April 1, 2008

On Eve of Facebook Chat, Babuki Takes a Chance

Mark Hendrickson

25 comments »

When Facebook rolls out its chat application (”Facebook Chat”) sometime this week, users are going to see an instant messaging bar at the bottom of their screen wherever they go on the site. And they won’t even have to install that bar; it will be put there automatically for everyone. That’s the power of complete and instantaneous distribution possessed by Facebook alone, and it’s what made us declare all 3rd party IM apps on Facebook as “basically dead”.

So you’d expect no more Social.IM or Friendvox’s to crop up, but a newly launched service called Babuki IM still thinks it has a chance to become the preferred IM client on Facebook.

Co-founder Aly Chesney points out two main advantages to his product: it can be used both through the Facebook website itself and through an AIR-based desktop client. And it works with other IM services such as AIM, Gtalk, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, MySpace, Livejournal, and even Social.IM.

Babuki also provides other useful features such as the ability to make yourself invisible to certain Facebook friends and to set a wider range of status messages (Away, Extended Away, Busy, etc.)

The interoperability Babuki provides with other IM services is certainly the main advantage it has over Facebook Chat, which will eschew the Jabber (XMPP) protocol in favor of a proprietary one. The Mac and PC compatible desktop client also gets a big thumbs up from me.

But the question will be whether Facebook users care enough about these features to choose Babuki over Facebook Chat, especially with the expectation that Facebook will add features and interoperability over time. I don’t predict many of them will, although we can hope that Babuki amasses enough users to pressure Facebook into adopting its superior functionality.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Harry Wang

    I choose neither.

    Harry “trying hard to be communicated with less but failing” Wang

  2. HmmConvenient

    I’m just waiting for Trillian to enter the market so I can pay $4.99 for sweet skins on these IM clients so I can show them off to all my friends.

  3. Michael

    What a joke…

  4. SoftwareSweatshop

    Babuki, eh? Let’s see if they’re any good.

    Raza Imam
    http://SoftwareSweatshop.com

  5. Evan

    Facebook: Waa-Waa…

    http://evansnyder.com

  6. LA Guy

    Damn .. It looks just like mosoto !! Search for mosoto on flickr and get the screenshots.

    babuki copied mosoto !

    http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/mosoto .

    Facebook chat ..

  7. John C. McClore

    I’ll stick with AIM and Windows Messenger. I don’t want a browser window open for IM. Facebook is comitting the same crime as everyone else. They put so much bloatware into their product it loses the value everyone intially saw in it and eventually becomes obsolete. Pages take so long to load nowadays and it’s full of bugs. Take a page out of Apple’s book and tightly regulate your environment–the open platform was initially a good idea, but it’s just ruining Facebook in the long run. What a shitty website.

  8. chris at trade2save

    Nothing beats Adium as far as I’m concerned.

  9. Brett

    I think this will also be the end of AIM for the college crowd…sorry startups but nice job facebook, one of the only smart things (from a user experience perspective) I’ve heard coming out of there since pre-application days (disclaimer, I hate third party app invites and everything associated).

    The ability to hide from certain facebook friend, or only enable certain friends to chat with you is a FANTASTIC idea and I hope one that facebook integrates.

  10. Mark Hendrickson

    @John McClore - Babuki comes as a desktop app too

    @LA Guy - Mosoto seems down for the count

  11. Frank Church

    @ John McClore, agreed. Bloatware is pervasive, and clutters the experience of many, once good, services (eg. website annotation tools).

    @Mark, most people already have AIM, MSmess, Trillian, or Adium; I’m the only one I know with AIR installed (I know that will change, but).

  12. Sam Davyson

    Not a hope…

    Of all the heavy Facebook users that I’ve told about the upcoming chat integration almost all have said “Oh no… I don’t want that — I’ll waste even more time on Facebook”.

    People aren’t going to go out of there way for this.

  13. dave

    I reckon they’ll do alright. Even meebo hasn’t managed to integrate with MySpace and Livejournal so should be able to pick a few users on their webversion with that. a Desktop version is a bonus too

  14. sky

    No chance. What a waste of time. Oxford dropout… Useless. Stanford / Harvard dropouts are better!

  15. iYobo

    very neat, i like it

    i think Facebook is going the mile by integrating these features all together in a fashionable manner, the site is becoming a one stop for almost all the internet needs for most users. however you cant be EVERYTHING in one place. As far as i see it by now, the market of facebook is very focused on its own self. Google and Yahoo have nothing to worry about, Facebook is a social network that has its limits at the end of the day, same like myspace.

  16. AJH

    Is there any doubt that Meebo will add Facebook chat immenently, thereby squeezing out any other web-based chat aggregators? Is there any doubt that Trillian will do the same for the desktop chat aggregator space? *scratches head*

  17. Smart

    Can someone explain the point of Facebook chat to me? Why make another feature on a site that is already user-rich and money poor?

    Build a payment transactions system.
    Build paid enterprise-ready services.
    Build an ad platform for developers.
    Add shops and merchant pages.

    So many things to make money on, and yet they decide to invest in a commodity like chat!? … I hear a high pitched wine of something coming in fast …

  18. Mark Hendrickson

    @Smart - they’re working on a payment system right now, expect it to be out this year

  19. team ray

    text chat is lame so 98

    live chat is whats needed

  20. Zach Weisman

    I’d like to use this but I think I wait for some momentum…

    I’d like to use it simply because I don’t like how facebook can compete with its application developers yet they don’t have to follow the self imposed rules. If they want to stimulate applicaton development and truly become the platform of the future, then why are they COMPETING with their developers whenever an application actually appears lucrative?

  21. Smart

    @Zach - I totally agree. They did it with polls, their wall, they’re doing it with chat. The worst part is, I don’t see how they make a dime off of this other than a small increase in ad revenue.

    @Mark - Sure, but if they keep eating their young (i.e. developers) there will be noone left to use the payment system.

  22. SutroStyle

    They thought it’s time to lock down the developers like Microsoft did in 1993. All I can say is buhahahah. Zuck is no Bill gates. Read my lips.

  23. Harry Wang

    Upon further inspection, that site’s name looks like a mistype of bukkake.

    Harry “not afraid to jizz with more than one other around” Wang

  24. David

    I vote for Digsby !

    Thats a groovy cross platform client that has a facebook app that allows facebook users to IM you from your profile without you having to login to facebook :)

    Got a whole rack of other features too.

    ttfn

  25. Mark G

    It would be nice if the app actually worked. I get indefinite time outs when I try and run it. Tut tut. Have they not heard of EC2?