<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click Fraud Keeps Rising, Up 15 percent in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:13:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fradulent Clicks on the Internet &#171; The AppGirl Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2930864</link>
		<dc:creator>Fradulent Clicks on the Internet &#171; The AppGirl Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2930864</guid>
		<description>[...] across an interesting article today on TechCrunch that talks about the growth in click-fraud rate. According to the research, nearly 2 out of 3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across an interesting article today on TechCrunch that talks about the growth in click-fraud rate. According to the research, nearly 2 out of 3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texxs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2655534</link>
		<dc:creator>texxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2655534</guid>
		<description>I hate to tell you I told you so, but I&#039;ve been saying this since before click fraud was a phrase.  I called them BS clicks.

I&#039;m betting the real number is actually far higher because they are just talking about the ones that are clear cut.

Google is going to do as little about this as possible because it&#039;s a major portion of their revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to tell you I told you so, but I&#8217;ve been saying this since before click fraud was a phrase.  I called them BS clicks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting the real number is actually far higher because they are just talking about the ones that are clear cut.</p>
<p>Google is going to do as little about this as possible because it&#8217;s a major portion of their revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Click Fraud At Record High &#124; Kawink Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2609739</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: Click Fraud At Record High &#124; Kawink Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2609739</guid>
		<description>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Två orosmoln: skivbolag och click fraud &#171; Fyra nyanser av brunt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2609377</link>
		<dc:creator>Två orosmoln: skivbolag och click fraud &#171; Fyra nyanser av brunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2609377</guid>
		<description>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click fraud gets its peak &#124; Surfing Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2608932</link>
		<dc:creator>Click fraud gets its peak &#124; Surfing Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2608932</guid>
		<description>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Click Fraud At Record High - Indometric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2608582</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: Click Fraud At Record High - Indometric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2608582</guid>
		<description>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Click Fraud At Record High</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2608521</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: Click Fraud At Record High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2608521</guid>
		<description>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company has seen since it started monitoring for it in 2006, dashing our hopes that it might hold steady in 2008. The company recorded a rate of 16.3% in Q1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2592073</link>
		<dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2592073</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s going to higher and higher no stop anyone, his traffic is too bigger and rise and rise..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s going to higher and higher no stop anyone, his traffic is too bigger and rise and rise..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cibula</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2510232</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cibula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2510232</guid>
		<description>InverSearch (http://www.inversearch.com) is the solution to the two leading Internet search related problems: irrelevant search results and pay-per-click fraud.

InverSearch business and consumer users simply post inquiries and the system immediately distributes their inquiries to registered businesses interested in responding to them. The responses users receive are relevant results. The inquiries businesses receive are credible leads.

InverSearch is an alternative to pay-per-click advertising that is immune to click fraud because business advertising is delivered in response to consumer inquiries, not in advance of them. InverSearch uses a patent-pending pay-per-response model whereby business users pay only for the number of responses they make to consumer inquiries rather than by the number of hits they receive.

An inverse search is quicker and easier than conducting a traditional Web search, produces relevant results, and does not devour businesses advertising budgets. Since businesses already respond to consumer inquiries that come from conventional business advertising, InverSearch easily replaces the online advertising businesses are already doing.

InverSearch provides businesses with the most credible, cost-effective means to obtain business leads, and provides consumers with the easiest, most reliable way to receive relevant search results. Individuals and businesses post confidential categorized inquiries, and the system immediately distributes the queries to businesses that have registered and want to respond to such inquiries. InverSearch allows businesses to control their marketing costs and achieve the highest possible advertising conversion rates while connecting with potential customers. Users can post an inquiry in a fraction of the time it takes to conduct a traditional Web search, and receive relevant results from genuinely interested self-identified sources.


About InverSearch, LLC

InverSearch is a privately held company specializing in the development of software to afford everyone a real alternative to scouring the Web and pay-per-click advertising. Those interested in searching an entirely new way can visit InverSearch at http://www.inversearch.com. InverSearch was launched on June 23, 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>InverSearch (<a href="http://www.inversearch.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.inversearch.com'>http://www.inversearch.com</a>) is the solution to the two leading Internet search related problems: irrelevant search results and pay-per-click fraud.</p>
<p>InverSearch business and consumer users simply post inquiries and the system immediately distributes their inquiries to registered businesses interested in responding to them. The responses users receive are relevant results. The inquiries businesses receive are credible leads.</p>
<p>InverSearch is an alternative to pay-per-click advertising that is immune to click fraud because business advertising is delivered in response to consumer inquiries, not in advance of them. InverSearch uses a patent-pending pay-per-response model whereby business users pay only for the number of responses they make to consumer inquiries rather than by the number of hits they receive.</p>
<p>An inverse search is quicker and easier than conducting a traditional Web search, produces relevant results, and does not devour businesses advertising budgets. Since businesses already respond to consumer inquiries that come from conventional business advertising, InverSearch easily replaces the online advertising businesses are already doing.</p>
<p>InverSearch provides businesses with the most credible, cost-effective means to obtain business leads, and provides consumers with the easiest, most reliable way to receive relevant search results. Individuals and businesses post confidential categorized inquiries, and the system immediately distributes the queries to businesses that have registered and want to respond to such inquiries. InverSearch allows businesses to control their marketing costs and achieve the highest possible advertising conversion rates while connecting with potential customers. Users can post an inquiry in a fraction of the time it takes to conduct a traditional Web search, and receive relevant results from genuinely interested self-identified sources.</p>
<p>About InverSearch, LLC</p>
<p>InverSearch is a privately held company specializing in the development of software to afford everyone a real alternative to scouring the Web and pay-per-click advertising. Those interested in searching an entirely new way can visit InverSearch at <a href="http://www.inversearch.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.inversearch.com'>http://www.inversearch.com</a>. InverSearch was launched on June 23, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Advertising Reality Check &#124; Business Builder Report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2391473</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Advertising Reality Check &#124; Business Builder Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2391473</guid>
		<description>[...] an estimated 16.6% of all clicks on web ads are fraudulent and in the case of PPC we add 5% depreciation for sales rate, our PPC budget is inflated by 21%. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an estimated 16.6% of all clicks on web ads are fraudulent and in the case of PPC we add 5% depreciation for sales rate, our PPC budget is inflated by 21%. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Adv&#8230;You Get What You Pay For &#171; Connected</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2334063</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Adv&#8230;You Get What You Pay For &#171; Connected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2334063</guid>
		<description>[...] believe this would eradicate the click fraud issue with CPC. Moreover, surely the CPA fee charged by Microsoft is more than that of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believe this would eradicate the click fraud issue with CPC. Moreover, surely the CPA fee charged by Microsoft is more than that of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe The Fight Against Click Fraud Isn’t Hopeless After All &#187; Mustafa Kemal Temel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2229258</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe The Fight Against Click Fraud Isn’t Hopeless After All &#187; Mustafa Kemal Temel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2229258</guid>
		<description>[...] this year the overall click fraud rate can be held steady instead of rising 15 percent, as it did in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year the overall click fraud rate can be held steady instead of rising 15 percent, as it did in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007年全球CPC点击欺诈猛增，中国退出前3位 &#124; SilenceWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2224781</link>
		<dc:creator>2007年全球CPC点击欺诈猛增，中国退出前3位 &#124; SilenceWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2224781</guid>
		<description>[...] That was up 47 percent in the fourth quarter, ending the year with a 28.3 percent click fraud rate. Read more.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That was up 47 percent in the fourth quarter, ending the year with a 28.3 percent click fraud rate. Read more.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe The Fight Against Click Fraud Isn&#8217;t Hopeless After All</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2224694</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe The Fight Against Click Fraud Isn&#8217;t Hopeless After All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2224694</guid>
		<description>[...] this year the overall click fraud rate can be held steady instead of rising 15 percent, as it did in 2007.   CrunchBase Information   Click Forensics  Information provided by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year the overall click fraud rate can be held steady instead of rising 15 percent, as it did in 2007.   CrunchBase Information   Click Forensics  Information provided by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; クリック詐欺率下がる、撲滅努力は結局無駄ではなかった</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2224626</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; クリック詐欺率下がる、撲滅努力は結局無駄ではなかった</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2224626</guid>
		<description>[...] おそらく今年は全体の不正クリック発生率も2007年のような15％増ではなく横ばいに押さえることも、夢ではなさそうだ。   CrunchBase Information   Click Forensics  Information provided by CrunchBase [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] おそらく今年は全体の不正クリック発生率も2007年のような15％増ではなく横ばいに押さえることも、夢ではなさそうだ。   CrunchBase Information   Click Forensics  Information provided by CrunchBase [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; update market news VII&#187; Blog Archive &#187; nugg.ad blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2206853</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; update market news VII&#187; Blog Archive &#187; nugg.ad blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2206853</guid>
		<description>[...] Click Fraud Keeps Rising, Up 15 percent in 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click Fraud Keeps Rising, Up 15 percent in 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2032350</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2032350</guid>
		<description>No surprises wat so ever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprises wat so ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did the Market Overreact To Google&#8217;s Click-Through Woes?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2007505</link>
		<dc:creator>Did the Market Overreact To Google&#8217;s Click-Through Woes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2007505</guid>
		<description>[...] more likely explanation is that Google is tightening the reins on clicks to combat click fraud and generate better clicks in general. Also the correlation between comScore&#8217;s click-through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more likely explanation is that Google is tightening the reins on clicks to combat click fraud and generate better clicks in general. Also the correlation between comScore&#8217;s click-through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrithik Roshan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2005659</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrithik Roshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2005659</guid>
		<description>Sorry the correct url is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2u9cqo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; The Eyes have it &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry the correct url is <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2u9cqo" rel="nofollow"> The Eyes have it </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrithik Roshan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2005656</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrithik Roshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2005656</guid>
		<description>You guys should check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/2t86ec&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; The Eyes have it &lt;/a&gt;. The author also has excellent columns at clickz.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys should check out <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2t86ec" rel="nofollow"> The Eyes have it </a>. The author also has excellent columns at clickz.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa_Organic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2005155</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa_Organic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2005155</guid>
		<description>End users rely on the integrity of the search engine.  Most people clicking adword links are your competitors.  If you are going to spend online marketing dollars - &quot;organic seo&quot; is the key word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>End users rely on the integrity of the search engine.  Most people clicking adword links are your competitors.  If you are going to spend online marketing dollars &#8211; &#8220;organic seo&#8221; is the key word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent Nicolas (Alenty)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2004958</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent Nicolas (Alenty)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2004958</guid>
		<description>If click fraud is achieved through robots, a way to decrease it is to detect robots, just like for comments.
Google won&#039;t make effort to decrease their revenues, the editors won&#039;t either because they won&#039;t shoot into their own foot.
So only a third party can do this, but this third party should be paid by the advertisers (who are the only ones losing money with this fraud).
So, how can we set up a system where advertisers pay a third party to monitor ad clicks on websites that they don&#039;t control whatsoever? Tricky question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If click fraud is achieved through robots, a way to decrease it is to detect robots, just like for comments.<br />
Google won&#8217;t make effort to decrease their revenues, the editors won&#8217;t either because they won&#8217;t shoot into their own foot.<br />
So only a third party can do this, but this third party should be paid by the advertisers (who are the only ones losing money with this fraud).<br />
So, how can we set up a system where advertisers pay a third party to monitor ad clicks on websites that they don&#8217;t control whatsoever? Tricky question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2003773</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2003773</guid>
		<description>This report is total BS. 

They got real issues with defining click fraud for starters. And if you can&#039;t really measure it properly how can you label some countries more click fraud prone than others.

I also find it suspicious that the U.S. seems like a greenish color, which would give an impression that there is less click fraud coming from that area, which is blatant BS.

Which all confirms that any data coming about click issues coming from companies other than Google or Yahoo is not worth the paper it is written on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report is total BS. </p>
<p>They got real issues with defining click fraud for starters. And if you can&#8217;t really measure it properly how can you label some countries more click fraud prone than others.</p>
<p>I also find it suspicious that the U.S. seems like a greenish color, which would give an impression that there is less click fraud coming from that area, which is blatant BS.</p>
<p>Which all confirms that any data coming about click issues coming from companies other than Google or Yahoo is not worth the paper it is written on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2003411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2003411</guid>
		<description>CPA is not really the answer or at least not the total answer.  

They only work for things that people buy the first time they see it.  If people go away from a site and come back later the publisher won&#039;t get credit. (That could be partially solved by cookies)  What if they just end up buying from a separate computer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPA is not really the answer or at least not the total answer.  </p>
<p>They only work for things that people buy the first time they see it.  If people go away from a site and come back later the publisher won&#8217;t get credit. (That could be partially solved by cookies)  What if they just end up buying from a separate computer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2003308</link>
		<dc:creator>aster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/22/click-fraud-keeps-rising-up-15-percent-in-2007/#comment-2003308</guid>
		<description>www. i-guide .ro
fraud will always occur in the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.' rel='nofollow'>www.</a> i-guide .ro<br />
fraud will always occur in the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
