After a lot of criticism, threats of legislation, and lawsuits, Comcast has decided that maybe it is not such a good idea after all to block its customers from sharing peer-to-peer BitTorrent files—even if BitTorrent is a bandwidth hog that accounts for “50% of Internet traffic.” Rather than discriminate against BitTorrent files per se, Comcast will now focus more broadly on any application or source of traffic that stresses its network. BitTorrent, for its part, says that it is working with Comcast and other ISPs to help them better manage BitTorrent streams.
There, don’t you guys feel better already?
(Photo by foundphotoslj).
rock on.
Let’s hope they will do the same for Gnutella.
I appreciate everything about that photo. Especially the Delorean in the background. Good find.
Ha, i was just admiring the photo too. It is fabulous… need it for my wallpaper
The new architecture from the Comcast/BitTorrent effort will be of great interest to content delivery networks (CDNs) who have been sorting out the best way that P2P can be used to assist in delivery of large files. Yesterday a CDN called Velocix announced a hybrid P2P streaming media service combining traditional caching with P2P delivery for live events. Velocix used to be CacheLogic, and worked with BitTorrent to develop the Cache Discovery Protocol, which lets ISPs cache the most popular torrent files, and then seed the files from servers within their network, reducing network traffic.
Anyone run a business selling digital products? Our products get distributed through BitTorrent so quickly…we’re working on ways to protect them better now…
Mystery CEO
“Comcast will now focus more broadly on any application or source of traffic that stresses its network”
WTF? Was it not mentioned that BitTorrent accounts for 50% of all internet traffic. I’m confused or are they being hypocrites?
What programs/services are next then? DAMN!
“Anyone run a business selling digital products? Our products get distributed through BitTorrent so quickly…we’re working on ways to protect them better now…”
We used to sell retail software. It was pirated all the time. I used to google cracks for our own products, and sign up anonymously to serialz forums in order to tell people the download had some type of virus in it, though it most likely didn’t.
At a certain point, you have to stop. It’s useless. People are going to steal. Especially Canadians because their laws are made that way.
If you’re going to ask people to buy software, tell them you’ll send them an encryption dongle through the mail with 2-3 days postage. They’ll run out of USB ports eventually, but it will save you big if you sell digital goods worth more than 20$ per unit.
I don’t think i’ll ever try to sell digital goods again, but if I did, I would pass on the overhead and mail them a dongle.
I’m not too terribly excited about this announcement mostly because I don’t think it will matter too much. I was recently switched from Insight to Comcast (Comcast took over this area) and have noticed major slowdowns. I regularly shop at AmieStreet and have noticed a considerable slow-down in my download speeds since being switched (1000+ kb/s with Insight, but with Comcast I am lucky to get 300 kb/s). When they promise to open up all the “pipes” nice and wide, THEN I will be excited. Until then I greet this announcement with a great big “meh”.
As of this morning, the filtering was still going on. I was unable to browse the net when I was running my torrents because they took my browsing speeds down to that of dialup. Until I actually see an improvement, I will stick with my slogan, “SCREW COMCAST!”
Sweet! Rock On!
I am going back in time!
I don’t understand why was Comcast trying to be the net cop in the first place. The users are paying their bills, why to screw them. If they started to analyze the traffic, wouldn’t it be easier to transfer p2p traffic as low priority? Sure, it isn’t the best solution, the network neutrality enthusiasts would be still upset because of the packet discrimination, and heavy p2p users would be upset because of the bittorrent slowdown, but QOS isn’t that bad for net neutrality as traffic blocking.
Bring it on! Just commented on the photo, i don’t think it is quite TC style.. a new style huh?
i wonder what Mark Cuban would say on this
I’m intrigued by the briefcase under the makeshift cocaine snorting table in the photo.
Note that this is actually Comcast vs. “BitTorrent the closed-source bittorrent company,” not bittorrent the protocol. Look for Bram to implement some kind of key that unlocks Comcast’s congestion control rather than Comcast opening everything up with transparently disclosed limits.
This is a face-saving PR move by Comcast hoping people (FCC) get the protocol confused with the company of the same name. Likely Comcast is backing this up with lobbyists at the FCC to get their investigation called off.
I still have yet to see any actual “improvement”. As one of the previous commenter’s said, when running bit torrent, browsing speeds screech to a halt. Also, I haven’t seen a hint of anything concerning seeding. Verizon is looking better and better these days, even if they don’t have FIOS in my area yet.
http://www.miscgarbage.com
Great, now Comcast is going to go after my non comcast VoIP – skype.
F@CK comcast, i’m sick of their sh!t. I’ve moved on to Fios and i’m never going back.
Focus on improving your f#*$ing network.
For those that don’t know already, Comcast already works against more than just BitTorrent traffic so I don’t see the big switch. The Sandvine technology they use prevents seeding and doesn’t care whether it’s BT or any other P2P–it blocks it.
So I don’t see this as news but more an acknowledgment of the status quo.
how about newsgroups ?
the photo shows illegal drug use going on, why?
Whatever this deal means, it does not mean that Comcast is out of the throttling business. We at Public Knowledge are still pushing forward with our petition to the FCC to demand that Comcast abide by the FCC principles of network management. More information about our petition can be found at:
http://www.publ...e.org/node/1485
Still did not understand what arrangement the two reached. Did anyone ?