March 26, 2008

CNET Cuts 10% Of Workforce, Effective Immediately (Updated With Internal Memo)

Duncan Riley

19 comments »

CNET has announced that it will cut 10% of its workforce, or 120 people, effective immediately, in a move said to help it “focus on long-term growth amid complaints from some investors.”

CNET has had no shortage of headlines recently, from changes at the top through to an ongoing battle for control against largest shareholder Jana Partners.

According to an internal memo from CEO Neil Ashe, the restructure will include stronger emphasis on centralized services in areas like IT architecture, SEO, yield monetization, Facilities, Legal, HR and Communications.

Business Unit Realignment: with the introduction of an open API, “CNET will move its services, catalog, content management system onto one platform, making content development, syndication and content import easier and more open.” CNET has realigned its investments in TechRepublic and ZDNET “to improve monetization,” although exactly how and in what form was not specified. TV.com will be abandoning its emphasis on video for more (we presume low cost) content such as “entertainment features, breaking news, trivia competition, and polls.”

International: CNET is considering raising local capital to expand in China, but the rest of the international business operations appear to be subject to a review with an announcement in weeks, by that we presume that CNET may be closing some international sites.

Restructure costs: $3.5 million and $4 million to be accounted for in Q1, 2008.

More when we have it. Staff being terminated were to be informed at 2pm PST.

Update: Programmer Robert Balousek is one of the first reported casualties.

Update: Here’s the full text of the internal memo from Ashe:

Hello Everyone,

We all recognize that we must continuously change to be successful, and we embrace change. At the beginning of the year, we talked about our focus on category defining brands and the need to drive greater efficiencies in the business. As part of that process, in late January, I asked Zander to lead a task force to evaluate our current organization and resource alignment.

The task force evaluated the following areas of our business: organizational construct, technology infrastructure, editorial development and go-to-market strategies. Our focus was on creating a leaner centralized organization that provides expertise and best practices around areas of excellence, efficiency, and governance such as IT architecture, SEO, yield monetization, facilities, legal, HR and communications; evolving our editorial teams so everyone is focused on content creation; innovating our technology infrastructure to embrace open APIs and drive more efficiencies throughout the organization; and finally, simplifying our sales approach by building on the traction of our partner account strategy.

Based on that business analysis, today, we are making significant changes to the organization. This includes the very difficult decision to make a workforce reduction that will affect 10 percent of our U.S. workforce or about 120 people. These changes allow the company to put greater focus on its leading brands, as well as help drive efficiencies throughout the business.

CNET Networks is made up of great employees who have all contributed to the success of the company. While the changes we are making are part of our long-term growth strategy, I understand that it doesn’t make it any easier to see our friends and colleagues leave us.

Today, employees have been meeting with their managers to hear more specifics on how these changes impact their individual roles. Anyone who is impacted will be informed by 2 p.m. Pacific Time. Resources will be in place to help all employees manage through this transition, including outplacement assistance services and support from employees’ managers and HR.

Let me provide you with an overview of the changes we are making.

Refocusing Central Services are realigning our centralized services. We will look to central groups to provide expertise and best practices around areas of excellence, efficiency, and governance. This includes areas like IT architecture, SEO, yield monetization, Facilities, Legal, HR and Communications.

Operations

Operations is a newly formed organization led by Sam Parker that covers the full breadth of our shared IT and product services. This group integrates our enterprise business systems and network groups into one team.

As part of this change, I’m pleased to announce that Ned Rhinelander is taking on the new role of VP of IT Architecture. In this new role, Ned will track technology choices and adoption across the company, identify opportunities for efficiencies and innovations, and work closely with business unit engineering leaders to set shared standards and directions. Sam and his team will work to continue to find ways to drive efficiencies, ensuring we get the full benefit from our scale, and our brands have an advantage in the markets in which they compete.

Sales

Dave Morris will take on the role of Chief Client Officer reporting directly to me and joining the executive committee. In this role, Dave will drive our revenue strategy including our management of partner accounts, network-wide advertising programs, and the Detroit auto market. Dave will also oversee a go-to-market sales strategy that supports the company’s revenue plan, as well as business operations and network product marketing.

We are making these changes to simplify our sales organization and to build on the early traction of our partner account strategy. The existing corporate accounts will become part of the partner accounts program. The partner accounts program allows the company to have an integrated sales approach that benefits from the expertise and talent we have throughout the organization, while at the same time allowing key marketing partners to realize the power of all of our leading brands.

Dave will be the Chairman of the Revenue Council and have the authority to create and drive company-wide revenue initiatives. Dave will also have a small team that will leverage the BU marketing organizations to support the company’s network initiatives. Finally, Jack Haire will be returning to his Special Advisor role and will continue working with me, Dave, and the executive committee.

Corporate Communications

Centrally, we will have a global corporate communications team focused on public relations and internal communications. Managed by Sarah Cain, this team will be responsible for building strategic plans and programs to effectively communicate our messages externally and internally. All other marketing will be handled at the BU level. Sarah will report directly to Mickey Wilson as they determine how this organization evolves.

Business Unit Realignment

At the BU level, resources are being realigned to support key strategic initiatives that represent the biggest opportunities and drive greater efficiencies. Here are some highlights from those changes:

With the move to an open API, CNET will move its services, catalog, content management system onto one platform, making content development, syndication and content import easier and more open

Within the business group, we have preserved our core investments in BNET, while aligning more of our resources to accelerate the brand’s growth. At the same time, we have realigned our investments in TechRepublic and ZDNET to improve monetization.

TV.com will put more emphasis on areas of most interest to their audience including entertainment features, breaking news, trivia competition, and polls, rather than original video programming

Stay tuned for more information about specific changes to your BU from your business unit leaders.

International

Lastly, as I talked about during last quarter’s earnings call, to further accelerate growth and leadership in China, the company is considering raising capital from local partners. We are also in the process of making additional decisions about our international business. I will be sharing more information about that in the coming weeks.

Today, difficult decisions were made. Each individual that was affected by these changes deserves our respect and gratitude for helping to make CNET Networks into the company it is today. And, while it is never easy to see our friends and colleagues leave us, together, we will work through this transition and stay focused on our goal to grow the company’s brands, revenues, and profits.

Best, NA

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Jon

    Hopefully these people who are cut can find a job elsewhere… now isn’t the best time to be job hunting no matter the field.

    Jon
    http://dreamclue.com … get the message!

  2. JD

    Cnet will probably kill itself before the dream team gets the chance to do it :)

    http://techsted.com

  3. Abbreviation

    Good job, TechCrunch!

    ;-)

  4. Aaron Choi

    Wanted to reach out to the people affected by the layoffs that are reading TC. I’m a principal at a recruiting firm with deep relationships with many upcoming start-ups in the Bay Area. If there are any displaced/unhappy engineeers out there, let me know if I can help you out! “firstname(at)rivierapartners(dot)com”

  5. Spicoli

    A 10% RIF is not really much of a belt tightenting, it’s really just a way to clear out the dead wood that is not contributing to the organization, except Programmer Robert Balousek of course, I’m sure he was a very valuable asset that CNET was really sad to let go…

  6. Phil McCraken

    @Aaron Choi, seriously…?

  7. Mark Dinan

    If anyone who was laid off by CNET wants to work at Salesforce.com, we are hiring a huge number of folks to work in SF and San Mateo, including:

    * Software Engineers - Java, Javascript, SQL, Ajax, etc
    * UI designers
    * Database Engineers

    mdinan(AT)salesforce.com or 650-328-2790.

    Mark

  8. Tim

    @Abbreviation, Good Job Tech Crunch what? Do you really believe that 120 people were let go because Tech Crunch is reporting on Web 2.0 news?

  9. Paul

    how can running tech news websites end up being so complicated? viz “Refocusing Central Services are realigning our centralized services. We will look to central groups to provide expertise and best practices around areas of excellence, efficiency, and governance.” Why can’t they just publish good stuff and sell ads around it?…

  10. EH

    Anybody else think it’s odd that in an announcement of a 10% RIF that half of it is devoted to announcing promotions?

  11. kai

    Watch who you’re calling “dead wood” there Spicoli, some of us read this blog, ya know.

  12. gary mckenzie

    People what is the problem here, companies shed dead weight all the time, if Bear Sterns were following suit maybe they wouldnt have ended up in the position they did.

    I applaud Cnet for what they are doing, their reponsibility is to their share holders not TC readers.

    P.S it is evident now more than ever that they have no intention of ever buying TC.

    Gary Mckenzie
    Co-founder
    reviewmyplace.com

  13. 113.com

    Come to China… lots of skilled workforce.. :-)

  14. big daddy

    I love the sign off. “Best, NA”. What a dick. And what the fuck does that “best” bullshit mean anyway, can we just stop that people?

    Just fucking type the damn extra word would ya???? Christ.

    Best Wishes,

    Big Daddy

  15. Rajiv Singh

    CNET should fire all the US employees and outsource the jobs to India.

  16. cnotr

    from someone who knows… (10 years at cnet). the reason why they are centralizing services is because they bloated the org structure and bloated middle management (…again, remember the lay offs of 2001?) and hired upper management friends - none of whom can make tough decisions and commit to a serious brand strategy. I’m starting to think that the Jana Partners shake up might not be a bad idea.. too bad they added poison pill severance packages to execs who can’t bring in new top tier advertisers to actually make some money… worthless Sales team and even more worthless Marketing team.. sorry kids… time to play grown-up business

  17. Spicoli

    @Kai…

    I’m just sayin…

    Laying of 120 people is not going to do a lot for the bottom line, lets be generous and say that the average pay is $45k annually, thats only $5.4 million a year, not a large amount.

    I have been on the management side of several RIF’s and the direction from above is always to release your dead wood, sorry, lowest contributing staff members.

  18. jddavis

    They needed to cut 40% of their work. There is no way there would be any drop in user-traffic even with a dramatic cut. Also, I know the holy grail is to keep engineers/developers around as they are “valuable”. But CNET is an old content company. They create content. All content management systems are open-source these days. Why do they need so many developers, strategists, etc…? They need to keep people that produce the content people want to read, move everything to a simple open-source CMS, and fire everyone else except sales. And keep 6 people to oversee everything.

  19. Eliot

    Your count of people writing for CNET is way off…

    http://www.cnet.com/4520-13403_1-6722494-2.html