<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Algorithm Is Changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Changes in Googles Algorithm? &#171; Colorado Highlands Group</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1980332</link>
		<dc:creator>Changes in Googles Algorithm? &#171; Colorado Highlands Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1980332</guid>
		<description>[...] The Google Algorithm is Changing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Google Algorithm is Changing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnnjazz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1942622</link>
		<dc:creator>dnnjazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1942622</guid>
		<description>now we are in end of Web 2.0 ... 
But what do we have in our hands? Nothing...
and u saying Google be  in Web3.0.... I suppose its wrong. Google is not ready for Web 3.0 , too
am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now we are in end of Web 2.0 &#8230;<br />
But what do we have in our hands? Nothing&#8230;<br />
and u saying Google be  in Web3.0&#8230;. I suppose its wrong. Google is not ready for Web 3.0 , too<br />
am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wibbels &#187; Google Algorithm: Change is a Good Thing. Right?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1921174</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wibbels &#187; Google Algorithm: Change is a Good Thing. Right?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1921174</guid>
		<description>[...] my long list of blogging topics, but we certainly can&#8217;t fail to cover new changes with the Google Algorithm.  Duncan Riley, at www.TechCrunch.com, fills in the details in an early month post on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my long list of blogging topics, but we certainly can&#8217;t fail to cover new changes with the Google Algorithm.  Duncan Riley, at <a href="http://www.TechCrunch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.TechCrunch.com</a>, fills in the details in an early month post on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayant Kumar Gandhi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1899908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayant Kumar Gandhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1899908</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Google Algorithm Is Changing...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Google Algorithm Is Changing
The example provided would seem to favor the conclusion; TCP/IP’s anniversary today has resulted in Google preferencing recent posts, including from Digg, over informative articles related to the search term such as W...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Google Algorithm Is Changing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Google Algorithm Is Changing<br />
The example provided would seem to favor the conclusion; TCP/IP’s anniversary today has resulted in Google preferencing recent posts, including from Digg, over informative articles related to the search term such as W&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Változott a Google algoritmusa &#124; OnlineMarketingWelt.hu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897817</link>
		<dc:creator>Változott a Google algoritmusa &#124; OnlineMarketingWelt.hu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897817</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch szerint a blogok közti keresést könnyítik meg a változtatások, és a blogkeresésre [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch szerint a blogok közti keresést könnyítik meg a változtatások, és a blogkeresésre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Morearty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Morearty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897576</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this change is somehow related to the really weird subcategories that show up under the main Wikipedia link if you type "wikipedia" into Google: http://www.morearty.com/blog/2008/01/03/crazy-google-subcategories/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this change is somehow related to the really weird subcategories that show up under the main Wikipedia link if you type &#8220;wikipedia&#8221; into Google: <a href="http://www.morearty.com/blog/2008/01/03/crazy-google-subcategories/" rel="nofollow">http://www.morearty.com/blog/2.....ategories/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uk Wholesale</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897268</link>
		<dc:creator>Uk Wholesale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897268</guid>
		<description>This is interesting. How can an SEO use this information to ones advantage? To me it looks like blog sites now have a distinct advantage in terms of SEO. This scares me, someone badmouthing our company in a blog is likely to outrank our website in the serps when searching for our company name (maybe for a short period).

It is time google was made to be accountable. I dont understand how anyone let google become so powerful. In an instance they can ban your site from the google index without telling you why ... and there isnt a damned thing you can do about it. This sort of thing can and has closed companies.

I would like to see information about website bans being made public - via osme form of forum. This way the site owner and the community in general would be able to comment and / or resolve issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting. How can an SEO use this information to ones advantage? To me it looks like blog sites now have a distinct advantage in terms of SEO. This scares me, someone badmouthing our company in a blog is likely to outrank our website in the serps when searching for our company name (maybe for a short period).</p>
<p>It is time google was made to be accountable. I dont understand how anyone let google become so powerful. In an instance they can ban your site from the google index without telling you why &#8230; and there isnt a damned thing you can do about it. This sort of thing can and has closed companies.</p>
<p>I would like to see information about website bans being made public - via osme form of forum. This way the site owner and the community in general would be able to comment and / or resolve issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retazos de la web del 2008-01-02 (microblogging) &#124; hombrelobo, una mente dispersa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897106</link>
		<dc:creator>Retazos de la web del 2008-01-02 (microblogging) &#124; hombrelobo, una mente dispersa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897106</guid>
		<description>[...] - The Google Algorithm Is Changing Google preferencing recent posts, including from Digg, over informative articles related to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - The Google Algorithm Is Changing Google preferencing recent posts, including from Digg, over informative articles related to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoxoANP! &#187; links for 2008-01-03</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897064</link>
		<dc:creator>xoxoANP! &#187; links for 2008-01-03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1897064</guid>
		<description>[...] The Google Algorithm Is Changing Yes! Score one for the frequent yappers! (tags: onlinemarketing OTP) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Google Algorithm Is Changing Yes! Score one for the frequent yappers! (tags: onlinemarketing OTP) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1896757</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1896757</guid>
		<description>I was wondering why they added the “tcp/ip” in their logo search link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering why they added the “tcp/ip” in their logo search link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs optimieren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1896072</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs optimieren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1896072</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google &#228;ndert den Algorithmus!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Oder doch nicht? Derzeit macht diese Meldung in der SEO-Sphere einigen Wirbel und dokumentiert, wie schnell sich halbe Meldungen zu falschen Aussagen wandeln k&#246;nnen.
Ausgangspunkt ist wohl der Post von Googlesystems zu einem bekannten Problem. Neu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google &#228;ndert den Algorithmus!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Oder doch nicht? Derzeit macht diese Meldung in der SEO-Sphere einigen Wirbel und dokumentiert, wie schnell sich halbe Meldungen zu falschen Aussagen wandeln k&#246;nnen.<br />
Ausgangspunkt ist wohl der Post von Googlesystems zu einem bekannten Problem. Neu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895820</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895820</guid>
		<description>what the frick does 'newness of post' have to do 'semantic search'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the frick does &#8216;newness of post&#8217; have to do &#8217;semantic search&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outdoor Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895711</link>
		<dc:creator>Outdoor Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895711</guid>
		<description>I've noticed this phenomenon a few a our sites.  New pages and recently indexed pages seem to show up quickly in the SERPs, then dwindle over the next few days.  It's a cool feature if it's true, because it allows smaller, less established sites to get noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this phenomenon a few a our sites.  New pages and recently indexed pages seem to show up quickly in the SERPs, then dwindle over the next few days.  It&#8217;s a cool feature if it&#8217;s true, because it allows smaller, less established sites to get noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenders John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenders John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895709</guid>
		<description>This has been known for some time. Everything evolves though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been known for some time. Everything evolves though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SISTRIX Suchmaschinen Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895661</link>
		<dc:creator>SISTRIX Suchmaschinen Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895661</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Über die Entstehung von SEO-Gerüchten...&lt;/strong&gt;

Gerüchte und Halbwahrheiten um die Bewertung verschiedener Faktoren durch Suchmaschinen sind genauso alt, wie die Suchmaschinenoptimierung selber. Irgendwann und irgendwo mal in die Welt gesetzt, halten sie sich ähnlich wie urbane Legenden gerne übe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Über die Entstehung von SEO-Gerüchten&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Gerüchte und Halbwahrheiten um die Bewertung verschiedener Faktoren durch Suchmaschinen sind genauso alt, wie die Suchmaschinenoptimierung selber. Irgendwann und irgendwo mal in die Welt gesetzt, halten sie sich ähnlich wie urbane Legenden gerne übe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Honolulu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895592</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Honolulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895592</guid>
		<description>Yes this may be old as far as them placing such a quick crawl on new posts on a blog, or a news site, however this is something that does warrant extra attention.  

Add in the other big changes over the last 2 quarters at the plex and you will see a bigger picture.  There was a PR re-assignment in recent months, paid links became the target of intense prejudice with the google webspam team, they experimented with a digg like feature for the SERPs annonced on the Google Labs blog.  Those 4 things tell me that we might be getting another big fat algo change by spring.  Why?

Google is nefarious for testing things in an incremental fashion, piece by piece.  Each of these things are separate pieces that are being fine-tuned.  Put it all together, and voila.. an algo change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this may be old as far as them placing such a quick crawl on new posts on a blog, or a news site, however this is something that does warrant extra attention.  </p>
<p>Add in the other big changes over the last 2 quarters at the plex and you will see a bigger picture.  There was a PR re-assignment in recent months, paid links became the target of intense prejudice with the google webspam team, they experimented with a digg like feature for the SERPs annonced on the Google Labs blog.  Those 4 things tell me that we might be getting another big fat algo change by spring.  Why?</p>
<p>Google is nefarious for testing things in an incremental fashion, piece by piece.  Each of these things are separate pieces that are being fine-tuned.  Put it all together, and voila.. an algo change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coupons</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895506</link>
		<dc:creator>Coupons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895506</guid>
		<description>If done correctly this can be very good when searching for events and other topics where recent is better. If the boost is temporary, to give an opportunity to new sites, the only problem I see are spammers creating new sites all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If done correctly this can be very good when searching for events and other topics where recent is better. If the boost is temporary, to give an opportunity to new sites, the only problem I see are spammers creating new sites all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coupons</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895505</link>
		<dc:creator>Coupons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895505</guid>
		<description>If done correctly this can be very good when searching for events and other topics were recent is better. If the boost is temporary, to give an opportunity to new sites, the only problem I see are spammers creating new sites all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If done correctly this can be very good when searching for events and other topics were recent is better. If the boost is temporary, to give an opportunity to new sites, the only problem I see are spammers creating new sites all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895194</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1895194</guid>
		<description>The example provided is so specific that perhaps there just wasn't that much old content to reference?  I did a search for “SES New York”, because in the past it has proven very hard to get Google to come up with *upcoming* events rather than past events.  That is still true; although Yahoo and Ask offered SESNY 2008 as the first result, Google shows it nowhere.  Since assumedly pages that describe the 2008 event are more recent than those describing 2007, that seems to run counter to the idea that recent posts are favored...right?  Maybe it's more along the lines of treating blog posts like news, and has some previous posters have noted, showing the results only briefly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example provided is so specific that perhaps there just wasn&#8217;t that much old content to reference?  I did a search for “SES New York”, because in the past it has proven very hard to get Google to come up with *upcoming* events rather than past events.  That is still true; although Yahoo and Ask offered SESNY 2008 as the first result, Google shows it nowhere.  Since assumedly pages that describe the 2008 event are more recent than those describing 2007, that seems to run counter to the idea that recent posts are favored&#8230;right?  Maybe it&#8217;s more along the lines of treating blog posts like news, and has some previous posters have noted, showing the results only briefly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CVOS the seo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894922</link>
		<dc:creator>CVOS the seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894922</guid>
		<description>The current problem with Google's instant indexing is sourcing authority sites. In the TCP/IP example a savvy spammer setup brand new websites (blogs) which should have zero authority, and zero backlinks which would normally exclude from the index. 

Websites with no quality incoming links should not be ranked #1, as this example painfully illustrates.

Google engineers will hopefully fix this soon so we won't have to worry about zealous wikipedia hackers taking over more search results positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current problem with Google&#8217;s instant indexing is sourcing authority sites. In the TCP/IP example a savvy spammer setup brand new websites (blogs) which should have zero authority, and zero backlinks which would normally exclude from the index. </p>
<p>Websites with no quality incoming links should not be ranked #1, as this example painfully illustrates.</p>
<p>Google engineers will hopefully fix this soon so we won&#8217;t have to worry about zealous wikipedia hackers taking over more search results positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parul Bindra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894914</link>
		<dc:creator>Parul Bindra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894914</guid>
		<description>I thought it was Google just lowering the overall value of PR - but how come some blogs are down and some are not?May be networking is the issue here - I think Google may have decided to this as many networks interlink their sites when they are not related, they are going to penalize them (as if they were a paid-for directory).

I’d love to hear more on this by Google and what they are doing or intend to do by this, rather than leaving everyone to guess.

Parul
www.bhopu.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was Google just lowering the overall value of PR - but how come some blogs are down and some are not?May be networking is the issue here - I think Google may have decided to this as many networks interlink their sites when they are not related, they are going to penalize them (as if they were a paid-for directory).</p>
<p>I’d love to hear more on this by Google and what they are doing or intend to do by this, rather than leaving everyone to guess.</p>
<p>Parul<br />
<a href="http://www.bhopu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bhopu.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G00gl3fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894587</link>
		<dc:creator>G00gl3fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894587</guid>
		<description>This is old news.

Since "Google Universal Search" was launched on May 16, 2007, Google crawls (and indexes) websites with fresh contents in order to show them within the SERPs. 

Sometimes you can see within the results 5-minute-old pages.

Of course, these contents are best ranked because they match better the Google relevance parameters (keywords at title, keywords at URL, ...) and published on websites with relevance (if not, they're not crawled so fast).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is old news.</p>
<p>Since &#8220;Google Universal Search&#8221; was launched on May 16, 2007, Google crawls (and indexes) websites with fresh contents in order to show them within the SERPs. </p>
<p>Sometimes you can see within the results 5-minute-old pages.</p>
<p>Of course, these contents are best ranked because they match better the Google relevance parameters (keywords at title, keywords at URL, &#8230;) and published on websites with relevance (if not, they&#8217;re not crawled so fast).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google²+eBay²=Uniseek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894455</link>
		<dc:creator>Google²+eBay²=Uniseek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894455</guid>
		<description>Spiders are not an effective means by which to search websites in real time (or something close to contemporaneity).

Google's results are often irrelevant for social and dynamic websites. It's best for static websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiders are not an effective means by which to search websites in real time (or something close to contemporaneity).</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s results are often irrelevant for social and dynamic websites. It&#8217;s best for static websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Spahn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894446</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894446</guid>
		<description>Yes I have noticed that with my startup, where the most linked site's post was Dec. 12th.  But, posts thereafter(Dec. 18) appear 1st before the most linked.

(Thanks every1 for the coverage).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I have noticed that with my startup, where the most linked site&#8217;s post was Dec. 12th.  But, posts thereafter(Dec. 18) appear 1st before the most linked.</p>
<p>(Thanks every1 for the coverage).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spuds</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894432</link>
		<dc:creator>Spuds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/01/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-1894432</guid>
		<description>As a website owner I will be watching the effect of this change with interest. I have no complaints if I get more traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a website owner I will be watching the effect of this change with interest. I have no complaints if I get more traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.091 seconds -->
