<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IAC &#8220;Very Close&#8221; To Acquiring Flixster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IAC&#8217;s Diller Summons Flixster To New York Just To Kill The Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-2004847</link>
		<dc:creator>IAC&#8217;s Diller Summons Flixster To New York Just To Kill The Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-2004847</guid>
		<description>[...] much anticipated IAC/Flixster acquisition isn&#8217;t going to happen, we&#8217;ve heard. The two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much anticipated IAC/Flixster acquisition isn&#8217;t going to happen, we&#8217;ve heard. The two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1930856</link>
		<dc:creator>gordn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1930856</guid>
		<description>first time TechCrunch visitor-- Learning the lingo slowly-- 
Flixster visitor loyalty appears to be well-earned, whether a deal goes through or not.  G  in CT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first time TechCrunch visitor&#8211; Learning the lingo slowly&#8211;<br />
Flixster visitor loyalty appears to be well-earned, whether a deal goes through or not.  G  in CT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Ramley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1921580</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Ramley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1921580</guid>
		<description>This is interesting news.  It is really one of the first big niche social networks to be listed for high dollar.  To note flixster's competition, there are a few with filmcrave.com bursting onto the scene in late august as having some interesting partners and picking up an OWA (over flixster no less).  I am curious to know what this may do to those small/niche social networking sites in terms of their value (cafe mom and others)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting news.  It is really one of the first big niche social networks to be listed for high dollar.  To note flixster&#8217;s competition, there are a few with filmcrave.com bursting onto the scene in late august as having some interesting partners and picking up an OWA (over flixster no less).  I am curious to know what this may do to those small/niche social networking sites in terms of their value (cafe mom and others)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w2i</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1919353</link>
		<dc:creator>w2i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1919353</guid>
		<description>Mike,
indeed, flixter has close to 19M global uniques
http://www.quantcast.com/flixster.com 
the site is quantified, which means we could take these numbers for real..
based on previous deals, 20M unique visitors per month could command a price close to or even above $200M..
my 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
indeed, flixter has close to 19M global uniques<br />
<a href="http://www.quantcast.com/flixster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quantcast.com/flixster.com</a><br />
the site is quantified, which means we could take these numbers for real..<br />
based on previous deals, 20M unique visitors per month could command a price close to or even above $200M..<br />
my 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918567</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918567</guid>
		<description>I'm sure this has something to do with IAC's new 3D social gaming venture GarageGames (instantaction.com) - from that angle it might make a bit more sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this has something to do with IAC&#8217;s new 3D social gaming venture GarageGames (instantaction.com) - from that angle it might make a bit more sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecee.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918257</link>
		<dc:creator>tecee.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918257</guid>
		<description>thsk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thsk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technicle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918201</link>
		<dc:creator>Technicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1918201</guid>
		<description>@#6: Omnidrive..

Some comments today on webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/13/who-protects-your-cloud-data</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#6: Omnidrive..</p>
<p>Some comments today on webworkerdaily.com/2008/01/13/who-protects-your-cloud-data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917907</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917907</guid>
		<description>Strange to hear that their traffic is going down, because their Alexa graph looks excellent.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/flixster.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange to hear that their traffic is going down, because their Alexa graph looks excellent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/flixster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/data/deta.....ixster.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nattriss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917814</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nattriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917814</guid>
		<description>I'll bet that Flixster's recent stats are down compared to May because in June they launched their Facebook 'Movies' application, which has been installed over 14 million times and has over a million active (daily) users (according to adonomics.com). As a previous user of Flixster, I am now much more likely to access it through the Facebook application because a lot of my Facebook friends also have it, but don't access Flixster directly.

8 million (November site visits) + 35 million (current monthly Facebook application visits) = a lot more than 12 million (May site visits).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet that Flixster&#8217;s recent stats are down compared to May because in June they launched their Facebook &#8216;Movies&#8217; application, which has been installed over 14 million times and has over a million active (daily) users (according to adonomics.com). As a previous user of Flixster, I am now much more likely to access it through the Facebook application because a lot of my Facebook friends also have it, but don&#8217;t access Flixster directly.</p>
<p>8 million (November site visits) + 35 million (current monthly Facebook application visits) = a lot more than 12 million (May site visits).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Media Ups Stake in IAC to 30%; IAC Getting "Close To" Flixster Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917772</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Media Ups Stake in IAC to 30%; IAC Getting "Close To" Flixster Acquisition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917772</guid>
		<description>[...] is a social network centered around movies.  According to TechCrunch, either the deal is done or is &#8220;very close.&#8221;  The deal is rumored to be potentially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a social network centered around movies.  According to TechCrunch, either the deal is done or is &#8220;very close.&#8221;  The deal is rumored to be potentially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917765</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917765</guid>
		<description>Also,

http://learncoldfusion.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also,</p>
<p><a href="http://learncoldfusion.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://learncoldfusion.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917687</link>
		<dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917687</guid>
		<description>boring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917438</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917438</guid>
		<description>IAC does seem to bargain shop - but then again, maybe Flixster might be the only game left for getting that many eyeballs.  I'm sure their venture capital guys will enjoy the buyout...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IAC does seem to bargain shop - but then again, maybe Flixster might be the only game left for getting that many eyeballs.  I&#8217;m sure their venture capital guys will enjoy the buyout&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917428</link>
		<dc:creator>Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917428</guid>
		<description>@7 had a great chuckle at what your site advertises. Thanks :) Oh and cool gadgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@7 had a great chuckle at what your site advertises. Thanks <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Oh and cool gadgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonestMall.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917389</link>
		<dc:creator>HonestMall.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917389</guid>
		<description>it'll be interesting to see how they will build and improve a movie community while also building and improving on their video community over at vimeo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how they will build and improve a movie community while also building and improving on their video community over at vimeo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mehus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917379</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mehus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917379</guid>
		<description>This is actually good news from a "lowering insane valuations" standpoint. If Flixster sells for $150 million, including earn-out, as the 10th largest social networking property on the Internet, just ahead of Bebo, that means Bebo's insanely huge guesstimated valuation of $1 billion is totally off the wall. It means that Bebo can't realistically sell itself for more than $100 million and their founder bet get his darn head of the clouds. No one's going to pay $1 billion for the 11th largest social networking website will slow or negative growth prospects. :)

Cheers,
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually good news from a &#8220;lowering insane valuations&#8221; standpoint. If Flixster sells for $150 million, including earn-out, as the 10th largest social networking property on the Internet, just ahead of Bebo, that means Bebo&#8217;s insanely huge guesstimated valuation of $1 billion is totally off the wall. It means that Bebo can&#8217;t realistically sell itself for more than $100 million and their founder bet get his darn head of the clouds. No one&#8217;s going to pay $1 billion for the 11th largest social networking website will slow or negative growth prospects. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzipan From Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917352</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzipan From Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917352</guid>
		<description>@9

look at all those page views. They have revenue and its real...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@9</p>
<p>look at all those page views. They have revenue and its real&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917333</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917333</guid>
		<description>As an employee of IAC, this is deeply disappointing and is another example of the poor strategic thinking that occurs at HQ. Buying a soon to be irrelevant player with no defensible content, who's traffic and PV will continue to decline due to their "widget" on Facebook. After the company splits, the quarterly calls are going to be brutal. Short this puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an employee of IAC, this is deeply disappointing and is another example of the poor strategic thinking that occurs at HQ. Buying a soon to be irrelevant player with no defensible content, who&#8217;s traffic and PV will continue to decline due to their &#8220;widget&#8221; on Facebook. After the company splits, the quarterly calls are going to be brutal. Short this puppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCluck - SEO/SEM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917318</link>
		<dc:creator>iCluck - SEO/SEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917318</guid>
		<description>I think Flickster is a great revenue stream, the reveue will just need to be maximized -- I think that number of page views is insane and very impressive -- It's all about finding the purple cow isn't it? I still don't understand though, Flickster is such a third tier service in comparison to YouTube. IAC Should be going for the biggest fish and the Alexa rating is the best point when buying these companies as well as their SEO/SEM status according to links and number of pages including page rank and site architecture. 

I.E. Flickster has 236,000 links and YouTube has 31,300,000 links.... That's a rather large difference.... Especially concerning their PRs and number of pages as well as loyalty fanbase. IAC may be wasting their money or if those page views are correct, they may be gaining a pretty good foothold...It depends on the outcome of the deal. I would buy it for much less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Flickster is a great revenue stream, the reveue will just need to be maximized &#8212; I think that number of page views is insane and very impressive &#8212; It&#8217;s all about finding the purple cow isn&#8217;t it? I still don&#8217;t understand though, Flickster is such a third tier service in comparison to YouTube. IAC Should be going for the biggest fish and the Alexa rating is the best point when buying these companies as well as their SEO/SEM status according to links and number of pages including page rank and site architecture. </p>
<p>I.E. Flickster has 236,000 links and YouTube has 31,300,000 links&#8230;. That&#8217;s a rather large difference&#8230;. Especially concerning their PRs and number of pages as well as loyalty fanbase. IAC may be wasting their money or if those page views are correct, they may be gaining a pretty good foothold&#8230;It depends on the outcome of the deal. I would buy it for much less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven W.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917288</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917288</guid>
		<description>Having been a frustrated IACI shareholder in the past ... my guess is after they acquire it there'd be a year of speculation and consternation by Wall St. analysts about how they might best spin it off ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a frustrated IACI shareholder in the past &#8230; my guess is after they acquire it there&#8217;d be a year of speculation and consternation by Wall St. analysts about how they might best spin it off <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technicle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917234</link>
		<dc:creator>Technicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917234</guid>
		<description>@Dyde - not unreasonable..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dyde - not unreasonable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917232</link>
		<dc:creator>jpp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917232</guid>
		<description>@15 the founders of Flixster are actually pretty smart guys who worked very hard for years to make this happen, and have created a valuable service. 

you are just jealous of the fact that they are about to make $50M each while you continue to slave away at your little job :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@15 the founders of Flixster are actually pretty smart guys who worked very hard for years to make this happen, and have created a valuable service. </p>
<p>you are just jealous of the fact that they are about to make $50M each while you continue to slave away at your little job <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyde</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917229</guid>
		<description>Damn Bubble 2.0 is in full swing. The tulip mania is starting. 
I should quit and start a new social network company - I'll call it bubbl2 and it will have no business model, no advertising revenue, and pages full of comments like OMG, LOLZ, ROFLMAO and of course spam. In fact any normal comments will be moderated. Then I'll sell it for 2000000000000000% profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn Bubble 2.0 is in full swing. The tulip mania is starting.<br />
I should quit and start a new social network company - I&#8217;ll call it bubbl2 and it will have no business model, no advertising revenue, and pages full of comments like OMG, LOLZ, ROFLMAO and of course spam. In fact any normal comments will be moderated. Then I&#8217;ll sell it for 2000000000000000% profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: User447</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917228</link>
		<dc:creator>User447</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917228</guid>
		<description>Are they going to get Lodwick back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they going to get Lodwick back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917226</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/12/iac-very-close-to-acquiring-flixster/#comment-1917226</guid>
		<description>IAC is pathetic.  They buy 3rd and 4th tier services.  They need to learn to go big or don't go at all.  What will this site do for them?  If you want to be in the game you need to buy a big name just like G bought YT.  These YT clones are not going to do anything for the big boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IAC is pathetic.  They buy 3rd and 4th tier services.  They need to learn to go big or don&#8217;t go at all.  What will this site do for them?  If you want to be in the game you need to buy a big name just like G bought YT.  These YT clones are not going to do anything for the big boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.102 seconds -->
