If you can’t beat ‘em, turn into a widget and join ‘em.
Condé Nast is changing strategies on Flip, its young-teen women social network that launched last February. They announced today that Flip will be “reshaped as a flexible web application designed to live on social networking platform, starting with Facebook.”
Translation: “We give up.” Comscore says Flip has dropped to around 100,000 monthly visitors from a high of half a million in May (see chart). Facebook has, by comparison, 100 million worldwide monthly visitors, or about 1,000 times the audience.
Condé Nast says that they’ll continue to operate the Flip.com website, but development and marketing efforts will shift to distributed applications.
So Flip turns, essentially, into one of thousands of Facebook applications. To date, the Flip application on Facebook has nine daily active users. This smells like deadpool to me.
Another deadpool! Too bad!
Facebook has 100 million users?
Just yesterday, Ouriel Ohayon wrote on TC that it’s “really easy to fact check that Facebook does not have close to a hundred million users”.
Someone in your office is not doing his/her fact-checking!
I like flip. I have been using flip for two years.
—
http://www.bywifi.com — Mobile Transcoding of Videos and Web Pages for Mobile Phone and PDA
Deadpool indeed. Its very hard to find space in a crowded market unless you come up with a killer app.
I read that they had 18 employees for Flip alone. What the heck were 18 people doing day to day for work on it? Sounds like poor management…the product itself is actually pretty cool
http://www.leveragingideas.com
At least they know when to say when, instead of throwing good money after bad.
It’s a waste of a perfectly fine domain name, though.
Anyone know what caused the steep descent after hitting their peak? Likely they had a runway to spend on SEM or distribution through Conde that expired and the site couldn’t sustain itself without it, but just interested if there is another culprit.
I guess this was a Flip flop.
18 people work on flip because it is pretty complicated to deliver that functionality we did. Anyone who writes something like that never build a flip.com.
Looks interesting. Evolve or die.
I like it
————
http://www.xencasino.com
“Facebook has 100 million users?
Just yesterday, Ouriel Ohayon wrote on TC that it’s “really easy to fact check that Facebook does not have close to a hundred million users”.
Someone in your office is not doing his/her fact-checking!”
–
100 million Monthly Visitors! not 100 million users.
Oh 100 million monthly visits.
It failed to stand out in a market with dozens of competitors (social networks), so it’s gone into a market with thousands of competitors (social network apps). Fail. Sorry, I know that word’s overused – but then, the damage is already done, so here it is again. Fail. Fail fail fail fail fail. What’s that coming over the hill? Is it fail? Yes.
They might be planning to beat Piczo!
I’m not sure I really agree with idea that it’s a good move for all businesses to abandon niche social network building. I’d say that Conde’ Nast’s “niche” market was actually too big a market segment to succeed. Long tail niche sites that I’ve seen be successful tend to target seemingly smaller communities, ones that are only large in internet aggregate rather than in initial market segmentation. (Young girls in the US alone is probably a 5-15 million person market segment) Successful niche social networks need more cohesive culture & connection than a target audience that size is likely to have.
If anything I’d think niche community sites haven’t yet been fully realized, Conde Nast’s strategy was perhaps unsuccessful due to their unwillingness to truly embrace a niche, a desire to homogenize a group that is too diverse and vast to banner together under one site such as flip. I’d say that Conde Nast’s new strategy of trying to leverage “other” social networking sites proves the point that their real problem was in identifying their niche, rather than with the strategy, as they’re hoping to tap into their demographic in each larger pool, which in some sense is a continuation of their original strategy of market segmentation with the added twist of recognizing that they are targeting too broad a group to offer them a single message or service that unifies or compels the whole audience. I.E. their long tail is their group within each larger group. I’d imagine they still won’t see much success without really chopping up their focus into even tighter, more unified market segments though.
I think rather than the day of the niche social network being over, it’s a sign that big companies who are trying to market to large, unfocused market segments can’t build cost effective social networks, which leaves an opportunity for smaller companies to create effective, focused networks. Businesses that do have a more easily identifiable, more cohesive audience would be a good fit for targeted social networks, and there is still a large desire for content publishing and sharing functionality that lives behind a user defined private fence. The trick here is all in the targeting, and all on the ROI you can expect from actually reaching your exact audience.
I just got an email from them saying it’s going to close:
—
Dear Flipster,
We are sorry to tell you that Flip will be closing on Tuesday, December 16.
If you have any flipbooks that you would like to save before this date, we suggest you print them. It’s easy; go to the flipbook and click on the Print button just below it.
Thank you for your dedication to Flip and for making it an exceptionally creative community. Also, please visit our sister site, TeenVogue.com.
Flip Staff
http://www.simp...fieddomains.com
Simplified Domains is a new and exciting way to expand upon the current domain naming system. It is important to realize that this system is an expansion upon the old system and it will integrate itself flawlessly into the current domain-naming scheme. Several problems exist in the current system, which are addressed by Simplified Domains.
Trademarked names are protected
Domain names in the current system are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain. It seems like all the “good ones” are taken. It is even more frustrating (and expensive) for a company such as Nissan or Miller whose domain names are not available. They are forced to pay “cybersquatters” money in order to get what should be theirs in the first place. Simplified Domains has millions of trademarked names reserved for their proper owners. (Using the USPTO database)
Simplified Domains is just that—simplified
Simplified Domains is a non-categorized system. Unlike the .com, .net, and .org, Simplified Domains does not operate under a set number of top level domains (TLDs). Instead, any three characters can be a TLD. For instance, Holiday Inn’s domain would be holiday.inn. Because the lines between .com, .net, and .org have become blurred to the point of uselessness, it is often difficult to know the extension of the domain you would like to visit. Additional top level domains only confuse this point even more—for instance, to buy something from My Favorite Store, is the address MyFavoriteStore.com, MyFavoriteStore.net, or MyFavoriteStore.store?
Works with Existing Domain Naming System
Simplified Domains is an expansion to the existing system—not a replacement. It works with .com, .net, and .org. This is why Simplified Domains uses the “backup three” idea—to work with the current system. Further, many companies have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on promoting their websites with a .com. There is no need to replace that domain—it is completely feasible to add a simplified domain name, such as Ama.zon and have them both point to the same place.
Infinitely More Possibilities
Because Simplified Domains uses any three letters for a domain extension, the possibilities for domain names are virtually limitless. Any three characters can go after the dot. And browsers can be programmed to automatically place the dot, making it even easier—you could get to Nissan’s website simply by typing Nissan into your browser’s address bar. Robust, yet simple—the way the Internet should be.
As businesses and individuals clamor to put their web sites on the ever-expanding World Wide Web, available domains are running out. Cyber-squatters are milking companies for millions of dollars for strategically purchased domain names. These problems will continue to invade the Internet community, unless the naming possibilities are expanded and simplified. We have the solution with Simplified Domains.
In the early stages of public Internet use, dividing domains into categories like .com, .org, .net was logical. With the climbing number of sites on the World Wide Web today, this categorization has become obsolete. As ICANN attempts to add more categorized extensions to the legacy naming system, all this does is run up the cost of doing business on the Internet by requiring companies to subscribe to every new extension to protect their trademark.
Simplified Domains, which is a alternative Non-Categorized Domain Name System, addresses the basic flaws in the current legacy system. With 46,000 possible domain extensions, Simplified Domains doesn’t restrict businesses and organizations in their choice of domain name. There is no need to add a “www.” a “.com” or any of the current top-level extensions. The Simplified Domains system takes a word or phrase (spaces removed) and places the “dot” three characters from the word ending to create a web site domain name:
simplifieddoma.ins
mycomp.any
calla.cab
players.nfl
micros.oft
goo.gle
pow.wow
phone.555
quicktime.mov
win.zip
Using the FireFox browser and a Simplified Domains add-on the browser automatically places the “dot” three characters from the end of whatever the user types. Cyber-squatting is another problem plaguing the current naming system. Domains are being purchased strategically and solely to make money reselling them to those who would want them for their web sites. Simplified Domains was developed using the US Trademark database. These trademarked names will be reserved for their rightful owners.
It’s very simple:
With Simplified Domains, companies and organizations can be themselves. (e.g. xe.rox, toy.ota, pizza.hut)
Internet users have a simpler way of navigating the World Wide Web.
Companies have millions of combinations to make names that make sense. (taxi.cab, hot.wax, hair.cut mybusin.ess)
Simplified Domains protects trademarks by comparing incoming domain registrations to a trademark database and if a name is trademarked, the instantaneous registration is stopped as extra checks and balances are required.
Everybody wins with Simplified Domains
It is important to realize this technology is an “expansion” of the underlying power within the current domain name system, not a replacement. We do add some power using our patent pending “3-back” system and our trademark check, nothing else. Web providers can take advantage of this power and still honor the traditional categories like “.com.” Setup can be done in a matter of minutes, and since our Domain Naming System (DNS) is hierarchical, we simply add our root servers into the “DNS food chain.” ISP’s and Website hosting companies can point their DNS requests to a worldwide server base kept on the Amazon Cloud. Our servers will then process these requests, sending the requests for Simplified Domain names to the appropriate server and directing .com, .org, .net, .gov, etc. to legacy DNS root servers. This process will be completely transparent to the user, and since Simplified Domains maintains its root servers on Amazon’s cloud, it’s fast.
Every day, more and more people turn to the Internet for business and leisure. The pure simplicity of Simplified Domains solves the complex problems of the legacy domain naming system and everybody wins.
Ever wish we could turn back the clock back on get a decent domain name; we just did.
Simplified Domains