<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weather Channel On The Market For $5 Billion+</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:36:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1917574</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1917574</guid>
		<description>i think this could be a good opportunity for google because the weather channel consists of a website and a tv station. they could start their video ads on the weather channel and possibly venture into weather predicting technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this could be a good opportunity for google because the weather channel consists of a website and a tv station. they could start their video ads on the weather channel and possibly venture into weather predicting technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1898834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1898834</guid>
		<description>This is a rare opportunity for one of the large media companies, or other potential buyer.  The Weather Channel is a profitable and very well run company.  It is poised to give some savvy buyer the competetive edge in feeding people&#039;s insatiable appetite for weather.  This company will dominate on television as well as the web for as far ahead as anyone can see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rare opportunity for one of the large media companies, or other potential buyer.  The Weather Channel is a profitable and very well run company.  It is poised to give some savvy buyer the competetive edge in feeding people&#8217;s insatiable appetite for weather.  This company will dominate on television as well as the web for as far ahead as anyone can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stebeballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897976</link>
		<dc:creator>stebeballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897976</guid>
		<description>No thanks, there isn&#039;t that much weather in the world.

fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks, there isn&#8217;t that much weather in the world.</p>
<p>fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897923</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897923</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s a bunch of money.  All the comments remind me of an article I read a few months ago:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Internet_Weather_Forecast_Accuracy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Internet Weather Forecast Accuracy&lt;/a&gt;

It&#039;s a detailed study that concluded the following:

&quot;In seeking high temperature forecasts, it looked best to use IntelliCast or The Weather Channel in the long term, but there wasn&#039;t a clear leader in the short to mid term. BBC seemed unreliable in all cases, as well as MSN in the long term. The Weather Network, CNN and Unisys all had blemishes (3, 4 and 0 days in advance, respectively), but were generally in with the pack. 

In seeking low temperature forecasts, IntelliCast and The Weather Channel were again the choice in the long term, joined by Unisys in the short term. BBC was still a dud in anything but the very short term, and MSN performed horribly in nearly all cases, as well as Accuweather in the long term. 

Accuweather was the clear leader in anything greater than 10 days in advance, being the only site providing a weather forecast.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s a bunch of money.  All the comments remind me of an article I read a few months ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Internet_Weather_Forecast_Accuracy" rel="nofollow">Internet Weather Forecast Accuracy</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a detailed study that concluded the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;In seeking high temperature forecasts, it looked best to use IntelliCast or The Weather Channel in the long term, but there wasn&#8217;t a clear leader in the short to mid term. BBC seemed unreliable in all cases, as well as MSN in the long term. The Weather Network, CNN and Unisys all had blemishes (3, 4 and 0 days in advance, respectively), but were generally in with the pack. </p>
<p>In seeking low temperature forecasts, IntelliCast and The Weather Channel were again the choice in the long term, joined by Unisys in the short term. BBC was still a dud in anything but the very short term, and MSN performed horribly in nearly all cases, as well as Accuweather in the long term. </p>
<p>Accuweather was the clear leader in anything greater than 10 days in advance, being the only site providing a weather forecast.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897751</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897751</guid>
		<description>I prefer weather.gov.

@ .rb :  In Google, simply search for &quot;San Diego weather&quot; (substitute your city name)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer weather.gov.</p>
<p>@ .rb :  In Google, simply search for &#8220;San Diego weather&#8221; (substitute your city name)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897690</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897690</guid>
		<description>I own a company that makes horseshoes for horse-drawn carriages. I believe I will sell my company for 14 trillion dollars. Everyone needs horse shoes, right? Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a company that makes horseshoes for horse-drawn carriages. I believe I will sell my company for 14 trillion dollars. Everyone needs horse shoes, right? Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipKey Blog - Expanding the Vacation Rental Market &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Weather Channel Puts Its Self Up For Sale – How does this affect their recent entry into the vacation rental market?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897524</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipKey Blog - Expanding the Vacation Rental Market &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Weather Channel Puts Its Self Up For Sale – How does this affect their recent entry into the vacation rental market?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897524</guid>
		<description>[...] hopes of leveraging its traffic and SEO assets to carve out a viable competitor to HomeAway. Today TechCrunch reported that TWC is putting itself up for sale for an estimated $5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hopes of leveraging its traffic and SEO assets to carve out a viable competitor to HomeAway. Today TechCrunch reported that TWC is putting itself up for sale for an estimated $5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .rb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897470</link>
		<dc:creator>.rb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897470</guid>
		<description>Just popped into my head...

why doesn&#039;t weather.google.com exist?

.rb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just popped into my head&#8230;</p>
<p>why doesn&#8217;t weather.google.com exist?</p>
<p>.rb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897423</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897423</guid>
		<description>Weather.com is horrible (layout, design, ads)  I hope the new owners redesign the site and hire real web people.

Social weather forecasting is what&#039;s new in 2008: http://www.otherweather.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weather.com is horrible (layout, design, ads)  I hope the new owners redesign the site and hire real web people.</p>
<p>Social weather forecasting is what&#8217;s new in 2008: <a href="http://www.otherweather.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.otherweather.com'>http://www.otherweather.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared W. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared W. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;For Sale:  The Weather Channel...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Weather Channel&#8217;s days as a privately owned cable network are numbered.  There&#8217;s a lot of wondering why they&#8217;re up for sale for as much $5 billion.  They certainly have prime-time Web real estate (weather.com), but I think people ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For Sale:  The Weather Channel&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Weather Channel&#8217;s days as a privately owned cable network are numbered.  There&#8217;s a lot of wondering why they&#8217;re up for sale for as much $5 billion.  They certainly have prime-time Web real estate (weather.com), but I think people &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared W. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared W. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;For Sale:  The Weather Channel...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Weather Channel&#8217;s days as a privately owned cable network are numbered.  There&#8217;s a lot of wondering why they&#8217;re up for sale for as much $5 billion.  They certainly have prime-time Web real estate (weather.com), but I think people ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For Sale:  The Weather Channel&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Weather Channel&#8217;s days as a privately owned cable network are numbered.  There&#8217;s a lot of wondering why they&#8217;re up for sale for as much $5 billion.  They certainly have prime-time Web real estate (weather.com), but I think people &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897370</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897370</guid>
		<description>The Weather Channel is an enormously successful enterprise.  It is by far the biggest independent basic cable channel left and virtually every big media company has tried to buy it at some point over the years.  And its web site, like it or not, is one of the most successful properties on the web.  This is a huge deal.  Landmark will get very close to its $5 billion
.
It is also a deal that is far more important to the web than people know.  The Weather Channel has been a major supporter of the National Weather Service and others who want to keep the weather data produced by the government free to anyone who wants to use it.  That position has been very important in preventing Accuweather and its allies from using their influence in Congress to have bills passed that would prevent the government from giving away the data that taxpayers pay the government to collect.  Though Accuweather no longer has its personal Senator, Rick Santorum, in the Senate to try and push through those bills, I am concerned that the Weather Channel might shift its position if it is bought by a major media conglomerate.  Those bills would cripple the many independent weather sites on the web.  They would also hurt the economy and cause the loss of jobs, because having the government produced weather data out there has produced a lot more of a vibrant weather economy than there would be if only a few companies were able to afford the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Weather Channel is an enormously successful enterprise.  It is by far the biggest independent basic cable channel left and virtually every big media company has tried to buy it at some point over the years.  And its web site, like it or not, is one of the most successful properties on the web.  This is a huge deal.  Landmark will get very close to its $5 billion<br />
.<br />
It is also a deal that is far more important to the web than people know.  The Weather Channel has been a major supporter of the National Weather Service and others who want to keep the weather data produced by the government free to anyone who wants to use it.  That position has been very important in preventing Accuweather and its allies from using their influence in Congress to have bills passed that would prevent the government from giving away the data that taxpayers pay the government to collect.  Though Accuweather no longer has its personal Senator, Rick Santorum, in the Senate to try and push through those bills, I am concerned that the Weather Channel might shift its position if it is bought by a major media conglomerate.  Those bills would cripple the many independent weather sites on the web.  They would also hurt the economy and cause the loss of jobs, because having the government produced weather data out there has produced a lot more of a vibrant weather economy than there would be if only a few companies were able to afford the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mock</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897333</link>
		<dc:creator>Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897333</guid>
		<description>@Spiel

Actually intellicast.com is a WSI site and WSI is owned by Landmark Communications. This makes intellicast.com the sister site to weather.com.

WSI is also the provider of TWC&#039;s computers and graphics systems. Of course, these two branches of Landmark Communications also share data. WSI targets industry, while TWC goes after the general consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spiel</p>
<p>Actually intellicast.com is a WSI site and WSI is owned by Landmark Communications. This makes intellicast.com the sister site to weather.com.</p>
<p>WSI is also the provider of TWC&#8217;s computers and graphics systems. Of course, these two branches of Landmark Communications also share data. WSI targets industry, while TWC goes after the general consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897332</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897332</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain why Alexa is still used for on-the-fly user statistics over Compete or Quantcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain why Alexa is still used for on-the-fly user statistics over Compete or Quantcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897296</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen a discussion of weather.com without the statement &quot;weather.com sucks&quot;, and this one is no exception (@#2).  I got sick of weather.com, so I made my own barebones weather site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://forecaster.ws&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;forecaster.ws&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen a discussion of weather.com without the statement &#8220;weather.com sucks&#8221;, and this one is no exception (@#2).  I got sick of weather.com, so I made my own barebones weather site (<a href="http://forecaster.ws" rel="nofollow">forecaster.ws</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897260</link>
		<dc:creator>acca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897260</guid>
		<description>&quot;Web site, weather.com, are already attracting interest from some of the biggest names in media, including NBC, a unit of General Electric; the News Corporation; and Comcast&quot; 
This is interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Web site, weather.com, are already attracting interest from some of the biggest names in media, including NBC, a unit of General Electric; the News Corporation; and Comcast&#8221;<br />
This is interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shalom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897244</link>
		<dc:creator>Shalom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897244</guid>
		<description>Looking at the November uniques from weather.com it seems like they&#039;re looking for around $1 billion valuation for the website of business, based on comparable sales.

That would leave around $4 billion for a channel that employs some 800 people, 125 of which are the core group, meteorologists. 

Cable is old media, and not too many properties have been on sale, but I would say that they are not going to get $4 billion dollars for the cable side of business, unless their profitability proves otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the November uniques from weather.com it seems like they&#8217;re looking for around $1 billion valuation for the website of business, based on comparable sales.</p>
<p>That would leave around $4 billion for a channel that employs some 800 people, 125 of which are the core group, meteorologists. </p>
<p>Cable is old media, and not too many properties have been on sale, but I would say that they are not going to get $4 billion dollars for the cable side of business, unless their profitability proves otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897242</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897242</guid>
		<description>Weather Channel? People still watch that on TV? Better yet, people use that online? It sucks, I swear it always says the opposite will happen.

Nothing beats Intellicast.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weather Channel? People still watch that on TV? Better yet, people use that online? It sucks, I swear it always says the opposite will happen.</p>
<p>Nothing beats Intellicast.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nascar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897220</link>
		<dc:creator>Nascar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897220</guid>
		<description>Does 5 billion make it sunny every day? If so, some one please make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does 5 billion make it sunny every day? If so, some one please make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micfo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897212</link>
		<dc:creator>micfo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897212</guid>
		<description>I think they need to work on to forecast accurately about any natural disaster in advance to alert people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they need to work on to forecast accurately about any natural disaster in advance to alert people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897181</guid>
		<description>Here we have a company with a lot of potential with a huge marketplace yet it gets a valuation a third that of a passing fad (facebook)? Something doesn&#039;t make much sense, either they are way under priced or facebook is over priced ;-)

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we have a company with a lot of potential with a huge marketplace yet it gets a valuation a third that of a passing fad (facebook)? Something doesn&#8217;t make much sense, either they are way under priced or facebook is over priced <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojaam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897005</link>
		<dc:creator>mojaam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897005</guid>
		<description>I must admit, that&#039;s a lucrative domain name. Even if there are too many weather websites out there, that comes of the top of an average person first. The channel, I&#039;m sure I have it but umm I don&#039;t even know which one is it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, that&#8217;s a lucrative domain name. Even if there are too many weather websites out there, that comes of the top of an average person first. The channel, I&#8217;m sure I have it but umm I don&#8217;t even know which one is it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MP3 Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1897000</link>
		<dc:creator>MP3 Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1897000</guid>
		<description>Check out the top 50 songs of 2K7 &amp; even download them!!!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mp3nation.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MP3Nation&lt;/a&gt;

Do post your replies.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the top 50 songs of 2K7 &amp; even download them!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://mp3nation.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">MP3Nation</a></p>
<p>Do post your replies&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1896959</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1896959</guid>
		<description>The Weather Channel, very competitive site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Weather Channel, very competitive site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1896920</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/the-weather-channel-on-the-market-for-5-billion/#comment-1896920</guid>
		<description>WTF? weather.com sucks. $5 billion? Hopefully Rupert buys it - that way we can get ALL of our news from a fair and balanced mega-corp. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://weather.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;weather.gov&lt;/a&gt; is free of ad-spam and straight to the facts. It&#039;s probably where all those other sites get most of their info anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? weather.com sucks. $5 billion? Hopefully Rupert buys it &#8211; that way we can get ALL of our news from a fair and balanced mega-corp. </p>
<p><a href="http://weather.gov/" rel="nofollow">weather.gov</a> is free of ad-spam and straight to the facts. It&#8217;s probably where all those other sites get most of their info anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
