<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VentureBeat Takes $320,000 First Round</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:06:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: De plus en plus de blogs (américains) lèvent des fonds…Est-ce bien raisonnable?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2064085</link>
		<dc:creator>De plus en plus de blogs (américains) lèvent des fonds…Est-ce bien raisonnable?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2064085</guid>
		<description>[...] y a un mois VentureBeat annonçait une levée de $320,000 . In 2007 Sugar Inc. ($10 millions), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 millions) et The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y a un mois VentureBeat annonçait une levée de $320,000 . In 2007 Sugar Inc. ($10 millions), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 millions) et The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; De plus en plus de blogs (américains) lèvent des fonds...Est-ce bien raisonnable?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2048855</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; De plus en plus de blogs (américains) lèvent des fonds...Est-ce bien raisonnable?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2048855</guid>
		<description>[...] y a un mois VentureBeat annonçait une levée de $320,000 . In 2007 Sugar Inc. ($10 millions), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 millions) et The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y a un mois VentureBeat annonçait une levée de $320,000 . In 2007 Sugar Inc. ($10 millions), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 millions) et The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domains &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Bloggers Raising Money. Here Come The Politics. And Here Comes My Rant.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2046814</link>
		<dc:creator>Domains &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Bloggers Raising Money. Here Come The Politics. And Here Comes My Rant.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2046814</guid>
		<description>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metablogging.gr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The state of the (blogger&#8217;s) union</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2045890</link>
		<dc:creator>metablogging.gr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The state of the (blogger&#8217;s) union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2045890</guid>
		<description>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; TechCrunchはドリームチームを目指す―われわれがベンチャー資金を入れない理由</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2045731</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; TechCrunchはドリームチームを目指す―われわれがベンチャー資金を入れない理由</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2045731</guid>
		<description>[...] VentureBeatは 32万ドルを調達した。2007年にはSugar Inc. （1千万ドル）、GigaOm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VentureBeatは 32万ドルを調達した。2007年にはSugar Inc. （1千万ドル）、GigaOm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Bloggers Raising Money. Here Come The Politics. And Here Comes My Rant.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-2045040</link>
		<dc:creator>More Bloggers Raising Money. Here Come The Politics. And Here Comes My Rant.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-2045040</guid>
		<description>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come as funding for bloggers is heating up in general. Just a month ago VentureBeat reported a $320,000 raise. In 2007 we saw Sugar Inc. ($10 million), GigaOm ($1 million), Xconomy, Blogher ($3.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1986507</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1986507</guid>
		<description>@11:

whoa, nellie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11:</p>
<p>whoa, nellie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: we are marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1986104</link>
		<dc:creator>we are marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1986104</guid>
		<description>Matt Marshall has the worst reputation in town.  He used to be important because he worked at the Mercury News.  Now he is just another fucktard with conflicts of interest.  He is a liar and his content is lagging bigtime.  

I particularly like his move to say...oh I&#039;ll disclosue who my investors are because PEHub found out through a filing.  Thanks Mike so you are misleading all the time.  

Matt: you&#039;re busted.  You tried to pull the wool over everyone eyes on this financing.   Does Dean know what he&#039;s getting into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Marshall has the worst reputation in town.  He used to be important because he worked at the Mercury News.  Now he is just another fucktard with conflicts of interest.  He is a liar and his content is lagging bigtime.  </p>
<p>I particularly like his move to say&#8230;oh I&#8217;ll disclosue who my investors are because PEHub found out through a filing.  Thanks Mike so you are misleading all the time.  </p>
<p>Matt: you&#8217;re busted.  You tried to pull the wool over everyone eyes on this financing.   Does Dean know what he&#8217;s getting into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1986096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1986096</guid>
		<description>Venture Beat is a &quot;funded blog network&quot;? It is a blog. Where is the rest of the network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venture Beat is a &#8220;funded blog network&#8221;? It is a blog. Where is the rest of the network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rubu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985968</link>
		<dc:creator>rubu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985968</guid>
		<description>nice zing on the salary note at the end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice zing on the salary note at the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Rumford</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Rumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985493</guid>
		<description>Nice to see VC money flowing to quality blogs that report unique content and insights that don&#039;t go the route of rumor mongering. Quality publishing has it&#039;s rewards.

Any VC&#039;s reading my blog? http://www.facereviews.com ;)

Rodney Rumford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see VC money flowing to quality blogs that report unique content and insights that don&#8217;t go the route of rumor mongering. Quality publishing has it&#8217;s rewards.</p>
<p>Any VC&#8217;s reading my blog? <a href="http://www.facereviews.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.facereviews.com'>http://www.facereviews.com</a> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rodney Rumford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985358</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985358</guid>
		<description>If they REALLY smart, the funding is ONLY for Takahashi&#039;s salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they REALLY smart, the funding is ONLY for Takahashi&#8217;s salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason C.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985352</guid>
		<description>&quot;VentureBeat joins GigaOm, who’ve raised two rounds, in the “funded blog network” category.&quot;

Didn&#039;t PaidContent get some funding too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;VentureBeat joins GigaOm, who’ve raised two rounds, in the “funded blog network” category.&#8221;</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t PaidContent get some funding too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzipan from Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985310</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzipan from Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985310</guid>
		<description>smart round of funding for those investors. basically just bought yourself blog-time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smart round of funding for those investors. basically just bought yourself blog-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yongfook</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985284</link>
		<dc:creator>yongfook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985284</guid>
		<description>wow, what a totally sensible amount of seed funding for a change.

am I still on Techcrunch??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, what a totally sensible amount of seed funding for a change.</p>
<p>am I still on Techcrunch??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985246</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985246</guid>
		<description>nice zing on the salary note at the end . . . :)

Mike, you listening?  Duncan wants a raise :) 

(I&#039;m sure whatever it is, its well deserved !)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice zing on the salary note at the end . . . <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mike, you listening?  Duncan wants a raise <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>(I&#8217;m sure whatever it is, its well deserved !)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985243</guid>
		<description>Glad insiders, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad insiders, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scabr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/comment-page-1/#comment-1985240</link>
		<dc:creator>Scabr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/venturebeat-takes-320000-first-round/#comment-1985240</guid>
		<description>Insiders too glad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insiders too glad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
