<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photobucket Image Editing Now Provided by FotoFlexer</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: c998c1bf32ee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2287627</link>
		<dc:creator>c998c1bf32ee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2287627</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;c998c1bf32ee...&lt;/strong&gt;

c998c1bf32ee330d0bee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>c998c1bf32ee&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>c998c1bf32ee330d0bee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FotoFlexer Tries To Take On Picnik With a New Look</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2056517</link>
		<dc:creator>www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FotoFlexer Tries To Take On Picnik With a New Look</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2056517</guid>
		<description>[...] Which one you use now is really just a matter of personal preference. (FotoFlexer is more tightly integrated with Photobucket, Picnik is baked into Flickr). I like Picnik. Mike prefers FotoFlexer. But as the traffic graph [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Which one you use now is really just a matter of personal preference. (FotoFlexer is more tightly integrated with Photobucket, Picnik is baked into Flickr). I like Picnik. Mike prefers FotoFlexer. But as the traffic graph [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FotoFlexer Tries To Take On Picnik With a New Look</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2052793</link>
		<dc:creator>FotoFlexer Tries To Take On Picnik With a New Look</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2052793</guid>
		<description>[...] Which one you use now is really just a matter of personal preference. (FotoFlexer is more tightly integrated with Photobucket, Picnik is baked into Flickr). I like Picnik. Mike prefers FotoFlexer. But as the traffic graph [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Which one you use now is really just a matter of personal preference. (FotoFlexer is more tightly integrated with Photobucket, Picnik is baked into Flickr). I like Picnik. Mike prefers FotoFlexer. But as the traffic graph [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2025996</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2025996</guid>
		<description>Snipshot is working great in its integration with ourdoings.com.

I'm not averse to adding other options for online photo sharing later, but Snipshot keeps its interface very simple.  When you crop, preserving the aspect ratio is intuitive.  With the other online photo editors users have more of a learning curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snipshot is working great in its integration with ourdoings.com.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not averse to adding other options for online photo sharing later, but Snipshot keeps its interface very simple.  When you crop, preserving the aspect ratio is intuitive.  With the other online photo editors users have more of a learning curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2018697</link>
		<dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2018697</guid>
		<description>This might be the reason why Picnik made the majority of its pro features free a few weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be the reason why Picnik made the majority of its pro features free a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2018682</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2018682</guid>
		<description>yeah i like the combination of the two services as they work well together.  we have thought about this for cutcaster as well and talked to a few potential partners.  very interested to see how that works out or speaking with anyone that has any ideas for partnerships in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i like the combination of the two services as they work well together.  we have thought about this for cutcaster as well and talked to a few potential partners.  very interested to see how that works out or speaking with anyone that has any ideas for partnerships in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin K</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017918</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017918</guid>
		<description>Hooray!  I am a huge fan of Photobucket and use it for uploading all my pictures; FotoFlexer will greatly enhance the service and simpify the process of cropping, rotating, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray!  I am a huge fan of Photobucket and use it for uploading all my pictures; FotoFlexer will greatly enhance the service and simpify the process of cropping, rotating, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xianhong</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017684</link>
		<dc:creator>Xianhong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017684</guid>
		<description>Sure, this is cool feature,  This will bring lots of fun to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, this is cool feature,  This will bring lots of fun to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yummy_pie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017585</link>
		<dc:creator>yummy_pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017585</guid>
		<description>It's awesome. I think Facebook should incorporate this too. Right now the default Facebook photo thing only allows you to upload and not do much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s awesome. I think Facebook should incorporate this too. Right now the default Facebook photo thing only allows you to upload and not do much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen_Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017342</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen_Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017342</guid>
		<description>FotoFlexer is actually good editing software.  A demo version was released last summer and If your familiar with Fireworks, this is the watered down, user friendly version.

-iTunes, eat your heart out...
http://myspace.com/soundbeastdigital</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FotoFlexer is actually good editing software.  A demo version was released last summer and If your familiar with Fireworks, this is the watered down, user friendly version.</p>
<p>-iTunes, eat your heart out&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://myspace.com/soundbeastdigital" rel="nofollow">http://myspace.com/soundbeastdigital</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017283</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/05/photobucket-image-editing-now-provided-by-fotoflexer/#comment-2017283</guid>
		<description>This is a really great technology. Being able to edit images at the same time at uploading them is very helpful and a nice time saver. I think facebook should try and incorporate this type of technology, people spend a lot of time looking at photos on facebook and I'm sure they would take advantage of this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really great technology. Being able to edit images at the same time at uploading them is very helpful and a nice time saver. I think facebook should try and incorporate this type of technology, people spend a lot of time looking at photos on facebook and I&#8217;m sure they would take advantage of this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.240 seconds -->
