<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Blodget, Still Betting On Google $2,000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:20:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Did the Market Overreact To Google&#8217;s Click-Through Woes?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-2547040</link>
		<dc:creator>Did the Market Overreact To Google&#8217;s Click-Through Woes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-2547040</guid>
		<description>[...] not be flat with last January). The deceleration is alarming, to say the least. Even Henry Blodget, Mr. Google $2,000, now thinks this is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not be flat with last January). The deceleration is alarming, to say the least. Even Henry Blodget, Mr. Google $2,000, now thinks this is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsaneIdea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did the Market Overreact To Google’s Click-Through Woes?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-2007574</link>
		<dc:creator>InsaneIdea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did the Market Overreact To Google’s Click-Through Woes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-2007574</guid>
		<description>[...] not be flat with last January). The deceleration is alarming, to say the least. Even Henry Blodget, Mr. Google $2,000, now thinks this is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not be flat with last January). The deceleration is alarming, to say the least. Even Henry Blodget, Mr. Google $2,000, now thinks this is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ull</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976714</link>
		<dc:creator>Ull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976714</guid>
		<description>GOOG may well grow at 10% CAGR, but the recent correction has been long overdue. Even now, after the huge share price decline, it&#039;s trading at 8.5x revenue, 23.3x	EBITDA and 37.3x earnings, not exactly cheap, but far more reasonable than the recent heady valuations.

Google is good in search advertising, and nothing else (and if the proverbial three guys in a garage come up with a better algorithm, it could lose much of its luster practically overnight). They will have to find new areas of growth to justify high premiums to the broad market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOG may well grow at 10% CAGR, but the recent correction has been long overdue. Even now, after the huge share price decline, it&#8217;s trading at 8.5x revenue, 23.3x	EBITDA and 37.3x earnings, not exactly cheap, but far more reasonable than the recent heady valuations.</p>
<p>Google is good in search advertising, and nothing else (and if the proverbial three guys in a garage come up with a better algorithm, it could lose much of its luster practically overnight). They will have to find new areas of growth to justify high premiums to the broad market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976564</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976564</guid>
		<description>Only 51% revenue growth last quarter from previous year?  Pfftttt!  That&#039;s pitiful.  A mere 14% quarter-over-quarter growth last quarter?  You disgust me, Google.

Seriously, though.  Google&#039;s having a pullback, no big deal.  Their long term projected growth rate is still awesome.  $2000 in 10 years seems conservative.  Avg analyst target on GOOG is still $710, which usually means within a one year timeframe.  If they grow at an avg of 20% for 5 years, then 10% for another 5, that should put them there.

And those estimates are based on current revenue sources, aka search advertising.  Enterprise Apps has huge potential to take market share from Microsoft, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 51% revenue growth last quarter from previous year?  Pfftttt!  That&#8217;s pitiful.  A mere 14% quarter-over-quarter growth last quarter?  You disgust me, Google.</p>
<p>Seriously, though.  Google&#8217;s having a pullback, no big deal.  Their long term projected growth rate is still awesome.  $2000 in 10 years seems conservative.  Avg analyst target on GOOG is still $710, which usually means within a one year timeframe.  If they grow at an avg of 20% for 5 years, then 10% for another 5, that should put them there.</p>
<p>And those estimates are based on current revenue sources, aka search advertising.  Enterprise Apps has huge potential to take market share from Microsoft, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976513</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976513</guid>
		<description>seriously? a must read? i have covered the internet sector for several yrs and read all of the major rags, i also publish myself. i read alley insider too, but there is honestly VERY LITTLE ORIGINAL JOURNALISM/WORK being done at SAI. the vast majority of their content is repurposed, reblog stuff. a must read? doesn&#039;t seem repetitive to you (i.e., a waste of time)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously? a must read? i have covered the internet sector for several yrs and read all of the major rags, i also publish myself. i read alley insider too, but there is honestly VERY LITTLE ORIGINAL JOURNALISM/WORK being done at SAI. the vast majority of their content is repurposed, reblog stuff. a must read? doesn&#8217;t seem repetitive to you (i.e., a waste of time)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dheeraj Sultanian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dheeraj Sultanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976441</guid>
		<description>@ 18 - WTF are you talking about?  Dollar Inflation does not affect Stock Prices, only dollar prices of goods and services to buy - complete misunderstanding of markets.

This current drop is not about earnings - its all about multiple compression.  Google still trades at a premium to the market, around 40 times this year vs. 20 times for the SP500.  It has this premium (which just a few months ago was nearly 60) due to its higher growth rate and favorable risk/reward ratio.  As that goes away, suddenly even though earnings look great, multiple comes crashing down so the stock looses 1/3 - 1/2 its value within weeks.  Its all happened before, will continue to happen in the future as expectations reset.

http://www.infosupply.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 18 &#8211; WTF are you talking about?  Dollar Inflation does not affect Stock Prices, only dollar prices of goods and services to buy &#8211; complete misunderstanding of markets.</p>
<p>This current drop is not about earnings &#8211; its all about multiple compression.  Google still trades at a premium to the market, around 40 times this year vs. 20 times for the SP500.  It has this premium (which just a few months ago was nearly 60) due to its higher growth rate and favorable risk/reward ratio.  As that goes away, suddenly even though earnings look great, multiple comes crashing down so the stock looses 1/3 &#8211; 1/2 its value within weeks.  Its all happened before, will continue to happen in the future as expectations reset.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infosupply.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.infosupply.com'>http://www.infosupply.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976422</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976422</guid>
		<description>please please please do a shout out for the &quot;microsoft is dead&quot; pauline ghram as well. don&#039;t be afraid to slam your web 2.0 fan boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please please please do a shout out for the &#8220;microsoft is dead&#8221; pauline ghram as well. don&#8217;t be afraid to slam your web 2.0 fan boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narsi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1976226</link>
		<dc:creator>Narsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1976226</guid>
		<description>I have asked many people many times, and everytime they have scoffed at me and called me a naysayer...now that I have become immune to cold stares and harsh words, I will ask this again - why on this blessed earth is anyone valuing a one-trick pony - and even in that trick not really unbeatable as there are no entry barriers - at such a ridiculous price?

What is so great about google now, can someone tell me? They are leaders in search, but come on, yahoo search is as good, so google&#039;s quality is more in the minds of the users. Google is a leader in absolutely nothing else, and in all others is not even second. All its services other than search are losing money and some are likely to result in serious blood loss owing to legal suits.

Well, may be they&#039;ll make tons money in partnership with NASA while searching for extra-terrestrials...Mars dollars anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have asked many people many times, and everytime they have scoffed at me and called me a naysayer&#8230;now that I have become immune to cold stares and harsh words, I will ask this again &#8211; why on this blessed earth is anyone valuing a one-trick pony &#8211; and even in that trick not really unbeatable as there are no entry barriers &#8211; at such a ridiculous price?</p>
<p>What is so great about google now, can someone tell me? They are leaders in search, but come on, yahoo search is as good, so google&#8217;s quality is more in the minds of the users. Google is a leader in absolutely nothing else, and in all others is not even second. All its services other than search are losing money and some are likely to result in serious blood loss owing to legal suits.</p>
<p>Well, may be they&#8217;ll make tons money in partnership with NASA while searching for extra-terrestrials&#8230;Mars dollars anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1975940</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1975940</guid>
		<description>Lol @ Poker Sharks comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol @ Poker Sharks comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1975938</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1975938</guid>
		<description>Btw... $2000 in 10-15 years wont be worth anything by the looks of how the value of the USD is going downhill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw&#8230; $2000 in 10-15 years wont be worth anything by the looks of how the value of the USD is going downhill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Sharks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1975753</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Sharks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1975753</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll make a prediction: Google shares will be worth $30,000 a share in 10 years time.

How?

£1 will equal 3,000US dollars as the US plunges into its deepest recession yet with the dollar dying like a wounded cat.

Id start converting your US dollars now before you can&#039;t buy a loaf of bread for less than $10,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll make a prediction: Google shares will be worth $30,000 a share in 10 years time.</p>
<p>How?</p>
<p>£1 will equal 3,000US dollars as the US plunges into its deepest recession yet with the dollar dying like a wounded cat.</p>
<p>Id start converting your US dollars now before you can&#8217;t buy a loaf of bread for less than $10,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy C</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1975593</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1975593</guid>
		<description>Quellt horreur !

A tech stock has plunged back to the levels of, err, 6 whole months ago. In a falling market.

Guess what - the price of shares can go down as well as up.

Try telling us something we don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quellt horreur !</p>
<p>A tech stock has plunged back to the levels of, err, 6 whole months ago. In a falling market.</p>
<p>Guess what &#8211; the price of shares can go down as well as up.</p>
<p>Try telling us something we don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ViralKing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1975072</link>
		<dc:creator>The ViralKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1975072</guid>
		<description>Inflation and the sort, no one can predict on long term, but google should get to $2k at some stage and sooner (less than 10 years) rather then later is my bet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inflation and the sort, no one can predict on long term, but google should get to $2k at some stage and sooner (less than 10 years) rather then later is my bet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ngu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ngu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974883</guid>
		<description>The honeymoon between Wall Street and Google is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The honeymoon between Wall Street and Google is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zwe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974608</link>
		<dc:creator>zwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974608</guid>
		<description>if facebook had a public mkt and started at 15 bill mkt cap the same day of googles peak, and the market &quot;correction&quot; , google correlation, and recent data including marks stats flushed out, where would it be trading this evening? wanna vosnap? what the hell was that disaster of a weekend!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if facebook had a public mkt and started at 15 bill mkt cap the same day of googles peak, and the market &#8220;correction&#8221; , google correlation, and recent data including marks stats flushed out, where would it be trading this evening? wanna vosnap? what the hell was that disaster of a weekend!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzipan from Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974600</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzipan from Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974600</guid>
		<description>Hilarious. I said GOOG was overpriced at $700 and shorted it and people laughed.

On Fri i said it was going to high 300&#039; in 60 days and a couple of you laughed. Now this.

The fundamental problem is that the valuation of these companies is not supported by any ability to exit. At $2000, the market cap is $600B, there is no company that can buy Google at that price, therefore the price is unjustified.

It&#039;s quite simple really, if you tell me you have something for sale at a price nobody can afford, its not worth it. Unless there is some hyper-inflation which takes hold or GOOG throws off enough cash on its own to support a LBO, it won&#039;t get to $2,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious. I said GOOG was overpriced at $700 and shorted it and people laughed.</p>
<p>On Fri i said it was going to high 300&#8242; in 60 days and a couple of you laughed. Now this.</p>
<p>The fundamental problem is that the valuation of these companies is not supported by any ability to exit. At $2000, the market cap is $600B, there is no company that can buy Google at that price, therefore the price is unjustified.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite simple really, if you tell me you have something for sale at a price nobody can afford, its not worth it. Unless there is some hyper-inflation which takes hold or GOOG throws off enough cash on its own to support a LBO, it won&#8217;t get to $2,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hanscom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hanscom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974579</guid>
		<description>To get to $2000, Google would need to hit a couple more home runs.  There is only so much left in the search market.  The larger the business becomes, the more difficult it is to keep up with the CAGR that justifies the high P/E ratio.  $2000 would be difficult even long term -- however, $1000 over the next five years could be in reach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get to $2000, Google would need to hit a couple more home runs.  There is only so much left in the search market.  The larger the business becomes, the more difficult it is to keep up with the CAGR that justifies the high P/E ratio.  $2000 would be difficult even long term &#8212; however, $1000 over the next five years could be in reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YDRIVE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974577</link>
		<dc:creator>YDRIVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974577</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s happening to GOOG... $495?!! Anyway, buy more YHOO... 8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s happening to GOOG&#8230; $495?!! Anyway, buy more YHOO&#8230; <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974547</link>
		<dc:creator>sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974547</guid>
		<description>i think the prices are falling because of slow down in USA economy not only google but everyone will have one or other impact on his/her life worldwide due to this slowdown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the prices are falling because of slow down in USA economy not only google but everyone will have one or other impact on his/her life worldwide due to this slowdown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Williard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974540</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Williard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974540</guid>
		<description>I tend to avoid SVI as much as possible these days. The coverage there has just become too mickymouse.  It is as if they expect the readers to have the memory of a goldfish - that would be the only way you could account for the conflicting predictions and analysis from one day to the next. 

Reading Blodgett is just too infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to avoid SVI as much as possible these days. The coverage there has just become too mickymouse.  It is as if they expect the readers to have the memory of a goldfish &#8211; that would be the only way you could account for the conflicting predictions and analysis from one day to the next. </p>
<p>Reading Blodgett is just too infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974537</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974537</guid>
		<description>Tech leadership is tenuous.  Sure, $2000 in 10-15 years is possible, that is, assuming, Google is still the dominant player.  Have you forgotten that ten years ago, Yahoo was on top of the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech leadership is tenuous.  Sure, $2000 in 10-15 years is possible, that is, assuming, Google is still the dominant player.  Have you forgotten that ten years ago, Yahoo was on top of the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbleHead</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974492</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbleHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974492</guid>
		<description>Mike, do you even read your own site?  When Duncan put this post up:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/imperium-googles-march-towards-becoming-amercias-biggest-company/

I used it as my own magazine cover 2.0 indicator to put a short on GOOG which has paid off handsomely.  Thanks for providing the ultimate stock fade with techcrunch.  I think I might get long some GOOG based on your post and cover my short although I&#039;d feel better if it was Duncan who had posted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, do you even read your own site?  When Duncan put this post up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/imperium-googles-march-towards-becoming-amercias-biggest-company/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/imperium-googles-march-towards-becoming-amercias-biggest-company/'>http://www.tech...iggest-company/</a></p>
<p>I used it as my own magazine cover 2.0 indicator to put a short on GOOG which has paid off handsomely.  Thanks for providing the ultimate stock fade with techcrunch.  I think I might get long some GOOG based on your post and cover my short although I&#8217;d feel better if it was Duncan who had posted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Larrikin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974490</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Larrikin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974490</guid>
		<description>@17 absolutely right. With the coming inflation and decline of the US dollar, $2000 will be not much more than breaking even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@17 absolutely right. With the coming inflation and decline of the US dollar, $2000 will be not much more than breaking even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonTroll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974476</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974476</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, take that Blodget, you asshole, you&#039;ve been TechPunched!
Oh, you didn&#039;t get it, don&#039;t you know I&#039;m just kidding around!
And fuck you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, take that Blodget, you asshole, you&#8217;ve been TechPunched!<br />
Oh, you didn&#8217;t get it, don&#8217;t you know I&#8217;m just kidding around!<br />
And fuck you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauricio Pastrana</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1974444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio Pastrana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/hey-blodget-still-betting-on-google-2000/#comment-1974444</guid>
		<description>Going by inflation, What cost $700 in 1987 would cost $1307.29 in 2007. That&#039;s a 20 year window, doesn&#039;t seem so far off to shoot for $2000 15 years forward eh?

-mp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going by inflation, What cost $700 in 1987 would cost $1307.29 in 2007. That&#8217;s a 20 year window, doesn&#8217;t seem so far off to shoot for $2000 15 years forward eh?</p>
<p>-mp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
