The tenets of Web 2.0 are not without their pornographic, or otherwise erotic, applications. We’ve covered PornoTube and EroShare, both of which are sites for user-generated porn. Now we’ve come across a site called Boobik? (yes, with a question mark in its name, and no, NSFW). If PornoTube is a YouTube of porn and EroShare is a Flickr of porn, then perhaps it’s best to describe Boobik? as a Twitter of porn.
To be fair, Boobik? doesn’t explicitly bill itself as a place for sharing user-generated pornography. Rather, it places the emphasis on social networking (the Facebook of porn?):
boobik is a place to meet people the sexy way.
You can get to know people through them sharing and broadcasting short experiences, thoughts and fantasies. By that we mean what they did last night, just now (hand in skirt under the desk), with whom and how many times). And don’t forget them pictures as well…
But the result, I imagine, will be mostly just to share pornographic material with others. The site’s frontpage shows a series of microblog posts, some of which contain photos with nudity. You can post text, photos, and video embeds with Boobik?, apparently of any rating level (the terms of service doesn’t preclude explicit material).
Want to share erotic thoughts on the go? You can also post to the site from a mobile phone, IM account, or email.
Thanks goes to Orli Yakuel for discovering this site.
Am I the only one who thinks “a place to meet people the sexy way” sounds like a bad euphemism for ‘find a call girl?’
Hmm.. boobik? is not a bad idea. But the way they’d make the website..
Boobik? gonna be totally spammed.
If you want to earn money in the pornindustry online, make a spam-free ugc where the professional pornmakers could get something out of it. Today, they upload movieclips just because they get some publicity in the description-field..
Interesting take on the niche, I’m not so certain that this has viability with things like AdultFriendFinder being a PlentyOfFish of the Adult world.
Oh no - “twitter sex” !
After seeing all of these sites, in the spirit of HotOrNot, somebody should make one called RealOrFake ….
er … shouldn’t that read, “yes, with a question mark in its name, and *YES*, NSFW”?
Wow. Ripping off a quickie just took on a whole new meaning.
Oh no - “twitter sex”
twatter?
Gee, and I thought I had something going with Twitterotica. http://twitter.com/twitterotica.com. I suppose there can never be enough sites like this.
So its just a sex-twitter thingie, how is this techcrunch material?
I’m thinking of starting something like pornocrunch to cover all porn statrup’s out there. Later Techcrunch will definitely acquire it
Lame. I prefer http://twatter.org
Have you ever thought what actually are all these new neat easy-to-use apps really good for? The Web2.0 emperor wears no clothes…
Why not just inject a wireless modem directly into men’s brains and connect it to Twitter? “I want to have sex with her, I want to have sex with her, I want to have sex with him, I want to have sex with her, I want to have sex with her so long as she wears a bag on her head…” that would be every seven seconds, according to Science(TM).
For the men who enjoy men there is also GayTwit.com