<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Sorting Through Some Crazy Google/Yahoo Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:19:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ikrzgx ygshudbw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2461337</link>
		<dc:creator>ikrzgx ygshudbw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2461337</guid>
		<description>npgzehbj fvlkoqp tchf igpaw kzfix psab kfzhyng</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>npgzehbj fvlkoqp tchf igpaw kzfix psab kfzhyng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partial List: Microsoft&#8217;s Nominees For The Yahoo Board</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2036930</link>
		<dc:creator>Partial List: Microsoft&#8217;s Nominees For The Yahoo Board</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2036930</guid>
		<description>[...] deadline to propose board members originally  was tomorrow. However, a recent delaying tactic by Yahoo pushed that date forward by a month or so. Everything [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deadline to propose board members originally  was tomorrow. However, a recent delaying tactic by Yahoo pushed that date forward by a month or so. Everything [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2018717</link>
		<dc:creator>ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2018717</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;would rather fight a fragmented market than a single, stronger, Microsoft/Yahoo.&#8221; (http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;would rather fight a fragmented market than a single, stronger, Microsoft/Yahoo.&#8221; (<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors " rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors '>http://www.tech...eyahoo-rumors </a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Is Still Looking For A White Knight—News Corp.&#8217;s Offer Does Not Pencil Out, Neither Does AOL&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2016412</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Is Still Looking For A White Knight—News Corp.&#8217;s Offer Does Not Pencil Out, Neither Does AOL&#8217;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2016412</guid>
		<description>[...] mother has looked at ways to scuttle Microsoft&#8217;s hostile bid for Yahoo: News Corp., AOL, Google, hedge funds. Even Barry Diller sniffed around (according to two sources), as did British Telecom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mother has looked at ways to scuttle Microsoft&#8217;s hostile bid for Yahoo: News Corp., AOL, Google, hedge funds. Even Barry Diller sniffed around (according to two sources), as did British Telecom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2011242</link>
		<dc:creator>Neek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2011242</guid>
		<description>Dream on. All this BS is fun to watch, but there&#039;s no stopping MS. Besides, are Yahoo really that stupid to substitute MS for Google, just to keep Microsoft&#039;s hands from the company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dream on. All this BS is fun to watch, but there&#8217;s no stopping MS. Besides, are Yahoo really that stupid to substitute MS for Google, just to keep Microsoft&#8217;s hands from the company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2010124</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2010124</guid>
		<description>The more actions Google takes on the Microhoo deal, the more I believe a merged Microhoo is good for competition.

Google is no better than Microsoft in terms of monopoloy attitude. I won&#039;t cheer for Google one day, and when all his competitors died, I found I have no choice but just use Google. That scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more actions Google takes on the Microhoo deal, the more I believe a merged Microhoo is good for competition.</p>
<p>Google is no better than Microsoft in terms of monopoloy attitude. I won&#8217;t cheer for Google one day, and when all his competitors died, I found I have no choice but just use Google. That scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paisley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2010089</link>
		<dc:creator>paisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2010089</guid>
		<description>then yahoo! can bring back Google search.. lmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then yahoo! can bring back Google search.. lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Cohn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Cohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009710</guid>
		<description>Too bad IBM is spending $15 billion on their own stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad IBM is spending $15 billion on their own stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll learn to work the saxaphone
I play just what I feel
Drink Scotch whiskey all night long
And die behind the wheel
They got a name for the winners in the world
And I want a name when I lose
They call Alabama the Crimson Tide
Call me Deacon Blues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll learn to work the saxaphone<br />
I play just what I feel<br />
Drink Scotch whiskey all night long<br />
And die behind the wheel<br />
They got a name for the winners in the world<br />
And I want a name when I lose<br />
They call Alabama the Crimson Tide<br />
Call me Deacon Blues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chush.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009449</link>
		<dc:creator>chush.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009449</guid>
		<description>20% to NewsCorp, 20% to Google, 60% to private equity and Yahoo is private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20% to NewsCorp, 20% to Google, 60% to private equity and Yahoo is private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tippo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009143</guid>
		<description>I think these rumours are going to continue for some time. But as long as they continue I think its good for Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these rumours are going to continue for some time. But as long as they continue I think its good for Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faramarz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009140</link>
		<dc:creator>Faramarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009140</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t read Hebrew. that last link is useless :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read Hebrew. that last link is useless <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotownStyle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009106</link>
		<dc:creator>MotownStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009106</guid>
		<description>Sorry, blogspot not down anymore...  I am so ashamed to have been fear-mongering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, blogspot not down anymore&#8230;  I am so ashamed to have been fear-mongering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotownStyle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009087</link>
		<dc:creator>MotownStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009087</guid>
		<description>I used to work for George Boutros - he is a pitbull (&quot;hey, dickhead!&quot; - is a common term of affection for him) and if Google wants it, he will execute their bidding very aggressively.

Speaking of Google - blogspot and blogger appear to be down.  Anything interesting there, Michael?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work for George Boutros &#8211; he is a pitbull (&#8221;hey, dickhead!&#8221; &#8211; is a common term of affection for him) and if Google wants it, he will execute their bidding very aggressively.</p>
<p>Speaking of Google &#8211; blogspot and blogger appear to be down.  Anything interesting there, Michael?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosefVirek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009086</link>
		<dc:creator>JosefVirek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009086</guid>
		<description>Even Google is no match against Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Google is no match against Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009066</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009066</guid>
		<description>this is fun to watch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is fun to watch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: embassy suites flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009056</link>
		<dc:creator>embassy suites flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009056</guid>
		<description>wow this is big fight of big guys. 
Yes no one wants yahoo to go to microsoft but how will google&#039;s shares respond if google buys 20 percent of yahoo? this definitely is a game to watch:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this is big fight of big guys.<br />
Yes no one wants yahoo to go to microsoft but how will google&#8217;s shares respond if google buys 20 percent of yahoo? this definitely is a game to watch:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandrogas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009053</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandrogas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009053</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, several more shareholders in Yahoo have announced lawsuits based on this breaking news.  

It&#039;s going to be interesting to see how this goes on from here.  Yahoo ultimately is just getting the crap kicked out of it by these two giants, so Google might just be able to sit back and start hiring more Yahoo refugees as time goes on just to spite Microsoft as well (course, that could be vice-versa).

I would however go as far to say that it might be a good time for that search engine advertising helper / social networking thingamajig startup seeing as they seem to be getting acquired at blazing speed while this deal is in limbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, several more shareholders in Yahoo have announced lawsuits based on this breaking news.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see how this goes on from here.  Yahoo ultimately is just getting the crap kicked out of it by these two giants, so Google might just be able to sit back and start hiring more Yahoo refugees as time goes on just to spite Microsoft as well (course, that could be vice-versa).</p>
<p>I would however go as far to say that it might be a good time for that search engine advertising helper / social networking thingamajig startup seeing as they seem to be getting acquired at blazing speed while this deal is in limbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009050</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009050</guid>
		<description>LOL, now there is a crunchbase for people. Michael, crunchbase will never catch on. Nice article though and no offense meant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, now there is a crunchbase for people. Michael, crunchbase will never catch on. Nice article though and no offense meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009048</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009048</guid>
		<description>Not sure this would be a good idea for Google. Yahoo couldnt prove to its share holder its valued at 19 bucks until MSFT had the hostile bid for 31 to boost the stock up by more than 60%. Turning down that generous offering was their biggest mistake. I doubt Google would be interested in taking over yahoo to bail them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure this would be a good idea for Google. Yahoo couldnt prove to its share holder its valued at 19 bucks until MSFT had the hostile bid for 31 to boost the stock up by more than 60%. Turning down that generous offering was their biggest mistake. I doubt Google would be interested in taking over yahoo to bail them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009046</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face the facts here. All this points to a higher ultimate purchase price for Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face the facts here. All this points to a higher ultimate purchase price for Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009043</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009043</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;fight a fragmented market than a single, stronger, Microsoft/Yahoo&quot;...


Very nicely worded. Remember in the late 90&#039;s when Apple almost went of of business (low on cash). Who injected them with an *investment* of $200M (figure correct?) Good ol Microsoft did. 
That investment was peanuts because it allowed MSFT to continue to eat up all the OS revenues while keeping Apple on life support!

So if Google can invest $x and keep Yahoo as a stand alone it can continue to treat it like a red headed step child and still bitch slap it on a QtoQ revenue basis while still having a large player competing. BRILLIANT!

God bless America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;fight a fragmented market than a single, stronger, Microsoft/Yahoo&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Very nicely worded. Remember in the late 90&#8217;s when Apple almost went of of business (low on cash). Who injected them with an *investment* of $200M (figure correct?) Good ol Microsoft did.<br />
That investment was peanuts because it allowed MSFT to continue to eat up all the OS revenues while keeping Apple on life support!</p>
<p>So if Google can invest $x and keep Yahoo as a stand alone it can continue to treat it like a red headed step child and still bitch slap it on a QtoQ revenue basis while still having a large player competing. BRILLIANT!</p>
<p>God bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009039</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009039</guid>
		<description>Is this considered a merge rather than a buyout?

Sam
http://topmusic.fm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this considered a merge rather than a buyout?</p>
<p>Sam<br />
<a href="http://topmusic.fm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://topmusic.fm'>http://topmusic.fm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009021</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009021</guid>
		<description>wow! this is really interesting, if any it just really buys Yahoo! more time to come up with a &quot;how to survive on their own&quot; strategy.

you have to wonder though what will happen to Y!&#039;s stock comes Q1 earnings, with most likely no real answer on a potential MSFT takeover...

as always, I just keep rooting for Y!, whatever it takes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! this is really interesting, if any it just really buys Yahoo! more time to come up with a &#8220;how to survive on their own&#8221; strategy.</p>
<p>you have to wonder though what will happen to Y!&#8217;s stock comes Q1 earnings, with most likely no real answer on a potential MSFT takeover&#8230;</p>
<p>as always, I just keep rooting for Y!, whatever it takes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrickandClick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2009019</link>
		<dc:creator>BrickandClick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/were-sorting-through-some-crazy-googleyahoo-rumors/#comment-2009019</guid>
		<description>Whichever way the M&amp;A ball bounces ... it&#039;ll be a nice boost to the market to see some of the billions in company cash these big boys have shelved, come off the shelf and come out to play.  Boo-ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whichever way the M&amp;A ball bounces &#8230; it&#8217;ll be a nice boost to the market to see some of the billions in company cash these big boys have shelved, come off the shelf and come out to play.  Boo-ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
