<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plaxo&#8217;s For Sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Plaxo And Facebook Merger Rumors False (So Far)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-2302943</link>
		<dc:creator>Plaxo And Facebook Merger Rumors False (So Far)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-2302943</guid>
		<description>[...] know Plaxo is for sale, presumably looking for north of $100 million and telling people around Silicon Valley that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know Plaxo is for sale, presumably looking for north of $100 million and telling people around Silicon Valley that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-sniper &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week’s Plaxo Merger Rumor: Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1981328</link>
		<dc:creator>E-sniper &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week’s Plaxo Merger Rumor: Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1981328</guid>
		<description>[...] desperately trying to sell&#8221; for quite some time. Late last year they got serious and hired an investment bank, Revolution Partners, to help move things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] desperately trying to sell&#8221; for quite some time. Late last year they got serious and hired an investment bank, Revolution Partners, to help move things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Plaxo Merger Rumor: Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1980257</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Plaxo Merger Rumor: Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1980257</guid>
		<description>[...] desperately trying to sell&#8221; for quite some time. Late last year they got serious and hired an investment bank, Revolution Partners, to help move things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] desperately trying to sell&#8221; for quite some time. Late last year they got serious and hired an investment bank, Revolution Partners, to help move things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want my data? State your business! @ Webcracy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898302</link>
		<dc:creator>Want my data? State your business! @ Webcracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898302</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch has a &#8216;maybe&#8217; story on Plaxo being for sale. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch has a &#8216;maybe&#8217; story on Plaxo being for sale. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StartupNewz.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898072</link>
		<dc:creator>StartupNewz.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898072</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Year Sale: Plaxo...&lt;/strong&gt;

Apparently Plaxo is for sale as per Mike at Tech Crunch. Plaxo has hired an investment banker to help them sell the company. As per last rumors, Plaxo was supposed to be acquired by Xing, but apparently it did not happen....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Year Sale: Plaxo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Apparently Plaxo is for sale as per Mike at Tech Crunch. Plaxo has hired an investment banker to help them sell the company. As per last rumors, Plaxo was supposed to be acquired by Xing, but apparently it did not happen&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey Golub</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898039</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey Golub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1898039</guid>
		<description>WoW! that's a very good news, Matt. 

I am really happy for the Plaxo guys as I already explained above why do I think those should sell the things ASAP... 
and it's also nice to see that the 2008 is starting with such a strong market shake! So good luck to the followers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW! that&#8217;s a very good news, Matt. </p>
<p>I am really happy for the Plaxo guys as I already explained above why do I think those should sell the things ASAP&#8230;<br />
and it&#8217;s also nice to see that the 2008 is starting with such a strong market shake! So good luck to the followers <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt M.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897893</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897893</guid>
		<description>PE Hub is saying that Revolution wasn't hired, and that Plaxo got a $200 million unsolicited offer: http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1873

Doesn't say who the offer came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PE Hub is saying that Revolution wasn&#8217;t hired, and that Plaxo got a $200 million unsolicited offer: <a href="http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1873" rel="nofollow">http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1873</a></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t say who the offer came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plaxo on the market and Alpha Pulse FB Connector boots Scoble-bad timing!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897777</link>
		<dc:creator>Plaxo on the market and Alpha Pulse FB Connector boots Scoble-bad timing!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897777</guid>
		<description>[...] night TechCrunch broke the news that Plaxo seems to be for sale.&#160; I was struggling for an angle to cover the story.&#160; Generally I think about who would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night TechCrunch broke the news that Plaxo seems to be for sale.&#160; I was struggling for an angle to cover the story.&#160; Generally I think about who would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey Golub</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897744</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey Golub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897744</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

it's a nice posting and it has gathered lots of people interested in the fate of Plaxo... so I couldn't also keep me away from commenting here it 'coz of the two strong reasons-

a. the name of Plaxo CEO's sound like a honey for my eyes- I am also Golub :)
b. you said Plaxo is a competitor of Xing. :)

So about the name- it's everything clear I suppose. That was just another reason for me to follow Plaxo since the very beginning when it was still really a spamming tool (and I used it exactly to contact the people I couldn't contact in any other way :lol:). I am Premium user of Plaxo for the years and I really love it as the Address-Book. as my Network-based very reliable and useful Address-Book. and everybody were happy until the Address-Book hasn't decided to become Social Network ;)

now about Xing. I think it's known for everyone here that Xing has recently acquired Neurona, and even before eConozco. Those were useful to Xing to become larger and always more powerful. In EU and not only (Spanish Networks have some great popularity in the Latin America). In EU as I believe everybody know, the Networks that claim themselves the competitors of Xing are Viadeo first of all and Ecademy. but it's clear that Xing is much more powerful. 
Xing is a European LinkedIn as I see it (being myself co-founder and VP of the first in the world Official LinkedIn Supporter Club in Italy). So here who will buy who- it could happen that Xing will eat now Viadeo, or LinkedIn will buy them all :)... Or who knows, as the rumors were telling LinkedIn will be put together with MySpace under the roof of News Corp... we'll see it soon, maybe already in  2008!

OK, those are the giants of Professional/ Business Networking. But what's the relations of Plaxo with Business Networking? hm..........

I think the project that could be compared with Plaxo as it is now, is probably Spock- the People Search Engine 2.0.
What's the reasoning of the people that will probably buy Plaxo? 
Traffic generated by the web site? So here Plaxo and Spock are already on a very similar position- have a look at Alexa's picture: http://tinyurl.com/2kg2xl
although Plaxo is a 5 years “start-up” and Spock has only few month of life!

what else? The prospects? It depends on the ideas and ambitions under the project!

So those two projects are the right pair to compare I think AT THE MOMENT, although the initial ideas of these two projects were very opposite- Plaxo have grown from a Personal/ Private Address-Book to a Social Network behind it, and Spock arrives from another side- it's goal is firstly to become a Global Who's Who + community (2.0) for the whole Web World, and then to apply the personal networking features around my profile. And to be able making this- the concept of Trust there was since the very beginning on Spock. And the concept of Plaxo, I think it has remained the same as it was in the beginning- just connect to everyone and be happy... boh!

have a look- on Plaxo what it was there? It was MY PERSONAL Address-Book, and one day I see that my PERSONAL contacts have started living their own social life... sincerely that made me crazy in the beginning... and lots of another Bloggers were writing about that Plaxo is crazy to have started from an Address-Book and to go Global. a strange way, I think it's a wrong way and the idea of 2007 that every good project (as a GREAT Address-Book, Plaxo) must “grow” to a Social Network- I wouldn't agree it should work for everyone!

I think it's a very risky and strange idea. So for myself I decided to not participate in the Social Life of my Address-Book :). also because I am used to more classical professional networking tools, such as LinkedIn and Xing- those are the great leaders both and have studied a lot from my point of view the philosophy of BUSINESS/ PROFESSIONAL Networking.

The same is true about Facebook and MySpace- those are great Networks oriented to Poke-my-friends and Content-is-everything, and those are greatly optimized for that. 

And what's about Plaxo?! An Address-Book that has started living its own Social Life? well, maybe somebody is happy about that, those people that are gonna pay those mega-millions to buy it have some personal reasoning I am sure. But I sincerely think that Plaxo is gonna sell itself ASAP, since if it's not sold, the people will loose their interest to it, having seen what's going on around in every direction- that of LinkedIn/Xing for Business, the one of Spock for Global Who's Who, and Facebook- the best Social tool ever for me :)

after all said, I invite all you who think that the Web should be Global, should be 2.0 and there should be a way to manage IN ONE PLACE our Network Identity- have a look at Spock, http://www.spock.com

btw, you'll find me there and we could network as a trusted buddies :)-
http://www.spock.com/Andrey-Golub</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>it&#8217;s a nice posting and it has gathered lots of people interested in the fate of Plaxo&#8230; so I couldn&#8217;t also keep me away from commenting here it &#8216;coz of the two strong reasons-</p>
<p>a. the name of Plaxo CEO&#8217;s sound like a honey for my eyes- I am also Golub <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
b. you said Plaxo is a competitor of Xing. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So about the name- it&#8217;s everything clear I suppose. That was just another reason for me to follow Plaxo since the very beginning when it was still really a spamming tool (and I used it exactly to contact the people I couldn&#8217;t contact in any other way :lol:). I am Premium user of Plaxo for the years and I really love it as the Address-Book. as my Network-based very reliable and useful Address-Book. and everybody were happy until the Address-Book hasn&#8217;t decided to become Social Network <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>now about Xing. I think it&#8217;s known for everyone here that Xing has recently acquired Neurona, and even before eConozco. Those were useful to Xing to become larger and always more powerful. In EU and not only (Spanish Networks have some great popularity in the Latin America). In EU as I believe everybody know, the Networks that claim themselves the competitors of Xing are Viadeo first of all and Ecademy. but it&#8217;s clear that Xing is much more powerful.<br />
Xing is a European LinkedIn as I see it (being myself co-founder and VP of the first in the world Official LinkedIn Supporter Club in Italy). So here who will buy who- it could happen that Xing will eat now Viadeo, or LinkedIn will buy them all :)&#8230; Or who knows, as the rumors were telling LinkedIn will be put together with MySpace under the roof of News Corp&#8230; we&#8217;ll see it soon, maybe already in  2008!</p>
<p>OK, those are the giants of Professional/ Business Networking. But what&#8217;s the relations of Plaxo with Business Networking? hm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think the project that could be compared with Plaxo as it is now, is probably Spock- the People Search Engine 2.0.<br />
What&#8217;s the reasoning of the people that will probably buy Plaxo?<br />
Traffic generated by the web site? So here Plaxo and Spock are already on a very similar position- have a look at Alexa&#8217;s picture: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2kg2xl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2kg2xl</a><br />
although Plaxo is a 5 years “start-up” and Spock has only few month of life!</p>
<p>what else? The prospects? It depends on the ideas and ambitions under the project!</p>
<p>So those two projects are the right pair to compare I think AT THE MOMENT, although the initial ideas of these two projects were very opposite- Plaxo have grown from a Personal/ Private Address-Book to a Social Network behind it, and Spock arrives from another side- it&#8217;s goal is firstly to become a Global Who&#8217;s Who + community (2.0) for the whole Web World, and then to apply the personal networking features around my profile. And to be able making this- the concept of Trust there was since the very beginning on Spock. And the concept of Plaxo, I think it has remained the same as it was in the beginning- just connect to everyone and be happy&#8230; boh!</p>
<p>have a look- on Plaxo what it was there? It was MY PERSONAL Address-Book, and one day I see that my PERSONAL contacts have started living their own social life&#8230; sincerely that made me crazy in the beginning&#8230; and lots of another Bloggers were writing about that Plaxo is crazy to have started from an Address-Book and to go Global. a strange way, I think it&#8217;s a wrong way and the idea of 2007 that every good project (as a GREAT Address-Book, Plaxo) must “grow” to a Social Network- I wouldn&#8217;t agree it should work for everyone!</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a very risky and strange idea. So for myself I decided to not participate in the Social Life of my Address-Book :). also because I am used to more classical professional networking tools, such as LinkedIn and Xing- those are the great leaders both and have studied a lot from my point of view the philosophy of BUSINESS/ PROFESSIONAL Networking.</p>
<p>The same is true about Facebook and MySpace- those are great Networks oriented to Poke-my-friends and Content-is-everything, and those are greatly optimized for that. </p>
<p>And what&#8217;s about Plaxo?! An Address-Book that has started living its own Social Life? well, maybe somebody is happy about that, those people that are gonna pay those mega-millions to buy it have some personal reasoning I am sure. But I sincerely think that Plaxo is gonna sell itself ASAP, since if it&#8217;s not sold, the people will loose their interest to it, having seen what&#8217;s going on around in every direction- that of LinkedIn/Xing for Business, the one of Spock for Global Who&#8217;s Who, and Facebook- the best Social tool ever for me <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>after all said, I invite all you who think that the Web should be Global, should be 2.0 and there should be a way to manage IN ONE PLACE our Network Identity- have a look at Spock, <a href="http://www.spock.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spock.com</a></p>
<p>btw, you&#8217;ll find me there and we could network as a trusted buddies :)-<br />
<a href="http://www.spock.com/Andrey-Golub" rel="nofollow">http://www.spock.com/Andrey-Golub</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897388</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897388</guid>
		<description>A $100M valuation on exit represents essentially a failed investment. This company has been in business for five years now, and has probably burned down $100M in that period.  It looks like they are running for the exits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $100M valuation on exit represents essentially a failed investment. This company has been in business for five years now, and has probably burned down $100M in that period.  It looks like they are running for the exits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micfo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897178</link>
		<dc:creator>micfo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897178</guid>
		<description>It has good domain name too, I hope it will fetch good price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has good domain name too, I hope it will fetch good price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897158</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897158</guid>
		<description>@will: yeah, email-hosting-for-fraud-reduction was a personal favorite... a few of us at PayPal proposed it as an internal skunkworks project back in '04, but didn't get any traction up the food chain.  then again they always had a pretty full menu of options over there.

(and for the record i don't Skype was a bad move, but probably more synergy with PayPal than for eBay proper.  again, at least they were trying to find a few levers.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@will: yeah, email-hosting-for-fraud-reduction was a personal favorite&#8230; a few of us at PayPal proposed it as an internal skunkworks project back in &#8216;04, but didn&#8217;t get any traction up the food chain.  then again they always had a pretty full menu of options over there.</p>
<p>(and for the record i don&#8217;t Skype was a bad move, but probably more synergy with PayPal than for eBay proper.  again, at least they were trying to find a few levers.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897080</link>
		<dc:creator>Between the Lines mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897080</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch: Plaxo for sale. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch: Plaxo for sale. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897074</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897074</guid>
		<description>Plaxo is not proftable. How can they? Asking $250m and more is riddiculous - its a great little tool - but with NO revenue model. Who should buy it? LinkedIn? I hear they are on the selling side as well. Xing? Not enough cash, not enough interrest. So Microsoft? Wel, they could integrate a similar service inot Outlook with their own programmers. Same for Google. 

Sorry, Plaxo - the only value you got is the private data of your users. Thats why I just deleted my account. 

r*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaxo is not proftable. How can they? Asking $250m and more is riddiculous - its a great little tool - but with NO revenue model. Who should buy it? LinkedIn? I hear they are on the selling side as well. Xing? Not enough cash, not enough interrest. So Microsoft? Wel, they could integrate a similar service inot Outlook with their own programmers. Same for Google. </p>
<p>Sorry, Plaxo - the only value you got is the private data of your users. Thats why I just deleted my account. </p>
<p>r*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tocatlian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897073</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tocatlian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1897073</guid>
		<description>Plaxo "jumped the shark" a long time ago (right around the time they start supporting AOL logins). I find LinkedIn to be a better service. There is no need for LinkedIn to acquire Plaxo. They simply need to add a couple of Plaxo's more useful features... and voila.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaxo &#8220;jumped the shark&#8221; a long time ago (right around the time they start supporting AOL logins). I find LinkedIn to be a better service. There is no need for LinkedIn to acquire Plaxo. They simply need to add a couple of Plaxo&#8217;s more useful features&#8230; and voila.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896837</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896837</guid>
		<description>Dave,  you hit the nail on the head on the email thing.  eBay should have been doing that a long time ago . . . . Im + Email + AntiPhising = google w/o search.  (ok, so google w/o search is not so interesting :) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,  you hit the nail on the head on the email thing.  eBay should have been doing that a long time ago . . . . Im + Email + AntiPhising = google w/o search.  (ok, so google w/o search is not so interesting <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896822</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896822</guid>
		<description>@marktiger: huh?  sorry i don't get that one.  

&lt;a href="https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/about-outside" rel="nofollow"&gt;PayPal has 150M+ accounts&lt;/a&gt; (ok, &#38; we know that's inflated slightly for 1-time usage, but ditto for Plaxo 20M+); why do they need another 10-20, probably with some overlap already? 

i might understand why eBay corp would want a email / social networking asset, except they already have Skype IM data.  if eBay really wants some synergy, they should acquire / private-label an email hosting provider &#38; offer it to eBay users free in exchange for spam/fraud reduction (which is a big problem, owning 1 or both ends of buyer-seller email would help improve).  altho note that probably works better in reverse with MSFT acquiring EBAY, altho that deal's been rumored forever.  still makes sense tho, imho.

maybe i'm missing something here -- what's the logic behind PayPal interest in Plaxo data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@marktiger: huh?  sorry i don&#8217;t get that one.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/about-outside" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.paypal.com');">PayPal has 150M+ accounts</a> (ok, &amp; we know that&#8217;s inflated slightly for 1-time usage, but ditto for Plaxo 20M+); why do they need another 10-20, probably with some overlap already? </p>
<p>i might understand why eBay corp would want a email / social networking asset, except they already have Skype IM data.  if eBay really wants some synergy, they should acquire / private-label an email hosting provider &amp; offer it to eBay users free in exchange for spam/fraud reduction (which is a big problem, owning 1 or both ends of buyer-seller email would help improve).  altho note that probably works better in reverse with MSFT acquiring EBAY, altho that deal&#8217;s been rumored forever.  still makes sense tho, imho.</p>
<p>maybe i&#8217;m missing something here &#8212; what&#8217;s the logic behind PayPal interest in Plaxo data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TravelGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896798</link>
		<dc:creator>TravelGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896798</guid>
		<description>who would want to buy a business which never gained trust among netizens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who would want to buy a business which never gained trust among netizens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896775</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896775</guid>
		<description>i heard eBay is looking to buy Plaxo to make investors whole and give the founders some sort of earn out.   PayPal wants the Plaxo data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard eBay is looking to buy Plaxo to make investors whole and give the founders some sort of earn out.   PayPal wants the Plaxo data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896650</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896650</guid>
		<description>LinkedIn-Plaxo deal is unlikely.... Plaxo is worth a lot more to other [bigger &#124; older &#124; dumber] companies than LinkedIn.

whether or not theyre worth north of $250M i dunno... guessing the post-money on the last round is north of $75M (altho might have been a flat or down round, anyone know?  3rd &#38; 4th rounds looked like corp-mezz rounds, so maybe not) 

still with ~20m users + more indirect thru partners, there is value there somewhere.  depends on whether new Pulse strategy works if modest vs larger value.  otherwise, guessing latent usage among those 20m, perhaps more like single digit M active base.

got to give them credit for sticking it out &#38; continuing to innovate tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LinkedIn-Plaxo deal is unlikely&#8230;. Plaxo is worth a lot more to other [bigger | older | dumber] companies than LinkedIn.</p>
<p>whether or not theyre worth north of $250M i dunno&#8230; guessing the post-money on the last round is north of $75M (altho might have been a flat or down round, anyone know?  3rd &amp; 4th rounds looked like corp-mezz rounds, so maybe not) </p>
<p>still with ~20m users + more indirect thru partners, there is value there somewhere.  depends on whether new Pulse strategy works if modest vs larger value.  otherwise, guessing latent usage among those 20m, perhaps more like single digit M active base.</p>
<p>got to give them credit for sticking it out &amp; continuing to innovate tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marzipan from toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896632</link>
		<dc:creator>marzipan from toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896632</guid>
		<description>If there are no takes, LinkedIn and Plaxo should merge. Before Pulse I thought that should be what happens since it would be a good fit. Post Pulse they might want too much $ for it to happen but it would still be complimentary. 

Not worth $250M though, that's ridiculous. Are they even profitable? Anybody, anybody ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are no takes, LinkedIn and Plaxo should merge. Before Pulse I thought that should be what happens since it would be a good fit. Post Pulse they might want too much $ for it to happen but it would still be complimentary. </p>
<p>Not worth $250M though, that&#8217;s ridiculous. Are they even profitable? Anybody, anybody ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Loureiro Solleiro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896621</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Loureiro Solleiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896621</guid>
		<description>Well, here's the answer : http://blog.plaxo.com/archives/2007/09/there_is_now_a_1.html

The Bill of Rights. Suppose we'd thank you Mike, if all this is true. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s the answer : <a href="http://blog.plaxo.com/archives/2007/09/there_is_now_a_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plaxo.com/archives.....w_a_1.html</a></p>
<p>The Bill of Rights. Suppose we&#8217;d thank you Mike, if all this is true. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Loureiro Solleiro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896594</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Loureiro Solleiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896594</guid>
		<description>Most commenters here don't seem to be aware that Plaxo has been very active in open standards efforts for the past year or so. 
Their push (with Pulse) into social networks has brought them broad acceptance in the web tech scene. And if their subscription numbers have flown so high is certainly because of this new found respect.
As the post outlines, they used to be seen as spammers and their marketing VP says they haven't pushed the new features to the whole user base yet.

Their offering has always been very promising but has always had flaws. Their premium service, with good features such as de-duplication and strange ones such as e-cards, is too expensive (US$60/year). Their technology is sometimes buggy (calendars are a real mess!) and their UI has a lot of room for improvement.

To me, the possibility that they've put themselves up for sale comes as a shock: it's a whole lot of really important data their users have entrusted them. And now, just as things were getting interesting, that we actually wanted to see more from them, they pull this off?

I'm waiting for real facts, but find the idea rather... disgusting. Hoping this is all fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most commenters here don&#8217;t seem to be aware that Plaxo has been very active in open standards efforts for the past year or so.<br />
Their push (with Pulse) into social networks has brought them broad acceptance in the web tech scene. And if their subscription numbers have flown so high is certainly because of this new found respect.<br />
As the post outlines, they used to be seen as spammers and their marketing VP says they haven&#8217;t pushed the new features to the whole user base yet.</p>
<p>Their offering has always been very promising but has always had flaws. Their premium service, with good features such as de-duplication and strange ones such as e-cards, is too expensive (US$60/year). Their technology is sometimes buggy (calendars are a real mess!) and their UI has a lot of room for improvement.</p>
<p>To me, the possibility that they&#8217;ve put themselves up for sale comes as a shock: it&#8217;s a whole lot of really important data their users have entrusted them. And now, just as things were getting interesting, that we actually wanted to see more from them, they pull this off?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for real facts, but find the idea rather&#8230; disgusting. Hoping this is all fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Zawacki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896539</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zawacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896539</guid>
		<description>Plaxo is a feature, not a company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaxo is a feature, not a company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896533</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/02/plaxos-for-sale/#comment-1896533</guid>
		<description>Plaxo's primary business model was to aggregate user's address information, and when a user changed addresses, they would sell that information to businesses. Have they done or announced a single deal to sell access to their user's information?

I agree that a connected universal address book is a valuable service, but the fact that Plaxo's is selling out is a failure of their business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaxo&#8217;s primary business model was to aggregate user&#8217;s address information, and when a user changed addresses, they would sell that information to businesses. Have they done or announced a single deal to sell access to their user&#8217;s information?</p>
<p>I agree that a connected universal address book is a valuable service, but the fact that Plaxo&#8217;s is selling out is a failure of their business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.140 seconds -->
