<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Nuclear Disaster&#8221; At SXSW Was Nothing More Than A Witch Burning</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10 Signed Copies of Sarah Lacy&#8217;s &#8220;Once You&#8217;re Lucky, Twice You&#8217;re Good&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2294320</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Signed Copies of Sarah Lacy&#8217;s &#8220;Once You&#8217;re Lucky, Twice You&#8217;re Good&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2294320</guid>
		<description>[...] her or hate her, BusinessWeek journalist and Tech Ticker co-host Sarah Lacy has written a new book called [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] her or hate her, BusinessWeek journalist and Tech Ticker co-host Sarah Lacy has written a new book called [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SXSW: Tlk&#8217;g Behnd Some1&#8217;s Bck 2.0 : muddy canvas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2265026</link>
		<dc:creator>SXSW: Tlk&#8217;g Behnd Some1&#8217;s Bck 2.0 : muddy canvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2265026</guid>
		<description>[...] crowd does factor in. Not as completely as Micheal Arrington believes. Criticism hurts. Sarah played into the crowds hands by reacting to their criticism. So much so she [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] crowd does factor in. Not as completely as Micheal Arrington believes. Criticism hurts. Sarah played into the crowds hands by reacting to their criticism. So much so she [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing the Strangest of Things &#171; Trees for the Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2213995</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing the Strangest of Things &#171; Trees for the Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2213995</guid>
		<description>[...] this apply to Twitter? Well, because events/happenings like tonight or what sounds like happened at SXSW earlier this year are what Twitter seems perfect for. Maybe Twitter was fixed just in time, maybe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] this apply to Twitter? Well, because events/happenings like tonight or what sounds like happened at SXSW earlier this year are what Twitter seems perfect for. Maybe Twitter was fixed just in time, maybe [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ePsychologie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anatomie d&#8217;une foule num&#233;rique</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2186426</link>
		<dc:creator>ePsychologie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anatomie d&#8217;une foule num&#233;rique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2186426</guid>
		<description>[...] Wired.com a consacré à l&#8217;affaire pas moins de quatre billets. TechnCrunch parle de &#8220;désastre nucléaire&#8221; Elle tient en quelques mots : l&#8217;interview du fondateur de facebook, Mark Zuckerberg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wired.com a consacré à l&#8217;affaire pas moins de quatre billets. TechnCrunch parle de &#8220;désastre nucléaire&#8221; Elle tient en quelques mots : l&#8217;interview du fondateur de facebook, Mark Zuckerberg [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-up skill: Find people who compensate for your weakness : South Florida Artist Entrepreneurs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2164435</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-up skill: Find people who compensate for your weakness : South Florida Artist Entrepreneurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2164435</guid>
		<description>[...] be girly in Austin, while everyone was Twittering at SXSW about how Mark Zuckerburg’s interview sucked. I was down the street at Nordstrom buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be girly in Austin, while everyone was Twittering at SXSW about how Mark Zuckerburg’s interview sucked. I was down the street at Nordstrom buying [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-up skill: Find people who compensate for your weakness &#187; Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2110173</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-up skill: Find people who compensate for your weakness &#187; Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2110173</guid>
		<description>[...] be girly in Austin, while everyone was Twittering at SXSW about how Mark Zuckerburg’s interview sucked. I was down the street at Nordstrom buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be girly in Austin, while everyone was Twittering at SXSW about how Mark Zuckerburg’s interview sucked. I was down the street at Nordstrom buying [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Sexy Gossip Tips from SXSW &#124; FUNKYBROWNCHICK.com &#124; sex. dating. relationships.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2048358</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Sexy Gossip Tips from SXSW &#124; FUNKYBROWNCHICK.com &#124; sex. dating. relationships.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2048358</guid>
		<description>[...] interview was a fucking train wreck, wasn&#8217;t it?!&#8221; Wired, Valleywag, Techmeme, Techcrunch, folks on Twitter and people from all over the world have all commented on the madness. Valleywag [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] interview was a fucking train wreck, wasn&#8217;t it?!&#8221; Wired, Valleywag, Techmeme, Techcrunch, folks on Twitter and people from all over the world have all commented on the madness. Valleywag [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overheard In Providence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SXSW Interactive: a look back</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2045738</link>
		<dc:creator>Overheard In Providence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SXSW Interactive: a look back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2045738</guid>
		<description>[...] of questioning. Eventually, the crowd revolted and Mark started taking questions from the audience. Some folks not in attendance blamed the anit-Sarah sentiment on sexism and twitter, but I respectfully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of questioning. Eventually, the crowd revolted and Mark started taking questions from the audience. Some folks not in attendance blamed the anit-Sarah sentiment on sexism and twitter, but I respectfully [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Source ID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SXSW wrap up</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2045147</link>
		<dc:creator>Source ID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SXSW wrap up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2045147</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t want to dwell on the negative. You can read about the various takes by Dave McClure, Michael Arrington (who by the way, was not in attendance), Wired, and many more (just google Zuckerberg Lacy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I don&#8217;t want to dwell on the negative. You can read about the various takes by Dave McClure, Michael Arrington (who by the way, was not in attendance), Wired, and many more (just google Zuckerberg Lacy [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2039688</link>
		<dc:creator>Enric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2039688</guid>
		<description>This is man about school coming to the rescue of mean girl getting her comeupance from math lab nerds.  Sarahacuda is interviewing the winner of the science fair and darling of the math lab nerds.  What should she expect when condescending him.  And boy, are these math labs nerds vicious -- veritable mongrels for the kill, lol.  Michael your smarter than making hay of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is man about school coming to the rescue of mean girl getting her comeupance from math lab nerds.  Sarahacuda is interviewing the winner of the science fair and darling of the math lab nerds.  What should she expect when condescending him.  And boy, are these math labs nerds vicious &#8212; veritable mongrels for the kill, lol.  Michael your smarter than making hay of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Piersall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2039648</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Piersall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2039648</guid>
		<description>Don't you moderate your comments around here? You've been spammed at least 4 times on this post alone - unless, of course, you think that 'Watch Handbags" &#38; "China Kitchen Cabinets" are relevant to this conversation?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you moderate your comments around here? You&#8217;ve been spammed at least 4 times on this post alone - unless, of course, you think that &#8216;Watch Handbags&#8221; &amp; &#8220;China Kitchen Cabinets&#8221; are relevant to this conversation?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad King</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2038802</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2038802</guid>
		<description>@ lemonobrien

I have a graduate degree in journalism - and started programming in 1984...none of that focuses on the issue that happened at the conference with her interview.

It was a poorly done interview - no preparation (it appeared), a lack of understanding about the audience and a weak job at taking care of the source in a professional way.

Be shitty all you want - the reality is, it was a whiff. The end of the world? No. But definitely a three-strike, sit-down whiff.

Brad King</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ lemonobrien</p>
<p>I have a graduate degree in journalism - and started programming in 1984&#8230;none of that focuses on the issue that happened at the conference with her interview.</p>
<p>It was a poorly done interview - no preparation (it appeared), a lack of understanding about the audience and a weak job at taking care of the source in a professional way.</p>
<p>Be shitty all you want - the reality is, it was a whiff. The end of the world? No. But definitely a three-strike, sit-down whiff.</p>
<p>Brad King</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad King</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2038800</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2038800</guid>
		<description>@ Simon Brocklehurst

If your best defense of a journalist is that the person being interviewed thought it was okay - then you FAIL when it comes to understanding what journalism is. 

Brad King</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Simon Brocklehurst</p>
<p>If your best defense of a journalist is that the person being interviewed thought it was okay - then you FAIL when it comes to understanding what journalism is. </p>
<p>Brad King</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Since When Did We All Become Eagles Fans? &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2037304</link>
		<dc:creator>Since When Did We All Become Eagles Fans? &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2037304</guid>
		<description>[...] dubbed it a &#34;witch burning.&#34; A similar hijacking behavior pattern broke out at the metrics panel. And it&#8217;s hard not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] dubbed it a &quot;witch burning.&quot; A similar hijacking behavior pattern broke out at the metrics panel. And it&#8217;s hard not [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036206</guid>
		<description>I watched the interview and it was ridiculous. She flirted with him half the time and attempted to add her own jokes that were basically making fun of him. That's great that they may have a long relationship or spoken many times but she did not shed a light on him as a CEO. He sounded embarrassed with the one story she told about him and he tried to wrangle her in when she got very off topic. This should be a sign to the interviewer how he wants it to be conducted. When the crowd called her out, Mark tried to smooth the tension, since she was yelling "Jesus Christ". She could of politely calmed down while he finished his answer to the attendees question. But she just gets more mad and then brings it up 2 more times ending the interview with "sorry i put you guys through an hour of torture, geez, send me an email to tell me why it was so bad!" (at which point someone yelled "give me your email address")

Insane!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the interview and it was ridiculous. She flirted with him half the time and attempted to add her own jokes that were basically making fun of him. That&#8217;s great that they may have a long relationship or spoken many times but she did not shed a light on him as a CEO. He sounded embarrassed with the one story she told about him and he tried to wrangle her in when she got very off topic. This should be a sign to the interviewer how he wants it to be conducted. When the crowd called her out, Mark tried to smooth the tension, since she was yelling &#8220;Jesus Christ&#8221;. She could of politely calmed down while he finished his answer to the attendees question. But she just gets more mad and then brings it up 2 more times ending the interview with &#8220;sorry i put you guys through an hour of torture, geez, send me an email to tell me why it was so bad!&#8221; (at which point someone yelled &#8220;give me your email address&#8221;)</p>
<p>Insane!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036035</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036035</guid>
		<description>"Sure, there were a couple of moments where the crowd yelled out, but that is absolutely normal at tech events these days."

Really? I've been to SXSW four times and @media once, and have *never* seen it. Maybe I'm just lucky.

I'm not about to wade through 204 comments to see if this has been covered, but as far as I'm concerned, the most telling Twitter post all day came from Ms. Lacy herself:

  http://twitter.com/sarahcuda/statuses/769000309

That's a nuclear fucking fail, if I've ever seen one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sure, there were a couple of moments where the crowd yelled out, but that is absolutely normal at tech events these days.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? I&#8217;ve been to SXSW four times and @media once, and have *never* seen it. Maybe I&#8217;m just lucky.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not about to wade through 204 comments to see if this has been covered, but as far as I&#8217;m concerned, the most telling Twitter post all day came from Ms. Lacy herself:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://twitter.com/sarahcuda/statuses/769000309" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/sarahcuda/statuses/769000309</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a nuclear fucking fail, if I&#8217;ve ever seen one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036016</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2036016</guid>
		<description>Having actually been there, its wasn't the "back of the room" being dissatisfied, as many people are trying to spin it.  It was the whole room.  I get that Mark Zucker is shy, but telling a story about him being covered in sweat, shouting out to a friend in the audience, and failing to ask follow up questions (or even questions at all, stories don't count) isn't the audiences fault, it's the interviewers.  She failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having actually been there, its wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;back of the room&#8221; being dissatisfied, as many people are trying to spin it.  It was the whole room.  I get that Mark Zucker is shy, but telling a story about him being covered in sweat, shouting out to a friend in the audience, and failing to ask follow up questions (or even questions at all, stories don&#8217;t count) isn&#8217;t the audiences fault, it&#8217;s the interviewers.  She failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Brocklehurst</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2035412</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Brocklehurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2035412</guid>
		<description>@203.  Cite one example?  Sure.  Here's a quote from comment #10  It's just one example...

"She called him a kid a few times, questioned Facebook’s valuation in a way that wasn’t inquisitive... she disrepected her interviewee. The crowd noticed and wouldn’t let her forget it... The crowd picked up on that and that’s what triggered that awful feeling of awkwardness watching the interview."

This quote exemplifies the poor judgement of many people in the room.  I understand it's how they *felt*, but it's still a lack of judgement.   They totally misread what was happening on stage, and the quality of the interview.   And they behaved badly, like whiny eight year olds that lack the social skills to do anything other than scream and shout when they don't get exactly what they want.

The truth is that Zuckerberg didn't feel that Lacy disrespected him. Neither did he feel belittled by her.  Nor did he feel awkward about Lacy's interview style.   That's because Lacy had no intention of disrepecting or belittling Zuckerberg, or of making him feel awkward. 

In fact, Zuckerberg felt that Lacy asked him interesting questions.  He likes her interview style, and thinks that she's a generally smart person that he enjoys working with.  Like the majoriy of people who have read this thread and voted, Zuckerberg feels that the way the the audience treated Lacy was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@203.  Cite one example?  Sure.  Here&#8217;s a quote from comment #10  It&#8217;s just one example&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;She called him a kid a few times, questioned Facebook’s valuation in a way that wasn’t inquisitive&#8230; she disrepected her interviewee. The crowd noticed and wouldn’t let her forget it&#8230; The crowd picked up on that and that’s what triggered that awful feeling of awkwardness watching the interview.&#8221;</p>
<p>This quote exemplifies the poor judgement of many people in the room.  I understand it&#8217;s how they *felt*, but it&#8217;s still a lack of judgement.   They totally misread what was happening on stage, and the quality of the interview.   And they behaved badly, like whiny eight year olds that lack the social skills to do anything other than scream and shout when they don&#8217;t get exactly what they want.</p>
<p>The truth is that Zuckerberg didn&#8217;t feel that Lacy disrespected him. Neither did he feel belittled by her.  Nor did he feel awkward about Lacy&#8217;s interview style.   That&#8217;s because Lacy had no intention of disrepecting or belittling Zuckerberg, or of making him feel awkward. </p>
<p>In fact, Zuckerberg felt that Lacy asked him interesting questions.  He likes her interview style, and thinks that she&#8217;s a generally smart person that he enjoys working with.  Like the majoriy of people who have read this thread and voted, Zuckerberg feels that the way the the audience treated Lacy was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Terdiman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2035058</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Terdiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2035058</guid>
		<description>#197 

Can you cite one example of something of substance from a comment by someone who was at the keynote that supports the general conclusions of people who weren't there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#197 </p>
<p>Can you cite one example of something of substance from a comment by someone who was at the keynote that supports the general conclusions of people who weren&#8217;t there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Inglis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034869</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Inglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034869</guid>
		<description>At first I thought it was unfair, but the more I thought about it and after watching her interview later I started to agree with everyone else.

She was interviewing herself about how she knows Mark. Secondly, flirting is good. Jumping a guy on stage (which it was close to), not so much.

And yeah, "from what you can gather" does not make great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought it was unfair, but the more I thought about it and after watching her interview later I started to agree with everyone else.</p>
<p>She was interviewing herself about how she knows Mark. Secondly, flirting is good. Jumping a guy on stage (which it was close to), not so much.</p>
<p>And yeah, &#8220;from what you can gather&#8221; does not make great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahaha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034806</link>
		<dc:creator>mahaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034806</guid>
		<description>Also, watching the video doesn’t tell you where in the audience the sound/boos/titters were coming from. I don’t think we have any 7.1 Dolby EX sound from keynote available yet. I was there and it wasn’t coming from some plotting sexist saboteurs the back of the room.&lt;a href="http://www.china-kitchen-cabinets.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.china-kitchen-cabinets.com/&lt;/a&gt; is blog for the video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, watching the video doesn’t tell you where in the audience the sound/boos/titters were coming from. I don’t think we have any 7.1 Dolby EX sound from keynote available yet. I was there and it wasn’t coming from some plotting sexist saboteurs the back of the room.<a href="http://www.china-kitchen-cabinets.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.china-kitchen-cabinets.com');">http://www.china-kitchen-cabinets.com/</a> is blog for the video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahaha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034786</link>
		<dc:creator>mahaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034786</guid>
		<description>I was there live, but in the overflow room for &lt;a href="http://www.watchhandbag.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.watchhandbag.com&lt;/a&gt;. I wasn’t following twitter/meebo, and I couldn’t see the “hecklers in the back of the room” since I wasn’t IN that particular room. But in the room I was in, everyone around me was grumbling like crazy about a) the incredibly inappropriate content of the interview (sweat stained shirts, really?), b) the constant attention grabbing questioning from Lacy, c) the highly pre-scripted answers (and questions, apparently) from/to Mark, and d) the entirely inappropriate way she managed the audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there live, but in the overflow room for <a href="http://www.watchhandbag.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.watchhandbag.com');">http://www.watchhandbag.com</a>. I wasn’t following twitter/meebo, and I couldn’t see the “hecklers in the back of the room” since I wasn’t IN that particular room. But in the room I was in, everyone around me was grumbling like crazy about a) the incredibly inappropriate content of the interview (sweat stained shirts, really?), b) the constant attention grabbing questioning from Lacy, c) the highly pre-scripted answers (and questions, apparently) from/to Mark, and d) the entirely inappropriate way she managed the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034613</guid>
		<description>John C Dvorak: NAILED IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John C Dvorak: NAILED IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034611</guid>
		<description>"Terrorism doesn't come from a deep hatred of anyone, it comes from lack of connectedness, a lack of communication, a lack of empathy."

SHUT UP. Is that it? Well, let's get Osama on Facebook so he can get in touch with his feelings and be all connected and docile.

*rolleyes*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Terrorism doesn&#8217;t come from a deep hatred of anyone, it comes from lack of connectedness, a lack of communication, a lack of empathy.&#8221;</p>
<p>SHUT UP. Is that it? Well, let&#8217;s get Osama on Facebook so he can get in touch with his feelings and be all connected and docile.</p>
<p>*rolleyes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Brocklehurst</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034448</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Brocklehurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/#comment-2034448</guid>
		<description>John, in this case, I think there's rather more to be said for not BEING THERE. Of course, though, as you say, watching something on video isn't the *same* as being there.  The question is: does the video show *enough* to see what was going on in this particular case?   And the answer is that it does; we're really not talking about anything particularly subtle or hard-to-understand here. 

In any case, for those that care to read them, the written analyses from those who *were* there merely serve to confirm that the video shows exactly what was going on.  The more they write, the clearer their phenotypes become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, in this case, I think there&#8217;s rather more to be said for not BEING THERE. Of course, though, as you say, watching something on video isn&#8217;t the *same* as being there.  The question is: does the video show *enough* to see what was going on in this particular case?   And the answer is that it does; we&#8217;re really not talking about anything particularly subtle or hard-to-understand here. </p>
<p>In any case, for those that care to read them, the written analyses from those who *were* there merely serve to confirm that the video shows exactly what was going on.  The more they write, the clearer their phenotypes become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.783 seconds -->
