<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jangl Turns On Audio Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:28:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TechPavan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2018840</link>
		<dc:creator>TechPavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2018840</guid>
		<description>Will this Jangl work for India?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this Jangl work for India?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adolf bin Streisand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2018547</link>
		<dc:creator>Adolf bin Streisand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2018547</guid>
		<description>Same question i ask everytime a post like this is made:

1) How many calls are you processing a day? 

And none of the Js have ever answered the question.

Why is this relevant? Because they&#039;re consuming telephony/bandwidth, and are paying someone for transport. There&#039;s NO getting around that.

The ad supported model is valid, but one must have millions of calls DAILY before its possible to be interesting to advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same question i ask everytime a post like this is made:</p>
<p>1) How many calls are you processing a day? </p>
<p>And none of the Js have ever answered the question.</p>
<p>Why is this relevant? Because they&#8217;re consuming telephony/bandwidth, and are paying someone for transport. There&#8217;s NO getting around that.</p>
<p>The ad supported model is valid, but one must have millions of calls DAILY before its possible to be interesting to advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2018474</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2018474</guid>
		<description>I find audio ads too annoying to have my time wasted on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find audio ads too annoying to have my time wasted on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2018418</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2018418</guid>
		<description>this is the first tyoe of &#039;ad&#039; based calling that i would consider using.  but i would actually prefer if it worked more like a calling card. i would call, listen to an ad, and than get a dial tone. if companies like brring that have people calling me listen to ads think i would use there service they are absolutely crazy; and i would likely break off any friend ship with someone who gave me a brring number to call them. i also would never use a service like globe7 that does not present ads but rather collect information through surveys, etc. in exchange for call credit.

i am pretty sure advertisers are not interested in me. but the absolute only chance they have of getting me as a &#039;customer&#039; is if the ads target me(not those calling me) and are ads in the traditional sense not &#039;data mining&#039; operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the first tyoe of &#8216;ad&#8217; based calling that i would consider using.  but i would actually prefer if it worked more like a calling card. i would call, listen to an ad, and than get a dial tone. if companies like brring that have people calling me listen to ads think i would use there service they are absolutely crazy; and i would likely break off any friend ship with someone who gave me a brring number to call them. i also would never use a service like globe7 that does not present ads but rather collect information through surveys, etc. in exchange for call credit.</p>
<p>i am pretty sure advertisers are not interested in me. but the absolute only chance they have of getting me as a &#8216;customer&#8217; is if the ads target me(not those calling me) and are ads in the traditional sense not &#8216;data mining&#8217; operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are You Listening?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2018307</link>
		<dc:creator>Are You Listening?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2018307</guid>
		<description>All the &quot;watch/listen to ads in return for X&quot; stuff is dumb.  As an advertiser, do you really want to advertise to someone who won&#039;t pay for:

a) Software - there&#039;s some lame VC funded startup that you featured before that lets you download things from Download.com for free if you do a credit check from Experian or something

b) International calling - well what will you buy then?  Food?  You probably don&#039;t pay attention to ads anyway if you use Jangl.

Moreover, once the ads become intrusive, someone else with a ton of VC money comes along and does it for free and you&#039;re f-ed. 

Good work Jangl.  Please blow some more VC money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the &#8220;watch/listen to ads in return for X&#8221; stuff is dumb.  As an advertiser, do you really want to advertise to someone who won&#8217;t pay for:</p>
<p>a) Software &#8211; there&#8217;s some lame VC funded startup that you featured before that lets you download things from Download.com for free if you do a credit check from Experian or something</p>
<p>b) International calling &#8211; well what will you buy then?  Food?  You probably don&#8217;t pay attention to ads anyway if you use Jangl.</p>
<p>Moreover, once the ads become intrusive, someone else with a ton of VC money comes along and does it for free and you&#8217;re f-ed. </p>
<p>Good work Jangl.  Please blow some more VC money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LocalHand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2017967</link>
		<dc:creator>LocalHand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2017967</guid>
		<description>Blyk in the UK makes a much better job by giving away free voice minutes and SMS in return of customers opting-in to receive SMS/MMS ads.

They started in Sept 07 and they already have about 30,000 customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blyk in the UK makes a much better job by giving away free voice minutes and SMS in return of customers opting-in to receive SMS/MMS ads.</p>
<p>They started in Sept 07 and they already have about 30,000 customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LocalHand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-2017961</link>
		<dc:creator>LocalHand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/06/jangls-turnning-on-audio-ads/#comment-2017961</guid>
		<description>The market for audio ads prior or during calls is limited since it is too intrusive.

There are better mobile advertising-supported models out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market for audio ads prior or during calls is limited since it is too intrusive.</p>
<p>There are better mobile advertising-supported models out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
