March 25, 2008

WePlay Takes $1.87 Million, Wants Rights To Kids Videos Before They Are Stars

Duncan Riley

29 comments »

weplay.jpgWePlay, a social networking come kids sports management site has taken $1.87 million in a round that included Pequot Private Equity, Creative Artists Agency and Major League Baseball, according to PEHub. Editor’s Update: The company tells TechCrunch it has raised $4.5 million—$3.5 million from Pequot and $1 million from angel investors, including management and athletes. CAA and Major League Baseball are not investors.

The New York Times has a positive write up on the site here (they report total funding at $4.5m); the short story is that apparently kiddies who play sport need their own social network and parents should have somewhere to manage teams, “get practice schedules, coordinate car pools and find out which equipment to purchase,” because those features haven’t been offered before.

Except they have in various forms. TeamSnap, Rosterbot, EasyTeamManager, SportsVite, RedZone Leauges and YourTeam.ca. Ah, but kiddies are going to want to social network on a site that their parents are using to manage the team, and not MySpace, Facebook, ClubPenguin, Habbo Hotel, EA-Land, Bebo, Friendster….

Perhaps that’s a little harsh, but an investment from Major League Baseball is not a good sign, given their support of the now failed Brightspot.TV. Sports organizations/ sports stars and online investing usually don’t make a great mix (will we ever forget MVP.com?)

The true driving force behind WePlay can be found at the beginning of the NY Times article where they talk about video footage of a 9 year old child playing sport who went on to become a star. To be fair WePlay doesn’t reserve the right to sell any content you upload to the site, it does want full rights to that content, and if your kid goes on to be a star, that content has a lot of value:

To the extent that the Services provide Users an opportunity to post, store and exchange articles, information, materials, data, files, programs, photographs, concepts, communications, footage, ideas and opinions (“User Content”), you agree to and hereby do grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, weplay, its contractors, and the users of the weplay Site an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free, fully sublicensable, fully paid up, worldwide license to use, copy, publicly perform, digitally perform, publicly display, and distribute such content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such content, including a User’s likeness.

It’s a (kiddie) trap!

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. ely fall

    well at least we know where a chunk of that money went: tony parker from the spurs. alright.

  2. sqylogin

    Interesting way to go about it. Definitely not cool.

    Also cum ≠ come :p

  3. sd

    check their traffic on compete.com . interesting

  4. Kevin Allman

    they want rights to content eh…i don’t agree with that..

    that said, all they have to do it put in in the terms…and if we are aware and choose to submit our videos there and click ‘Yes i agree’…

    who are we to then complain about rights…

  5. Kevin

    sd–

    I’m not sure the compete.com traffic info is useful. I think the domain name used to be used by a sporting goods company.

    Also, I like what http://www.teamsporttech.com is doing in this space.

  6. Ed

    I would bless this if it were for making everyone’s life easier, but there are two reasons why I don’t like it. First, there are already tools out there for parents and children involved in youth sports. I don’t think this will enhance it. Second, and perhaps may greatest objection, is what’s described as the driving force for this. That is highlighting the 9 year old who will become a future star. I’ve seen how crazy parents of youth athletes have become. This will just provide additional fuel to them. Kids just want to be kids. If they want to share pictures and videos with their peers, they already do that through applications such as Facebook and Youtube.

  7. anonymous

    it blows my mind that you guys never mention highschoolsports.net (bought by ganett for 50m), rivals.com , eteamz , and digitalsports.com, which each have thousands of schools using their back office not to mention they’re gigantic media networks. I guess you guys like to mention the tiny players that have no real traction.

    techcrunch journalistic ability = epic fail , per usual

  8. zack

    the domain name refers to a sporting goods company, people always after money as usual….uh

  9. Pete Rose

    Disclosure: I am an investor in WePlay. Am I gambling with my money?

  10. Craig Allen

    Good to see some momentum building in the amateur sports sector…

  11. AdvertiseSpace

    @ Pete Rose
    I guess you didn’t learn you lesson last time. :)

    In that line up, I’d put my money on Yourteam.ca

  12. Dan Martell

    I personally know the guys at YourTeam.ca, and they know the space and execute like nobodies business - my monies on them as well!

  13. Soccer Dad

    I came to much the same conclusion (http://onthepitch.org/2008/03/26/weplaycom-do-youth-teams-need-a-social-network/) - this seems like an all around bad idea given how it is mostly a generic social networking site, and there are a lot of other services like those you mention, or http://teamsnap.com, that do so much more. I just don’t see the coaches buying into this, and if they don’t, the parents and players aren’t likely to jump in.

    Great catch on the license stuff!

  14. Chris Nadeau

    TC thanks for the mention. We think this is an exciting space that combines two passions - the web and sports!

  15. Charles Barkley

    Pete: I feel ya, bro. I invested in YourTeam.ca but they don’t even own YourTeam.ca and I think all of their money gets spent on stock graphics from iStockPhoto and on blog shills. Good thing I only gambled $500 on them. How much are you into WePlay for?

  16. Hagia Sophia

    I the title the prize is $1.87 million, in the article the prize is $1.97 million

  17. Craig Allen

    Good point Charles… I think you might get a better return at: http://www.yourteamonline.ca

    Leave the gambling to Pete Rose…!

  18. Chris Nadeau

    Good point Charles! :-) If you invest in http://www.yourteamonline.ca you will definitely get a better return.

  19. Adrian Nadeau

    Thanks for the props TC! It should be interesting to see how everything unfolds! Thanks to everyone else for their YTO (www.yourteamonline.ca) votes as well!

  20. Jim Nguyen

    What a crowded field. Which site do you all think will rise to the top?

  21. Adrian Nadeau

    I don’t know if it’s that crowded. I believe all of them serve different purposes. Some are for team management only (managers), others are more social network oriented, and some are systems are for teams to manage/host their team website only. However, some are combinations of all 3. All depends what the users are looking for.

  22. Search Engine Optimization Journal

    Agreeing with many on here…overcrowded field and not sure about the rights to kids videos before they are stars…does any other video network online do that?

  23. Adrian Nadeau

    I agree with you there, that is totally uncalled for (taking the rights of the videos that are uploaded to make a $$ off of them).

  24. Jason Craig

    I love this space but I don’t think the winner will be any of those listed. I’ve tried most of those, yourteamonline and teamsnap and opolis, I don’t like how they’re attacking the market, and haven’t had much use for my teams with them.
    I watched a video of this CEO pitching at some conference, has nobody noticed that the MySpaces and Facebooks of the world were started by the KIDS who actually wanted to use the service? If this was a social network for parents of kids who play sports that’s one thing, but adults trying to build social networks for young kids is something different entirely.
    I’m guessing the community (if they get one) won’t post a single video the second it leaks that their rights to that content are gone.
    I feel like I’m missing something. Is this guy friends with Derek Jeter?
    Thumbs down.

  25. JJ

    Do this…. Google WePlay and click ‘images’ with safe filtering off. I’d like to think that pros like Jeter and Manning would have a team of advisors around them who would vet every opportunity.

  26. scoobypop

    Z baby

    zAthlete……………

  27. DaNae

    check this out: http://www.sportsdrive.com. much more potential than all othe published on sports & internet within the last two years. This is a buzzer!

  28. Greg Burton

    The problem is that WePlay, now open for the public, is extraordinarily droll. This is an off-the-shelf social net reskinned. Scheduling? Videos? Done better. Social net? Not even really possible on the site. Boring…

    Try out http://www.Zoosse.com/ (prototype). Right now it’s a social network satisfying the social and scheduling needs of athletes and teams (and doing it well), but when the Beta launches in June, they will add complete informational portals for each of the participating sports; to help people learn about their sports, train better, win more, and get connected and recruited. Already, with no advertising, and only open for a few weeks, they have Olympians, pros and ranked athletes on board. Dynamic.

    Most interesting: They are partners with a company that is promising them a million young athletes a year for the next five years.

    This is the best athlete social net out there, and if their Sport Portals are as solid as expected, they may have the right combo of social/functional services for athletes…and the audience!!…that will make this THE athlete space on the Web. Watch http://www.zoosse.com/

  29. Sports Taxi

    I went to http://www.sportsdrive.com and it’s pretty good stuff. I gave the sports assessment to my 16 year old son and it really let me know as a father/coach how to approach his learing skills on the basketball court. thanks for the info DaNae.