<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Spreads Its Video Love to Everyone But YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veoh Video Network - Tasty Take-Over - Left The Box.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-2299522</link>
		<dc:creator>Veoh Video Network - Tasty Take-Over - Left The Box.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-2299522</guid>
		<description>[...] The Investors Veoh has some major investors, listing Goldman Sachs and Time Warner Viacom Viacom is syndicating to everyone but YouTube, everyone including [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Investors Veoh has some major investors, listing Goldman Sachs and Time Warner Viacom Viacom is syndicating to everyone but YouTube, everyone including [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Mattey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1913325</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Mattey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1913325</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Strategic Delusion #1812 / Treating the internet as a distribution platform&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newteevee/~3/213986487/" rel="nofollow"&gt;“A video destination is just really hard to differentiate,” said Verjee. “It’s really far away from a must-buy for an advertiser or a must-go-to for a consumer.”&lt;/a&gt; Verjee is not wrong.  With mainstream video content it's not just hard, it's IMPOSSIBLE.

Every studio views the internet as just A N OTHER distribution platform, an inert pipe, where they can count up more eyeballs and sell or share more advertising.  Networks/Broadcasters such as MTV &lt;a href="http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4594" rel="nofollow"&gt;distribute to anyone that asks&lt;/a&gt;, as long as they take the lions share of revenue.  How do you differentiate when your competitors have the same content?

GoFish like many others are playing into the hands of today's dominant players.  This strategy does not pay off, the studios/labels will increase the take year after year until they bleed the market dry.  Economically, this is no different than what's happen&lt;strike&gt;ing&lt;/strike&gt;ed in the music business where people like &lt;a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/01/bolt-gofish-deal-still-not-done/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bolt&lt;/a&gt; and very recently &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/08/pandora_uk_closes/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pandora&lt;/a&gt; [UK] have given up because of trouble licensing music for distribution.  It just becomes too expensive and unviable.

If you want to differentiate, if you want to have a dominant strategy, you have to start again, build from the ground up and rearchitect the value system.  It isn't easy.  You need a revolutionary mindset.  You need to reinvent TV.

This means revisiting how video is conceived, produced, delivered and experienced by viewers.  From an advertising perspective it means reinventing TV marketing altogether.  Advertising can no longer mean, "distribute content bundled with ads to its network partners".   Oh let's just "bundle" some pre-roll, post-roll, mid-roll, banner ads.  This adds ZERO value to the viewer experience, in fact it is detrimental, check out the negative comments on &lt;a href="http://www.joost.com/forums/f/ads/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Joost's Forum&lt;/a&gt; re: advertising.

We can't build on the decaying foundations of the current TV business.  There are a bunch of very clever writers striking in Hollywood who could really help shape this, they've been trying to advance the video experience for years but &lt;a href="http://cms.mit.edu/podcasts/C3FOE2007/2007-11-17-session5-cult_media-640x480.m4v" rel="nofollow"&gt;have always been stifled&lt;/a&gt; by the paymasters [networks].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Strategic Delusion #1812 / Treating the internet as a distribution platform</b></p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newteevee/~3/213986487/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/feeds.feedburner.com');">“A video destination is just really hard to differentiate,” said Verjee. “It’s really far away from a must-buy for an advertiser or a must-go-to for a consumer.”</a> Verjee is not wrong.  With mainstream video content it&#8217;s not just hard, it&#8217;s IMPOSSIBLE.</p>
<p>Every studio views the internet as just A N OTHER distribution platform, an inert pipe, where they can count up more eyeballs and sell or share more advertising.  Networks/Broadcasters such as MTV <a href="http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4594" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/pressmediawire.com');">distribute to anyone that asks</a>, as long as they take the lions share of revenue.  How do you differentiate when your competitors have the same content?</p>
<p>GoFish like many others are playing into the hands of today&#8217;s dominant players.  This strategy does not pay off, the studios/labels will increase the take year after year until they bleed the market dry.  Economically, this is no different than what&#8217;s happen<strike>ing</strike>ed in the music business where people like <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/01/bolt-gofish-deal-still-not-done/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/newteevee.com');">Bolt</a> and very recently <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/08/pandora_uk_closes/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.theregister.co.uk');">Pandora</a> [UK] have given up because of trouble licensing music for distribution.  It just becomes too expensive and unviable.</p>
<p>If you want to differentiate, if you want to have a dominant strategy, you have to start again, build from the ground up and rearchitect the value system.  It isn&#8217;t easy.  You need a revolutionary mindset.  You need to reinvent TV.</p>
<p>This means revisiting how video is conceived, produced, delivered and experienced by viewers.  From an advertising perspective it means reinventing TV marketing altogether.  Advertising can no longer mean, &#8220;distribute content bundled with ads to its network partners&#8221;.   Oh let&#8217;s just &#8220;bundle&#8221; some pre-roll, post-roll, mid-roll, banner ads.  This adds ZERO value to the viewer experience, in fact it is detrimental, check out the negative comments on <a href="http://www.joost.com/forums/f/ads/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.joost.com');">Joost&#8217;s Forum</a> re: advertising.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t build on the decaying foundations of the current TV business.  There are a bunch of very clever writers striking in Hollywood who could really help shape this, they&#8217;ve been trying to advance the video experience for years but <a href="http://cms.mit.edu/podcasts/C3FOE2007/2007-11-17-session5-cult_media-640x480.m4v" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/cms.mit.edu');">have always been stifled</a> by the paymasters [networks].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1910323</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1910323</guid>
		<description>Viacom is jealous of YouTube, now their case about copyright doesn't make sense. I hope the judge makes Viacom pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom is jealous of YouTube, now their case about copyright doesn&#8217;t make sense. I hope the judge makes Viacom pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908644</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908644</guid>
		<description>Brightcove distribute Viacoms content too...plus a whole host of others including British Sky Broadcasting, Sony BMG UK, Hachette Filipacchi UK, Emap and IPC Media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brightcove distribute Viacoms content too&#8230;plus a whole host of others including British Sky Broadcasting, Sony BMG UK, Hachette Filipacchi UK, Emap and IPC Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newssweb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908249</link>
		<dc:creator>newssweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908249</guid>
		<description>Viacom sucks and Stewart is right. At the end Greedy Viacom will meet failures in its strategy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom sucks and Stewart is right. At the end Greedy Viacom will meet failures in its strategy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908113</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1908113</guid>
		<description>I love John Stewart for this very reason. Glad to see you got a clip, I was waiting anxiously for someone to post about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love John Stewart for this very reason. Glad to see you got a clip, I was waiting anxiously for someone to post about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scratchiti</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1907948</link>
		<dc:creator>scratchiti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1907948</guid>
		<description>it's a shame hulu isn't the place aggregating all this content.  I think they really have the best player and experience of anyone out there (especially the ability to create your own sharable/embeddable clips).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a shame hulu isn&#8217;t the place aggregating all this content.  I think they really have the best player and experience of anyone out there (especially the ability to create your own sharable/embeddable clips).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1907604</link>
		<dc:creator>huh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/08/viacom-spreads-its-video-love-to-everyone-but-youtube/#comment-1907604</guid>
		<description>I just tried out FanCast and have to say I will go there instead of Hulu.com, as they have Hulu stuff and CBS stuff.  

Now with Viacom doing this what's the point of Joost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried out FanCast and have to say I will go there instead of Hulu.com, as they have Hulu stuff and CBS stuff.  </p>
<p>Now with Viacom doing this what&#8217;s the point of Joost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.059 seconds -->
