<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Crazy Musicians Still Think They Should Get Paid For Recorded Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:53:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Economic Models, Commodity Computing &#38; Something Beautiful &#171; thoughts on computing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2935515</link>
		<dc:creator>Economic Models, Commodity Computing &#38; Something Beautiful &#171; thoughts on computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2935515</guid>
		<description>[...] of Bragg&#8217;s piece. Better than the post itself, is a lengthy and at times entertaining comment thread that continued to argument for awhile. In any case, Arrington&#8217;s basic case is something like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Bragg&#8217;s piece. Better than the post itself, is a lengthy and at times entertaining comment thread that continued to argument for awhile. In any case, Arrington&#8217;s basic case is something like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-1/#comment-2850581</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2850581</guid>
		<description>of course people made money of music before it was able to be recorded- what do you think sheet music is?? and why do you think its called &quot;copy&quot;right because you are paying for the right to copy a piece- regardless of the format.
The physical reproduction of a CD is only a very small amount of the price of the overall product- artists should &quot;sit back and watch the income flow in??&quot; do you know how ridiculously hard it is to firstly get notice, secondly sell your own music (that you have put time and money into in order to create and record!)? and you think we dont deserve to get paid for that time and effort?
Im sure if you work for 8 hours on something then you would expect to be paid? Why should musicians be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course people made money of music before it was able to be recorded- what do you think sheet music is?? and why do you think its called &#8220;copy&#8221;right because you are paying for the right to copy a piece- regardless of the format.<br />
The physical reproduction of a CD is only a very small amount of the price of the overall product- artists should &#8220;sit back and watch the income flow in??&#8221; do you know how ridiculously hard it is to firstly get notice, secondly sell your own music (that you have put time and money into in order to create and record!)? and you think we dont deserve to get paid for that time and effort?<br />
Im sure if you work for 8 hours on something then you would expect to be paid? Why should musicians be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Townes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2808898</link>
		<dc:creator>Townes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2808898</guid>
		<description>Wow, the death of ideals and creativity in my own lifetime. Great going, geeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the death of ideals and creativity in my own lifetime. Great going, geeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “360″ Music Deals Become Mandatory As Labels Prepare For Free Music &#171; STREET KNOWLEDGE MEDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2710835</link>
		<dc:creator>“360″ Music Deals Become Mandatory As Labels Prepare For Free Music &#171; STREET KNOWLEDGE MEDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2710835</guid>
		<description>[...] And that, for me, is the key. Bronfman, an outsider to the music world until recently, sees the writing on the wall - music downloads will eventually be free, and will serve as little more than marketing collateral to other revenue streams. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And that, for me, is the key. Bronfman, an outsider to the music world until recently, sees the writing on the wall &#8211; music downloads will eventually be free, and will serve as little more than marketing collateral to other revenue streams. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#171; New Business Concepts Music Industry 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2702783</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#171; New Business Concepts Music Industry 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2702783</guid>
		<description>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Now Everything Is Google&#8217;s Fault? &#124; Genuine Forex Trading</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2689174</link>
		<dc:creator>So Now Everything Is Google&#8217;s Fault? &#124; Genuine Forex Trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2689174</guid>
		<description>[...] that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.&#8221; We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.&rdquo; We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-1/#comment-2686003</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2686003</guid>
		<description>Arrington is right, only bloggers should make money. Not mucisians. Hobby should remain what it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrington is right, only bloggers should make money. Not mucisians. Hobby should remain what it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Now Everything Is Google’s Fault &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2685848</link>
		<dc:creator>So Now Everything Is Google’s Fault &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2685848</guid>
		<description>[...] enterprise…Now that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.” We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enterprise…Now that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.” We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Now Everything Is Google&#8217;s Fault</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2685777</link>
		<dc:creator>So Now Everything Is Google&#8217;s Fault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2685777</guid>
		<description>[...] enterprise…Now that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.” We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enterprise…Now that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.” We dismantled his emotional rant and suggested that, actually, Bebo should be paid for all the free marketing they gave those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2678861</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2678861</guid>
		<description>A week later, I am still stunned by the sheer arrogance of this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A week later, I am still stunned by the sheer arrogance of this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2678587</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2678587</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I&#039;ve never heard the &quot;china does it, so it must be ok&quot; argument before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I&#8217;ve never heard the &#8220;china does it, so it must be ok&#8221; argument before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-1/#comment-2678554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2678554</guid>
		<description>Believe me, after being signed to both Sony AND Warner Bros., and touring for almost four years with MANY, MANY artists, I can say with CERTAINTY that artists absolutely DO care about people stealing their music.


I wrote this in response to a different blog, but I think it is just as relevant:   http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/31/stealing-music-is-it-wrong-or-isnt-it/#comment-2678517


With this kind of backwards thinking, see how many of your “favorite bands” actually stick around to make another record. Would you continue to make a product just to give it away for free or have it stolen? Only an idiot would do that. “Here, I just spent the past four months crafting this beautiful painting with 24kt gold trim, why don’t you just TAKE it? No, really, go ahead! I’ll be painting LIVE at the park next week, tell your friends!” Yeah, right.

I’m not saying that music shouldn’t be AFFORDABLE, or that labels weren’t charging too much, but if you think about the amount of marketing money they put into an album (also too much in my opinion), there was definitely a cost to be passed to the consumer. Labels aside, look at it from a creative standpoint. Do you realize how many hours upon hours of blood, sweat, and tears go into writing and recording a good song? To demand the right to own it for free, or feeling entitled to own it without compensating the artist is absolutely absurd. I mean, really, think about it. Why don’t we ask GM for free cars? I mean, we’re actually PAYING so that they can keep creating. Maybe the government should do an “Artist Bailout”?

I realize that there is the argument that bands can make money through touring and merchandise, but let’s be honest, there are only a handful of bands that can actually successfully do that.

So, go on stealing your “favorite artist’s” music, just don’t be surprised when there are no longer any new songs to steal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me, after being signed to both Sony AND Warner Bros., and touring for almost four years with MANY, MANY artists, I can say with CERTAINTY that artists absolutely DO care about people stealing their music.</p>
<p>I wrote this in response to a different blog, but I think it is just as relevant:   <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/31/stealing-music-is-it-wrong-or-isnt-it/#comment-2678517" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/31/stealing-music-is-it-wrong-or-isnt-it/#comment-2678517'>http://www.tech...comment-2678517</a></p>
<p>With this kind of backwards thinking, see how many of your “favorite bands” actually stick around to make another record. Would you continue to make a product just to give it away for free or have it stolen? Only an idiot would do that. “Here, I just spent the past four months crafting this beautiful painting with 24kt gold trim, why don’t you just TAKE it? No, really, go ahead! I’ll be painting LIVE at the park next week, tell your friends!” Yeah, right.</p>
<p>I’m not saying that music shouldn’t be AFFORDABLE, or that labels weren’t charging too much, but if you think about the amount of marketing money they put into an album (also too much in my opinion), there was definitely a cost to be passed to the consumer. Labels aside, look at it from a creative standpoint. Do you realize how many hours upon hours of blood, sweat, and tears go into writing and recording a good song? To demand the right to own it for free, or feeling entitled to own it without compensating the artist is absolutely absurd. I mean, really, think about it. Why don’t we ask GM for free cars? I mean, we’re actually PAYING so that they can keep creating. Maybe the government should do an “Artist Bailout”?</p>
<p>I realize that there is the argument that bands can make money through touring and merchandise, but let’s be honest, there are only a handful of bands that can actually successfully do that.</p>
<p>So, go on stealing your “favorite artist’s” music, just don’t be surprised when there are no longer any new songs to steal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Noircs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2676010</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Noircs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2676010</guid>
		<description>So with all this &quot;music should be free&quot; and &quot;free will be inevitable,&quot; does that mean by actually paying for music on itunes rather than downloading it for free from P2P I am just as backward thinking as the music industry?

If we all switch to P2P dowloading for free rather than going to iTunes will it speed up the death of the music industry as we know it and will finally put an end to these long drawn out discussions on the state of this and the state of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So with all this &#8220;music should be free&#8221; and &#8220;free will be inevitable,&#8221; does that mean by actually paying for music on itunes rather than downloading it for free from P2P I am just as backward thinking as the music industry?</p>
<p>If we all switch to P2P dowloading for free rather than going to iTunes will it speed up the death of the music industry as we know it and will finally put an end to these long drawn out discussions on the state of this and the state of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-1/#comment-2653178</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2653178</guid>
		<description>why? Why MUST musicians make money off distribution? They didn&#039;t before music could be recorded, why should they now. People seem to think it&#039;s a law of the universe that musicians should be able to record a few songs, sit back and watch the cash roll in. &quot;oh, but musicians can&#039;t sell music any more because of downloading&quot;. Well, too bad. The technological innovation of records allowed musicians to distribute their music on a physical medium and charge money for it. Now, the technological innovation of the internet cuts out the physical part of the distribution, hence there is nothing to charge for... They&#039;re just pissed because the lost their cash cow. The party&#039;s over people, get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why? Why MUST musicians make money off distribution? They didn&#8217;t before music could be recorded, why should they now. People seem to think it&#8217;s a law of the universe that musicians should be able to record a few songs, sit back and watch the cash roll in. &#8220;oh, but musicians can&#8217;t sell music any more because of downloading&#8221;. Well, too bad. The technological innovation of records allowed musicians to distribute their music on a physical medium and charge money for it. Now, the technological innovation of the internet cuts out the physical part of the distribution, hence there is nothing to charge for&#8230; They&#8217;re just pissed because the lost their cash cow. The party&#8217;s over people, get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2649515</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2649515</guid>
		<description>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#171; JC Shepard.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2649120</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#171; JC Shepard.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2649120</guid>
		<description>[...] recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#124; Webtrendblog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2649003</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 &#124; Webtrendblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2649003</guid>
		<description>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2647888</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2647888</guid>
		<description>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also understand that recorded music will largely be little more than marketing collateral, meaning that the Internet services being sued today for copyright infringement will be embraced in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music 2.0 - Jump ship while you still can musicians, something better is a-comin. &#124; ThinkSketchDesign</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2643120</link>
		<dc:creator>Music 2.0 - Jump ship while you still can musicians, something better is a-comin. &#124; ThinkSketchDesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2643120</guid>
		<description>[...] Even Warner Music Group CEO Edgar Bronfman has acknowledged that CD sales alone are an outdated monetization model:  As techcrunch puts it here - even big business &#8220;sees the writing on the wall - music downloads will eventually be free, and will serve as little more than marketing collateral to other revenue streams.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even Warner Music Group CEO Edgar Bronfman has acknowledged that CD sales alone are an outdated monetization model:  As techcrunch puts it here &#8211; even big business &#8220;sees the writing on the wall &#8211; music downloads will eventually be free, and will serve as little more than marketing collateral to other revenue streams.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back I Am &#124; Webtrendblog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2640988</link>
		<dc:creator>Back I Am &#124; Webtrendblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2640988</guid>
		<description>[...] is a fascinating character. I quickly determined he basically felt the same way about the music business that I do. In short, he thinks he got out at exactly the right time. His [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a fascinating character. I quickly determined he basically felt the same way about the music business that I do. In short, he thinks he got out at exactly the right time. His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back I Am</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2640707</link>
		<dc:creator>Back I Am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2640707</guid>
		<description>[...] is a fascinating character. I quickly determined he basically felt the same way about the music business that I do. In short, he thinks he got out at exactly the right time. His [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a fascinating character. I quickly determined he basically felt the same way about the music business that I do. In short, he thinks he got out at exactly the right time. His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2622117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2622117</guid>
		<description>Dear Michael Arrogant, 
Sure, if someone agrees to give their music away for free, he cannot go back and then demand money through that channel.  His mistake.
But Don&#039;t tell people  that music is only worth the cost of the disk.  That&#039;s just wrong.
The mentality that music isn&#039;t really worth anything and should be free because musicians are concert stars and rake in tons of dough paid by &quot;someone else&quot; is what people use to make it okay with themselves to get something for nothing.  It&#039;s what makes musicians think they &#039;HAVE&#039; to agree to give the music away for free even though it means they are basically PAYING to create something worthwhile for society.  The majority of the music out there is by guys who get paid very little if anything at all, not by a couple of guys at the top of the chart with concert and merchandising deals. And even those who chart have fifty hands down their pants stealing them blind.  We are talking a dollar download that pays a few pennies to the artist at best, then hundreds of thousands of &quot;free&quot; copies off that dollar download. For this a guy sweats blood and tears to produce music for people like YOU.  I watch very talented artists struggle every day just to live.  In a criminally-minded rip-off &quot;market&quot;, the assignment of value to intellectual property loses all perspective, and you get a crappy and degraded, low-toned market where everybody thinks they can write, and in place of actual music these people begin to rely on increasingly degraded shock value and body parts to get attention - oops wait, that&#039;s what we have now.  The great artists who inspire with heart and soul will eventually get fed up and pretty soon all you will have is a degraded playing field full of worthless left-overs. When a society loses its artists, it loses its ability to imagine the world and it loses its soul. Don&#039;t be one of the harbingers of the Dead Age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Michael Arrogant,<br />
Sure, if someone agrees to give their music away for free, he cannot go back and then demand money through that channel.  His mistake.<br />
But Don&#8217;t tell people  that music is only worth the cost of the disk.  That&#8217;s just wrong.<br />
The mentality that music isn&#8217;t really worth anything and should be free because musicians are concert stars and rake in tons of dough paid by &#8220;someone else&#8221; is what people use to make it okay with themselves to get something for nothing.  It&#8217;s what makes musicians think they &#8216;HAVE&#8217; to agree to give the music away for free even though it means they are basically PAYING to create something worthwhile for society.  The majority of the music out there is by guys who get paid very little if anything at all, not by a couple of guys at the top of the chart with concert and merchandising deals. And even those who chart have fifty hands down their pants stealing them blind.  We are talking a dollar download that pays a few pennies to the artist at best, then hundreds of thousands of &#8220;free&#8221; copies off that dollar download. For this a guy sweats blood and tears to produce music for people like YOU.  I watch very talented artists struggle every day just to live.  In a criminally-minded rip-off &#8220;market&#8221;, the assignment of value to intellectual property loses all perspective, and you get a crappy and degraded, low-toned market where everybody thinks they can write, and in place of actual music these people begin to rely on increasingly degraded shock value and body parts to get attention &#8211; oops wait, that&#8217;s what we have now.  The great artists who inspire with heart and soul will eventually get fed up and pretty soon all you will have is a degraded playing field full of worthless left-overs. When a society loses its artists, it loses its ability to imagine the world and it loses its soul. Don&#8217;t be one of the harbingers of the Dead Age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just A Proxy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-8/#comment-2617604</link>
		<dc:creator>Just A Proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2617604</guid>
		<description>From John Rzeznik of The Goo Goo Dolls:

I take umbrage to the statement &quot;Recorded music is nothing but marketing material to drive awareness of an artist.&quot;  Recorded music is the essence of the artist.  I don&#039;t write songs to market myself.  It&#039;s not an advertisement for my persona.  Explain to me what identity  a songwriter has without their music?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From John Rzeznik of The Goo Goo Dolls:</p>
<p>I take umbrage to the statement &#8220;Recorded music is nothing but marketing material to drive awareness of an artist.&#8221;  Recorded music is the essence of the artist.  I don&#8217;t write songs to market myself.  It&#8217;s not an advertisement for my persona.  Explain to me what identity  a songwriter has without their music?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warner Music Slaps Songbeat With Lawsuit &#124; 226bw Tech News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-7/#comment-2617359</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner Music Slaps Songbeat With Lawsuit &#124; 226bw Tech News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2617359</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch has written quite a bit about the highs and lows of online music distribution and sales, and how the industry is responding to the changes that will inevitably continue to turn their business model upside down. Read some of our thoughts here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch has written quite a bit about the highs and lows of online music distribution and sales, and how the industry is responding to the changes that will inevitably continue to turn their business model upside down. Read some of our thoughts here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warner Music Slaps Songbeat With Lawsuit &#124; All about MICROSOFT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/comment-page-7/#comment-2616927</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner Music Slaps Songbeat With Lawsuit &#124; All about MICROSOFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/22/these-crazy-musicians-still-think-they-should-get-paid-for-recorded-music/#comment-2616927</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch has written quite a bit about the highs and lows of online music distribution and sales, and how the industry is responding to the changes that will inevitably continue to turn their business model upside down. Read some of our thoughts here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch has written quite a bit about the highs and lows of online music distribution and sales, and how the industry is responding to the changes that will inevitably continue to turn their business model upside down. Read some of our thoughts here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
