<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPhone To Debut In February?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:50:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Easy to use cellphone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-2874793</link>
		<dc:creator>Easy to use cellphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-2874793</guid>
		<description>I hope this happens but I don&#039;t want the phone to look like that.  I read on jitterbug that this could be happening but I didn&#039;t believe it at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this happens but I don&#8217;t want the phone to look like that.  I read on jitterbug that this could be happening but I didn&#8217;t believe it at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doe Niet Zo Moeilijk!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1890505</link>
		<dc:creator>Doe Niet Zo Moeilijk!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1890505</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;De Grote Jaarlijkse DNZM-Verzamelpost...&lt;/strong&gt;

2007, deel 2......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>De Grote Jaarlijkse DNZM-Verzamelpost&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>2007, deel 2&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Turd Recycling</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1885422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Turd Recycling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1885422</guid>
		<description>That phone looks like a turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That phone looks like a turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1883376</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1883376</guid>
		<description>At Mobile World, there are 3 buildings with 2 floors a piece (not counting multi-story outdoor structures). Two stands is barely a showing - most mid-tier adult content peddlers have more. This is a just-for-show appearance. Or maybe a &quot;please develop for Andriod - we&#039;ll pay you!&quot; effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Mobile World, there are 3 buildings with 2 floors a piece (not counting multi-story outdoor structures). Two stands is barely a showing &#8211; most mid-tier adult content peddlers have more. This is a just-for-show appearance. Or maybe a &#8220;please develop for Andriod &#8211; we&#8217;ll pay you!&#8221; effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micfo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1881997</link>
		<dc:creator>micfo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1881997</guid>
		<description>I hope it would be definitely have some nice feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it would be definitely have some nice feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1880192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1880192</guid>
		<description>I hope they look better than that piece of carp!


fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they look better than that piece of carp!</p>
<p>fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinAndFun.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1880177</link>
		<dc:creator>WinAndFun.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1880177</guid>
		<description>We will learn in 9 weeks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will learn in 9 weeks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1880074</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1880074</guid>
		<description>Rumors... Who starts them? Usually the same person who then disapproves them. Remember who started the story :) It was Isabel Aguilera, Managing director of Google Spain and Portugal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors&#8230; Who starts them? Usually the same person who then disapproves them. Remember who started the story <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It was Isabel Aguilera, Managing director of Google Spain and Portugal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remoran</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879754</link>
		<dc:creator>remoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879754</guid>
		<description>Dog ugly. No one would design something like this for real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dog ugly. No one would design something like this for real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879410</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879410</guid>
		<description>let me clarify - for starters the persons thumb is clearly in direct sunlight and clearly over exposed - the screen would obviously be blown out from the sun too. The UI is basically an image that&#039;s been dropped on to some fugly looking abomination of a smart phone. It&#039;s not even a good fake image.

I saw this image a few weeks ago on another blog and couldn&#039;t believe TC is taking it seriously and actually using it. Lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let me clarify &#8211; for starters the persons thumb is clearly in direct sunlight and clearly over exposed &#8211; the screen would obviously be blown out from the sun too. The UI is basically an image that&#8217;s been dropped on to some fugly looking abomination of a smart phone. It&#8217;s not even a good fake image.</p>
<p>I saw this image a few weeks ago on another blog and couldn&#8217;t believe TC is taking it seriously and actually using it. Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879380</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879380</guid>
		<description>am I the only person here who thinks this is picture is a bad photoshop fake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am I the only person here who thinks this is picture is a bad photoshop fake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdrohn.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879136</link>
		<dc:creator>jdrohn.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879136</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The GPhones Debut...&lt;/strong&gt;

Lately, there is a lot of talk over Google&#8217;s wireless ambitions.  They are trying to secure a wireless frequency, they just got a patent approved for credit card transactions over their mobile plans, and they have an open source OS for handhelds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The GPhones Debut&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Lately, there is a lot of talk over Google&#8217;s wireless ambitions.  They are trying to secure a wireless frequency, they just got a patent approved for credit card transactions over their mobile plans, and they have an open source OS for handhelds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Merydith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879109</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Merydith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879109</guid>
		<description>Wow - super ugly device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; super ugly device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879095</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879095</guid>
		<description>someday we can visit the websie in China

http://www.china-birdsnest.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someday we can visit the websie in China</p>
<p><a href="http://www.china-birdsnest.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.china-birdsnest.com'>http://www.china-birdsnest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879079</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879079</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That&#039;s one fugly phone.  It&#039;s as if they took every phone/UI element that has ever been included on any phone, and attempted to put them together.  That makes my 8700-series blackberry look like a fine work of art.  Crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That&#8217;s one fugly phone.  It&#8217;s as if they took every phone/UI element that has ever been included on any phone, and attempted to put them together.  That makes my 8700-series blackberry look like a fine work of art.  Crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1879050</link>
		<dc:creator>Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1879050</guid>
		<description>Looks like the best of 3 worlds, iPhone+Nokia6280+Blackberry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the best of 3 worlds, iPhone+Nokia6280+Blackberry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El primer Google Phone para principios de 2008 &#124; Espira Tecnologías Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878978</link>
		<dc:creator>El primer Google Phone para principios de 2008 &#124; Espira Tecnologías Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878978</guid>
		<description>[...] rumores surgen porque como bien dicen en Tech Crunch, ¿por qué Google ha reservado 2 stands en  el Mobile World Congress de Barcelona? ¿Acaso [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rumores surgen porque como bien dicen en Tech Crunch, ¿por qué Google ha reservado 2 stands en  el Mobile World Congress de Barcelona? ¿Acaso [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mint question</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878947</link>
		<dc:creator>mint question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878947</guid>
		<description>&quot;At least Duncan Riley can always rely on comments being dumber and less informed than he is. It’s like watching Stevie Wonder give Hellen Keller driving lessons.&quot;

Mrs. Riley, please don&#039;t post on the site with offensive comments in an effort to defend your son&#039;s oft half-assed writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At least Duncan Riley can always rely on comments being dumber and less informed than he is. It’s like watching Stevie Wonder give Hellen Keller driving lessons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mrs. Riley, please don&#8217;t post on the site with offensive comments in an effort to defend your son&#8217;s oft half-assed writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mint question</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878943</link>
		<dc:creator>mint question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878943</guid>
		<description>&quot;dam ceo said there is no gphone.&quot;

CEOs say crap all the time to protect IP and upcoming product launches. Not saying that applies here but that&#039;s a severely flawed supporting fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dam ceo said there is no gphone.&#8221;</p>
<p>CEOs say crap all the time to protect IP and upcoming product launches. Not saying that applies here but that&#8217;s a severely flawed supporting fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878935</link>
		<dc:creator>Argh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878935</guid>
		<description>At least Duncan Riley can always rely on comments being dumber and less informed than he is. It&#039;s like watching Stevie Wonder give Hellen Keller driving lessons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Duncan Riley can always rely on comments being dumber and less informed than he is. It&#8217;s like watching Stevie Wonder give Hellen Keller driving lessons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878930</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no reason for Google to develop handsets of their own. The current manufacturers are more than capable of doing that for them. The real power (and money-makers, I suppose) are in the software that drive the phones.

We can all guess that at some point Google will be giving away phones with Android-related software built in for free. The catch is that, as with most Google services, they&#039;ll deliver ads to the phone as well. It&#039;s different, but as we&#039;ve seen with the more traditional web-based apps, it works. People get free services, and Google make a fortune. Fair play to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason for Google to develop handsets of their own. The current manufacturers are more than capable of doing that for them. The real power (and money-makers, I suppose) are in the software that drive the phones.</p>
<p>We can all guess that at some point Google will be giving away phones with Android-related software built in for free. The catch is that, as with most Google services, they&#8217;ll deliver ads to the phone as well. It&#8217;s different, but as we&#8217;ve seen with the more traditional web-based apps, it works. People get free services, and Google make a fortune. Fair play to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878867</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878867</guid>
		<description>I agree with others about the fact that Google is more about software.
It&#039;s not the first time we see a rumor about Gphone, but all Google has done is releasing apps for mobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with others about the fact that Google is more about software.<br />
It&#8217;s not the first time we see a rumor about Gphone, but all Google has done is releasing apps for mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tostada-man</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878823</link>
		<dc:creator>Tostada-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878823</guid>
		<description>Google is all about the software. Software, software, software!!!

Oh, wait! They sell those Google boxes....

So Google can also wants to play in the hardware/device/smartphone arena? If Google wants to get into the &quot;physical&quot; world, let&#039;s throw a crazy idea out there: Let&#039;s say Google buys.....Palm?

Crazy, you say?.... Palm is not doing that good, meaning a good buying price. The everlasting rumors of a Motorola or Nokia takeoves don&#039;t seem to gather traction. And Palm is here in Silicon Valley. Plus Palm OS needs an overhaul. They also would give Microsoft a headache, because I&#039;m sure they would stop selling the Windows version of the Treo (Google likes to &quot;stick it to Redmond&quot;).

Anyhow.... Stay tune for the next round of products from Google: GToilet, GCondoms, GPizza and GHairspray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is all about the software. Software, software, software!!!</p>
<p>Oh, wait! They sell those Google boxes&#8230;.</p>
<p>So Google can also wants to play in the hardware/device/smartphone arena? If Google wants to get into the &#8220;physical&#8221; world, let&#8217;s throw a crazy idea out there: Let&#8217;s say Google buys&#8230;..Palm?</p>
<p>Crazy, you say?&#8230;. Palm is not doing that good, meaning a good buying price. The everlasting rumors of a Motorola or Nokia takeoves don&#8217;t seem to gather traction. And Palm is here in Silicon Valley. Plus Palm OS needs an overhaul. They also would give Microsoft a headache, because I&#8217;m sure they would stop selling the Windows version of the Treo (Google likes to &#8220;stick it to Redmond&#8221;).</p>
<p>Anyhow&#8230;. Stay tune for the next round of products from Google: GToilet, GCondoms, GPizza and GHairspray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878795</guid>
		<description>Thats one ugly phone !

Hopefully Google would have a better design team on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats one ugly phone !</p>
<p>Hopefully Google would have a better design team on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/comment-page-1/#comment-1878738</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/26/gphone-to-debut-in-february/#comment-1878738</guid>
		<description>Why do they need to stands - One for handset makers to show off Android powered phones, the other is for Google to show how they will use their newly won frequency spectrum will be used.

More totally unsubstantiated speculation? OK, there will be a slick HTC handset running Android, doing all the standard 3G mobile phone stuff, but it will also have a 700MHz radio with support for Skype, Gmail, YouTube and Open Social powered web sites.

Baseless speculation, I has it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they need to stands &#8211; One for handset makers to show off Android powered phones, the other is for Google to show how they will use their newly won frequency spectrum will be used.</p>
<p>More totally unsubstantiated speculation? OK, there will be a slick HTC handset running Android, doing all the standard 3G mobile phone stuff, but it will also have a 700MHz radio with support for Skype, Gmail, YouTube and Open Social powered web sites.</p>
<p>Baseless speculation, I has it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
