March 27, 2008

Handipoints Thinks a Virtual World Could Make Kids Do Chores in the Real One

Mark Hendrickson

20 comments »

If your kid’s obsessed with Webkinz and Club Penguin but you can’t get them to do their chores, you may want to take a look at a new entrant into the virtual worlds scene called Handipoints.

Founder Viva Chu started Handipoints in January 2007 with the notion that chore charts would be both more fun and more effective if they were moved online. So he created a site with two main parts: one that helped parents track how their kids helped out around the house, and another that consisted of a virtual world on par with the other pseudo-3D services kids have come to enjoy.

These two parts work closely with one another to create sufficient incentives for kids to do their work. When kids successfully complete activities (such as cleaning their room, taking out the trash, or even brushing their teeth and eating an apple), they gain either of two types of points: so-called “handipoints” that can be redeemed for real-world items such as Nerf guns and toys; and “bonus points” that can be used to buy virtual goods in the online world. Parents determine which type of point, and how many of them, is rewarded for good behavior.

Setting up a system for kids to redeem points for physical goods (or money) was easy enough; all they had to do was hook up Amazon’s APIs and create a custom storefront. But a significant effort has gone into creating an entirely new and appealing virtual world, one that’s replete with different settings, activities, items, and other users.

Like Webkinz, kids can walk around the virtual world and talk to each other using canned chat (where you pick statements from a list instead of typing them). This prevents inappropriate behavior. The graphics are impressive and the functionality is rather sophisticated. In addition to buying items and socializing, users can play in-world games and watch movies (these require points, too).

Handipoints has raised $800k from Charles River Ventures and several angels - Keith Rabois, Georges Harik, Gady Nemirovsky, Robert Fanini, and Aydin Senkut. It’s been in beta since November 2007 and has gained 150k users so far, with 3.5 users per family on average (that breaks down into 1 parent and about 2 kids). Most of the service’s virtual goods are free, but the company plans on making money through selling premium goods to parents who want to make them available for their kids.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. …ing’s blog » Blog Archive » Handipoints认为虚拟世界可以让孩子在真实时间中做些杂务
  2. Virtual Paris 2007 » Mes liens du 21 mars 2008 au 29 mars 2008
  3. Game Tycoon»Blog Archive » Articles of Interest
  4. The Watch - virtual worlds in the news : The Metaverse Journal - Australia’s Virtual World News Service
  5. Monster’s Blog » Blog Archive » Be The First To Find Out How Media Is Trying To Target Your Child

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. chinchan

    Hello,
    Your blog is nice for those parents who have no time management for their children. This blog would help a lot for the parents to teach their children to have a time management to do their tasks. Cause kids are now in to the web world. Visiting your site would make the children realize how to be a responsible human being.

  2. Jackson

    I agree! This seems like a great way to show children how to be more responsible and helpful.

  3. CARversation.com

    CRAZYYYYYYYYY

  4. David Mackey

    This seems like a really great idea. I love it.

  5. Matt

    very cool angle in this space.

  6. mobilegadget

    love the icon, brush your teeth with… soap

  7. AreJay

    I love this, so will my 9 year old! Thank you for the review!

    AreJay

  8. william

    does anyone know how the rewards fulfillment is done? i.e. how does handipoints pay amazon to purchase one of the reward gifts and have it sent to the kid who earned and picked it?

    as far as i know, amazon’s api and storefront doesn’t only provides a way for the end customer to buy the product for themselves. in this case though, handipoints will have to purchase the gift onbehalf for the recipient, since the recipient only has “handipoints” and not cash/credit card.

    william

  9. william

    oh nevermind….it seems that the parent has to purchase the reward from amazon themselves and give it to the kid. i thought handipoints rewards the kids based on points accumulated, like chuck’n'cheese or something.

  10. daniel

    http://www.geocities.com/poi243

  11. Harry Wang

    Good luck to them. There are a lot of pampered/spoiled brats out there with an ever growing sense of entitlement.

    Harry “former pampered/spoiled brat and not afraid to admit it” Wang

  12. Kathy Klein

    Wow. What a total waste. Eventually the kids won’t even be doing chores. Who came up with this crap?

  13. Melissa Tell

    teaching kids that there must be reward for everything they do isn’t good for them, imagine they will be looking for bunch of stock options each time they organzied something at work! I hope none of these kids ever work for me.

    Also, I don’t like the privacy aspect of this. disturbing. disturbing. disturbing.

    Am I on Jupiter, that a family has on aveage 3.5 kids as I read here? You say it has 150K users but the plots on the other page shows 20K. Is someone pumping this? If so, please stop it, keep the good things that techcrunch has been doing so far: reporting the facts and please question that is not.

    Handipoints, Try to make money the right way and the model that is sustainable.

  14. Melissa Tell

    Why do they say they have been out there only since Nov 2007? They have been around at least as long as January of 2007. See here.

    http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070117/4152/

    I can see that someone is trying to pump this up by saying how fast this site is growing. Grow up and leave the kids alone.

  15. Cyndy Aleo-Carreira

    Melissa is on the money. They REQUIRE a full name (first and last) for any child you enter under your account, whether you wish to participate in paying the child through the site or not. They skirt around the privacy implications because the parents are the ones required to provide the information, not the child, but comparing it safety-wise to Webkinz is inaccurate. There shouldn’t be any reason for them to collect my child’s first and last name, especially when they are stating in the TOS that information collected is being used for targeted advertising. To whom? The kids?