Comments on: iPhone SDK And Restrictions: Some Of The Details Aren’t Great.

By: iPony » Blog Archiv » Die Roadmap für die iPhone-Software gewinnt an Kontur

Fri, 15 May 2009 18:41:38 +0000

[...] noch eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Apple Ankündigung interessiert, dem sei dieser TechCrunch Artikel empfohlen. [...]

By: matt

matt — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:40:26 +0000

Don’t be stupid. Just because its running in the background doesn’t mean its sniffing around. It cant do anything in the background that it cant do when you run it.

You shouldn’t be loading it if you don’t trust it to run.

By: Legal Forms

Legal Forms — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:43:39 +0000

I agree, there's nothing worse for mobile applications. Surely it's not unreasonable to expect an "app" to work the way it was designed to! Frank Sullivan legal forms Website Owner

By: iphone forum

iphone forum — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:14:22 +0000

Thinking about getting an iphone but unsure about something? Check out iPhone Answers at http://www.iphoneanswers.org

By: VaporWarning » Blog Archive » Thoughts on desktop Linux incompatibilities with iPhone and Android

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:24:42 +0000

[...] we’d still be screwed. Platform restrictions disallow several key abilities. Case in point, we could not background our iTunes-replacement music player while we browsed the web (or did anything else, for that [...]

By: iTouch | TechnoMagicians Blog

iTouch | TechnoMagicians Blog — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:00:40 +0000

[...] Update: Couple of articles about this subject. One from DailyTech and the other from TechCrunch. Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]

By: 4 « Turnstile

4 « Turnstile — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:13:36 +0000

[...] I’d love to drain all my iPhone battery due to a bunch of apps that keeps working in background. Silly, [...]

By: iPhone creativity – Third party background processes | miki.s

iPhone creativity – Third party background processes | miki.s — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:26:16 +0000

[...] Entwicklungsumgebung. Anfangs euphorisch und im späteren Verlauf immer nüchterner betrachtet (iPhone SDK And Restrictions: Some Of The Details Aren’t Great., Daring Fireball: The Flip Side of the Multitasking Argument, Daring Fireball: One App at a Time). [...]

By: TechCrunch en français » Et voici les nouvelles applications pour l’iPhone

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:38:31 +0000

[...] sur le kit de developpement de l’iPhone annoncé en Mars. Ces applications auront certaines limitations (ne fonctionne qu’une seule application à la fois et des services VoIP seulement avec WiFi, [...]

By: Here Come The New iPhone Apps

Here Come The New iPhone Apps — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:45:01 +0000

[...] last March, will be distributed through the upcoming iPhone App Store. These apps will have some limitations (you can only run one app at a time and VOIP services only work via WiFi, for instance), but they [...]

By: lynnfredricks.com / The Business of the iPhone SDK Part I

lynnfredricks.com / The Business of the iPhone SDK Part I — Sun, 25 May 2008 23:33:44 +0000

[...] has been widely reported that you will follow Apple guidelines in developing your applications – or else. While this annoys [...]

By: Mobile Phone News From Omio » Blog Archive » The iPhone Software Roadmap

Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:47:03 +0000

[...] can see this, Tech Crunch have kindly embedded the document in their article, which you can read here (scroll down to the [...]

By: The iPhone SDK, not as shiny as it was yesterday. | Technology Viewer

The iPhone SDK, not as shiny as it was yesterday. | Technology Viewer — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:09:42 +0000

[...] iPhone SDK And Restrictions: Some Of The Details Aren’t Great. | TechCrunch [...]

By: No background applications using iPhone SDK | Mobileography

No background applications using iPhone SDK | Mobileography — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:40:22 +0000

[...] example provided by TechCrunch: instant messaging applications (we saw a demo of an AIM version at the event today), can’t run [...]

By: Android va-t-il croquer la pomme ? » Le mordu de technologie

Android va-t-il croquer la pomme ? » Le mordu de technologie — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:24:23 +0000

[...] à disposition il y a une dizaine de jours le SDK de l’iPhone, celui-ci offre nettement moins de possibilités. ). Pour appuyer cet esprit de partage et de communauté et parce-qu’il a bien compris [...]

By: chush.net

chush.net — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:02:00 +0000

Just read the SDK docs. What a shame! One can do SO much more with windows mobile than with an iPhone. Who would think that Apple would be much more closed for developers than MS.

By: Episode #5 - Luminary Thumb - UnNamed Tech Podcast

Episode #5 - Luminary Thumb - UnNamed Tech Podcast — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:05:33 +0000

[...] SDK discussion iPhone SDK And Restrictions: Some Of The Details Aren’t Great. - Techcrunch iphone lego-touch: millions of bricks in your pocket - Technabob iPhone 2.0: [...]

By: Constraints or Limitations: Choose One at Good Idea! Now find a better one.

Constraints or Limitations: Choose One at Good Idea! Now find a better one. — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:17:25 +0000

[...] limitation example from TechCrunch on the release of the iPhone API: Perhaps future versions of the iPhone, with additional CPU and memory resources, won’t have [...]

By: Tid Bits - Tech, Life, Entrepreneurship » First glance inside the new iPhone app store

Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:27:39 +0000

[...] ModMyiFone. Two reputable sources for information of this kind. For more information visit here and here. Digg [...]

By: If the iPhone SDK is a “joke”, Apple will be laughing all the way to the bank » VentureBeat

Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:44:08 +0000

[...] API usage, no SIM unlocking and not having the ability to run more than one application at a time. Mike Arrington of Techcrunch enumerated some of restrictions right after the announcement, and Zac Bowling extends upon [...]

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:02:14 +0000

For the Android less desirable because Java is bloated/slow/… folks. The language is Java and even the first pass of the compiler, but it targets the Dalvik virtual machine, not a Sun JRE. That said, an implementation of Java ME appears to be available for Android from Esmertec, http://www.esmertec.com/, an Open Handset Alliance member.

http://code.goo...is-android.html

From the above URL.

“Every Android application runs in its own process, with its own instance of the Dalvik virtual machine. Dalvik has been written so that a device can run multiple VMs efficiently. The Dalvik VM executes files in the Dalvik Executable (.dex) format which is optimized for minimal memory footprint. The VM is register-based, and runs classes compiled by a Java language compiler that have been transformed into the .dex format by the included “dx” tool.”

And finally intelligent state saving does not satisfy event based requirements, or allow for providing audio while a user views something else.

By: Rusty Shackleford

Rusty Shackleford — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:45:21 +0000

I’m surprised Apple’s thugs, I mean lawyers haven’t had that document removed from your site y et.

By: HardMac’s Blog » Blog Archive » Whiners, start your engines [UPDATED]

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:35 +0000

[...] (actually more tech pundits than real developers) all over the web, for example here, here and here. It’s just about being slightly fed-up with people never ever being satisfied with what they [...]

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:10:41 +0000

P.S.
It also appears the first 5 post on this site are completely bogus. Look at the names. lame. When real people started posting your article turned into a joke.

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:05:22 +0000

oh man, really? You guys never quit do you. Talk about a gigantic exaggeration, your picture is absolutely over the top. Your bagging on something that isn’t even out yet. seriously, you have no cred. none. zero.

I’ll finish by saying this. Get off the “look at me I’m a smarty pants” band wagon and stop thinking your cool by finding every little imperfection. Bottom line, it’s much more interesting to read articles about what you can do not what you can’t do.

Oh, btw. Your are breaking the developers agreement by posting the UI guidelines. And here you are bagging on apple, you can’t even follow the agreement you made. Amazing!