<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft, The Jekyll And Hyde Of Companies</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miller Time Stratumseind Eindhoven</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2062775</link>
		<dc:creator>Miller Time Stratumseind Eindhoven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2062775</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Miller Time Stratumseind Eindhoven...&lt;/strong&gt;

FlyGesture is activated like Exposé or Dashboard, bringing up a transparent window of \"guides\" to move your mouse through. Moving your mouse through the guides lets FlyGesture know what action or actions you want to be performed, such as closing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Miller Time Stratumseind Eindhoven&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>FlyGesture is activated like Exposé or Dashboard, bringing up a transparent window of \&#8221;guides\&#8221; to move your mouse through. Moving your mouse through the guides lets FlyGesture know what action or actions you want to be performed, such as closing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2033702</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2033702</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is all about the vendor lock in. Don’t trust ‘em and go only with apple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is all about the vendor lock in. Don’t trust ‘em and go only with apple&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie T</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2033514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2033514</guid>
		<description>C'mon Duncan. Build Zune software for an OS that runs on approx 5% of the world's computers, of which no more than 5% of those computers' owners would bother to buy?

I don't need to be an economics professor to point out the folly of doing that, do I?

-J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon Duncan. Build Zune software for an OS that runs on approx 5% of the world&#8217;s computers, of which no more than 5% of those computers&#8217; owners would bother to buy?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need to be an economics professor to point out the folly of doing that, do I?</p>
<p>-J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Long</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028714</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028714</guid>
		<description>Wow, funny how many people think that "ask" should be "task". For those not in the know, Duncan is an aussie (no, not Ozzie) and we know what he means by "it's a hard ask". Means it's not easy. He doesn't mean "hard task" at all. 
-GBS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, funny how many people think that &#8220;ask&#8221; should be &#8220;task&#8221;. For those not in the know, Duncan is an aussie (no, not Ozzie) and we know what he means by &#8220;it&#8217;s a hard ask&#8221;. Means it&#8217;s not easy. He doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;hard task&#8221; at all.<br />
-GBS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028528</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028528</guid>
		<description>Doug, good reflection and I agree that everyone should use the OS that he/she feels comfortable with.

What Mk in #6 didn't understand is that a Mac is not a PC, OS X is not Windows, so why should it behave like the same way? To me, that is a major misconception in the whole debate.

The right-click wasn't considered intuitive in the Mac world, but took really off in the Windows world. So much, that Apple included it now with the Mighty Mouse, albeit not as default.

MS is where it is because of its management. It once competed with IBM and won because it was flexible enough. Market establishment rendered it today to be as cumbersome as Big Blue.

Talking of Jekyll and Hyde: Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer seem to me to portray this image. Maybe it's all just a purposeful farce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, good reflection and I agree that everyone should use the OS that he/she feels comfortable with.</p>
<p>What Mk in #6 didn&#8217;t understand is that a Mac is not a PC, OS X is not Windows, so why should it behave like the same way? To me, that is a major misconception in the whole debate.</p>
<p>The right-click wasn&#8217;t considered intuitive in the Mac world, but took really off in the Windows world. So much, that Apple included it now with the Mighty Mouse, albeit not as default.</p>
<p>MS is where it is because of its management. It once competed with IBM and won because it was flexible enough. Market establishment rendered it today to be as cumbersome as Big Blue.</p>
<p>Talking of Jekyll and Hyde: Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer seem to me to portray this image. Maybe it&#8217;s all just a purposeful farce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028244</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028244</guid>
		<description>I really want to like Microsoft, I really do.  I cut my teeth on DOS.  As the author points out, old MS is Steve and Steve needs to go.  His obsession with "beating" Google is comical.  Is it so bad to just make a good OS and Office Suite?  Remember when Outlook use to be usable?  Now my happiest users are the ones that don't have that POS running on their machine.  That's sad to me.   

Ray Ozzie was a good pick-up.  I wish they could get a good CEO to match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to like Microsoft, I really do.  I cut my teeth on DOS.  As the author points out, old MS is Steve and Steve needs to go.  His obsession with &#8220;beating&#8221; Google is comical.  Is it so bad to just make a good OS and Office Suite?  Remember when Outlook use to be usable?  Now my happiest users are the ones that don&#8217;t have that POS running on their machine.  That&#8217;s sad to me.   </p>
<p>Ray Ozzie was a good pick-up.  I wish they could get a good CEO to match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028117</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2028117</guid>
		<description>Wow - The article subject was OK, but what drove me to comment was how this article was so badly written 

Was this a school competition??? Although that's a bit of an injustice to schools I guess. I'm sure a 12 year old could have done a better job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - The article subject was OK, but what drove me to comment was how this article was so badly written </p>
<p>Was this a school competition??? Although that&#8217;s a bit of an injustice to schools I guess. I&#8217;m sure a 12 year old could have done a better job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbyo Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2027978</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbyo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2027978</guid>
		<description>funny title :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny title <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Grossman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2027183</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Grossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2027183</guid>
		<description>My car has been broken into, brick smashed through the window on the street, TWICE in the past three months in order to steal my Zunes. 

I had a Zune 30GB, black, which was stolen on Christmas day (some time between midnight and 10AM). The thief also stole a wrapped gift for my girlfriend, but it's the Zune I really miss...

I had a Zune 8GB, black, which was stolen just a week and a half ago. 

I'd sure love to own a Zune, but I can't afford to buy a 3rd. Mind sending me yours, Duncan, since you have no use for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My car has been broken into, brick smashed through the window on the street, TWICE in the past three months in order to steal my Zunes. </p>
<p>I had a Zune 30GB, black, which was stolen on Christmas day (some time between midnight and 10AM). The thief also stole a wrapped gift for my girlfriend, but it&#8217;s the Zune I really miss&#8230;</p>
<p>I had a Zune 8GB, black, which was stolen just a week and a half ago. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d sure love to own a Zune, but I can&#8217;t afford to buy a 3rd. Mind sending me yours, Duncan, since you have no use for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026589</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026589</guid>
		<description>Ryan W.: no offense taken. It's just that often we, all of us, get far too worked up over something as mundane as an operating system. In the grand scheme of things, there are far bigger things to REALLY ticked about.  Don't get me going on politics!

I can't get too specific, but trust me, I know what I'm talking about here. Sure, Apple designed the original iPod to work with their Macs. To do otherwise would have been illogical at the time. But you have to hand it to Steve Jobs in that he quickly realized that IF he moved the iPod over from a Mac-only platform to a more universal platform via incorporating a USB interface on the iPod, then the sky was the limit. It WAS difficult to do with those early iPod designs, as the 2.5 watt limit of USB would simply not charge the iPods batteries *of that time* while simultaneously spinning the hard drive.  It was that simple. Apple then re-worked the architecture of the iPod to accommodate a USB charging scheme. Once that was in place, then the next brilliant piece of the puzzle was to write a PC app, moving iTunes over to the PC. Just like that, Apple snuck into the PC domain, and iPod sales took off. (Hunt for a graph of iPod unit sales versus time to see that "the knee of the curve" starts with the introduction of iTunes/PC.) To deny Apple, and Steve Jobs in particular, is missing the obvious. It took guts to walk away from the Apple-standard Firewire interface, but Jobs did it. Compare and contrast that attitude with Microsoft's, which seems (to me) to have a hard time adopting to someone else's standards. Jobs may be an arrogant so-and-so, but he's also got a ton of business smarts (in his older age).  He doesn't seem to believe in trying to move the mountain to Mohammed, if you understand what I mean. Note that the latest iPods no longer support Firewire data transfer. The transition is complete!

(This is also just my opinion, but USB was a struggling standard until Jobs put it into the original iMac. He walked away from Apple's long-time standards of their serial port and SCSI, and incorporated nothing but USB on that iMac. That took guts! When the iMac came out, the main complaint was that there was nothing to connect to it!  The criticisms were right. But the popularity of that machine, I believe, drove the acceptance of USB. Remember all of those scanners, floppies, and mice that mimicked the iMac look? Microsoft and Intel defined the standard, but it was Apple that made it mainstream. PC manufacturers were extremely reluctant to incorporate it into their machines. Few PCs, to this day, have given up on the old serial and parallel ports.)

Neither Microsoft or Apple is going away. Each will continue to thrive because they appeal to different people. The iPhone will be the same way --- the Blackberry platform isn't going to die, or "get beat" by the iPhone.  Different people prefer different features, and each platform will sell to those competing markets. For instance, some people hate "soft keyboards," but Jobs hates buttons. (And fans.) As long as these sorts of preferences exist in each of us, there will be a market for each camp.

I can't believe that I'm being this calm, as I get worked up over this OS thing all the time. But I'm willing to work with either operating system to get my jobs done. I have little use for MS products, but I can't ignore their success.  Neither does Jobs, I might add. Guys like Balmer strike me as a major impediment for Microsoft, only because he is unyielding to market demands. If MS ever replaced that guy and took more of an open standards attitude, as Apple has done, they'd probably wipe Apple out. Again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan W.: no offense taken. It&#8217;s just that often we, all of us, get far too worked up over something as mundane as an operating system. In the grand scheme of things, there are far bigger things to REALLY ticked about.  Don&#8217;t get me going on politics!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t get too specific, but trust me, I know what I&#8217;m talking about here. Sure, Apple designed the original iPod to work with their Macs. To do otherwise would have been illogical at the time. But you have to hand it to Steve Jobs in that he quickly realized that IF he moved the iPod over from a Mac-only platform to a more universal platform via incorporating a USB interface on the iPod, then the sky was the limit. It WAS difficult to do with those early iPod designs, as the 2.5 watt limit of USB would simply not charge the iPods batteries *of that time* while simultaneously spinning the hard drive.  It was that simple. Apple then re-worked the architecture of the iPod to accommodate a USB charging scheme. Once that was in place, then the next brilliant piece of the puzzle was to write a PC app, moving iTunes over to the PC. Just like that, Apple snuck into the PC domain, and iPod sales took off. (Hunt for a graph of iPod unit sales versus time to see that &#8220;the knee of the curve&#8221; starts with the introduction of iTunes/PC.) To deny Apple, and Steve Jobs in particular, is missing the obvious. It took guts to walk away from the Apple-standard Firewire interface, but Jobs did it. Compare and contrast that attitude with Microsoft&#8217;s, which seems (to me) to have a hard time adopting to someone else&#8217;s standards. Jobs may be an arrogant so-and-so, but he&#8217;s also got a ton of business smarts (in his older age).  He doesn&#8217;t seem to believe in trying to move the mountain to Mohammed, if you understand what I mean. Note that the latest iPods no longer support Firewire data transfer. The transition is complete!</p>
<p>(This is also just my opinion, but USB was a struggling standard until Jobs put it into the original iMac. He walked away from Apple&#8217;s long-time standards of their serial port and SCSI, and incorporated nothing but USB on that iMac. That took guts! When the iMac came out, the main complaint was that there was nothing to connect to it!  The criticisms were right. But the popularity of that machine, I believe, drove the acceptance of USB. Remember all of those scanners, floppies, and mice that mimicked the iMac look? Microsoft and Intel defined the standard, but it was Apple that made it mainstream. PC manufacturers were extremely reluctant to incorporate it into their machines. Few PCs, to this day, have given up on the old serial and parallel ports.)</p>
<p>Neither Microsoft or Apple is going away. Each will continue to thrive because they appeal to different people. The iPhone will be the same way &#8212; the Blackberry platform isn&#8217;t going to die, or &#8220;get beat&#8221; by the iPhone.  Different people prefer different features, and each platform will sell to those competing markets. For instance, some people hate &#8220;soft keyboards,&#8221; but Jobs hates buttons. (And fans.) As long as these sorts of preferences exist in each of us, there will be a market for each camp.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe that I&#8217;m being this calm, as I get worked up over this OS thing all the time. But I&#8217;m willing to work with either operating system to get my jobs done. I have little use for MS products, but I can&#8217;t ignore their success.  Neither does Jobs, I might add. Guys like Balmer strike me as a major impediment for Microsoft, only because he is unyielding to market demands. If MS ever replaced that guy and took more of an open standards attitude, as Apple has done, they&#8217;d probably wipe Apple out. Again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026580</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026580</guid>
		<description>I look at all of this differently. I'm an ex-Microsoftie now running a startup in Seattle. The current situation at Microsoft favors us because many of the good guys are getting so frustrated with not being able to get stuff done that they are leaving - and that suits me and every other startup in Seattle just fine.

So we're all happy with Ballmer continuing to slowly kill off the company, because it just increases the local talent pool. And thankfully, it's typically the talented developers who leave to seek better opportunities (or to ship a product more often than every 5 years if they are in Windows Division) leaving behind the, err, 'not so good'.

So all i have to say to Ballmer ' Developers, Developers, Developers! - keep putting your own ones down so we can build a new ecosystem with them!'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look at all of this differently. I&#8217;m an ex-Microsoftie now running a startup in Seattle. The current situation at Microsoft favors us because many of the good guys are getting so frustrated with not being able to get stuff done that they are leaving - and that suits me and every other startup in Seattle just fine.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re all happy with Ballmer continuing to slowly kill off the company, because it just increases the local talent pool. And thankfully, it&#8217;s typically the talented developers who leave to seek better opportunities (or to ship a product more often than every 5 years if they are in Windows Division) leaving behind the, err, &#8216;not so good&#8217;.</p>
<p>So all i have to say to Ballmer &#8216; Developers, Developers, Developers! - keep putting your own ones down so we can build a new ecosystem with them!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026450</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026450</guid>
		<description>Microsoft's idea of standards compliant is "We change our standards to be compliant with our products." The only reason IE8 is going to be compliant is because for once their devs are actually making web products, and realizing "oh wow, IE is an expensive pain in the ass."  You can bet top dollar that once Silverlight is crammed down our throats, you can kiss cross-platform support good bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s idea of standards compliant is &#8220;We change our standards to be compliant with our products.&#8221; The only reason IE8 is going to be compliant is because for once their devs are actually making web products, and realizing &#8220;oh wow, IE is an expensive pain in the ass.&#8221;  You can bet top dollar that once Silverlight is crammed down our throats, you can kiss cross-platform support good bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vendor Lock In</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026413</link>
		<dc:creator>Vendor Lock In</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026413</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is all about the vendor lock in.  Don't trust 'em and avoid 'em at all costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is all about the vendor lock in.  Don&#8217;t trust &#8216;em and avoid &#8216;em at all costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026384</guid>
		<description>Doug:

I'm sorry for acting childish. I agree people should be allowed to write their own personal opinions about products. This is what makes the Internet so wonderful. 

I'm not so sure about your Firewire argument, I think it was more of a coincidence at the time. Apple has constantly shown that they are the most closed platform available. Apple at first was trying to lure customers into using Mac OSX by making the iPod Mac exclusive, they soon realized that this would eventually have a dead end due to their lower market share. 

Anyways, I'm not sure who is right or who is wrong. Sorry for offending!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry for acting childish. I agree people should be allowed to write their own personal opinions about products. This is what makes the Internet so wonderful. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about your Firewire argument, I think it was more of a coincidence at the time. Apple has constantly shown that they are the most closed platform available. Apple at first was trying to lure customers into using Mac OSX by making the iPod Mac exclusive, they soon realized that this would eventually have a dead end due to their lower market share. </p>
<p>Anyways, I&#8217;m not sure who is right or who is wrong. Sorry for offending!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026175</link>
		<dc:creator>James Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2026175</guid>
		<description>Scott Guthrie is amazing; I still read his blog on Microsoft technologies (mostly ASP.Net, which he invented).

I think you're absolutely right on about a company needing to have a visionary at the top; even if you have great people in the middle if the CEO doesn't get it, then it's pulling the whole company backward.

A lot of times when the top of a company is run by marketing people without technical background that's what happens.  Almost all the successful start-ups are founded by engineers with great ideas, rather than marketing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Guthrie is amazing; I still read his blog on Microsoft technologies (mostly ASP.Net, which he invented).</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re absolutely right on about a company needing to have a visionary at the top; even if you have great people in the middle if the CEO doesn&#8217;t get it, then it&#8217;s pulling the whole company backward.</p>
<p>A lot of times when the top of a company is run by marketing people without technical background that&#8217;s what happens.  Almost all the successful start-ups are founded by engineers with great ideas, rather than marketing people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jekyll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025985</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jekyll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025985</guid>
		<description>XP RULES !!!! WOOOOOT !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP RULES !!!! WOOOOOT !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jekyll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025969</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jekyll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025969</guid>
		<description>Sorry,  MS is all Mr. Hyde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry,  MS is all Mr. Hyde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025883</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025883</guid>
		<description>Ryan W: while there is some truth to your statement about the first iPods, let me ask you this: how many PCs back in 2001-2002 had a Firewire connector? (And for that matter, how many today?) Remember, the first iPods were Firewire-based. Only Firewire had the power requirements to charge the first iPods. USB's 2.5 watt power limitation would simply not do the trick. USB-based made its appearance in 18 months later in 2003. Even then, you could not charge the iPod through USB. Apple finally figured out how to charge the iPod with USB (it isn't as easy as it may appear, especially back then when the pod's power requirements were much higher). Apple then brilliantly updated iTunes to run on a PC in October 2003 (brilliant because the results speak for themselves).  Give the other Steve (Jobs) credit: he recognized that a greater opportunity existed. He modified the hardware and software accordingly to expand sales. It worked! I believe the author is saying, or asking, why can't Microsoft do the same, open the Zune to Mac users? Isn't this supposed to be a kumbaya world where everyone accommodates everyone else? Personally, I think the effort would be wasted, but it's a legitimate question.

For those who love/hate XP/Vista/OSX Zune/iPod, it's a simple matter of preferences. Propeller-heads like full control of all the knobs. Some of the entries above testify to this. For them, they should stick with MS products. For those who dread ANY control of the knobs, such as most of my family members, OSX is a better choice. Not everyone is as inclined to do whatever it is you do. Some like complexity, some like simplicity. Period.

I've never understood why anyone, reviewer or customer, can't write a review stating his personal preferences, and not be jumped upon as being a "fanboy" (what a juvenile term...). Normal humans like some things and dislike others. What's so wrong with that? Not everyone shares your preferences. If a reviewer makes a false statement, that's another matter.

But "why can’t I right-click inside a 'open' or 'save' dialog window and do operations, or rename other files on the fly" (as one commenter said in #6) is merely a personal preference. I, for one, have zero desire for such a feature. Who's right? Answer: no one. Just one guy's preferences versus another.

Hopefully, I kept a civil tone, despite my instincts to do otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan W: while there is some truth to your statement about the first iPods, let me ask you this: how many PCs back in 2001-2002 had a Firewire connector? (And for that matter, how many today?) Remember, the first iPods were Firewire-based. Only Firewire had the power requirements to charge the first iPods. USB&#8217;s 2.5 watt power limitation would simply not do the trick. USB-based made its appearance in 18 months later in 2003. Even then, you could not charge the iPod through USB. Apple finally figured out how to charge the iPod with USB (it isn&#8217;t as easy as it may appear, especially back then when the pod&#8217;s power requirements were much higher). Apple then brilliantly updated iTunes to run on a PC in October 2003 (brilliant because the results speak for themselves).  Give the other Steve (Jobs) credit: he recognized that a greater opportunity existed. He modified the hardware and software accordingly to expand sales. It worked! I believe the author is saying, or asking, why can&#8217;t Microsoft do the same, open the Zune to Mac users? Isn&#8217;t this supposed to be a kumbaya world where everyone accommodates everyone else? Personally, I think the effort would be wasted, but it&#8217;s a legitimate question.</p>
<p>For those who love/hate XP/Vista/OSX Zune/iPod, it&#8217;s a simple matter of preferences. Propeller-heads like full control of all the knobs. Some of the entries above testify to this. For them, they should stick with MS products. For those who dread ANY control of the knobs, such as most of my family members, OSX is a better choice. Not everyone is as inclined to do whatever it is you do. Some like complexity, some like simplicity. Period.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood why anyone, reviewer or customer, can&#8217;t write a review stating his personal preferences, and not be jumped upon as being a &#8220;fanboy&#8221; (what a juvenile term&#8230;). Normal humans like some things and dislike others. What&#8217;s so wrong with that? Not everyone shares your preferences. If a reviewer makes a false statement, that&#8217;s another matter.</p>
<p>But &#8220;why can’t I right-click inside a &#8216;open&#8217; or &#8217;save&#8217; dialog window and do operations, or rename other files on the fly&#8221; (as one commenter said in #6) is merely a personal preference. I, for one, have zero desire for such a feature. Who&#8217;s right? Answer: no one. Just one guy&#8217;s preferences versus another.</p>
<p>Hopefully, I kept a civil tone, despite my instincts to do otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025811</link>
		<dc:creator>on ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025811</guid>
		<description>Balmer is great.
:-)

http://yooflix.com/ShowVideo.aspx?directLink=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=1274983729713522403</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balmer is great.<br />
 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://yooflix.com/ShowVideo.aspx?directLink=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=1274983729713522403" rel="nofollow">http://yooflix.com/ShowVideo.a.....9713522403</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2025343</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me? This article is trash. You complain about how you need to download software to get the Zune to function correctly when Microsoft hasn't made the software yet for OSX, oh boo hoo. Microsoft hasn't made the software for Mac the same way Apple didn't let you use an iPod at first for Windows. Trust me, if Apple had 95% of the market you would not be able to use an iPod on a Windows machine. Both companies are exactly the same. The Zune infact is a great product, probably better than the iPod. Finally, this article is really poorly written. Did you honestly say anything new regarding Microsoft that hasn't been said a billion times from another Mac fanboy? What was the reason for writing this? Your FREE Zune didn't work properly? Let me guess that had it even worked you'd find something to complain about such as 'omg i had to liek go to the website to download the software'. Just give the Zune back to the community that actually would be appreciative to get something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? This article is trash. You complain about how you need to download software to get the Zune to function correctly when Microsoft hasn&#8217;t made the software yet for OSX, oh boo hoo. Microsoft hasn&#8217;t made the software for Mac the same way Apple didn&#8217;t let you use an iPod at first for Windows. Trust me, if Apple had 95% of the market you would not be able to use an iPod on a Windows machine. Both companies are exactly the same. The Zune infact is a great product, probably better than the iPod. Finally, this article is really poorly written. Did you honestly say anything new regarding Microsoft that hasn&#8217;t been said a billion times from another Mac fanboy? What was the reason for writing this? Your FREE Zune didn&#8217;t work properly? Let me guess that had it even worked you&#8217;d find something to complain about such as &#8216;omg i had to liek go to the website to download the software&#8217;. Just give the Zune back to the community that actually would be appreciative to get something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024915</link>
		<dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024915</guid>
		<description>The link to the interview with VP Scott Guthrie is incorrect, and on the actual post about it, theres no video showing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to the interview with VP Scott Guthrie is incorrect, and on the actual post about it, theres no video showing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocknroll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024854</link>
		<dc:creator>rocknroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024854</guid>
		<description>@21 - obviously hasn't used the Zune. 

I just picked up the 8GB Zune, and it's a good piece of equipment. It has a solid feel, nice interface, and a few great features.

1. Radio - I watch TV at the gym and pick up the FM broadcast.
2. Software - looks cool, works great, and doesn't feel like a spreadsheet
3. Subscription - I thought I would hate this, but I LOVE it - for $15/mo, you can download as much as you want. It lasts as long as you keep the service, but heck - it's the price of 1 CD per month! And you don't have to worry about what to buy or what to trash - you can have everything!

I've had 5 iPods, but I don't have any iTunes lock-in - I preferred buying CDs for my household and having unlimited rights. I CHOOSE the Zune lock in (though you can stop the subscription at any time) because of convenience - I won't stop using it until something even better comes along. I guess I've just moved on from owning disks and content - my kids probably won't appreciate them when I'm gone anyway!

The only problem I have with the service is that my wife and daughter just got a taste of it and they want my Zune, so Duncan - why don't you raffle off your "brick" to those of us who can find a better use for it? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21 - obviously hasn&#8217;t used the Zune. </p>
<p>I just picked up the 8GB Zune, and it&#8217;s a good piece of equipment. It has a solid feel, nice interface, and a few great features.</p>
<p>1. Radio - I watch TV at the gym and pick up the FM broadcast.<br />
2. Software - looks cool, works great, and doesn&#8217;t feel like a spreadsheet<br />
3. Subscription - I thought I would hate this, but I LOVE it - for $15/mo, you can download as much as you want. It lasts as long as you keep the service, but heck - it&#8217;s the price of 1 CD per month! And you don&#8217;t have to worry about what to buy or what to trash - you can have everything!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had 5 iPods, but I don&#8217;t have any iTunes lock-in - I preferred buying CDs for my household and having unlimited rights. I CHOOSE the Zune lock in (though you can stop the subscription at any time) because of convenience - I won&#8217;t stop using it until something even better comes along. I guess I&#8217;ve just moved on from owning disks and content - my kids probably won&#8217;t appreciate them when I&#8217;m gone anyway!</p>
<p>The only problem I have with the service is that my wife and daughter just got a taste of it and they want my Zune, so Duncan - why don&#8217;t you raffle off your &#8220;brick&#8221; to those of us who can find a better use for it? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traven</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024610</link>
		<dc:creator>Traven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024610</guid>
		<description>As someone who attended the 2nd Keynote live at MIX, I don't know how you came away with these ideas.   The whole "old Microsoft vs. new Microsoft" was brought up by Kawasaki at the near the end of the keynote when he mentioned that the new Microsoft was much less arrogant, listened more, and was a pleasure to work with.  During the entire keynote Steve's focus was on moving Microsoft software and products forward so as not to stagnate.  He clearly labeled Microsoft as an underdog in several product categories.  Sure he joked around with Apple, but most of the jokes and jabs were in response to similar Kawasaki jokes and jabs going the other way and all of them were good natured.  In fact, I remember him praising Apple in more than one way.

I was thoroughly impressed with 2 things about that keynote.   First, the level of knowledge Steve displayed about every single aspect of Microsoft was astounding.  It's a huge company but he spoke intelligently and frankly about nearly every question asked (even questions from the audience, which could have caught him by surprise).  There were only 2 questions he deflected and for obvious reasons (EU Antitrust and a sports-related question from the Seattle times that was inappropriate for the audience).   Second was that he let loose up there with a lot of the questions and even his actions.   My opinion of Microsoft went up significantly from that keynote alone.   Keep in mind that I'm writing this post and watched that keynote with a Macbook Pro open in front of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who attended the 2nd Keynote live at MIX, I don&#8217;t know how you came away with these ideas.   The whole &#8220;old Microsoft vs. new Microsoft&#8221; was brought up by Kawasaki at the near the end of the keynote when he mentioned that the new Microsoft was much less arrogant, listened more, and was a pleasure to work with.  During the entire keynote Steve&#8217;s focus was on moving Microsoft software and products forward so as not to stagnate.  He clearly labeled Microsoft as an underdog in several product categories.  Sure he joked around with Apple, but most of the jokes and jabs were in response to similar Kawasaki jokes and jabs going the other way and all of them were good natured.  In fact, I remember him praising Apple in more than one way.</p>
<p>I was thoroughly impressed with 2 things about that keynote.   First, the level of knowledge Steve displayed about every single aspect of Microsoft was astounding.  It&#8217;s a huge company but he spoke intelligently and frankly about nearly every question asked (even questions from the audience, which could have caught him by surprise).  There were only 2 questions he deflected and for obvious reasons (EU Antitrust and a sports-related question from the Seattle times that was inappropriate for the audience).   Second was that he let loose up there with a lot of the questions and even his actions.   My opinion of Microsoft went up significantly from that keynote alone.   Keep in mind that I&#8217;m writing this post and watched that keynote with a Macbook Pro open in front of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panefsky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024382</link>
		<dc:creator>panefsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024382</guid>
		<description>Ballmer is crazy but he is very inspiring to developers.
I would kill to have him as a manager in our company.
Developers, developers, developers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballmer is crazy but he is very inspiring to developers.<br />
I would kill to have him as a manager in our company.<br />
Developers, developers, developers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Water Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024232</link>
		<dc:creator>Water Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/07/microsoft-the-jekyll-and-hyde-of-companies/#comment-2024232</guid>
		<description>Dude who in their right mind will go to a PC conference with a Mac?  I mean, come on!  You have yourself to blame for not thinking ahead about the Zune not connecting to your Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude who in their right mind will go to a PC conference with a Mac?  I mean, come on!  You have yourself to blame for not thinking ahead about the Zune not connecting to your Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.545 seconds -->
