<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Lawsuits Hit Seven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo facing 7 lawsuits (so far) over Microsoft bid &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2022731</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo facing 7 lawsuits (so far) over Microsoft bid &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2022731</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via TechCrunch] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via TechCrunch] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Schonholz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2010461</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Schonholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2010461</guid>
		<description>I think the best thing an unhappy share-holder can do is liquidate. The only caveat is where there is gross negligence in running the business. But that is a different story all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing an unhappy share-holder can do is liquidate. The only caveat is where there is gross negligence in running the business. But that is a different story all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009177</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009177</guid>
		<description>@2 if your yahoo hires made your website yahoo should be glad they got rid of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2 if your yahoo hires made your website yahoo should be glad they got rid of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009089</guid>
		<description>@3 You obviously don't understand that the board is protected by the business judgment rule, and these lawsuits are a waste of paper because they won't get anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3 You obviously don&#8217;t understand that the board is protected by the business judgment rule, and these lawsuits are a waste of paper because they won&#8217;t get anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandrogas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009044</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandrogas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009044</guid>
		<description>@3:  I do, but a minor stockholder would have more power by removing their investment then by suing the company just because.  Who's to say that Yahoo doesn't pull out some kind of ace from out of nowhere (it's a long shot, but hey, you never know).  If every company that turned down an impromptu offer from another company got sued, then companies would stop going public.

Anyone know who are the people / organizations suing Yahoo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3:  I do, but a minor stockholder would have more power by removing their investment then by suing the company just because.  Who&#8217;s to say that Yahoo doesn&#8217;t pull out some kind of ace from out of nowhere (it&#8217;s a long shot, but hey, you never know).  If every company that turned down an impromptu offer from another company got sued, then companies would stop going public.</p>
<p>Anyone know who are the people / organizations suing Yahoo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009014</guid>
		<description>If they aren't happy with Yahoo, then they should just sell their shares... I don't understand how a lawsuit will do much of anything, any settlement (if there is one) just ends up being paid with lower share values.

Jon
http://woodmarvels.com - Create Unique Memories</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they aren&#8217;t happy with Yahoo, then they should just sell their shares&#8230; I don&#8217;t understand how a lawsuit will do much of anything, any settlement (if there is one) just ends up being paid with lower share values.</p>
<p>Jon<br />
<a href="http://woodmarvels.com" rel="nofollow">http://woodmarvels.com</a> - Create Unique Memories</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009003</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2009003</guid>
		<description>@1 you obviouslyt dont understand that the board has a fidiciary duty for the stockholders to make a profit for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1 you obviouslyt dont understand that the board has a fidiciary duty for the stockholders to make a profit for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2008989</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2008989</guid>
		<description>Thank you Yahoo, our new hires (or your new losses) are working out great over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Yahoo, our new hires (or your new losses) are working out great over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandrogas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2008981</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandrogas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/yahoo-lawsuits-hit-seven/#comment-2008981</guid>
		<description>Concerned parties could have of course made as much of a hubub about the deal as possible, wait for the inevitable shoot through the roof of the stock, then sold and bought Microsoft's lowered stock amounts...  Seems like it might have been a better solution for a longer term payout and they would have made some cash in the interrim.

Not 100% sure why suing a public company because they did something different than what you wanted because your very small share of stock belies that you have very little voice in the running of a larger company.

But so the world turns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned parties could have of course made as much of a hubub about the deal as possible, wait for the inevitable shoot through the roof of the stock, then sold and bought Microsoft&#8217;s lowered stock amounts&#8230;  Seems like it might have been a better solution for a longer term payout and they would have made some cash in the interrim.</p>
<p>Not 100% sure why suing a public company because they did something different than what you wanted because your very small share of stock belies that you have very little voice in the running of a larger company.</p>
<p>But so the world turns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.044 seconds -->
