December 26, 2007

EU: Microsoft’s Last Stand Against Google’s Acquisition of DoubleClick

Duncan Riley

31 comments »

As we reported December 20, the last hurdle to Google’s acquisition of Doubleclick now rests with the European Union after obtaining approval for the merger in the United States.

One company petitioning against the acquisition is Microsoft. The NY Times has a copy of a leaked Microsoft document here (.doc) that details in dot points the case against the acquisition. One choice quote:

By acquiring the dominant provider of ad-serving tools that publishers use to manage and make their inventory available to advertisers, Google will force other online ad networks to build and market their own ad-serving tools. Unless and until Google’s competitors are able to obtain access to competitively neutral and unbiased ad-serving tools like those currently provided by DoubleClick, the ability of Google’s rivals to create viable alternative pipelines will be very difficult, if possible at all. Moreover, by the time competitors are able to assemble their own pipelines, given the network economics that characterize online advertising, Google likely will have obtained in non-search advertising the same unbeatable market position that it now enjoys in search advertising.

And then there’s the Powerpoint slides. Here’s Microsoft’s case in pictures:

slide1.jpg

slide2.jpg

slide3.jpg

As Erick previously noted: “The European Commission won’t bow out so easily.” The EU has a much stronger track record against anti-competitive behavior that the FTC has under the Bush Administration, and with Microsoft spending time and money lobbying against the deal it would a brave person who bets that Google is assured of getting unconditional approval for the acquisition.

(slides via Slashdot)

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. The Indian Online Advertising Enigma « Sukshma

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Jon

    Interesting how one monopolist is trying to keep another potential monopolist from taking over their sector. Ironic that this happens to be in the EU as well… where Microsoft doesn’t have a good track record of winning.

    Jon

  2. will

    great slides

  3. Chris Cera

    You can view a web-based version of this document here: http://vuzit.com/doc/view/mn/1?zoom=2

  4. Everett

    I guess the only way to gain FULL control of the total ad space is to downright own all the content that’s out there. I’m willing to bet in the next couple of years the large search companies ie Google and Yahoo will “open” their platform, following Facebook, and allow 3rd party apps builders to build their sites onto the search engine’s platform only now it won’t just be app developers but content providers ie cnn, nyt, sfgate, reuters who will sell their content on the sites. A few more years after that and we’ll find that the Internet and all its precious content will be fenced into either Facebook, Google or Yahoo’s gated communities where they’ll whore all the advertising banners, ad words, etc…. :(

  5. ex-Googler

    I’m betting they get unconditional approval. Google doesn’t even view Microsoft as a competitor. Believe it or not, they don’t set out on each new venture with “destroy Microsoft” on the top of the agenda. That would be absolutely counter-productive. Microsoft are the ones that see Google as the competitor (or should I say threat). Its very simple, aggressive and timely marketing in highly accessible markets will almost always prove fruitful. But who am I talk …

  6. Mr Boin

    Those slides are fantastic!

    Eu won’t stop the deal, they hate Microsoft too much… IMHO

  7. Brian Mingus

    You’re not fooling anyone. Those are tubes.

  8. marzipan from toledo

    Because Google is so dominant in PPC ad networks and search, Google is able to extract more money out of its advertisers that other networks.

    What we know is that Publishers follow profits and it is getting to the point in many instances that the net gross profit that Google is able to generate off its ad sales is more than what other networks bring in.

    The danger here is that once that happens, Microsoft or Yahoo won’t even be able to give away ads because the marginal utility (however a publisher decides to measure it) a publisher gets from its Google-based networks is more than the entire benefit they would see from switching to Microsoft or Yahoo even if MSFT,Y!, etc. decided to do 100% revshare.

    What needs to happen is that competing ad networks need to band together and employ destroyer pricing now. Anything short of this will see to it that they remain second class citizens indefinitely.

  9. Don

    I see the series of tubes in the presentation, but where’s the big truck?

  10. ex-Googler

    HA! @ Brian Mingus

  11. NWLB

    Google does enjoy a well earned advantage. It should not be punished, unless it is actually defying the principles of free enterprise. Too this point, it is not. It may not be a given that Google will win its fight, but it should. Odds are Google already knows anything it needs to know from DoubleClick by now. The only purpose blocking the merger would serve, is to leave it to be bought by a lesser company.

    I’d put money on Google hiring most of DoubleClicks staff away, and crushing it anyway. Microsoft could do that now, but it chooses not to compete, but sue. Nothing new there either.

  12. Esteban

    great slides! congratulations to make it simple for us!
    http://www.spymac.com/details/?2321924

  13. nemrut

    ‘great slides..’ visual masturbation if you ask me. and dont the folks at MS know how to use spell check(eg, ‘Intergration’)?

  14. AW

    Oh God, I might be crazy but I read Microsoft’s comment as, “Competing with Google will be hard and we don’t want to.”

  15. Ree Tanjuatco

    Those slides are like alien designs built to confuse people to distort the better sense of the DoubleClick acquisition.

    Clearly there is no monopoly here. I can choose search engines and switch anytime I want. Bottom line Google’s monopoly is a ghost its competetors are trying to sustain simply because they can’t build a better search product.

    Give me a search engine that can directly answer natural language questions with complete and concise results and I’ll switch with all my heart and soul.

    But in the meantime guys Google is King of search.

  16. Ballmer

    Google will become a monopoly! That is always bad!

    fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

  17. fred

    Anyone that does not see a problem with what Google is doing in the ad space either works for Google or is just plain dumb.

  18. Ed

    Agree with 17 (Fred).

    Common sense people.

  19. myelectones

    google is the best..
    i luve adsense.. :D

  20. ex-Googler

    hey fred.

    Would you care to back that comment up with some facts? Because in my opinion, people who simply pass judgment on a company without presenting facts, usually works for the competitor or is just plain dumb.

  21. Todd

    Irony anyone? Microsoft submits their argument that the Google deal is a monopoly….in their proprietary Word file format!?!?!?

    Note to Microsoft, send the EU slide shows in an open file format.

  22. Q

    I’ve been called a Google apologist in these comments before.

    Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick would probably severely hamper competition in the space of online ads. Google may seem great and fair now, but if it buys itself into an unusually strong position, that will stop being true as it tries to keep its position. The best way to keep Google honest and benefit *you*, consumers, is free open and unrestricted competition.

    Most major monopolies in the past have sustained themselves by eliminating (acquiring, unsustainably udercutting, etc) possible competition, cf. Microsoft, Standard Oil….

    The fact that Microsoft is making the argument means nothing. Do you realize that you hate ad hominem attacks against your own causes, but jump at the opportunity to attack your opponents? Reset your thinking. Irony, Todd? Do not make a mockery of logic.

  23. WinAndFun.com

    Even I like Google, if they make a monopoly in advertising it will bad for both advertisers and publishers…

  24. bloggo

    The fact is that ad networks suck. They all pay publishers a paltry rate ($1 cpm if you’re lucky). They are basically colluding to keep cpms to publishers at the same rate, despite there being thousands of competitors (been to adtech lately)? And despite their so-called “targeting technology”, they all basically operate in the same manner - a clearinghouse for junk impressions.

    Most real publishers sell their inventory directly via an inside sales force or use rep firms, and only use ad networks to serve their remnant inventory. Many publishers will not run Adsense ads in their “premium” inventory, which is why there are separate ad units on the page reserved for cpc (much lower down in fact.) If publishers were to run adsense in premium display inventory, for which they charge advertisers very high cpms with high minimum buys, they would risk devaluing the inventory and losing business.

    As long as Google doesn’t compete with the publishers themselves, and attempt to disintermediate their own sales force, they will be fine. Go ahead and go after ad networks. They’re a crap business and deserve it.

  25. Jay T

    @bloggo
    Aductions is a new one on the landscape.

    I checked it out today and it appears have considerable potential, IMHO.

    http://www.aductions.com

  26. Matt

    Gee based on those pictures, Microsofts case looks pretty strong.

  27. Chris

    “As Erick previously noted: ‘The European Commission won’t bow out so easily.’ The EU has a much stronger track record against anti-competitive behavior that the FTC has under the Bush Administration, and with Microsoft spending time and money lobbying against the deal it would a brave person who bets that Google is assured of getting unconditional approval for the acquisition.”

    After all the Apple and Google fanboyery that spews forth from this blog - its nice to finally see some common sense analysis on TechCrunch.

  28. DavidTan

    And i thought MS woud never complain. Remember that they bundled and hardcoded IE and WMP into every Windows?

    BTW, those were great slides!

  29. Ultimate Diligence Blog (=^ v ^=)

    Thanks for sharing! ^o^

    hi, if you have time, go to my blog take a look, thx!!!!! ^o^

    The blog have many informations, hope to able to help you!!!^^

    Ultimate Diligence Blog (=^ v ^=)

    http://ultimatediligenceblog.blogspot.com/

  30. Josh

    Oh man the irony. I thought this post was a joke. Never thought I’d see the day when Microsoft goes on an anti-trust crusade. Don’t those guys have any shame?