March 3, 2008

AOL: Up To 30 New Sites By The End Of 2008

Duncan Riley

24 comments »

picture-250.pngAOL is to launch at least 12 new sites in the next six months, and between 20 and 30 new sites by the end of the year.

Bill Wilson, AOL Executive Vice President of Programming told Bloomberg that AOL wants “to be sure we are appealing to as many consumers as we can.” Ultimately it’s all about numbers; more web properties should equal more traffic and more advertising revenue.

Erick has asked twice when AOL is going to be spun off in what he calls an “advertising IPO.” The continued mass rollout of new sites, combined with the spinoff of AOL’s dying dialup business, would suggest that the company is beefing itself up for that very purpose.

MG Siegler at VentureBeat does ask an important question though: is this a strategy of quantity over quality?

While certainly there is a logic to that strategy, it’s hard to feel excited about a company that hopes to succeed simply by putting more of its product on the web rather than focusing on improving the sites they already have.

AOL sites still sit in a fairly healthy fourth place behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft; if improving their lot means going wide and niche to draw more people to AOL in an endeavor to sell more ads, it has the potential of working.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Your Company Will Be In Trouble If You Don’t Focus On Product Quality

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. allen stern

    my hope is that it’s not another yahoo strategy of throw up a bunch of stuff and see what sticks…
    http://www.centernetworks.com/.....-new-sites

  2. Dallas J Clark

    I hope at least there is just one login required for all those sites, they should adopt OpenID into these sites.

  3. Frank Church

    That’s immediately what I thought of too Allen. I feel bad for them.

  4. ben

    they must off subscibed to jeff paul’s internet millions program. Must of got 3 of his 10 free websites packages. smart…

  5. Aziz

    … and this is what happens when you partner with the big guy (goog) instead of taking them head on .. too bad .. someone (microsoft, yahoo, aol) please stand up to google ..

  6. Zeplin1 Phil

    Sounds like the SHOTGUN approach to product development.

  7. Alex Rudloff

    “it’s hard to feel excited about a company that hopes to succeed simply by putting more of its product on the web rather than focusing on improving the sites they already have.”

    As if the two strategies were mutually exclusive?

  8. damon

    ahh yes, the old throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks, I thought that was for 1 or 2 man shots in a garage…

  9. dale

    these guys are just pull straws now!!

  10. Mike Taylor

    I think pixnay.com is one of them. which is disappointing

  11. Random Dan

    Someone didn’t read the “Peanut Butter Manifesto”

  12. Spuds

    Will they be any good? I suspect not.

  13. Marah Marie

    @ #1, Allen Stern, good point. You have to log in continously to every seperate site owned by AOL - it’s a total PITA.

    Say you log into XDrive and click on a link from XDrive to BlueString; you have to log in - again.

    Say you want to check your email at that point (online); you have to log into that, too, even if you’re already logged into both XDrive and BlueString.

    In fact, PITA doesn’t even begin to describe the depth of the pain and inconvenience this can cause.

    I don’t think (although I haven’t tried it yet) that using OpenID would solve that problem.

  14. Marah Marie

    Oh, I meant to reply to Allen too in saying that AOL has “thrown up” a ton of websites and portals in the last year; I just think it’s too soon to tell if they’ll “stick” or not (most of their new websites seem pretty decent, BTW…its the comments on them that suck)…but my first reply was actually for #2, Dallas Clark…I must have scrolled too fast.

  15. chris_rock

    http://www. i-guide .ro
    http://www. i-guide .ro
    http://www. i-guide .ro
    http://www. i-guide .ro

  16. skeptik

    Oh, so it is starting to make sense. They are indeed making use of their remaining talent (like the AOL French folks the Alley brags about)

    Asylum was pretty dope.

    Never heard about Walletpop and Stylelist that Microhoo mentioned so I went there and saw other links to their Weblogs content….Engadget, Joystiq, DownloadSquad, AisleDash, Gadling, ParentDish, Luxist, Massively, Cinimatical, TVSquad, Autoblog, DIYLife, etc.

    Are these the sites they are referring to in the article? They are legitimate content that will be helpful to different types of audiences.

  17. Mark

    For what it’s worth, if these “new” sites are like Asylum.com then kudos! Good stuff, relevent content, diversified. Isn’t that what the internet is all about?

  18. eddie

    The reality for those paying attention is the AOL has been leaning into the fragmentation of the web for the last year as they already launched 30 new sites in 2007 and are simply continuing that trend in 2008. Not many have written about the early success of those new launches but a few started to take note. For example in music they introduced Spinner.com, PopEater.com, TheBoomBox.com, etc. all in 2007 and took the site from 5th placed to #1 place according to Comscore in January 2008. They also have #1 sites with Black Voices, TMZ, etc. while new site launches like Asylum.com are already #2 in the men’s lifestyle site (who would have thought AOL could compete in attracting the 18-24 male). They also took back all their women’s and lifestyle sites from Time and and WebMD and launched StyleList and in under a year have the 3rd ranked Health site according to Comscore. Clearly something is working for them but the blogosphere at large has not taken notice. With this news about a dozen more sites (is this really news given they introduced 30 in 2007) maybe we will start to hear more about the heartbeat of AOL as they are not only still alive but seem to be doing the right things to be vital again.

  19. Johnson

    Very “AOL”. exactly what revolutionhealth is doing now.

  20. OpenBurner

    To enter into the hearts of the web2.0 communities, AOL needs
    the equivalents of FeedBurner (Google) and MyBlogLog (Yahoo).

    OpenFeeder and MyBlogFans are waiting for AOL’s acquisition –
    when they debut - soon. AOL just need to reserve a little money
    for these two, at least, in our humble opinion.. :P

  21. Nathan Seth

    AOL Business is now advertising, Advertising means getting right advertising to right audience (targeting audiences). By having more sites, will attract more targeted audience so AOL can deliver exact targeted advertising to get good successful click through.

  22. erick holtz

    Nathan - totally agree. The strategy is the right one and based in Eddie’s comment, AOL is having some success with the work they did in 2007 and the new re-launches as well as the brand new sites. Their old site powered by instyle was web 0.5 while the new StyleList.com is actually much better. Fanhouse is the best sports blog site on the web in my view. I recall a bunch of news around their Finance offering last Nov but not sure how that is doing vs Yahoo Finance. Is their Music site really #1 by Comscore — I don’t think that can be true. and where is Moviefone these days? behind MSN and Yahoo?

  23. mike logan

    Great, 30 slow sites. Love your comment, Ben. mike