<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SeaDragon In Silverlight: The Coolest Bit From Mix Keynote One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Silverlight 2 Deep Zoom really is something new - Jon Galloway</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2047902</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Silverlight 2 Deep Zoom really is something new - Jon Galloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2047902</guid>
		<description>[...] Hard Rock Memorabilia site got a lot of press MIX 08; TechCrunch called it the coolest part of the MIX keynote. It takes advantage of a new Silverlight 2 feature called Deep Zoom, which allows for smooth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hard Rock Memorabilia site got a lot of press MIX 08; TechCrunch called it the coolest part of the MIX keynote. It takes advantage of a new Silverlight 2 feature called Deep Zoom, which allows for smooth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Prowse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2042228</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Prowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2042228</guid>
		<description>This is quite annoying - it doesn't support Safari on Windows. If Microsoft is going to try to take on Flash, then they need to make their product available on as many platforms as Flash. Trying to force users to use their web browser just isn't going to cut it. And if Microsoft isn't putting the resources behind Silverlight to make it work on browsers like Safari, then they can't expect it to succeed. They either need to do it right or they can't expect to be taken seriously as a platform provider. Whatever happened to the "new, open" Microsoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite annoying - it doesn&#8217;t support Safari on Windows. If Microsoft is going to try to take on Flash, then they need to make their product available on as many platforms as Flash. Trying to force users to use their web browser just isn&#8217;t going to cut it. And if Microsoft isn&#8217;t putting the resources behind Silverlight to make it work on browsers like Safari, then they can&#8217;t expect it to succeed. They either need to do it right or they can&#8217;t expect to be taken seriously as a platform provider. Whatever happened to the &#8220;new, open&#8221; Microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2027775</link>
		<dc:creator>jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2027775</guid>
		<description>Hi chris,

but the website you posted is very bad example to compare to deep zoom.
The example is slow and not smooth. When i zoom in i have to wait nearly 30- 60 seconds before the resolution change. Its big pixel look when you zoom in. And the user feeling is bad, because to use the big buttons can´t be compare to use the mouse like the demo in deep zoom. 

jens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi chris,</p>
<p>but the website you posted is very bad example to compare to deep zoom.<br />
The example is slow and not smooth. When i zoom in i have to wait nearly 30- 60 seconds before the resolution change. Its big pixel look when you zoom in. And the user feeling is bad, because to use the big buttons can´t be compare to use the mouse like the demo in deep zoom. </p>
<p>jens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2026219</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2026219</guid>
		<description>Lots of claim with no real understanding of the underling technology of SeaDragon. The real difference with Zoomify or Google Maps, or HD View from MS research, is that SeaDragon allows zooming on a COLLECTION of images. That's what different, and that's what hard. Images can be of different resolution, and still it zooms seamlessly. Pretty hard stuff to do when you think of it. I know because we do it, and it's hard. BTW we do it in Flash, and we also zoom on video. 

For those interested they can see here hi-res pictures of Van Gogh paintings: http://www.zoomomail.com/b8612b694c69d783a5ccf7dc9b284ec9

Or check out the site: www.zoomorama.com , download the authoring tool and start having Zooming fun time with your 10Mpixels pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of claim with no real understanding of the underling technology of SeaDragon. The real difference with Zoomify or Google Maps, or HD View from MS research, is that SeaDragon allows zooming on a COLLECTION of images. That&#8217;s what different, and that&#8217;s what hard. Images can be of different resolution, and still it zooms seamlessly. Pretty hard stuff to do when you think of it. I know because we do it, and it&#8217;s hard. BTW we do it in Flash, and we also zoom on video. </p>
<p>For those interested they can see here hi-res pictures of Van Gogh paintings: <a href="http://www.zoomomail.com/b8612b694c69d783a5ccf7dc9b284ec9" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoomomail.com/b8612.....dc9b284ec9</a></p>
<p>Or check out the site: <a href="http://www.zoomorama.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoomorama.com</a> , download the authoring tool and start having Zooming fun time with your 10Mpixels pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2021815</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2021815</guid>
		<description>"You can make your own Deep Zoom (or SeaDragon thingy) here."

Where??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can make your own Deep Zoom (or SeaDragon thingy) here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018923</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018923</guid>
		<description>I only had a small issue with it not reloading after installing the latest Silverlight. But other than that, it's AWESOME.

Zooming in and out of all that data was quick and simple. Info came up as I got into more details, and it's quite compelling. Very interesting. 

You can make your own Deep Zoom (or SeaDragon thingy) here.

http://blogs.msdn.com/expression/archive/2008/03/05/download-the-preview-of-the-deep-zoom-composer.aspx

The same technology I think.

And for you Mac users, you would think OS X is the most highly support for OS in the world, isn't it? Silverlight is still in beta btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only had a small issue with it not reloading after installing the latest Silverlight. But other than that, it&#8217;s AWESOME.</p>
<p>Zooming in and out of all that data was quick and simple. Info came up as I got into more details, and it&#8217;s quite compelling. Very interesting. </p>
<p>You can make your own Deep Zoom (or SeaDragon thingy) here.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/expression/archive/2008/03/05/download-the-preview-of-the-deep-zoom-composer.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/expressi.....poser.aspx</a></p>
<p>The same technology I think.</p>
<p>And for you Mac users, you would think OS X is the most highly support for OS in the world, isn&#8217;t it? Silverlight is still in beta btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018901</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018901</guid>
		<description>chris  - I cant see the link to the site!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chris  - I cant see the link to the site!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018649</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018649</guid>
		<description>@skc - when you visit the site, click the 'view the mosaic' button - from there you'll be able to zoom in (and out) of a very high resolution image of a photo-mosaic (we broke the guiness world record for the creating the largest ever photomosaic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@skc - when you visit the site, click the &#8216;view the mosaic&#8217; button - from there you&#8217;ll be able to zoom in (and out) of a very high resolution image of a photo-mosaic (we broke the guiness world record for the creating the largest ever photomosaic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018363</link>
		<dc:creator>skc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018363</guid>
		<description>Chris, sorry...what is your site supposed to do exactly. I haven't been able to figure it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, sorry&#8230;what is your site supposed to do exactly. I haven&#8217;t been able to figure it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2018333</guid>
		<description>advertboy. Yes Seadragon is a component of PhotoSynth that was Acquired (not developed in the lab), but that's not innovative. That's not what makes Photosynth inspiring nor revolutionary. The ability to synthesize 1000's of images from numerous sources into a single psuedo 3D image, now that is revolutionary. The algorithm that point cloud uses is what makes Photosynth really sing, now that's revolutionary.

Maybe you can articulate what makes Seadragon innovative. You probably will do a much better job than what MS was able to do. I know you're a Silverlight developer so maybe you can educate us on the technological advances that Seadragon makes. I think most of us would love to advance the UX of our users, if Seadragon can do it, I'd love to expend the time to learn it. 

But it appears to me and others that it isn't anything new, nor does it do anything better than what Zoomify does. The backend for zoomify is very easy to use, it democratizes the use of advanced technology to those who aren't coders. I've used both Zoomify and a free application that produces the processed images you use in Google Maps to navigate giga pixels images. 

I agree with you that if Silverlight pushes Adobe to make Flash and other applications better, we all will benefit. And you are right that should be the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>advertboy. Yes Seadragon is a component of PhotoSynth that was Acquired (not developed in the lab), but that&#8217;s not innovative. That&#8217;s not what makes Photosynth inspiring nor revolutionary. The ability to synthesize 1000&#8217;s of images from numerous sources into a single psuedo 3D image, now that is revolutionary. The algorithm that point cloud uses is what makes Photosynth really sing, now that&#8217;s revolutionary.</p>
<p>Maybe you can articulate what makes Seadragon innovative. You probably will do a much better job than what MS was able to do. I know you&#8217;re a Silverlight developer so maybe you can educate us on the technological advances that Seadragon makes. I think most of us would love to advance the UX of our users, if Seadragon can do it, I&#8217;d love to expend the time to learn it. </p>
<p>But it appears to me and others that it isn&#8217;t anything new, nor does it do anything better than what Zoomify does. The backend for zoomify is very easy to use, it democratizes the use of advanced technology to those who aren&#8217;t coders. I&#8217;ve used both Zoomify and a free application that produces the processed images you use in Google Maps to navigate giga pixels images. </p>
<p>I agree with you that if Silverlight pushes Adobe to make Flash and other applications better, we all will benefit. And you are right that should be the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechMonster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017928</link>
		<dc:creator>TechMonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017928</guid>
		<description>JPEG2000. Wavelets. This is supposed to be the revolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JPEG2000. Wavelets. This is supposed to be the revolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017806</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017806</guid>
		<description>For those of you questioning Zoomify  - check out this site that I developed last year: http://www.tooheysnewworldrecord.com.au/offline/main.html

Then tell me that it doesn't compare to Microsoft's 'new' technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you questioning Zoomify  - check out this site that I developed last year: <a href="http://www.tooheysnewworldrecord.com.au/offline/main.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tooheysnewworldreco...../main.html</a></p>
<p>Then tell me that it doesn&#8217;t compare to Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;new&#8217; technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017596</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017596</guid>
		<description>Not so much a "bad install experience" as a non-existent one.  

  "Microsoft Silverlight may not be supported on your computer's hardware
  or operating system. "

...and indeed it isn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much a &#8220;bad install experience&#8221; as a non-existent one.  </p>
<p>  &#8220;Microsoft Silverlight may not be supported on your computer&#8217;s hardware<br />
  or operating system. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;and indeed it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: advertboy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017591</link>
		<dc:creator>advertboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017591</guid>
		<description>completely agree.. my point was that what they've achieved in 2 versions is amazing. In my opinion they install process is flawless.

As for the install issues people are saying they are experiencing, i believe it may be because they had the issue of having a version (1.1) installed which is a developer version not advised to be installed by ordinary people. Just guessing here thou!

The install process I've had with SL has been flawless, and I put my dummy user hat when I installed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>completely agree.. my point was that what they&#8217;ve achieved in 2 versions is amazing. In my opinion they install process is flawless.</p>
<p>As for the install issues people are saying they are experiencing, i believe it may be because they had the issue of having a version (1.1) installed which is a developer version not advised to be installed by ordinary people. Just guessing here thou!</p>
<p>The install process I&#8217;ve had with SL has been flawless, and I put my dummy user hat when I installed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AW</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017572</link>
		<dc:creator>AW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017572</guid>
		<description>@23: The problem here is that Silverlight 2 is competing with Flash 9. Flash might have had trouble in its early years, but that was a long time ago. Silverlight is competing against a relatively mature product now, so there's no valid "well, Flash 1 was probably buggy too" excuse to be had here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@23: The problem here is that Silverlight 2 is competing with Flash 9. Flash might have had trouble in its early years, but that was a long time ago. Silverlight is competing against a relatively mature product now, so there&#8217;s no valid &#8220;well, Flash 1 was probably buggy too&#8221; excuse to be had here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: advertboy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017485</link>
		<dc:creator>advertboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017485</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha You quoted photsynth as inspiring.. Guess what seadragon is the technology in photosynth that you so highly praised!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha You quoted photsynth as inspiring.. Guess what seadragon is the technology in photosynth that you so highly praised!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: advertboy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017482</link>
		<dc:creator>advertboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017482</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately if you were one of the few that installed silverlight 1.1 alpha you may need to uninstall it manually. This may be the issue you guys are getting! 

When flash was version 1 moving int version 2 I'm sure it would have had the same teething problems so don't give me the all mightier than god argument that flash is better than silverlight because their install process works..

As for the adoption rates, so what if flash is 90+% Doesn't mean that new technologies shouldn't try to enter this space. That is where innovation is stimulated. If there was no-one to push flash then they would be moving at a much slower rate! You should all be thanking Microsoft for stiring the flash adobe/flash giant!

And for your information seadragon is nothing like zoomify or GIS systems or any other technology out there! Get your facts straight before you compare. Seadragon is in a league of it's own, it really is a new technology that came out of the labs that no one else in the world can do! 

Do your research before making stupid comments that make you look like idiots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately if you were one of the few that installed silverlight 1.1 alpha you may need to uninstall it manually. This may be the issue you guys are getting! </p>
<p>When flash was version 1 moving int version 2 I&#8217;m sure it would have had the same teething problems so don&#8217;t give me the all mightier than god argument that flash is better than silverlight because their install process works..</p>
<p>As for the adoption rates, so what if flash is 90+% Doesn&#8217;t mean that new technologies shouldn&#8217;t try to enter this space. That is where innovation is stimulated. If there was no-one to push flash then they would be moving at a much slower rate! You should all be thanking Microsoft for stiring the flash adobe/flash giant!</p>
<p>And for your information seadragon is nothing like zoomify or GIS systems or any other technology out there! Get your facts straight before you compare. Seadragon is in a league of it&#8217;s own, it really is a new technology that came out of the labs that no one else in the world can do! </p>
<p>Do your research before making stupid comments that make you look like idiots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017481</guid>
		<description>Take a look at http://xrez.com/sea07_giga.html This is a much more powerful example. These guys have been doing hi res giga-pixel imagery for a long time. If you do a demo that supposed to make Scoble cry the least you could do is acquire imagery that is worth a lick. If you look at the Hard Rock demo, it's the same idea. It's sliced images loading off a grid system. 

Ha Ha Ha, I think you're missing the point. This is nothing new. It's been done before and done a lot better. The PhotoSynth demo at Ted, that was inspiring. This is pedestrian. Go look at the xrez examples. Multi Gigapixel images. Many well over 10 Gigapixels. The Bo Didley example means Didley, it doesn't load a 400MB file, it shows a glorified thumbnail of the image. As you zoom in it calls for a higher resolution image in the same location within the image. It's a layer. Same as Google Maps. Just with a slicker UI. 

The point is that people have been doing this using tools that are FREE and can be loaded as an AJAX page. No need for a Beta plugin that doesn't install for some.

There's no need to bash other technologies, just to buy into the PR spin. Go look around. It's nothing new. 

If you feel compelled to develop using MS development tools good for you. But being brand agnostic and just striving to deliver a User Experience that is engaging, I'm not impressed and I think most who have actually seen sites like xrez, won't be either. Because there is nothing new. It's mature technology that MS is just bringing to forefront and trying to extract the PR benefits from. Nothing more. It's just another example of how MS has lost it's innovation capability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at <a href="http://xrez.com/sea07_giga.html" rel="nofollow">http://xrez.com/sea07_giga.html</a> This is a much more powerful example. These guys have been doing hi res giga-pixel imagery for a long time. If you do a demo that supposed to make Scoble cry the least you could do is acquire imagery that is worth a lick. If you look at the Hard Rock demo, it&#8217;s the same idea. It&#8217;s sliced images loading off a grid system. </p>
<p>Ha Ha Ha, I think you&#8217;re missing the point. This is nothing new. It&#8217;s been done before and done a lot better. The PhotoSynth demo at Ted, that was inspiring. This is pedestrian. Go look at the xrez examples. Multi Gigapixel images. Many well over 10 Gigapixels. The Bo Didley example means Didley, it doesn&#8217;t load a 400MB file, it shows a glorified thumbnail of the image. As you zoom in it calls for a higher resolution image in the same location within the image. It&#8217;s a layer. Same as Google Maps. Just with a slicker UI. </p>
<p>The point is that people have been doing this using tools that are FREE and can be loaded as an AJAX page. No need for a Beta plugin that doesn&#8217;t install for some.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no need to bash other technologies, just to buy into the PR spin. Go look around. It&#8217;s nothing new. </p>
<p>If you feel compelled to develop using MS development tools good for you. But being brand agnostic and just striving to deliver a User Experience that is engaging, I&#8217;m not impressed and I think most who have actually seen sites like xrez, won&#8217;t be either. Because there is nothing new. It&#8217;s mature technology that MS is just bringing to forefront and trying to extract the PR benefits from. Nothing more. It&#8217;s just another example of how MS has lost it&#8217;s innovation capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017473</link>
		<dc:creator>Sri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017473</guid>
		<description>This is gr8!

For all those who bitch about the technology, go to http://blogs.msdn.com/expression/archive/2008/03/05/download-the-preview-of-the-deep-zoom-composer.aspx and create a DeepZoom control of your own photos and see how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is gr8!</p>
<p>For all those who bitch about the technology, go to <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/expression/archive/2008/03/05/download-the-preview-of-the-deep-zoom-composer.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/expressi.....poser.aspx</a> and create a DeepZoom control of your own photos and see how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017468</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017468</guid>
		<description>I believe Seadragon is based on the JPEG2000 standard, which allows for the real-time unencoding of arbitrary levels of detail on arbitrarily high-resolution imagery. As a poster above mentioned this has been common in GIS applications for a while (including some stuff I worked on when I was at www.idelix.com), but I think there is some real promise for it in consumer-level apps. I look forward to seeing where this goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Seadragon is based on the JPEG2000 standard, which allows for the real-time unencoding of arbitrary levels of detail on arbitrarily high-resolution imagery. As a poster above mentioned this has been common in GIS applications for a while (including some stuff I worked on when I was at <a href="http://www.idelix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.idelix.com</a>), but I think there is some real promise for it in consumer-level apps. I look forward to seeing where this goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micro Who?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017438</link>
		<dc:creator>Micro Who?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017438</guid>
		<description>Isn't Microsoft Dead Yet ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Microsoft Dead Yet ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE: TheChris and CG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017413</link>
		<dc:creator>RE: TheChris and CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017413</guid>
		<description>Silverlight 2 is in beta 1. Released for 1 day. I imagine that the installation process is in beta, too. Even then, it's not that bad. I could figure it out. Go to the memorabilia page, click the Silverlight badge, run the SL installer, refresh the page. It works. Not that hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silverlight 2 is in beta 1. Released for 1 day. I imagine that the installation process is in beta, too. Even then, it&#8217;s not that bad. I could figure it out. Go to the memorabilia page, click the Silverlight badge, run the SL installer, refresh the page. It works. Not that hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Install Issue? Not me.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017404</link>
		<dc:creator>Install Issue? Not me.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017404</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone having such a bad install experience? When I went to the main page, I got a nice screenshot with the Silverlight install logo, clicked it, which installed the plug-in, then I went back to the page and it worked fine as expected.

It does seem like the site is a little slow right now. Probably choking a bit with all the traffic from all the attention from this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone having such a bad install experience? When I went to the main page, I got a nice screenshot with the Silverlight install logo, clicked it, which installed the plug-in, then I went back to the page and it worked fine as expected.</p>
<p>It does seem like the site is a little slow right now. Probably choking a bit with all the traffic from all the attention from this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha Ha Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha Ha Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017394</guid>
		<description>I agree that the photography could be better. But if you watch the keynote, the speaker mentions that all they could get their hands on were the images used by Hard Rock for print work.

But did you see the Bo Diddley guitar at the end? That *one image* alone is 400 MB.

Choke on that zoomify!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the photography could be better. But if you watch the keynote, the speaker mentions that all they could get their hands on were the images used by Hard Rock for print work.</p>
<p>But did you see the Bo Diddley guitar at the end? That *one image* alone is 400 MB.</p>
<p>Choke on that zoomify!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017393</link>
		<dc:creator>CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/seadragon-in-silverlight-the-coolest-bit-from-mix-keynote-one/#comment-2017393</guid>
		<description>Agreed: F- on the whole installation process. 

At least Flash has already gone through the growing pains of intermittent updates and can minimize the disruption. 

Hell, I think the installation/upgrade path for running meez.com's java applet is smoother than this. 

CG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed: F- on the whole installation process. </p>
<p>At least Flash has already gone through the growing pains of intermittent updates and can minimize the disruption. </p>
<p>Hell, I think the installation/upgrade path for running meez.com&#8217;s java applet is smoother than this. </p>
<p>CG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.111 seconds -->
