<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Solutions, ICANN Sued Over Domain Front Running</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Die neuen TLDs der ICANN sind super &#171; Kassenzone - Commerce, Mobile, Technologie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2409970</link>
		<dc:creator>Die neuen TLDs der ICANN sind super &#171; Kassenzone - Commerce, Mobile, Technologie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2409970</guid>
		<description>[...] so gut anzukommen. Die ICANN hat eher das Bild einer Abzockorganisation - einige Pannen tun ihr Übriges dazu. Aber das gilt es hier nicht zu diskutieren. Die Diskussion auf bbc.co.uk konnte ich leider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so gut anzukommen. Die ICANN hat eher das Bild einer Abzockorganisation - einige Pannen tun ihr Übriges dazu. Aber das gilt es hier nicht zu diskutieren. Die Diskussion auf bbc.co.uk konnte ich leider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is Your Webhost and Why it Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2154159</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is Your Webhost and Why it Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2154159</guid>
		<description>[...] more reasons here and here about why Network Solutions should be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more reasons here and here about why Network Solutions should be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Network Solutions Hijacking Unassigned Sub-Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2153791</link>
		<dc:creator>www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Network Solutions Hijacking Unassigned Sub-Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2153791</guid>
		<description>[...] another reason to not use Network [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another reason to not use Network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions Now Gives Its Customers The Option Of Being Victimized</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2127420</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions Now Gives Its Customers The Option Of Being Victimized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2127420</guid>
		<description>[...] for domain names, via the despised practice of front running.&#160; Now with Network Solutions being sued over their antics, they have changed their procedures a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for domain names, via the despised practice of front running.&nbsp; Now with Network Solutions being sued over their antics, they have changed their procedures a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandar Tzanov ~ The Titan &#187; Domain Record Info</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2050571</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandar Tzanov ~ The Titan &#187; Domain Record Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2050571</guid>
		<description>[...] record information on a domain, but I did not want anyone tracking domains I look up. Or like some bad registrars, have any possible domain I look up end up as registered thanks to the ICANN grace period and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] record information on a domain, but I did not want anyone tracking domains I look up. Or like some bad registrars, have any possible domain I look up end up as registered thanks to the ICANN grace period and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2050401</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2050401</guid>
		<description>If anyone needs another witness, just ask me.  I just got scammed by NetSol.  They claim to have no affiliation with new.net , basicfusion.com , or the Vendare Group who own the latter two.  When I spoke with gregg006 at Network Solutions, he gave me the email contact for Venare Group.  The email is netsol-0107@netblue.com.  Notice anything fishy?  I asked him why their email would begin with 'netsol' if they have no affiliation with NetSol?  Make sense?  Basic Fusion is a taster of the most dirty sort.  Check this out: http://www.tastereports.com/registrar.html?registrar_id=187.  Network Solutions is just plain nasty and should not be trusted for anything at all.  The same day I registered goodguysconcrete.com at 1and1.com, these pukes also registered our name.  This is the name of our registered corporation.  Where do they get off using our corporate name without permission?

Contact me if you need another victim for class action or any other legal action.  Email me at: ggconcrete@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone needs another witness, just ask me.  I just got scammed by NetSol.  They claim to have no affiliation with new.net , basicfusion.com , or the Vendare Group who own the latter two.  When I spoke with gregg006 at Network Solutions, he gave me the email contact for Venare Group.  The email is <a href="mailto:netsol-0107@netblue.com">netsol-0107@netblue.com</a>.  Notice anything fishy?  I asked him why their email would begin with &#8216;netsol&#8217; if they have no affiliation with NetSol?  Make sense?  Basic Fusion is a taster of the most dirty sort.  Check this out: <a href="http://www.tastereports.com/registrar.html?registrar_id=187" rel="nofollow">http://www.tastereports.com/re.....rar_id=187</a>.  Network Solutions is just plain nasty and should not be trusted for anything at all.  The same day I registered goodguysconcrete.com at 1and1.com, these pukes also registered our name.  This is the name of our registered corporation.  Where do they get off using our corporate name without permission?</p>
<p>Contact me if you need another victim for class action or any other legal action.  Email me at: <a href="mailto:ggconcrete@gmail.com">ggconcrete@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jac</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2045458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2045458</guid>
		<description>NS changed the verbage on their website. Apparently this is now a "feature" that they offer - how convenient! What a bunch of BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NS changed the verbage on their website. Apparently this is now a &#8220;feature&#8221; that they offer - how convenient! What a bunch of BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2043779</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2043779</guid>
		<description>This is fantastic! This front running is happening to everyone including ME and it happened on Register.com - who sold MY domain name (that I was mulling over for a day or 2 before buying) it to Afternic - a search of Whois reveals the purchaser is a company called "Basic Fusion" but they are in cahoots with Regsiter.com because they ONLY offer bulk domain name registration - you have to already own at least 5,000 domain names to be eligible to buy it. IT's CALLED RACKETEERING AND I'm getting a lawyer on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fantastic! This front running is happening to everyone including ME and it happened on Register.com - who sold MY domain name (that I was mulling over for a day or 2 before buying) it to Afternic - a search of Whois reveals the purchaser is a company called &#8220;Basic Fusion&#8221; but they are in cahoots with Regsiter.com because they ONLY offer bulk domain name registration - you have to already own at least 5,000 domain names to be eligible to buy it. IT&#8217;s CALLED RACKETEERING AND I&#8217;m getting a lawyer on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 21st Century Identity Crisis: Naming Strategies for the New Marketspace &#171; Cool Rules Pronto</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2035023</link>
		<dc:creator>21st Century Identity Crisis: Naming Strategies for the New Marketspace &#171; Cool Rules Pronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2035023</guid>
		<description>[...] in Third World countries hoping to score an extra buck. The domain-registration and hosting service Network Solutions was recently sued for automatically grabbing web addresses that people were researching on their site. Regardless of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Third World countries hoping to score an extra buck. The domain-registration and hosting service Network Solutions was recently sued for automatically grabbing web addresses that people were researching on their site. Regardless of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2033125</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2033125</guid>
		<description>I set up www.netsolfrontrunning.com to make folks aware of Net Sol reserving domains when you search for them on NetworkSolutions.com.  I searched for a domain there and had to wait 5 days to get it somewhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I set up <a href="http://www.netsolfrontrunning.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.netsolfrontrunning.com</a> to make folks aware of Net Sol reserving domains when you search for them on NetworkSolutions.com.  I searched for a domain there and had to wait 5 days to get it somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2013146</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2013146</guid>
		<description>Simple solution.

Everyone go there and start "searching" for domain names. If they purchase these names can they keep up with the mass internet population? Do they have infinate money? Make the bitches go broke by overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple solution.</p>
<p>Everyone go there and start &#8220;searching&#8221; for domain names. If they purchase these names can they keep up with the mass internet population? Do they have infinate money? Make the bitches go broke by overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s All About the Money With Network Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2012454</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s All About the Money With Network Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2012454</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/domain-registrar-network-solutions-front-running-on-whois-searches/1359  http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/featured/domain-registrar-network-solutions-front-running-on-whois-searches/1359" rel="nofollow">http://www.domainnamenews.com/.....rches/1359</a>  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008.....t-running/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007737</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007737</guid>
		<description>Yea, a few weeks ago I read about NS doing this crap. So what to do? Try it, see if it's really true of course....so I searched for a domain name that only my dad would want (www.his name.com) and it was available. So I waited until the next day, and sure enough that name was no longer available. 

Why?

Because the Network Solutions scums bought it. BUT I could "buy it" from Network Solutions for a price higher than had I bought it the night before. 

Scum Bags! 

In hindsight, I should have checked something less important than a domain name that someone might actually want....but at least it wasnt a name that I myself would have wanted!!!!! 

(Oh, and...um....sorry about your domain name being snatched by Network Solutions dad)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, a few weeks ago I read about NS doing this crap. So what to do? Try it, see if it&#8217;s really true of course&#8230;.so I searched for a domain name that only my dad would want (www.his name.com) and it was available. So I waited until the next day, and sure enough that name was no longer available. </p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because the Network Solutions scums bought it. BUT I could &#8220;buy it&#8221; from Network Solutions for a price higher than had I bought it the night before. </p>
<p>Scum Bags! </p>
<p>In hindsight, I should have checked something less important than a domain name that someone might actually want&#8230;.but at least it wasnt a name that I myself would have wanted!!!!! </p>
<p>(Oh, and&#8230;um&#8230;.sorry about your domain name being snatched by Network Solutions dad)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oleg m</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007627</link>
		<dc:creator>oleg m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007627</guid>
		<description>Do you guys not see that this problem is really an opportunity in disguise?

You have CONTROL over what domains another company registers. 

Since the community thinks that this practice is a stinker, I declare a contest to come up with the best domain 'searching' script on network solutions. Random alpha-numeric characters are good. 
Bonus points for keeping track of the 'searched' domains and 'researching' every 5 days :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you guys not see that this problem is really an opportunity in disguise?</p>
<p>You have CONTROL over what domains another company registers. </p>
<p>Since the community thinks that this practice is a stinker, I declare a contest to come up with the best domain &#8217;searching&#8217; script on network solutions. Random alpha-numeric characters are good.<br />
Bonus points for keeping track of the &#8217;searched&#8217; domains and &#8216;researching&#8217; every 5 days <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stig Nordas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007481</link>
		<dc:creator>Stig Nordas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007481</guid>
		<description>Serves them right. Its bad enough they got the entire domain market handed to them on a silver platter back in 95, but this dirty-low-down practice is going to serve as a strong lesson for the scum bags who practice it. There are many other players in the 'Front Running' game. Their time is up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serves them right. Its bad enough they got the entire domain market handed to them on a silver platter back in 95, but this dirty-low-down practice is going to serve as a strong lesson for the scum bags who practice it. There are many other players in the &#8216;Front Running&#8217; game. Their time is up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott G</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007455</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007455</guid>
		<description>So I put it to the test. I went to Dotster and search for the

    NoWayToGoThereHaHa

domain. The .com, .net, and .org were all available. I went to Network Solutions a few minutes later and performed a search for the same domains -- as expected, the .com, .net, and .org were available. A few minutes later I went back to Dotster in a different tab of my browser and performed the same search I had performed earlier and it is true -- in this search, not even 5-10 minutes later, the NoWayToGoThereHaHa.com was no longer available but I could "Make an offer" on it. I click on the "Make an offer" link and that takes me to www.sedo.com, a domain name broker.

Interestingly, I went back to Network Solutions via a new tab and repeated the search -- the domain name for .com is still available via Network Solutions.

It appears that they are doing a couple of things. First, they are reserving a domain that was searched on immediately such that you can only get that domain name via Network Solutions. Second, it appears that (in my case) any domain that is already "registered" gets the "Make an offer" link which points off to sedo.com. The sedo.com and other domain name brokers may be aware of way Network Solutions reserves searched domain names -- what these domain name brokers do then is they check and see if Network Solutions has reserved the name because someone did a search on it and then they offer people a way to "buy" the domain by making an offer, where the minimum offer is $200. If you make an offer of $200 (or more), I suspect the broker will go and buy the domain name from Network Solutions at the cheap rate, and then transfer it to you -- they keep the difference between your bid and what they paid Network Solutions.

Interestingly, a whois search on sedo.com (eventually) turned up a connection to tucows.com, but I didn't pursue it further.

Someone needs to follow the trail of money and company ownerships (who owns tucows.com, for example?).

/s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I put it to the test. I went to Dotster and search for the</p>
<p>    NoWayToGoThereHaHa</p>
<p>domain. The .com, .net, and .org were all available. I went to Network Solutions a few minutes later and performed a search for the same domains &#8212; as expected, the .com, .net, and .org were available. A few minutes later I went back to Dotster in a different tab of my browser and performed the same search I had performed earlier and it is true &#8212; in this search, not even 5-10 minutes later, the NoWayToGoThereHaHa.com was no longer available but I could &#8220;Make an offer&#8221; on it. I click on the &#8220;Make an offer&#8221; link and that takes me to <a href="http://www.sedo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sedo.com</a>, a domain name broker.</p>
<p>Interestingly, I went back to Network Solutions via a new tab and repeated the search &#8212; the domain name for .com is still available via Network Solutions.</p>
<p>It appears that they are doing a couple of things. First, they are reserving a domain that was searched on immediately such that you can only get that domain name via Network Solutions. Second, it appears that (in my case) any domain that is already &#8220;registered&#8221; gets the &#8220;Make an offer&#8221; link which points off to sedo.com. The sedo.com and other domain name brokers may be aware of way Network Solutions reserves searched domain names &#8212; what these domain name brokers do then is they check and see if Network Solutions has reserved the name because someone did a search on it and then they offer people a way to &#8220;buy&#8221; the domain by making an offer, where the minimum offer is $200. If you make an offer of $200 (or more), I suspect the broker will go and buy the domain name from Network Solutions at the cheap rate, and then transfer it to you &#8212; they keep the difference between your bid and what they paid Network Solutions.</p>
<p>Interestingly, a whois search on sedo.com (eventually) turned up a connection to tucows.com, but I didn&#8217;t pursue it further.</p>
<p>Someone needs to follow the trail of money and company ownerships (who owns tucows.com, for example?).</p>
<p>/s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Blow</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007405</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Blow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007405</guid>
		<description>How do I get on this law suite? I have used NetSol to check domain names and twice have found it very odd that a domain name that was free for years got tied up only a day or two after I checked them? I know I'm in sync with what's going in the market--but I'm not THAT good.

Thanks, JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I get on this law suite? I have used NetSol to check domain names and twice have found it very odd that a domain name that was free for years got tied up only a day or two after I checked them? I know I&#8217;m in sync with what&#8217;s going in the market&#8211;but I&#8217;m not THAT good.</p>
<p>Thanks, JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007401</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007401</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Network Solutions, ICANN Sued Over Domain Front Running...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Network Solutions, ICANN Sued Over Domain Front Running&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007260</guid>
		<description>cost, that is the dumbest post in the world... think before you post, they would be out of business in 2 days if they were actually registering them. There is a 4 day period which they can hold domains... a policy which ICANN has set up. So ICANN and other registrars are responsible for the same tactics. It's not just one company, it's a whole set of standards that needs to come under fire here... starting with ICANN for allowing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cost, that is the dumbest post in the world&#8230; think before you post, they would be out of business in 2 days if they were actually registering them. There is a 4 day period which they can hold domains&#8230; a policy which ICANN has set up. So ICANN and other registrars are responsible for the same tactics. It&#8217;s not just one company, it&#8217;s a whole set of standards that needs to come under fire here&#8230; starting with ICANN for allowing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007209</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007209</guid>
		<description>click on the above link to see an analysis of the issues.

I agree that Network Solutions’ business plan to “reserve” all available name search queries was questionable from an ethics and business point of view. I, for one, am surprised that Network Solutions and ICANN have been sued in a class action format.

I originally posted about potential consumer protection liability related to NSI’s reserve policy &lt;a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/anticybersquatting_consum/2008/01/nsi-accused-of.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, but NSI quickly modified it’s policy and provided adequate notice on its web site in order to inform consumers that it would be reserving searched domains. That post is found &lt;a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/anticybersquatting_consum/2008/01/dnfr-allegation.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#160; 

Consumer protection lawsuits are all about misrepresentation and “deception.”; Once Network Solutions posted notice on its web site that it would be engaging in this particular business practice, it is hard to imagine how consumers would argue they were “deceived.”

As far as ICANN liability, the only possibility is an argument that Network Solutions was violating the accreditation agreement with ICANN and ICANN failed to follow-up on that known violation. However, I have not seen any good analysis on the Internet which suggests that a violation of policy did occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>click on the above link to see an analysis of the issues.</p>
<p>I agree that Network Solutions’ business plan to “reserve” all available name search queries was questionable from an ethics and business point of view. I, for one, am surprised that Network Solutions and ICANN have been sued in a class action format.</p>
<p>I originally posted about potential consumer protection liability related to NSI’s reserve policy <a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/anticybersquatting_consum/2008/01/nsi-accused-of.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/tcattorney.typepad.com');">here</a>, but NSI quickly modified it’s policy and provided adequate notice on its web site in order to inform consumers that it would be reserving searched domains. That post is found <a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/anticybersquatting_consum/2008/01/dnfr-allegation.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/tcattorney.typepad.com');">here</a>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Consumer protection lawsuits are all about misrepresentation and “deception.”; Once Network Solutions posted notice on its web site that it would be engaging in this particular business practice, it is hard to imagine how consumers would argue they were “deceived.”</p>
<p>As far as ICANN liability, the only possibility is an argument that Network Solutions was violating the accreditation agreement with ICANN and ICANN failed to follow-up on that known violation. However, I have not seen any good analysis on the Internet which suggests that a violation of policy did occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cost</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007153</link>
		<dc:creator>cost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007153</guid>
		<description>Does it cost Network Solutions to register these domains that people are searching for? If so, I'd suggest people create scripts that constantly look up domain names.

You could create ones that nobody else will want, such as AAAAAAAAAAAA1.com and just count up from there.

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it cost Network Solutions to register these domains that people are searching for? If so, I&#8217;d suggest people create scripts that constantly look up domain names.</p>
<p>You could create ones that nobody else will want, such as AAAAAAAAAAAA1.com and just count up from there.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007102</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007102</guid>
		<description>This happened to me when checking for a domain using DreamHost. Next day it was registered by someone else! They should investigate other registrars too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happened to me when checking for a domain using DreamHost. Next day it was registered by someone else! They should investigate other registrars too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ace of Spades that doesn’t hide in a hole</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007047</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ace of Spades that doesn’t hide in a hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2007047</guid>
		<description>I think this is the only reason Netsol is still in business, cut off this supply Kabateck Brown Kellner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the only reason Netsol is still in business, cut off this supply Kabateck Brown Kellner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Town Crier</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2006252</link>
		<dc:creator>Town Crier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2006252</guid>
		<description>"Front Running"?? Call it what it is... (domain name) EXTORTION! Conducted by a commercial enterprise; which makes it RACKETEERING, across state lines, which makes it a federal offense covered by the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 1961.

"A racketeering enterprise investigation may be initiated when facts or circumstances reasonably indicate that two or more persons are engaged in a continuing course of conduct for the purpose of obtaining monetary or commercial gains or profits wholly or in part through racketeering activity. The standard of "reasonable indication" is identical to that governing the initiation of a general crime investigation under Part II."

A class action lawsuit is great... for the lawyers.
An FBI Racketeering Investigation, charges and a trial is what is needed to end this practice once and for all. In My (I am not a lawyer, but a concerned Netizen) Opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Front Running&#8221;?? Call it what it is&#8230; (domain name) EXTORTION! Conducted by a commercial enterprise; which makes it RACKETEERING, across state lines, which makes it a federal offense covered by the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 1961.</p>
<p>&#8220;A racketeering enterprise investigation may be initiated when facts or circumstances reasonably indicate that two or more persons are engaged in a continuing course of conduct for the purpose of obtaining monetary or commercial gains or profits wholly or in part through racketeering activity. The standard of &#8220;reasonable indication&#8221; is identical to that governing the initiation of a general crime investigation under Part II.&#8221;</p>
<p>A class action lawsuit is great&#8230; for the lawyers.<br />
An FBI Racketeering Investigation, charges and a trial is what is needed to end this practice once and for all. In My (I am not a lawyer, but a concerned Netizen) Opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LACJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2006072</link>
		<dc:creator>LACJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/25/network-solutions-icann-sued-over-domain-front-running/#comment-2006072</guid>
		<description>They are still doing it.  I just checked with:

classactionshurt.com

and

waittillyouseetheattorneysfees.com

Class actions allow the plaintiffs to request attorney's fees from a losing defendant.  If it comes to that (they will probably fight certification of the class) they will get hit, but big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are still doing it.  I just checked with:</p>
<p>classactionshurt.com</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>waittillyouseetheattorneysfees.com</p>
<p>Class actions allow the plaintiffs to request attorney&#8217;s fees from a losing defendant.  If it comes to that (they will probably fight certification of the class) they will get hit, but big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.110 seconds -->
