around until a full year later. Current created the ripples! </p>
<p>Ryan Merket &#8211; see above &#8230; Current wants its logo back from Dancejam more like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2118743</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2118743</guid>
		<description>Have you all seen the website www.vocalo.org? It is trying to do a similar thing with radio instead of TV? It has some differences, but the goals are similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you all seen the website <a href="http://www.vocalo.org?" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.vocalo.org?'>http://www.vocalo.org?</a> It is trying to do a similar thing with radio instead of TV? It has some differences, but the goals are similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2118438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2118438</guid>
		<description>Glad to see Al Gore doing well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Al Gore doing well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Merket</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2117717</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Merket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2117717</guid>
		<description>Dancejam wants its logo back. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dancejam wants its logo back. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrisMiss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2115576</link>
		<dc:creator>CrisMiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2115576</guid>
		<description>I think this is a really cutting-edge idea and service - blending print/video, web/TV.  I like the voice technology!  Current is thinking ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a really cutting-edge idea and service &#8211; blending print/video, web/TV.  I like the voice technology!  Current is thinking ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: * Miss Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2115008</link>
		<dc:creator>* Miss Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/02/current-news-an-even-easier-way-for-web-audiences-to-get-on-tv/#comment-2115008</guid>
		<description>It never ceases to surprise how both the Digg and YouTube concept send ripples throughout the business world and society.

You would have thought just 10 years ago, that the public could eventually have so much influence - for decades it had all been under the whim of editors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never ceases to surprise how both the Digg and YouTube concept send ripples throughout the business world and society.</p>
<p>You would have thought just 10 years ago, that the public could eventually have so much influence &#8211; for decades it had all been under the whim of editors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
