Comments on: Dailymotion Offers Bandwidth-Hogging HD Videos

By: Watch HD Videos

Watch HD Videos — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:06:21 +0000

HD videos online is awesome. I am glad dailymotion is doing the same. Another site I noticed that recently started doing that was http://www.shareview.us.

By: HonestMall.com

HonestMall.com — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:50:17 +0000

yea, why the heck don’t you guys ever mention vimeo when you talk about HD?

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:48:31 +0000

I kept waiting for one of the cars to veer into the crowd and kill 8 people or so…

By: Janek

Janek — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:55:47 +0000

This one’s just about worth watching:

http://www.dail...e-hd_shortfilms

Bandwidth-wise I’m not having any problems, but unfortunately the Flash plugin under linux doesn’t seem to take advantage of hardware accelerated video playback yet…

By: Proteus

Proteus — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:10:57 +0000

Quality is not so great despite the 2M bitrate.

Two reasons I guess :
-> no H.264 codec here, it’s On2 VP6 (available in Flash
-> they probably transcoded smaller videos into 720p (this one http://www.dail...0×720_auto is called 1280×720, but the real size is 640×480 – I downloaded the file)

By: Matt Brian

Matt Brian — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:19:10 +0000

I agree with Dalas, get on Vimeo and check these out:

http://www.vimeo.com/hd

By: Matthew S

Matthew S — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:19:48 +0000

2 megabits per second is not enough for 720p, even with H.264 and low action.

This is like the megapixel wars with digital cameras or the MHz/GHz CPU wars. Higher numbers don’t mean better quality.

The whole package needs to be there. There are sites elsewhere doing higher bitrates with lower resolution that look much better when scaled to fullscreen.

By: dalas v

dalas v — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:08:53 +0000

Come upload your HD videos on Vimeo.com right now. No need to wait for everyone else to decide to let you do it.

By: Kurtlar Vadisi

Kurtlar Vadisi — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:49:23 +0000

I think internet speeds and bandwidth limits should be adjusted accordingly.

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:10:29 +0000

I’d call this HIGHER definition, not HD. It’s better than what they had before, but calling it HD is a bit of a stretch. Motion artifacts and pixelation do not an HD picture make.

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:02:51 +0000

Great… right on time for when ISPs are looking into methods of capping bandwidth heavy users Dailymotion is at the top of my list regarding streaming video… they kill YouTube in every way except for traffic – hopefully this turns things around for them!

Jon
http://woodmarvels.com – Create Unique Memories

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:07:46 +0000

before they offer HD maybe they should get some higher bandwidth. I’m on a 20/5 FIOS and its telling me I’m too sow

By: Elvis Ripley

Elvis Ripley — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:48:30 +0000

It is Daily Motion that can’t keep up. The data rate isn’t too bad.

By: Gary

Gary — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:45:23 +0000

Geez, I have been running 480p/30fps video at 800kbps and 720p/30fps at 1.3Mbps over the Web in a testbed and, so far, it has cost me under $50K. $39M? $43M?

By: JV

JV — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:19:02 +0000

“Your connection seems to slow to run HD…”

Nice typo.

By: damon

damon — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:24:43 +0000

$43M bucks and they have alot of video game videos, wahoooooo

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:24:24 +0000

Cool! Though I still think Stage6 has the best HD-videos on the net. I hope Youtube will join in soon…

By: Elijah

Elijah — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:03:53 +0000

Finally! It will be only fair to skip the hd player and go directly to the web. The spoils of the format war, the people haz them.