Comments on: Meanwhile, Microsoft Buys Danger For $500 Million

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup | Ryan Cleary

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:25:14 +0000

[...] the Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: Sidekick Fiasco Reflects Poorly on Microsoft « Twilight in the Valley of the Nerds

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:17:19 +0000

[...] acquiring Danger for $500 million in 2008, Microsoft owned not only the acquired company’s assets, including the Sidekick, but also the [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup « talldankaden

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:21:14 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: Betsocial.net — Blog — T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:54:27 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: Daniel Saltman » T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:52:34 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: talldantimmy » T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:51:50 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup « DailyPolitikal Faux Finishing

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:46:54 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup | danielsaltmantomas

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:46:32 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup « talldankobe

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:46:00 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: dailypolitikalmortgage

dailypolitikalmortgage — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:45:56 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: danielsaltman » Blog Archive » T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:44:55 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup » Daniel Saltman

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:44:33 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Danger’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup « Joe The Flow

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:54:07 +0000

[...] the Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February 2008. [...]

By: It’s backed up right – why backups are something to think about « Blade Watch

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:09:58 +0000

[...] the Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: T-Mobile Sidekick Disaster: Microsoft’s Servers Crashed, And They Don’t Have A Backup

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:59:42 +0000

[...] Sidekick is totally reliant on the cloud because it doesn’t store its data locally. Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February [...]

By: CarkArgurry

CarkArgurry — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:48 +0000

http://fjajnghy...jenenyfhrgb.com fjajnghyhwiejkymhujjenenyfhrgb
fjajnghyhwiejkymhujjenenyfhrgb
fjajnghyhwiejkymhujjenenyfhrgb

By: Microsoft will be the New Sega Story « ProtoPlanner

Microsoft will be the New Sega Story « ProtoPlanner — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:40:33 +0000

[...] the last 8 years, it seems that Microsoft has been in one long buy out after buy out of other peoples technology, and absorbing them like a ball of mercury, adopting and growing. There’s nothing wrong about [...]

By: Complete List of 2008 Web/Tech/Internet Acquisitions » The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp

Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:17:40 +0000

[...] is the maker of the Sidekick cell phone. Press Release | TechCrunch | GigaOm | [...]

By: So many ZunePhone rumours, so much denial! at SmartPhoneCool.com

So many ZunePhone rumours, so much denial! at SmartPhoneCool.com — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:01:16 +0000

[...] hey, here’s some food for thought – why would Microsoft buy Danger for $500 million dollars? I, personally, will be very disappointed if Microsoft doesn’t make [...]

By: So many ZunePhone rumours, so much denial! at WindowsMobile Cool

So many ZunePhone rumours, so much denial! at WindowsMobile Cool — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:53:46 +0000

[...] hey, here’s some food for thought – why would Microsoft buy Danger for $500 million dollars? I, personally, will be very disappointed if Microsoft doesn’t make [...]

By: Android is (almost) here « MobileUX

Android is (almost) here « MobileUX — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:43:48 +0000

[...] No doubt there is plenty of Danger/Sidekick influence in the Android G1. And Microsoft bought Danger earlier this year. [...]

By: hamza karim

hamza karim — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:39:49 +0000

a wond ’s the 12 oro

By: Geek News Daily Podcast » Blog Archive » Geek News Daily #22 for February 11, 2008

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:39:52 +0000

[...] Microsoft buys Danger [...]

By: Microsoft made a really dumb ad for Vista… at imthegenius

Microsoft made a really dumb ad for Vista… at imthegenius — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:13:27 +0000

[...] I wonder how they’re gonna screw up the sidekick? [...]

By: huh

huh — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:37:51 +0000

what was actually $1.5 billion…the price Micro paid for Danger? for a company that did not see profit for almost two years out…that would be a deal for Danger, but I would be surprised if that were the case. where does this device rank in sales? reminds me of a cheap electronic toy…but I am not in their demo graphic…so oh well.