Comments on: What’s Next for YouTube (Video Editing, Recommendations, Advertiser Analytics)

By: sundaymicky

sundaymicky — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:15:40 +0000

this will help you…. Use YouTube Mate.
it can automatically download and convert youtube video to other video and audio formats for mobile phone, iPod, iPhone, Pocket PC, PSP, or Zune ect.
Free download here:
http://www.youtubetoipod.org/

By: What Does YouTube Have Up Its Sleeve? Guess Right, And Win An iPod Shuffle.

What Does YouTube Have Up Its Sleeve? Guess Right, And Win An iPod Shuffle. — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:46:39 +0000

[...] Dialing up the advertising? Another way to get on mobile phones or big-screen TVs? Or as was leaked in February, better video-editing tools, personal video recommendations, better advertiser analytics, or new [...]

By: steve

steve — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:19:45 +0000

1.title:Take YouTube Videos with you

YouTubeRobot.com today announces YouTube Robot 2.0, a tool that enables you to download video from YouTube.com onto your PC, convert it to various formats to watch it when you are on the road on mobile devices like mobile phone, iPod, iPhone, Pocket PC, PSP, or Zune.

YouTube Robot allows you to search for videos using keywords or browse video by category, author, channel, language, tags, etc. When you find something noteworthy, you can preview the video right in YouTube Robot and then download it onto the hard disk drive. The speed, at which you will be downloading, is very high: up to 5 times faster than other software when you download a single file and up to 4 times faster when you download multiple files at a time.

Manual download is not the only option with YouTube Robot. You may as well schedule the download and conversion tasks to be executed automatically, even when you are not around. Downloading is followed by conversion to the format of your choice and uploading videos to a mobile device (if needed). For example, you can plug in iPod, select the video, go to bed, and when you wake up next morning, your iPod will be ready to play new YouTube videos.

Product page: http://www.youtuberobot.com
Direct download link: http://www.yout.../utuberobot.exe
Company web-site: http://www.youtuberobot.com
E-mail: support@youtuberobot.com

By: josh

josh — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:26:12 +0000

I want better sound quality @ youtube!

By: LIS651 » Blog Archive » What’s Next for YouTube?

LIS651 » Blog Archive » What’s Next for YouTube? — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:59:48 +0000

[...] http://www.tech...tiser…/ [...]

By: Rodrigo Nascimento

Rodrigo Nascimento — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:09:34 +0000

acesse http://www.videolog.tv

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:28:14 +0000

There is actually a rumour saying that Google is interested in Jaycut.

By: James

James — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:06:36 +0000

If YouTube introduce annoying overlay advertising, consumers will look elsewhere for their video and there will always be a video site willing to stay ad-free.

YouTube is a great service but not a great business yet. There are lots of innovative services surfacing in the 2.0 era but there is no innovation in business models.

I’d never pay $10/month for Facebook but I certainly would for HD YouTube.

By: edenstrom.wordpress.com

edenstrom.wordpress.com — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:08:59 +0000

Oh, I guess the Swedes at http://www.jaycut.com will be following upgrade #2 closely.

By: Wes

Wes — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:08:04 +0000

I like active sharing. I think its a good idea. YouTube have to keep on adding new features to stay ahead of the competition.

By: uploadchoice

uploadchoice — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:39:55 +0000

I like the feature of advanced analytics tools that will enable advertiser to track videos geographically

By: primetangent

primetangent — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:03:25 +0000

For advertising they need to do something like overlay.tv in which advertisers can place links on objects in the videos its great for product placement.

By: Mr. Long John

Mr. Long John — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:19:03 +0000

Advertiser analytics: nobody clicked on your ad. People were annoyed.

By: ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA « Daily Marauder

ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA « Daily Marauder — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:34:57 +0000

[...] Learmonth tried to get in, but was thrown out. Luckily, Deep Focus CEO Ian Schafer took notes. (http://www.tech...ions-advertiser... [...]

By: digdug

digdug — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:15:23 +0000

Do you think cable/telcom operators are going to watch bandwidth consumption (as isp provider) go up and viewership of their cable channels go down without doing anything? Of course they are going eventually meter bandwidth and you will pay for your HD stream, VOIP, music, etc. based on usage. You will get your HD, but it won’t be free.

By: Myaboo

Myaboo — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:13:17 +0000

to add to my previous comments, let me say that generally if you engage in the mass public service ( like youtube and facebook which has a large user base) , there is a disproportion of the amount of money you make and your user base or traffic.

You can have far less users but still be making more money. Youtube needs to consider the commercial side of things if it wants enough money to continue innovating.

It can for example allow third parties to use its bandwith and store/host their videos on its servers. Amazon entered this arena and its paying off

http://spy.myaboo.com

By: jackie

jackie — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:51:03 +0000

By: Tube Talk

Tube Talk — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:49:22 +0000

HD is for couch potatoes. YouTube is for active participants in this new online video revolution.

HD and YouTube are two different animals, as YouTube fan (wink) Mark Cuban will tell you.

Asking for HD on YouTube is like going to an Italian restaurant and asking for sushi.

By: Myaboo

Myaboo — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:38:09 +0000

the problem with youtube it’s not its ability to innovate with more services and better video quality but rather it’s problem to monetize effectively its traffic.

A subscription model should be introduced to open a new revenue stream for HD and other premium services.

A good idea that they haven’t considered so far is collaborative script writing which can help produce video. i.e a group of users write the scenarios and another group of talented people produced the video. Can turn it into an online soap opera in the long run. Monetizing the video is not a problem because you can syndicate the content to mass tv in the future.

That’s the next big hit.

http://spy.myaboo.com/

By: BenHuc

BenHuc — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:28:28 +0000

@bob

Youtube can’t improve video quality for the same reason you use it!
It’s a huge community and it will be totally impossible that everybody access high quality video.
I don’t know how much Google pay each day for Youtube servers but it will be absolutely unaffordable with HD.
That’s why small video sharing sites propose HD (because of a little audience) and Youtube is forced to low quality video.
Unless they give access to a paying premium service…

By: Don

Don — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:07:20 +0000

Interesting, but until YouTube goes HD this doesn’t make much difference to me.

By: Mario Hemsley

Mario Hemsley — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:33:33 +0000

We have almost 400 videos on YouTube, and add 7-10 videos per week. We welcome the analytics and quality improvements, but what about some improved RSS features? When will we get RSS for every playlist that we create? We can make RSS for all YouTube features and our favorites, but what about the playlists? We also need some more flexibility with the profile design too. Oh, and can we make videos that are removed automatically disapperar from the playlists, or at least not stop the playback. One thing I like about my other widgets is that they remove videos that are not available and keep playing! Anyway, THANKS to YouTube for the changes, keep them coming!

By: larry

larry — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:15:31 +0000

Yes, I have already seen Searchles’ online video Editing tool. I have been using that like crazy. They call it Searchles TV Remash.

By: john

john — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:13:36 +0000

This morning I took a dump and it was shaped like a love heart… so appropriate for valentines day

By: YouTube Power User

YouTube Power User — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:59:44 +0000

I have dozens of videos up on YouTube, and personally the most welcome feature is the “advanced analytics tools”, because I’d like to know where the clicks on my videos come from. Even a rough idea, a la Sitemeter, will satisfy my curiosity.

And I hope YouTube can make the “advanced analytics tools” available for all users, not just the marketers. (YouTube team, are you listening?)

Better yet, if YouTube can just make it possible for users to embed the hit-count meters (like Sitemeter) on their video pages, that will be just dandy. I can do this on Blogger, surely, it is technically feasible on YouTube pages???