<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ziff Davis Media Takes A Dip In The Deadpool</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ogman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018929</link>
		<dc:creator>ogman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018929</guid>
		<description>There's a good explanation of what is actually going on here: http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=8657645&#38;publicUserId=1002446

Pretty much sound like this changes nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a good explanation of what is actually going on here: <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=8657645&amp;publicUserId=1002446" rel="nofollow">http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntr.....Id=1002446</a></p>
<p>Pretty much sound like this changes nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018665</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018665</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm sure ZDM will be out of the deadpool. It has too many well-known properties not to be able to do something reasonable with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m sure ZDM will be out of the deadpool. It has too many well-known properties not to be able to do something reasonable with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018502</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018502</guid>
		<description>1up seems to be the only thing they have going for them, which is kinda of sad, because its not exactly growing by leaps and bounds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1up seems to be the only thing they have going for them, which is kinda of sad, because its not exactly growing by leaps and bounds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Chang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018267</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018267</guid>
		<description>It's actually a common misconception that ZDNet is part of Ziff Davis Media - it isn't. It used to be, but was sold off in a previous restructuring of debt. (ZDNet is now owned by CNET). Also, Ziff Davis Media and Ziff Davis Enterprise are two different companies now...another thing that not many people realize. 

I am not so sure that Ziff Davis is going to stay in the deadpool...its debt was crippling, but if it can emerge from Chapter 11, it might be able to make some headway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually a common misconception that ZDNet is part of Ziff Davis Media - it isn&#8217;t. It used to be, but was sold off in a previous restructuring of debt. (ZDNet is now owned by CNET). Also, Ziff Davis Media and Ziff Davis Enterprise are two different companies now&#8230;another thing that not many people realize. </p>
<p>I am not so sure that Ziff Davis is going to stay in the deadpool&#8230;its debt was crippling, but if it can emerge from Chapter 11, it might be able to make some headway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiyama</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018262</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiyama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018262</guid>
		<description>1up's new review grading system is a huge improvement, and 1up Yours and the 1up Show are fantastic podcasts...here's hoping they survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1up&#8217;s new review grading system is a huge improvement, and 1up Yours and the 1up Show are fantastic podcasts&#8230;here&#8217;s hoping they survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod / techwatching.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018254</link>
		<dc:creator>rod / techwatching.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018254</guid>
		<description>I would agree with Jimmy D, that much of the content  produced from ZD was very weak - their strategy always seemed to be to produce as much as possible with the hope that saturation of markets would lead to customers. That being said, of late their blogs seem to have picked things up... good insights and reportage.

No blog network needs 225 million in financing however. Corporately, ZD should have spun off the blog network into its own entity and traded ownership in the subsidiary against their debts. Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with Jimmy D, that much of the content  produced from ZD was very weak - their strategy always seemed to be to produce as much as possible with the hope that saturation of markets would lead to customers. That being said, of late their blogs seem to have picked things up&#8230; good insights and reportage.</p>
<p>No blog network needs 225 million in financing however. Corporately, ZD should have spun off the blog network into its own entity and traded ownership in the subsidiary against their debts. Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018235</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018235</guid>
		<description>theres a blog entry on techcrunch pg 2 that triggers phishing filters

its really annoying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres a blog entry on techcrunch pg 2 that triggers phishing filters</p>
<p>its really annoying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy D</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018214</guid>
		<description>ZDnet was terrible! PC Magazine was perpetually dumbed down with tons of advertisements and their idea of a motherboard review was 2 paragraphs parroting info contained in press releases. I hope CNet is next to go down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZDnet was terrible! PC Magazine was perpetually dumbed down with tons of advertisements and their idea of a motherboard review was 2 paragraphs parroting info contained in press releases. I hope CNet is next to go down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posties.us</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018196</link>
		<dc:creator>Posties.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018196</guid>
		<description>Fold everything under news.com - niche sites are too abundant and easily duplicated if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fold everything under news.com - niche sites are too abundant and easily duplicated if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt K.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018193</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/ziff-davis-media-takes-a-dip-in-the-deadpool/#comment-2018193</guid>
		<description>Saw this on digg.
It's sad to see it go.
But Ziff was half way between the new media and the old media.

As far as I know, Ziff will continue operations as normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this on digg.<br />
It&#8217;s sad to see it go.<br />
But Ziff was half way between the new media and the old media.</p>
<p>As far as I know, Ziff will continue operations as normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.296 seconds -->
