Comments on: Ask May Dump Teoma For Google, Layoff 100 People

By: Vivian

Vivian — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:39:50 +0000

Well at some point, when Google and MSN/Yahoo/Ask are squeezing the world, look out for Visvo.com and other like them which are TRUE SEARCH engines rather than ad engines masquerading as search engines

By: ask lover

ask lover — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:24:55 +0000

bye bye teoma.. but what will happen with teoma next.. I wonder

By: hmm

hmm — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:14:17 +0000

not to mention ask has some of the brightest engineers. they deserve to be elsewhere

By: ask user

ask user — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:12:11 +0000

@16, nobody notices grammatical errors and dont feed the bullyman(MS Word)

By: ask user

ask user — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:10:36 +0000

i love ask for its interface and its results are pretty good and sometimes better than google. sad if this happens. so much for google’s monopoly.

By: Julian Kussman

Julian Kussman — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:57:16 +0000

Dear Editors of Techcrunch,
Can someone please run all of Duncan Riley’s stories through MS Word’s grammar and spelling checker? I have yet to see one article he’s written that was free of errors. It really detracts from your professional image.

E.g.: “…Ask may abandon or selling its Teoma search engine…”

By: JimOnline

JimOnline — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:27:33 +0000

After all the whoopla that Ask made (and money spent) to show themselves different from everyone else, it seems they’re throwing in the towel if they go with Google search. What’s the point in typing in Ask.com, when Google.com is the end result?

The fix resulting from downsizing will only be temporary. As “whoopie” wrote, soon all that will be left is Google and Yahoo … and I’m not so sure about Yahoo.

By: whoopie

whoopie — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:30:46 +0000

#4 in a two horse race. turning this thing into a rebranding effort is a no-brainer. the engineering staff is wasting their time, ask.com is a footnote in the market

soon only G and yahoosoft will be left

everyone else is on borrowed time

By: dale

dale — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:23:58 +0000

going to ASk is like a waste of time. You can never find anything.

By: NotABug

NotABug — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:10:10 +0000

To #6, not sure if they’re interested in getting acquired, IAC is hughe, but you never know, if Yahoo! got such an offer from the vole, anything is possible.

Let’s see how this works out for all the people that had deals with ask.com, wonder how a search engine change will affect all the existing partner contracts.

By: Marcus Ruark

Marcus Ruark — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:36:08 +0000

When we announced earlier this week that surveyed users preferred Gigablast’s (http://www.gigablast.com/) search results to Ask.com’s results by a 30% margin in a blind “taste test,” I thought Gigablast might have more time to enjoy the moment. Who knew Ask might raise the white flag so soon…

Admittedly, Gigablast has a long way to go in terms of market share, and a tough road ahead, but our quality search results certainly make us a real alternative to the dwindling group of current search leaders.

Others have said it, but I’ll repeat it: this is certainly going to be an exciting year in search.

Marcus Ruark
Gigablast, Inc.

http://www.gigablast.com

By: Samson

Samson — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:30:31 +0000

It would seem like the decision to approach Google as their complete search provider is more of an executive decision with the end goal towards maximizing their ROI, rather than to advance the ASK brand or technology.

Perhaps for ASK the best bet is to restructure the site as a portal that more finely integrates IAC numerous other assets to provide value to users. Search to me seems like a losing game for them. Googles technology is only going to get better (google will keep pouring more $$$ and more engineers), and its not likely that the ASK team working on search will be able to keep pace.

ASK still has a known brand on the web that can be leveraged in other category’s then to assume the ASK brand can only live by SEARCH.

By: setbrand

setbrand — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:14:31 +0000

Ask is doing well to its sphere, it take some share away from MSN, the traffic to Ask.com significantly grown up, I don’t think it will be acquired by someone in near future.

By: Damien

Damien — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:04:50 +0000

why not just point their domain hosting to google.com and be done with it.

By: jenkins

jenkins — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:56:25 +0000

Yahoo is NOT going to buy Ask.com. Why? They suffer from declining usage and get 70% of their revenue from Google.

By: Jon A.

Jon A. — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:53:15 +0000

I don’t understand this move. It devalues Ask.com as an independent search engine and options to get acquired down the road…

By: Andy Gongea

Andy Gongea — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:48:23 +0000

This is bad bad news. Google is heading into the search engine battle almost alone. Too bad, I was hoping that Ask would gain some market share but it looks like the pretty user interface is not gonna help them.

Kudos for their efforts.

By: SearcH◆ EngineS WEB

SearcH◆ EngineS WEB — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:48:07 +0000

Microsoft may act on this rumor and attempt to acquire them.

Also dont count Yahoo out – Ask is valuable property – and Yahoo did acquire Altavista and AllTheWeb when they could no longer sustain themselves

By: Yakov

Yakov — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:34:35 +0000

The question Aske never answered is how its search is different from Google. No wonder, they are heading to deadpool with their search engine..

By: jenkins

jenkins — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:32:40 +0000

They’re a total BS search engine. All they really care about are those Google links on top of their pages. Everything else is window dressing.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:27:08 +0000

Call me stupid…but isn’t ask a search engine? Or do they call themselves an advertising business?