<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Revamps Design, Adds Status Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2014729</link>
		<dc:creator>SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2014729</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;10 Ideas to Take LinkedIn to the Next Level:  Because It Needs It (Sorry&#160;Guys)...&lt;/strong&gt;

In many ways I think LinkedIn has a much more interesting story than Facebook.  They&#8217;ve made very few mistakes, they&#8217;re trusted where Facebook is not, and they&#8217;re well positioned to be the Business Social Network, while Facebook is n...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>10 Ideas to Take LinkedIn to the Next Level:  Because It Needs It (Sorry&nbsp;Guys)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In many ways I think LinkedIn has a much more interesting story than Facebook.  They&#8217;ve made very few mistakes, they&#8217;re trusted where Facebook is not, and they&#8217;re well positioned to be the Business Social Network, while Facebook is n&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoManager</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2013946</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoManager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2013946</guid>
		<description>I think that could be useful to let users decide to switch from the old and new interface clicking a button. Plaxo did ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that could be useful to let users decide to switch from the old and new interface clicking a button. Plaxo did &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edwerznet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2011484</link>
		<dc:creator>edwerznet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2011484</guid>
		<description>Лучший сайт о забавных вещах Мнго всего полезного этот  в  и чтиво для проведения свободного времени. На нашем портале Вы найдете множество различной халявы, В. 
Мы учли все Ваши пожелания, только у нас регулярные пополнения базы, присоединяйся к нашим посетителям.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Лучший сайт о забавных вещах Мнго всего полезного этот  в  и чтиво для проведения свободного времени. На нашем портале Вы найдете множество различной халявы, В.<br />
Мы учли все Ваши пожелания, только у нас регулярные пополнения базы, присоединяйся к нашим посетителям.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lodispoto</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2011257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lodispoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2011257</guid>
		<description>David in comment 36 seems enthusiastic ( joking).  Although I agree with him that there is room for competition, the improvements go far and will help the site become more popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David in comment 36 seems enthusiastic ( joking).  Although I agree with him that there is room for competition, the improvements go far and will help the site become more popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010882</link>
		<dc:creator>David S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010882</guid>
		<description>All I've seen over the past 5 years from this company is: 

1) Website Redesign that resembles a blog template 
2) Photo Upload feature (amazing it took so long) 
3) Answers Section - glorified version of 1990's Forums  
4) Status Update - idea taken from Facebook
5) Ineffective Mobile App (you can't connect with new people, you can't edit your profile.... and ironically, you can't even "call" your existing contacts!).

There's a real opportunity for another business network to come along and pass these guys up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;ve seen over the past 5 years from this company is: </p>
<p>1) Website Redesign that resembles a blog template<br />
2) Photo Upload feature (amazing it took so long)<br />
3) Answers Section - glorified version of 1990&#8217;s Forums<br />
4) Status Update - idea taken from Facebook<br />
5) Ineffective Mobile App (you can&#8217;t connect with new people, you can&#8217;t edit your profile&#8230;. and ironically, you can&#8217;t even &#8220;call&#8221; your existing contacts!).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a real opportunity for another business network to come along and pass these guys up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoanneB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010688</link>
		<dc:creator>JoanneB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010688</guid>
		<description>I like that they are changing things around to see what works. Although I miss the simple look and feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that they are changing things around to see what works. Although I miss the simple look and feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fizetés és állás</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010671</link>
		<dc:creator>fizetés és állás</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010671</guid>
		<description>strange for the first sight, but after 10 min you get used to it, and now I like it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>strange for the first sight, but after 10 min you get used to it, and now I like it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Sasso</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010572</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Sasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010572</guid>
		<description>The old design was very nice, sometimes i don't understand why those web 2.0 companies have to show that they are doing something all the time and change their design now and then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old design was very nice, sometimes i don&#8217;t understand why those web 2.0 companies have to show that they are doing something all the time and change their design now and then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fake Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010518</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fake Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010518</guid>
		<description>Personally, I love the new site design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I love the new site design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010466</link>
		<dc:creator>nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010466</guid>
		<description>It's amazing that a site with such crappy design and user experience is growing as fast as claimed.  The concept of Linkedin is sound but the execution...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing that a site with such crappy design and user experience is growing as fast as claimed.  The concept of Linkedin is sound but the execution&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Schonholz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010458</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Schonholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010458</guid>
		<description>I agree with some comments above ... I really do not like the new look. It is a little confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some comments above &#8230; I really do not like the new look. It is a little confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff D</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010402</guid>
		<description>I have no issues with the cosmetic changes.  People always complain when any website changes their interface, it's almost an instinctive reaction.  

As for changes, LinkedIn is about to foray into the expert services market again (like Gerson Lehrman Group.)  I wonder if their user base is going to be asked to sign on to this service or if we will just start getting emails regarding relevant consults?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no issues with the cosmetic changes.  People always complain when any website changes their interface, it&#8217;s almost an instinctive reaction.  </p>
<p>As for changes, LinkedIn is about to foray into the expert services market again (like Gerson Lehrman Group.)  I wonder if their user base is going to be asked to sign on to this service or if we will just start getting emails regarding relevant consults?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010347</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010347</guid>
		<description>If it is not broken........ I personally feel the old tabs are better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is not broken&#8230;&#8230;.. I personally feel the old tabs are better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boaz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010325</link>
		<dc:creator>Boaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010325</guid>
		<description>The site now has a cleaner look and I commend LinkedIn for the effort. I do agree, however, with the previous comment about the redundancy of the rounded corners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site now has a cleaner look and I commend LinkedIn for the effort. I do agree, however, with the previous comment about the redundancy of the rounded corners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010179</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010179</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see what will happen with the new design and features.  Could be promising for LinkedIn, and will hopefully get more people to actively engage in the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see what will happen with the new design and features.  Could be promising for LinkedIn, and will hopefully get more people to actively engage in the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Otterlei</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010153</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Otterlei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010153</guid>
		<description>Yea, I saw this design a few weeks ago from a guy I work with. He sent out an email to everyone about the UI change but no one else got the new design...it turned out that he was chosen to get the new UI as a tester...when I saw it my stomach turned...They had some basic flow problems with the old one, but I think they would have been better off to fix the current issues versus throwing everything to the wind and going with this "facebook" style...now everyone has learn a new UI...not good....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I saw this design a few weeks ago from a guy I work with. He sent out an email to everyone about the UI change but no one else got the new design&#8230;it turned out that he was chosen to get the new UI as a tester&#8230;when I saw it my stomach turned&#8230;They had some basic flow problems with the old one, but I think they would have been better off to fix the current issues versus throwing everything to the wind and going with this &#8220;facebook&#8221; style&#8230;now everyone has learn a new UI&#8230;not good&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel Schwarz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010006</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikel Schwarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2010006</guid>
		<description>@ Jim Rudnick &#38; @ airj1012 - Agree with both of you.  The news feed (on old and new home page designs) was not implemented thoughtfully.  At a minimum during their beta, they should have (and I've posted as much):

1. Ability to hide/turn off the News module during the beta

2. Allow us to move it lower in priority on the home page. (they have some of this functionality on the new beta home page -- but not for News)

3. Allow us to reorder the list (the most recent companies are the ones I'd be most interested in)

It would have been nice to have *some* control over how that module behaved during the beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jim Rudnick &amp; @ airj1012 - Agree with both of you.  The news feed (on old and new home page designs) was not implemented thoughtfully.  At a minimum during their beta, they should have (and I&#8217;ve posted as much):</p>
<p>1. Ability to hide/turn off the News module during the beta</p>
<p>2. Allow us to move it lower in priority on the home page. (they have some of this functionality on the new beta home page &#8212; but not for News)</p>
<p>3. Allow us to reorder the list (the most recent companies are the ones I&#8217;d be most interested in)</p>
<p>It would have been nice to have *some* control over how that module behaved during the beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Strellner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009930</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009930</guid>
		<description>I like the new design, but I don't think I prefer it over the old one either.  Seems to load a little faster than the old design, which is a plus.

I don't think it looks like Facebook either.  It is much cleaner than their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new design, but I don&#8217;t think I prefer it over the old one either.  Seems to load a little faster than the old design, which is a plus.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it looks like Facebook either.  It is much cleaner than their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: airj1012</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009747</link>
		<dc:creator>airj1012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009747</guid>
		<description>@ Jim Rudnick - Yes, that news feed really bothers me too.  First of all its news about an employer that I don't work for anymore.  Not that I have anything against my old employer but I don't really care about their news anymore.  I've even tried to contact LinkedIn to ask if it could be taken off and they couldn't help.  First fix this flaw, then worry about your design flaws (which I think there are a lot of on LinkedIn).  I think the site has a lot of potential (and I know it's been around for a while and has lots of users) but I think there are many things that could be improved.  It seems like communication is at a minimum on that site, which is ironic because it's suppose to help people network.  I understand there should be some restrictions because people would start spamming, but then need to rethink some of their processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jim Rudnick - Yes, that news feed really bothers me too.  First of all its news about an employer that I don&#8217;t work for anymore.  Not that I have anything against my old employer but I don&#8217;t really care about their news anymore.  I&#8217;ve even tried to contact LinkedIn to ask if it could be taken off and they couldn&#8217;t help.  First fix this flaw, then worry about your design flaws (which I think there are a lot of on LinkedIn).  I think the site has a lot of potential (and I know it&#8217;s been around for a while and has lots of users) but I think there are many things that could be improved.  It seems like communication is at a minimum on that site, which is ironic because it&#8217;s suppose to help people network.  I understand there should be some restrictions because people would start spamming, but then need to rethink some of their processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechFaceCrunchBook</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009620</link>
		<dc:creator>TechFaceCrunchBook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009620</guid>
		<description>Don't know if others are experiencing this but my news feed on LinkedIn has turned into a ghost town.  I have only 1 action in the last WEEK!  3 actions in the last MONTH.  And I have about 70 connections too.  Is LinkedIn traffic dying off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if others are experiencing this but my news feed on LinkedIn has turned into a ghost town.  I have only 1 action in the last WEEK!  3 actions in the last MONTH.  And I have about 70 connections too.  Is LinkedIn traffic dying off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rudnick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rudnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009541</guid>
		<description>the thing that REALLY bugs me, is the stupid beta on your LI home page that posts news from old employers. no way to turn it off. no way to set it up or configure same either. been emailing support for an answer on how i can get rid of same, and their customer service just don't care. wish seth godin ran the company, that way i'd get an answer on what to do. oh, i also then tried to delete an old employer to see if that would take off that stupid news header - nope. looks like they don't update their dbase either....sigh...makes me wonder why i bother!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing that REALLY bugs me, is the stupid beta on your LI home page that posts news from old employers. no way to turn it off. no way to set it up or configure same either. been emailing support for an answer on how i can get rid of same, and their customer service just don&#8217;t care. wish seth godin ran the company, that way i&#8217;d get an answer on what to do. oh, i also then tried to delete an old employer to see if that would take off that stupid news header - nope. looks like they don&#8217;t update their dbase either&#8230;.sigh&#8230;makes me wonder why i bother!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orli</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009537</link>
		<dc:creator>Orli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009537</guid>
		<description>Nice, but not enough.

I'd really like to be able to share content from this platform, such as: recommendations, basic information about myself, resume etc., with friends on other networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, but not enough.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to be able to share content from this platform, such as: recommendations, basic information about myself, resume etc., with friends on other networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009526</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009526</guid>
		<description>Who cares about design when it comes to LinkedIn?

All I know is it's just a great tool for me to keep in touch with people I've worked with or met professionally over the years. 

They can make it purple and green for all I like and it'd still be a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about design when it comes to LinkedIn?</p>
<p>All I know is it&#8217;s just a great tool for me to keep in touch with people I&#8217;ve worked with or met professionally over the years. </p>
<p>They can make it purple and green for all I like and it&#8217;d still be a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009501</guid>
		<description>It's interesting. I hate Facebook but really like LinkedIn. Much to their dismay I do not view Linkedin as anything beyond their original purpose, no matter what they change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting. I hate Facebook but really like LinkedIn. Much to their dismay I do not view Linkedin as anything beyond their original purpose, no matter what they change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raskin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009496</link>
		<dc:creator>Raskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/27/linkedin-revamps-design-adds-status-updates/#comment-2009496</guid>
		<description>Meh...new UI's are tough, everyone's a critic. The fact is LinkedIn didn't WORK right with the old design. You had to click three places just to see your new invites, etc. Hopefully this is more functional, Facebook / imeem / DIGG / Orkut comparisons aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh&#8230;new UI&#8217;s are tough, everyone&#8217;s a critic. The fact is LinkedIn didn&#8217;t WORK right with the old design. You had to click three places just to see your new invites, etc. Hopefully this is more functional, Facebook / imeem / DIGG / Orkut comparisons aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.091 seconds -->
