<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CVSDude to Grease oDesk&#8217;s Outsourcing Wheels</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karel Soupal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1979663</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Soupal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1979663</guid>
		<description>My question would be how much of the user base is actually using this option ... I have written a &lt;a href="http://ework.cz/odeskcom-review/" rel="nofollow"&gt;review of odesk in this post&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question would be how much of the user base is actually using this option &#8230; I have written a <a href="http://ework.cz/odeskcom-review/" rel="nofollow">review of odesk in this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kolev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1977417</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1977417</guid>
		<description>@Mark: As a Web 2.0 blog, you should promote companies like Unfuddle or SpringLoops, which have true Web 2.0 products and not one of the old-school purely hosting companies like CVSDude, wush.net, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark: As a Web 2.0 blog, you should promote companies like Unfuddle or SpringLoops, which have true Web 2.0 products and not one of the old-school purely hosting companies like CVSDude, wush.net, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1976616</link>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1976616</guid>
		<description>this is what makes the internet beautiful... the rest is frosting... may all prosper gloriously</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is what makes the internet beautiful&#8230; the rest is frosting&#8230; may all prosper gloriously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1976597</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1976597</guid>
		<description>With all of this version tracking moving into web-based repositories, is there a future here for web-based IDEs where no real configuration of the workspace and repositories is required?

Maybe something similar to IBM's Eclifox project, but served using the SaaS model?

We've seen office applications migrate to the web, why not an IDE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of this version tracking moving into web-based repositories, is there a future here for web-based IDEs where no real configuration of the workspace and repositories is required?</p>
<p>Maybe something similar to IBM&#8217;s Eclifox project, but served using the SaaS model?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen office applications migrate to the web, why not an IDE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Marion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974711</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Marion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974711</guid>
		<description>Mark- Thanks for the story- we are excited to provide hosting for oDesk's customers, and their trusted online marketplace for developers will help our customers grow their own businesses.

Jon- You may not have heard of us because the industry / concept of commercial source code hosting, and providing essential change management tools as a service (i.e. Subversion, CVS, Trac, Bugzilla, etc.) is still somewhat novel. But it makes a lot of sense, saves a lot of money- and we're lucky to have loyal customers (http://cvsdude.com/testimonials.pl). Competitors include any major software change management solution.  

User 447- Your free plan is permanent, enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark- Thanks for the story- we are excited to provide hosting for oDesk&#8217;s customers, and their trusted online marketplace for developers will help our customers grow their own businesses.</p>
<p>Jon- You may not have heard of us because the industry / concept of commercial source code hosting, and providing essential change management tools as a service (i.e. Subversion, CVS, Trac, Bugzilla, etc.) is still somewhat novel. But it makes a lot of sense, saves a lot of money- and we&#8217;re lucky to have loyal customers (http://cvsdude.com/testimonials.pl). Competitors include any major software change management solution.  </p>
<p>User 447- Your free plan is permanent, enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Goler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974652</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Goler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974652</guid>
		<description>Mark - Thanks for covering this news.  We're excited about the partnership.

@ Joel - We'll continue to offer our existing SVN solution which remains a free option and one that is integrated with your oDesk team room.  CVSDude provides more fine-grained management of repository permissions and other goodies, though, if you desire a greater level of control.

@ Ryan - Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark - Thanks for covering this news.  We&#8217;re excited about the partnership.</p>
<p>@ Joel - We&#8217;ll continue to offer our existing SVN solution which remains a free option and one that is integrated with your oDesk team room.  CVSDude provides more fine-grained management of repository permissions and other goodies, though, if you desire a greater level of control.</p>
<p>@ Ryan - Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Spahn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974589</guid>
		<description>We found my developer on there.... a year and half later he's now our CTO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We found my developer on there&#8230;. a year and half later he&#8217;s now our CTO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Strellner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974574</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974574</guid>
		<description>Looks like oDesk is keeping their SVN and promoting the one from CVSDude as an upgrade.

http://cvsdude.com/product.pl?pnrId=100

Oh, and the CVSDude promotion stuff is already live in my oDesk account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like oDesk is keeping their SVN and promoting the one from CVSDude as an upgrade.</p>
<p><a href="http://cvsdude.com/product.pl?pnrId=100" rel="nofollow">http://cvsdude.com/product.pl?pnrId=100</a></p>
<p>Oh, and the CVSDude promotion stuff is already live in my oDesk account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: User447</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974565</link>
		<dc:creator>User447</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974565</guid>
		<description>I had never heard of CVSdude before. All the Subversion ports in our office are currently being used by customers, and I was forced to use local subversion.

I just opened a CVSDude account and I am now using that for free. I dunno how long I can keep it under 2 megs, but if you don't commit image files, then you are pretty much set. Losing images is no big deal anyway. You can just email them to the other developers and share the same username, to keep it free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never heard of CVSdude before. All the Subversion ports in our office are currently being used by customers, and I was forced to use local subversion.</p>
<p>I just opened a CVSDude account and I am now using that for free. I dunno how long I can keep it under 2 megs, but if you don&#8217;t commit image files, then you are pretty much set. Losing images is no big deal anyway. You can just email them to the other developers and share the same username, to keep it free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Strellner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974559</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974559</guid>
		<description>I find it more interesting that oDesk is willing to phase out their existing CVS solution that was custom built for them.

Granted, we don't use oDesks existing solution, and I am sure most other companies don't either because, well, it sucked.

Its good to see that they are willing to move onto better things instead of holding onto something that isn't working for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it more interesting that oDesk is willing to phase out their existing CVS solution that was custom built for them.</p>
<p>Granted, we don&#8217;t use oDesks existing solution, and I am sure most other companies don&#8217;t either because, well, it sucked.</p>
<p>Its good to see that they are willing to move onto better things instead of holding onto something that isn&#8217;t working for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974522</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974522</guid>
		<description>Outsourcing my brown ass...IBM just fired 700 newly recruited workers at India -  http://www.techbanyan.com/archives/146

wait a min..is the work moving to China?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outsourcing my brown ass&#8230;IBM just fired 700 newly recruited workers at India -  <a href="http://www.techbanyan.com/archives/146" rel="nofollow">http://www.techbanyan.com/archives/146</a></p>
<p>wait a min..is the work moving to China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hendrickson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hendrickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974436</guid>
		<description>@Jon - I should have clarified; CVSDude has 40,000+ &lt;em&gt;users&lt;/em&gt; and several thousand customers (aka company accounts).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon - I should have clarified; CVSDude has 40,000+ <em>users</em> and several thousand customers (aka company accounts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/04/cvsdude-to-grease-odesks-outsourcing-wheels/#comment-1974422</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting concept, though, I think for most project, simply having one team in place to handle everything is still more efficient unless timeliness and budgets dictate otherwise. If 40K companies use this software solution already, that means there is a heck of a lot of potential growth to still happen considering I never heard of these guys before.

Who are their competitors? IBM, CGI, Microsoft?

Jon
http://buzvia.com - Share Influence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting concept, though, I think for most project, simply having one team in place to handle everything is still more efficient unless timeliness and budgets dictate otherwise. If 40K companies use this software solution already, that means there is a heck of a lot of potential growth to still happen considering I never heard of these guys before.</p>
<p>Who are their competitors? IBM, CGI, Microsoft?</p>
<p>Jon<br />
<a href="http://buzvia.com" rel="nofollow">http://buzvia.com</a> - Share Influence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.300 seconds -->
