http://www.fileshack.us/download.php

I’m looking for something that will easily paste screen shots to the internet, I was thinking either Gspace or some other photo hosting website would have a firefox addon, or maybe this would do the trick.

No such luck. Works for text though.

(The paid account says media is supported [http://controlc.com/forums/features-paid-version-t5.html], FYI)

SEOs employ people to make relevant-looking comments with links on high-traffic blogs, in order to increase their own page rank. These clowns just add a generic blowjob comment to every post to drum up traffic.

Then again, every TC post is essentially a blowjob comment devoid of any critical analysis.

How many of these comments are from the same user? Too many raving groupies loving it.

You do NOT have permission to store and disseminate my company’s copyrighted content.

This is something I would definately never use. Just another technology tidbit that doesn’t solve a real problem.

Also to interact between web and ‘offline’ is fine. But if I want to get used to it, I need net access everywhere and I may online be a casual user.

I remember the enterprise I was working in controlling for installed citrix while forbidding to have local apps. It took my boss half a day of me getting more and more frustrated over the problem of copy and paste not working in the smooth flow I was used to to present me with an order for a laptop so that I would be allowed offline access.

The problem is that if you really work with the clipboard, you will use it heavily. This goes from c&p of data colums to text to files to images, at least several times an hour. The speed of a connection cannot keep up with this as you want to work fast - which is why you hit ctrl-c and ctrl-v. And that even with encryption?

Therefor, the naming is a bad choice and I wonder if they ever consulted somebody working heavily with the keyboard; as ctrl-c/shift-ctrl-c and alt-c have meanings already (and limit them to the windows world - isnt copy on the mac apple-c?)

There are many interesting ways one could work around this issue (and really be bought up *cough* have a nice exit) but this does not seem like one of them.

Great.

http://www.jhatak.com
Blazing Fast Internet Web Meetings : Free

I could actually here Mike Arrington groaning as he wrote this paragraph. Why bother covering services that don’t make any sense? Maybe I’ll invent a service that logs all of my bluescreen ram dumps so people can see the random lines of OpenGL code that crash my video card drivers, AND SUBSCRIBE TO IT VIA RSS!!!

john
dishonestrealtor.com

You do realize that what you just described is not specific to the MD5, so Founder’s absolutely right - “collisions have no impact on its security”.

Based on the info available in the OP it is hard to speculate what their exact implementation is and whether it is “awfully amateurish”. There’s just no enough information.

+1

However the description in the quote is quite wishy-washy. They have to realize that dumbing down security descriptions and watering it down with some unrelated trivia (”half of time used on .. blah blah”) not helping to establish their security credibility AT ALL.

Just publish the damn spec, and let people take it apart. If they in fact spend 50% of dev time designing the security architecture, it should be rock solid and withstand any public scrutiny with ease.

I gather lots of great data for research this way and it retains the URL and images.

Mostly I use this to then generate google docs and other more formal bits of information.

ControlC sounds like it would work great for harvesting of information and allowing for programmatic consumption.