<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Touch This: DanceJam Opens To The Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: MySpace in deals with labels, Tudou raises $53M, and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2051175</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: MySpace in deals with labels, Tudou raises $53M, and more &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2051175</guid>
		<description>[...] you read about them, well, you know the end is near,&#8221; says Om. Then again, we survived the launch three weeks ago of MC Hammer&#8217;s DanceJam, so maybe the internet is more resilient this time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you read about them, well, you know the end is near,&#8221; says Om. Then again, we survived the launch three weeks ago of MC Hammer&#8217;s DanceJam, so maybe the internet is more resilient this time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanceJam Brings Dance Battles Online - Betaflow</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2016149</link>
		<dc:creator>DanceJam Brings Dance Battles Online - Betaflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2016149</guid>
		<description>[...] beta on March 3rd. The company has closed $4.5 million in funding, with a some portion coming from TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington. The company intends to bring dance battles to the Internet where users have a &#8220;dance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beta on March 3rd. The company has closed $4.5 million in funding, with a some portion coming from TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington. The company intends to bring dance battles to the Internet where users have a &#8220;dance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProHipHop: Hip Hop Business</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015751</link>
		<dc:creator>ProHipHop: Hip Hop Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DanceJam Launches, So Why the Delay?...&lt;/strong&gt;

So DanceJam finally launches and it's kind of underwhelming. Not that there's anything particular wrong with it except that why did it take so long to launch a product that doesn't seem to use the expert content they put so much time and energy into...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DanceJam Launches, So Why the Delay?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So DanceJam finally launches and it&#8217;s kind of underwhelming. Not that there&#8217;s anything particular wrong with it except that why did it take so long to launch a product that doesn&#8217;t seem to use the expert content they put so much time and energy into&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015161</guid>
		<description>I think the site has potential. However TAKKLE.com has a similar product to that of DanceJam its called Throwdowns. In essence you could do the same exact thing on TAKKLE as you could on DanceJam. Create a Throwdown and label it just for fun: Best Dance Moves. You should check it out, its a relatively new product to the space as well and it looks great.

Good luck to DanceJam however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the site has potential. However TAKKLE.com has a similar product to that of DanceJam its called Throwdowns. In essence you could do the same exact thing on TAKKLE as you could on DanceJam. Create a Throwdown and label it just for fun: Best Dance Moves. You should check it out, its a relatively new product to the space as well and it looks great.</p>
<p>Good luck to DanceJam however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward kim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015152</link>
		<dc:creator>edward kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2015152</guid>
		<description>I had this exact idea about year ago, called YouDanceLikeAFreak.com. I never followed through on it, but nice to know that other people are thinking the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this exact idea about year ago, called YouDanceLikeAFreak.com. I never followed through on it, but nice to know that other people are thinking the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013875</link>
		<dc:creator>gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013875</guid>
		<description>dance jam = fail.

deadpool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dance jam = fail.</p>
<p>deadpool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013846</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013846</guid>
		<description>dancejam 24 hours later:

4 new videos added
all-time top video now has 879 views

I hpoe I am wrong and it does take off, but so far, the only people who think this is cool are the VCs and some commenters above.  maybe we can have a duncan riley v allen stern hyphy battle.  or maybe investor v investor.  come on Michael, throw down and take on the Hammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dancejam 24 hours later:</p>
<p>4 new videos added<br />
all-time top video now has 879 views</p>
<p>I hpoe I am wrong and it does take off, but so far, the only people who think this is cool are the VCs and some commenters above.  maybe we can have a duncan riley v allen stern hyphy battle.  or maybe investor v investor.  come on Michael, throw down and take on the Hammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013561</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013561</guid>
		<description>RE: #18 (My own post)

Sorry. I should have looked around first. They all use the same (almost exact) TOS to shift the onus... the DMCA and Safe Harbor save the day.


Anyway, it's Miller time..... umm, I mean Hammer time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: #18 (My own post)</p>
<p>Sorry. I should have looked around first. They all use the same (almost exact) TOS to shift the onus&#8230; the DMCA and Safe Harbor save the day.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s Miller time&#8230;.. umm, I mean Hammer time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Strellner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013309</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013309</guid>
		<description>I am pleasantly surprised by it.  I thought it was going to be failure when I first read about the concept, but I think it may actually have legs.

Launching, even a beta, on a Saturday is a bad idea though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pleasantly surprised by it.  I thought it was going to be failure when I first read about the concept, but I think it may actually have legs.</p>
<p>Launching, even a beta, on a Saturday is a bad idea though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013279</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013279</guid>
		<description>I really like the battle meme. I reckon the interface is going to develop in a different direction from that of YouTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the battle meme. I reckon the interface is going to develop in a different direction from that of YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonTroll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013224</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013224</guid>
		<description>MC who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013189</link>
		<dc:creator>Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013189</guid>
		<description>$4.5 million pissed away. DanceJam is destined to fail. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4.5 million pissed away. DanceJam is destined to fail. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013133</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013133</guid>
		<description>This is ala Myspace for dance club, pretty cool idea. McHammer been a guess at GigaOm and share his idea on why he build this kind of website to promote Dance style or niche instead kid doing drug somewhere. 
2 thumbs up for McHammer.

Nat
www.workersinc.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ala Myspace for dance club, pretty cool idea. McHammer been a guess at GigaOm and share his idea on why he build this kind of website to promote Dance style or niche instead kid doing drug somewhere.<br />
2 thumbs up for McHammer.</p>
<p>Nat<br />
<a href="http://www.workersinc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.workersinc.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Ackles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013119</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Ackles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013119</guid>
		<description>Wicked Cool, Dance moves... then I saw you had to sign in to post a comment. I left immediately. Comments should be treated like a blog.

Just a tip...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked Cool, Dance moves&#8230; then I saw you had to sign in to post a comment. I left immediately. Comments should be treated like a blog.</p>
<p>Just a tip&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013103</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013103</guid>
		<description>This is the most ridiculous site I have ever seen.  Dance battles?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most ridiculous site I have ever seen.  Dance battles?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013100</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013100</guid>
		<description>Love the slow motion toggle in the videos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the slow motion toggle in the videos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013042</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013042</guid>
		<description>On the plus side, DanceJam has:

1) extended the battle meme in an entertaining way
2) raised a s***load of cash with noting more than an idea
3) allowed Arrington to invest so TC will pimp the site

On the minus side, DanceJam has:

1) launched on a Saturday.  the story will be dead by monday
2) launched with almost 0 content - the top video has 396 views right now despite the TC link
3) launched without any hot chicks (did #5 above even go to the site?)
4) allowed Arrington to invest.  dude is blogging genius but he has bad angel karma

Deadpool in 6 months.  Sorry Michael.  Better luck with Seesmic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the plus side, DanceJam has:</p>
<p>1) extended the battle meme in an entertaining way<br />
2) raised a s***load of cash with noting more than an idea<br />
3) allowed Arrington to invest so TC will pimp the site</p>
<p>On the minus side, DanceJam has:</p>
<p>1) launched on a Saturday.  the story will be dead by monday<br />
2) launched with almost 0 content - the top video has 396 views right now despite the TC link<br />
3) launched without any hot chicks (did #5 above even go to the site?)<br />
4) allowed Arrington to invest.  dude is blogging genius but he has bad angel karma</p>
<p>Deadpool in 6 months.  Sorry Michael.  Better luck with Seesmic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bischke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bischke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013040</guid>
		<description>Kick-ass site.  Really engaging (my girlfriend is addicted already).  Kudos to Geoffrey and the gang at DanceJam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick-ass site.  Really engaging (my girlfriend is addicted already).  Kudos to Geoffrey and the gang at DanceJam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013038</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013038</guid>
		<description>Youtube commanded the bulk of the $1.6 billion payday on the back of copyright infringement. It is very convenient to throw legalese on the user. Hey! But in the mean time, I will take the money and it's valuation.

Works for big corporations all the time.

What's right and what's wrong is all arbitrary. Or so it may seem.

Good luck to Dance Jam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube commanded the bulk of the $1.6 billion payday on the back of copyright infringement. It is very convenient to throw legalese on the user. Hey! But in the mean time, I will take the money and it&#8217;s valuation.</p>
<p>Works for big corporations all the time.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s right and what&#8217;s wrong is all arbitrary. Or so it may seem.</p>
<p>Good luck to Dance Jam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013007</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2013007</guid>
		<description>It's cool. I wish I had thought of it. But I guess if anybody was going to do it, it would be Hammer.

I have one question, though.

How do user-submitted video sites deal with the copyright of the music in the videos? There are gobs of video sites. How come they (or their users) are not all involved in copyright infringement suits?

I read DanceJam's terms of service. It seems like the legalese shifts all the responsibility either to the user (as if some kid with a webcam is going to secure the rights to a song before they include it in their video), or to the copyright owner (the infringement continues until the owner goes through the precise motions to halt it).

Any copyright experts want to chime in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cool. I wish I had thought of it. But I guess if anybody was going to do it, it would be Hammer.</p>
<p>I have one question, though.</p>
<p>How do user-submitted video sites deal with the copyright of the music in the videos? There are gobs of video sites. How come they (or their users) are not all involved in copyright infringement suits?</p>
<p>I read DanceJam&#8217;s terms of service. It seems like the legalese shifts all the responsibility either to the user (as if some kid with a webcam is going to secure the rights to a song before they include it in their video), or to the copyright owner (the infringement continues until the owner goes through the precise motions to halt it).</p>
<p>Any copyright experts want to chime in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012979</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012979</guid>
		<description>Why not post these videos on YouTube and get 100000x more views?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not post these videos on YouTube and get 100000x more views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonestMall.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012968</link>
		<dc:creator>HonestMall.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012968</guid>
		<description>Super happy about this being out!


its kinda funny.   a lot of re-packaging of youtube contentent.  i wonder if this ever got too big they would dissalow them to keep using their videos.

every one of these 12 of these videos are just imported over from youtube:
http://www.dancejam.com/videos?with%5Blesson%5D=true&#38;q=&#38;x=38&#38;y=9&#38;order=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super happy about this being out!</p>
<p>its kinda funny.   a lot of re-packaging of youtube contentent.  i wonder if this ever got too big they would dissalow them to keep using their videos.</p>
<p>every one of these 12 of these videos are just imported over from youtube:<br />
<a href="http://www.dancejam.com/videos?with%5Blesson%5D=true&amp;q=&amp;x=38&amp;y=9&amp;order=" rel="nofollow">http://www.dancejam.com/videos.....amp;order=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dim Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012961</link>
		<dc:creator>Dim Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012961</guid>
		<description>Why can't youtube just throw up a niche site too if it becomes popular, or am I thinking too much like microsoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t youtube just throw up a niche site too if it becomes popular, or am I thinking too much like microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012925</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012925</guid>
		<description>wont touch youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wont touch youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzipan from Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012901</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzipan from Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/01/can-touch-this-dancejam-opens-to-the-public/#comment-2012901</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Mike. Seems the haters have gone into hiding for now. Looks good, I think it'll be a success.

@9 unless you bootstrap something like this yourself, $4.5mm is needed so that the company is well capitalized to properly market itself, hire the right people, and get the product off the ground.

Once it's off the ground, you want to be well capitalized enough to have time to raise another round without having your original investors holding a gun to your head.

That is why you need $4.5MM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Mike. Seems the haters have gone into hiding for now. Looks good, I think it&#8217;ll be a success.</p>
<p>@9 unless you bootstrap something like this yourself, $4.5mm is needed so that the company is well capitalized to properly market itself, hire the right people, and get the product off the ground.</p>
<p>Once it&#8217;s off the ground, you want to be well capitalized enough to have time to raise another round without having your original investors holding a gun to your head.</p>
<p>That is why you need $4.5MM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.090 seconds -->
