<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask and Digg Team Up for Big News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:00:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Türkei</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2634416</link>
		<dc:creator>Türkei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-2634416</guid>
		<description>Yep! Its an important speed for Ask. Yahoo and Google are far ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep! Its an important speed for Ask. Yahoo and Google are far ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suchmaschinenoptimierung</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2561980</link>
		<dc:creator>Suchmaschinenoptimierung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-2561980</guid>
		<description>I think this will be a good Deal for Ask AND Digg! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will be a good Deal for Ask AND Digg! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1982837</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1982837</guid>
		<description>how many more aggregation sites are gonna popup ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many more aggregation sites are gonna popup ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1980179</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1980179</guid>
		<description>I like the way it&#039;s formated and integrated and it easy to read than Google news which i read all the time, the only negative is the news update late. I will give it more time to try , over all i like it and maybe stick to it in reading news.


Nat
www.workersinc.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way it&#8217;s formated and integrated and it easy to read than Google news which i read all the time, the only negative is the news update late. I will give it more time to try , over all i like it and maybe stick to it in reading news.</p>
<p>Nat<br />
<a href="http://www.workersinc.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.workersinc.com'>http://www.workersinc.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baynado</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979902</link>
		<dc:creator>Baynado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979902</guid>
		<description>Wow, great deal for Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great deal for Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Allman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979578</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Allman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979578</guid>
		<description>naturally i journeyed first thing to the tech part of the site. I like the idea of media being bundled with the news stories. However, as others have noted, it could get a hassle sifting through the stories. 
The stories don&#039;t seem to be broken down into nice clusters like techmeme or megite. 
e.g the top story now is &quot;News.blog: Apple slows iPod, iPhone production&quot; , but when I expand, I&#039;m seeing topics yes related to ipod and the iphone, but in a general sense...i would have liked to see stories about the ipod, iphone production....

but i guess thats a small thing....:)
and course, bignews is much larger than the tech section =]
I think ask.com has done a pretty good job overall with the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naturally i journeyed first thing to the tech part of the site. I like the idea of media being bundled with the news stories. However, as others have noted, it could get a hassle sifting through the stories.<br />
The stories don&#8217;t seem to be broken down into nice clusters like techmeme or megite.<br />
e.g the top story now is &#8220;News.blog: Apple slows iPod, iPhone production&#8221; , but when I expand, I&#8217;m seeing topics yes related to ipod and the iphone, but in a general sense&#8230;i would have liked to see stories about the ipod, iphone production&#8230;.</p>
<p>but i guess thats a small thing&#8230;.:)<br />
and course, bignews is much larger than the tech section =]<br />
I think ask.com has done a pretty good job overall with the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979554</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979554</guid>
		<description>Yes, the point of view feature is cool. I think its pretty basic at the moment (someone has just categorized a source as &#039;liberal&#039; or &#039;conservative&#039;). I think there can be some more innovation/creativity around this. Full disclosure: I&#039;m working on a project that has some of this functionality, so I don&#039;t want to sound too negative. Any innovation or changes in the news space is refreshing and welcome, and I think Ask BigNews does really well in some area, especially search (no coincidence!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the point of view feature is cool. I think its pretty basic at the moment (someone has just categorized a source as &#8216;liberal&#8217; or &#8216;conservative&#8217;). I think there can be some more innovation/creativity around this. Full disclosure: I&#8217;m working on a project that has some of this functionality, so I don&#8217;t want to sound too negative. Any innovation or changes in the news space is refreshing and welcome, and I think Ask BigNews does really well in some area, especially search (no coincidence!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TakeThisOneNick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979511</link>
		<dc:creator>TakeThisOneNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979511</guid>
		<description>#17: Yes I agree, trawling through lots of articles is no fun, but I still like the option or least the perception of choice.  Also I found that you can do a search and use their filters to pick a view point (like Liberal) to sort through the results.  Thats cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#17: Yes I agree, trawling through lots of articles is no fun, but I still like the option or least the perception of choice.  Also I found that you can do a search and use their filters to pick a view point (like Liberal) to sort through the results.  Thats cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979500</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979500</guid>
		<description>@11 - I see the point you are trying to make, but I don&#039;t think anyone said only one source always produces the best (high quality/credible/unbiased) content. If there are 1 or 2 articles about a particular topic that are of higher quality than the other 98, why do we need to trawl through the rest? Of course, who decides which articles are higher quality? thats another topic altogether ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11 &#8211; I see the point you are trying to make, but I don&#8217;t think anyone said only one source always produces the best (high quality/credible/unbiased) content. If there are 1 or 2 articles about a particular topic that are of higher quality than the other 98, why do we need to trawl through the rest? Of course, who decides which articles are higher quality? thats another topic altogether <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979398</link>
		<dc:creator>nanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979398</guid>
		<description>Share your favourite stories &amp; reviews at popdup.com. New emerging social bookmarking platform</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Share your favourite stories &amp; reviews at popdup.com. New emerging social bookmarking platform</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979157</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979157</guid>
		<description>No big team here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big team here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979140</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979140</guid>
		<description>Been using it for a few hours.  I really like it.  The BigPicture is a great way to see how a story unfolded and i like the mix of stories and the visual presentation.  Ask is really on a roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been using it for a few hours.  I really like it.  The BigPicture is a great way to see how a story unfolded and i like the mix of stories and the visual presentation.  Ask is really on a roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew olanoff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979101</link>
		<dc:creator>drew olanoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979101</guid>
		<description>Pre-cursor to more integration?  Maybe a test-out-our-teamwork type thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-cursor to more integration?  Maybe a test-out-our-teamwork type thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979077</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979077</guid>
		<description>Social editing-type features (most-emailed, most viewed, etc.) seem popular on mass-market news sites, but still isn&#039;t clear that people want to engage with or even just read a horizontal social editing site.  Newsvine&#039;s numbers have been dropping (perhaps because of last year&#039;s funky re-design, where they may have over-complicated the site with portal-like flexibility), and Digg&#039;s expansion out of IT news just seems to have watered down the site.

Maybe the right formula is just around the corner, but until then it looks like social editing&#039;s better matched to verticals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social editing-type features (most-emailed, most viewed, etc.) seem popular on mass-market news sites, but still isn&#8217;t clear that people want to engage with or even just read a horizontal social editing site.  Newsvine&#8217;s numbers have been dropping (perhaps because of last year&#8217;s funky re-design, where they may have over-complicated the site with portal-like flexibility), and Digg&#8217;s expansion out of IT news just seems to have watered down the site.</p>
<p>Maybe the right formula is just around the corner, but until then it looks like social editing&#8217;s better matched to verticals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Enginuity - Search Engine Marketing Insights From Clay Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979018</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Enginuity - Search Engine Marketing Insights From Clay Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979018</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ask Launches Digg-style News Service...&lt;/strong&gt;

There have been rumors for a couple of weeks that IAC has been looking to hire people for a new &#8216;content&#8217; project launching in the near future. This likely isn&#8217;t it but Ask has launched a Digg-style news portal called Ask Big News.
It...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ask Launches Digg-style News Service&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There have been rumors for a couple of weeks that IAC has been looking to hire people for a new &#8216;content&#8217; project launching in the near future. This likely isn&#8217;t it but Ask has launched a Digg-style news portal called Ask Big News.<br />
It&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TakeThisOneNick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1979003</link>
		<dc:creator>TakeThisOneNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1979003</guid>
		<description>I think thats what the number &quot;BigFactor&quot; they call it, means.  It helps you figure out the top stories.

And for perspectives, I actually like the option (while I may never exercise it) to see lots of articles.  After all if only one source truly produced the &quot;real&quot; news and without bias, shouldn&#039;t we just have a state run news agency (hmmmm......).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think thats what the number &#8220;BigFactor&#8221; they call it, means.  It helps you figure out the top stories.</p>
<p>And for perspectives, I actually like the option (while I may never exercise it) to see lots of articles.  After all if only one source truly produced the &#8220;real&#8221; news and without bias, shouldn&#8217;t we just have a state run news agency (hmmmm&#8230;&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NegativeSpace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978994</link>
		<dc:creator>NegativeSpace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978994</guid>
		<description>I dunno...seems to make sense to me. Ask is trying to establish itself as an alternative to Google News, et al, and this seems like a decent first step. I mean, you can&#039;t tell me Google News or even CNN is any better these days. Thank god it&#039;s not just another Digg clone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno&#8230;seems to make sense to me. Ask is trying to establish itself as an alternative to Google News, et al, and this seems like a decent first step. I mean, you can&#8217;t tell me Google News or even CNN is any better these days. Thank god it&#8217;s not just another Digg clone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978992</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978992</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sites like...mine!&quot; Genius.

If Ask is going to get some value out of this partnership they&#039;d be well-served to apply their searching and filtering heuristics to the Digg-overload problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sites like&#8230;mine!&#8221; Genius.</p>
<p>If Ask is going to get some value out of this partnership they&#8217;d be well-served to apply their searching and filtering heuristics to the Digg-overload problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bring-back the-diskette</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978935</link>
		<dc:creator>bring-back the-diskette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978935</guid>
		<description>I agree with mr. Islam. Why would some want the option to read 500 articles on the same subject?

Isn&#039;t tech supposed to make our lives easier?

Data overload helps no one. I prefer services that show only the important stories, top 10s, etc... Sites like nobosh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with mr. Islam. Why would some want the option to read 500 articles on the same subject?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t tech supposed to make our lives easier?</p>
<p>Data overload helps no one. I prefer services that show only the important stories, top 10s, etc&#8230; Sites like nobosh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978931</guid>
		<description>Also I meant to add, it gives you a bunch of digg posts on the topic too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I meant to add, it gives you a bunch of digg posts on the topic too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978930</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978930</guid>
		<description>#3 check out a specifc news item&#039;s BigPicture, which gives you a week&#039;s worth of data for the news item, including #of blog posts and images per day for the item/topic. It&#039;s pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 check out a specifc news item&#8217;s BigPicture, which gives you a week&#8217;s worth of data for the news item, including #of blog posts and images per day for the item/topic. It&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978928</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978928</guid>
		<description>lol @ Digg and &quot;news&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol @ Digg and &#8220;news&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978926</link>
		<dc:creator>Janko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978926</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it make more sense for Ask to plug Bloglines instead of Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it make more sense for Ask to plug Bloglines instead of Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978920</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978920</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. There&#039;s nothing  compelling about it, and I can&#039;t see the differentiator. While I certainly think the online news space is huge and can handle multiple players, this seems like &#039;just another social news site.&#039; Perhaps there&#039;s a twist and I&#039;m missing it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. There&#8217;s nothing  compelling about it, and I can&#8217;t see the differentiator. While I certainly think the online news space is huge and can handle multiple players, this seems like &#8216;just another social news site.&#8217; Perhaps there&#8217;s a twist and I&#8217;m missing it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1978918</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/06/ask-and-digg-team-up-for-big-news/#comment-1978918</guid>
		<description>So in other words, Ask is going to buy Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in other words, Ask is going to buy Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
