March 24, 2008

Facebook To Launch Preferred Application Program

Michael Arrington

25 comments »

The Facebook Platform, launched in May 2007, has been an unqualified success. Nearly 20,000 applications have been released by third party developers, and it spurred Google to quickly launch a competing platform of its own. At least two venture funds have been created that focus solely on Facebook applications. Etc.

But the flood of applications caused problems right from the start. Facebook has repeatedly changed the rules, but always seems one step behind the creative moves by developers to spam their way into gaining new users. Most recently, limits were put in place that limit the number of invitations users could send out. The more people who ignore requests from a particular application, the lower the limit for that app.

Clearly Facebook is a little tired of beating questionable developer tacticts away with a stick. So now they will try the carrot approach as well - by rewarding developers who play by the rules and build useful, popular applications. The new program is being called the Preferred Application Program.

This isn’t related to the recent CBS/March Madness issue where Facebook allowed a (paying) partner to play by different rules than the others. From what we’ve heard, Facebook is not going to be asking developers who are chosen to participate to pay in any way for this privilege. Classification as “preferred” will be merit based…although so far no one seems to know what the requirements will be.

Nor do they seem to know exactly how Facebook will reward these developers. One way is to have different rules, like allowing application users to invite more than the normal number of friends per day. That would be very attractive to developers, but the recent backlash over the CBS incident shows that the rank and file won’t stand for that.

But there are an almost unlimited number of other ways that Facebook can promote preferred developers. Preferred apps can show up higher in search, for example. And Facebook can give them a badge or other sign of endorsement that they can add to their application pages. A more subtle, but possibly more powerful benefit, may be to change the rules on how and when user activities through these applications can show up in the News Feed. Finally, new Facebook users could be presented with a set of default third party applications to add when they create an account, perhaps tailored to their stated interests.

Facebook hasn’t yet responded to a request for comment on the new program. From what we hear this is still in the planning stages and at least a month or so from being launched.

Update: Just got this response from Facebook, which is either a confirmation or a denial of this story: “We’ve definitely been iterating on Facebook Platform and are continuing to experiment with new models to better communicate and engage with our community. The team is considering developer partnership programs and developer roundtables with the goal of gathering feedback to improve Platform.”

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. imeem veröffentlicht Programmierschnittstelle | COMMENTMUS!C
  2. Snap Summit 2.0 summary: It’s all about Facebook » VentureBeat
  3. Geek Democracy 03282008 « Geek Democracy
  4. Facebook Preferred? - The Unofficial Facebook Blog
  5. Week 08-13 del.icio.us links March 25, 2008 « SteveintheUK.Com

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. The Hater

    I’ve got an idea!

    It’s a Facebook application that allows people to fight as zombies! and as ghosts! and a bunch of other neat, fun things because, you know, kids use Facebook and Facebook is so hot and we’re all going to make so much money even though no one ever clicks advertisements or gives a damn at all about them and..

  2. bob cobb

    ugh, I have a feeling this wont be for my app, even though Im not one of those spammy apps

  3. John C

    Who cares.

    I won’t add an Application to my profile unless I see it on somebody else’s profile and it stands out as something that would be cool on mine. I don’t go onto Facebook and search for applications.

  4. 113.com

    Likely that Facebook didn’t really anticipate that there were indeed so many app developers when they first launched the platform…

    In any case, they definitely need it (and, can want it), given so many apps to choose from… like preferred partners concept etc.

  5. Anuj

    Certainly a big setback for small businesses whose business solely depends on spamming facebook users..lol

  6. Matthew

    I was thinking of this when I was on facebook recently mainly because I have been using Firefox.

  7. fb_apper

    @Anuj and Bob Cobb

    “spammy app”? Ha!

    fb, plaxo, tagged, and any other service that optimizes for the gmail import tool are the ORIGINAL spammy apps.

    optimizing for the invite screen on facebook is spam lite compared to importing and sending emails to ALL of your contacts.

    you think flixter’s evaluation was based on much more than their (declining) user numbers?

    take a look at their registration flow, and tell me you don’t think 2 out of 5 people will fall for importing all of their email contacts and spamming their friends.

    “Going viral” is spamming, plain and simple. The value you derive from these “viral” services is between you, your god, and the entrepreneur.

    It’s the culture, and I say fuck it, just go with it.

  8. Ben

    The FB Platform an “unqualified success”?

    Mike, not even Facebook thinks this. It has been awesome for marketing and PR, but the real aim of the platform - to increase the utility of Facebook by allowing others to build useful applications - has been largely undercut by the viral trivialities that now dominate the site and annoy users. How many people do you know that find Facebook all that more useful than 9 months ago? If you ask common users, who are on the site almost exclusively for the purpose of personal communication, the utility of the site has gone sideways at best. There is certainly potential there, but let’s call a spade a spade.

  9. AlFunk

    Dopewars! Thats the only app worth clicking. I used to play it on my graphing calculator in physics class.

  10. Peter Harrington

    Hmm for some reason your link post on facebook has messed up my facebook home page, haha facebook ftl

  11. friends

    facebook still thinks this is high school….now we have a preferred friends clique….bottom line—-these apps outside of maybe 100, are not working, the branded apps work as well as the outposts companies tried to set up in second life!!!

  12. Akshay Jain

    @8 Ben : What facebook has given is a platform, it is upto the app developers to make applications which they feel can be useful to the users. Like any other place for every 1 good application, there will be 99 not-so-good ones. What facebook has got as a result is immense attention of not just users but even the big companies who are coming up with their own version of Facebook apps. Be it Yahoo / Amazon they are all coming with their own FB apps and to me that is an “unqualified success”

    Regarding, where FB is taking it. I think some things are on the cards
    1. Better Analytics for App Developers : Tell them who is using it, how it is being used, which part of the world, maybe even their demographics
    2. Subscription model : Facebook shares the revenue with app developers

    So like Microsoft, Oracle having Certified Gold / Silver Partners; Facebook can do the same stuff depending on the kind of applications, benefit, userbase, adherence to details etc.

    Overall I think it has the potential to be a universe of its own.

    Akshay

  13. Leonid S. Knyshov

    I like it when competing applications do not work.

    I’ve added 5 of my competitors to my upcoming application, only 2 of them actually worked properly.

    Good…good…

  14. "Jennifer Just TP'ed Justin's Profile Page"

    That’s the app I want. To TP somebody’s profile page. Just imagine seeing rolls and rolls of white toilet paper marching across somebody’s profile page filled with personal illusions of grandeur. Too bad that person has to know you and accept the TP application before you can TP his profile. That just takes all the fun out of it.

  15. Tony Hirst

    One approach would be to allow ‘institutional’ apps; if an organisation has its own profile/canvas page, and people fan it, then that organisation has a user initiatied trusted relationship with those fans; as such its applications might get improved treatment (whatever that means) with its fans?

    If networks/groups published their own apps, then these could be offered as a default, or at least as canned suggested apps, to anyone joining those apps/groups.

  16. Tekin Tatar

    Facebook or other social network platforms should charge developers for using their platform. Then you will see less spam applications, like quizzes. This is the way. If you are serious with your application, then pay for an inclusion fee. I know developers even companies copying an application and resubmitting it as it is a different product.

  17. Wal

    @Tekin

    I don’t think that will reduce it in anyway. Some of the most guilty parties on the FB spaminess side of things are those with significant financial backing. If anything it may actually provide extra incentive to spam more, so they can overcome the cost of the ‘hurdle’ quicker.

    As for the spaminess of quizes, this is down to poor management by facebook. In the developer community we were complaining about the practice for months before facebook came up with a policy… which IMHO very weak, they then have been very quiet on policing it (when they should be naming and shaming and making examples of bad practices and demonstrating they are serious about it).

  18. fb_apper

    @Wal
    Ridiculous. Policing, naming and shaming? Have you ever heard of a chilling effect? Optimizing for the invite is NOTHING compared to optimizing for the email import. Go back to 70’s era russia.

  19. A Developer

    I’m calling in to one of these round tables today, though the topic isn’t on Preferred Apps. We’ll see.

  20. Fidel Cast

    Waste of money and time.