March 9, 2008

The Best Things In Life May Be Free, But It Cost $400 Million To Get The Beatles On iTunes

Duncan Riley

38 comments »

Update: CNET is reporting that this may be inaccurate - “A spokeswoman for Sony/ATV Music Publishing told CNET News.com that the reports are “untrue.”"

money2.jpgThe best things in life are free
But you can keep them for the birds and bees
Now give me money
That’s what I want
That’s what I want, yeah
That’s what I want…

Paul McCartney has signed a $400 million deal with Apple for the distribution of the entire Beatles’ back catalog on iTunes. Under the deal, the money will be distributed to Ringo Starr, the families of George Harrison and John Lennon, Michael Jackson, EMI and Sony, along with McCartney getting his share as well.

The deal finally finishes Steve Job’s quest for the Holy Grail of music downloads.

(via CrunchGear)

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. 113.com

    Still delightful for Jobs, and Beatles fans as well. Good stuff.

  2. Jon

    This is great news… for the Beatles but if I was a shareholder with Apple, I would be fuming… they got taken to the cleaners due to Jobs obsession with them.

    Jon
    http://woodmarvels.com - Create Unique Memories

  3. Paul

    $400M? That’s A LOT of downloads to recoup that.

  4. Peter Kafka

    Paul, you’re correct. Duncan, you’re wrong.

  5. Boring Market

    I think it was a worthwhile investment, its the Beatles for gosh sake. Do I think they will turn a profit on this investment? Not for a couple of years.

  6. allen stern

    Duncan - make a seesmic or qik/flixwagon video of you singing that :)

  7. Beatles Lover

    Wonder if APPLE Computers was named after APPLE record label

    Surely Jobs was a fan

    The perfect circle comes to a close :-D

  8. MikeT

    I love the Beatles.
    However, people’s tastes change. The Beatles may not be on the top “to download” list of as many music lovers as before. Add here the huge number of albums sold by now - to those who cherish the Beatles and you get a quite weak prospective of recouping the 400M.
    Looks like it’s one of ol’ Stevie’s caprices…

  9. Forumistan

    Wow, that is a lot of money. iTunes should be very rich. Thanks for the information.

  10. Fabian Schonholz

    It is funny, when I first finished reading the article I thought “only $400M, what a low price”. Then I read all your comments. And am of the post Beatles generation, and while I like them, I am not sure if I would buy a track from iTunes.

  11. smcnally

    Apple will get well more than $100MM in ‘free’ press because of this deal.

    based on the terms w/r/t exclusivity, length, etc. it could be 2x+ that in press and buzz.

  12. Dito

    Been waiting for this for years. Price tag does not surprise me in the least. The Beatles are worth it.

  13. Mark F

    Exactly who is interested in this? Is there a lot of Beatles fans who want to listen to the Beatles on an iPod but don’t already have the CDs to rip?

  14. Steve

    Is it just the cynic in me, or is this related to McCartney’s divorce settlement?

  15. Jesus H Christ

    i wonder how much MJ gets considering is owns most of the Beatles songs, from a prior deal with sony.

  16. joan

    MJ probably got the biggest portion of them all.
    But what’s important here is not who gets how much but how much Apple paid.
    There’s no way of knowing what the ROI will be but Apple is the only one who gets to sell these songs!!
    So where are you gonna look when you plan on buying a digital download?
    When you have an ipod you almost automatically go to the itunes store.
    If not you have quite a lot of other options.
    But I’m willing to bet that the first place you go to will be the one with the biggest library!

  17. joan

    I do have one question though. How long does the exclusivity last?

  18. CC Rider

    Oh, the biggest library? You mean torrents? Yes, I will use those.

  19. Russ

    Right before Jackson’s house goes on the auction block….nice timing.

  20. some guy

    $400M, probably should have waited until his divorce was finalized.

  21. Your Daddy

    Yeah, looks like NeverLand Ranch is safe!

  22. Inside Knowledge

    this sets a dangerous precedent for apple

  23. Your Daddy

    BTW, WTF actually pays for music these days?

  24. Jonathan Silber

    This is actually delightfully funny.

  25. The Magnate

    Hahahaha!! $400 M?!!

    MagNet is coming….

  26. Omer

    This probably also closes the never ending saga on Apple’s deal with the Beatles real estate over Apple the label. The issue came up again when Apple started up itunes which was kind of against the original agreement they had wrto using the Apple name.

    Im sure a couple of pages reads that the Beatles estate may not bother Apple Computer about using the Apple name in ‘music’ related businesses. In fact i think it probably says you can do what f you want with it…

    financially speaking:

    $400M = 404million dowloads (@99centes) + bandwidth +capex - related PR

    and it doesnt even seem to be an exclusive deal…

  27. You all crack me up

    @ 10 smcnally - are you kidding? $100 MM of free press? Not quite. Not even close. Maybe $10 MM of free press. Then again, most of the press and blogosphere is already filled with Apple fanboys so the net effect is not that big.

    Overall, this is a retarded deal. It’s good to know someone is in a position of strength to negotiate with Apple.

    In other news… Ringo Starr renegotiates Thomas the Tank Engine licensing on iTunes…

  28. What a Joke

    What a joke. This sets a dangerous precedent for Apple. How much is Apple going to have to pay for AC/DC? Or how much will it take to get NBC back on the site? Will the movie studios now ask for money upfront before a rental hits the site? Apple should have just let the Beatles twist in the wind for another year or two.

  29. ZiZi

    Wow, exactly at the right time for poor MJ, he is once again saved.

  30. ZiZi

    what I dont understand is how PM or any of the beatles had any say in this??
    all the music is owned by Sony and MJ 50/50, anyone know?

  31. mobilekick.com

    Theres like 500 beatles songs, and 1 million beatles fans on itunes. That leaves SJ with 100 Million, and one of the best exclusive deals ever made.

  32. nate

    Move over U2 iPod…

  33. Greek-Songs.com

    That’s really good news…

  34. Hey Jude

    MobileKick.com you are retarded….

    those 1 million fans probably own all 500 songs….if you don’t then again, you are retarded….

  35. John C. McClore

    MJ saved again, the man is just destined to be rich!

  36. John C. McClore

    What’s next? If he loses this money he wins the Powerball?

  37. Bob Dole

    I hope MJ buys Candy Mountain and gets Charlie a new kidney…joyness

  38. Andrew Akers

    You guys have got to be kidding me . All of you guys are missing the point . How many I Phone / I Pods / is the Beatles Catalog Deal going to sell ( if it is indeed true) It will contribute plenty to the bottom line . Lets see another million phones @ about 150 profit per phone, plus the I Pods, and then of course the down loads . It will sell hardware and the Mac platform and get the Beatles music into a whole other generation. My children are now 19 and 23 and I started them on the Beatles at 5 years old . If it is indeed true it will put I Tunes wayyyyyyy over the top . Good Night Zune