<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Checkout Tries To Ring Up Market-Share Gains With Free Transactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TekGems</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1840914</link>
		<dc:creator>TekGems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1840914</guid>
		<description>If Google Checkout wants to catch up with Paypal, they need to provide even bigger incentives to buyers. Remember when Paypal was giving away $5 for ever referral that signed up for your invite e-mail? Google Checkout could do the same. It worked for Paypal, it could work for Google Checkout.

Google Checkout also needs some better integration tools so approvals can occur in real-time (e.g. AuthorizeNet). Its kind of ridiculous that you have to wait for Google Checkout to approve the transaction. Could be seconds or hours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google Checkout wants to catch up with Paypal, they need to provide even bigger incentives to buyers. Remember when Paypal was giving away $5 for ever referral that signed up for your invite e-mail? Google Checkout could do the same. It worked for Paypal, it could work for Google Checkout.</p>
<p>Google Checkout also needs some better integration tools so approvals can occur in real-time (e.g. AuthorizeNet). Its kind of ridiculous that you have to wait for Google Checkout to approve the transaction. Could be seconds or hours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmoshay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1840644</link>
		<dc:creator>pmoshay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1840644</guid>
		<description>i was considering using google payments for cc processing until i saw the abject misery and lack of communication, support merchants using them endure on there own users newsgroup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was considering using google payments for cc processing until i saw the abject misery and lack of communication, support merchants using them endure on there own users newsgroup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCI Compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1838043</link>
		<dc:creator>PCI Compliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1838043</guid>
		<description>PayPal had Ebay and Amazon has itself. Google needs something else besides free processing in the short term to spur wider and quicker acceptance rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PayPal had Ebay and Amazon has itself. Google needs something else besides free processing in the short term to spur wider and quicker acceptance rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1837671</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1837671</guid>
		<description>If only Google will accept international merchants :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only Google will accept international merchants <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836828</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836828</guid>
		<description>Gaggle crap is lame!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaggle crap is lame!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836783</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836783</guid>
		<description>I much preferred the good old days when Google competed for market share simply by making the best product... It's always been a kind of a fairy tale come true for me where Google came to become the dominant search player through having a superior product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much preferred the good old days when Google competed for market share simply by making the best product&#8230; It&#8217;s always been a kind of a fairy tale come true for me where Google came to become the dominant search player through having a superior product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836687</guid>
		<description>If Google was smart, they would start a separate company providing this service so privacy or data capture wouldn't be an issue, right now they know my traffic info via analytics, advertising through adsense and this is not including other programs I do not participate in such as gmail, adwords, this... too much info for one company in my opinion.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google was smart, they would start a separate company providing this service so privacy or data capture wouldn&#8217;t be an issue, right now they know my traffic info via analytics, advertising through adsense and this is not including other programs I do not participate in such as gmail, adwords, this&#8230; too much info for one company in my opinion.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ovariancancerstage</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836336</link>
		<dc:creator>ovariancancerstage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836336</guid>
		<description>We need more technology when we talk about paypal accounts.... the system is not the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need more technology when we talk about paypal accounts&#8230;. the system is not the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kolev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836296</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836296</guid>
		<description>PayPal and Google Checkout are two different products with two different purposes. PayPal aims to make profit per transaction, Google aims at collecting and exploiting who buys what where at what price and so on. Amazon Payments is more like PayPal and I prefer it. If you're a serious merchant, 2% transaction fee is not an issue. You know that most merchants have coupons for 20% off, 30% off and even for higher discounts depending on their margin. Giving free marketing info to Google is an issue though. Or at least it is to serious businesses. PayPal and Amazon Payments are the two payment systems for serious merchants. Millions of people already have their credit cards with Amazon, so, it's a natural choice. Their micropayment capability is also good. PayPal has the same, but you need to open a second account and it's a headache. PayPal also has virtual terminal, which allows merchants to take offline payments. That's a big plus, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PayPal and Google Checkout are two different products with two different purposes. PayPal aims to make profit per transaction, Google aims at collecting and exploiting who buys what where at what price and so on. Amazon Payments is more like PayPal and I prefer it. If you&#8217;re a serious merchant, 2% transaction fee is not an issue. You know that most merchants have coupons for 20% off, 30% off and even for higher discounts depending on their margin. Giving free marketing info to Google is an issue though. Or at least it is to serious businesses. PayPal and Amazon Payments are the two payment systems for serious merchants. Millions of people already have their credit cards with Amazon, so, it&#8217;s a natural choice. Their micropayment capability is also good. PayPal has the same, but you need to open a second account and it&#8217;s a headache. PayPal also has virtual terminal, which allows merchants to take offline payments. That&#8217;s a big plus, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836241</link>
		<dc:creator>jro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836241</guid>
		<description>If Google actually succeeds in gaining market share, the comparisons to MS are inevitable.

And before everyone starts explaining the differences in order to justify the tactics, please consider these statements:

"Google is using its dominance in search and search advertising to subsidize and break into other markets."

"Microsoft is using its dominance in operating systems and desktop applications to subsidize and break into other markets."

Anti-competitive is anti-competitive, no matter how you slice it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google actually succeeds in gaining market share, the comparisons to MS are inevitable.</p>
<p>And before everyone starts explaining the differences in order to justify the tactics, please consider these statements:</p>
<p>&#8220;Google is using its dominance in search and search advertising to subsidize and break into other markets.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Microsoft is using its dominance in operating systems and desktop applications to subsidize and break into other markets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anti-competitive is anti-competitive, no matter how you slice it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marketing lane</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836201</link>
		<dc:creator>marketing lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836201</guid>
		<description>This is kind of like the chicken and the egg. Google cannot increase its Checkout user base unless merchants accept it as a payment and merchants wont spend money adding this feature to their site if there are no users. 

Paypal has the advantage in that it allows you to send money to friends and therefore people will generally have funds in those accounts. I have both Paypal and Google Checkout accounts and most of the time I end up using Paypal just because I already have funds in the account. With Paypal recently introducing the debit card Master Card as a way of purchasing anything online or B&#38;M, Google may start to see  itself loosing market share. 

The only incentive I see for site owners is when it comes to Adwords. If a merchant accepts Google Checkout their ads receive a little extra exposure in the form of the Google Checkout logo. These ads generally have a higher click through rate and will provide better return for the advertiser. I have suggested to nearly every client to accept Google Checkout specifically for this reason and no other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kind of like the chicken and the egg. Google cannot increase its Checkout user base unless merchants accept it as a payment and merchants wont spend money adding this feature to their site if there are no users. </p>
<p>Paypal has the advantage in that it allows you to send money to friends and therefore people will generally have funds in those accounts. I have both Paypal and Google Checkout accounts and most of the time I end up using Paypal just because I already have funds in the account. With Paypal recently introducing the debit card Master Card as a way of purchasing anything online or B&amp;M, Google may start to see  itself loosing market share. </p>
<p>The only incentive I see for site owners is when it comes to Adwords. If a merchant accepts Google Checkout their ads receive a little extra exposure in the form of the Google Checkout logo. These ads generally have a higher click through rate and will provide better return for the advertiser. I have suggested to nearly every client to accept Google Checkout specifically for this reason and no other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836198</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836198</guid>
		<description>google is 0-2 in taking on ebay's core markets. google base and checkout both are DOA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google is 0-2 in taking on ebay&#8217;s core markets. google base and checkout both are DOA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illustrious Bozo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836177</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrious Bozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836177</guid>
		<description>Well, for one, I read various trade journals and blogs and have seen various write-ups where growth is quite has been quite slow for Checkout and has a very low penetration percentage.  This was back around September/October which was 9 or 10 months after they offered the deal starting back in January.  I think a few early adopters even backed out (but they have gained a few other big adopters as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for one, I read various trade journals and blogs and have seen various write-ups where growth is quite has been quite slow for Checkout and has a very low penetration percentage.  This was back around September/October which was 9 or 10 months after they offered the deal starting back in January.  I think a few early adopters even backed out (but they have gained a few other big adopters as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MGZ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836160</link>
		<dc:creator>MGZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836160</guid>
		<description>Bozo: How do you know how much they have gained? I use them all the time for sending invoices to people to receive payment, with no fees paid to Google. Love it!

MGZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bozo: How do you know how much they have gained? I use them all the time for sending invoices to people to receive payment, with no fees paid to Google. Love it!</p>
<p>MGZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Nadarajah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836080</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Nadarajah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836080</guid>
		<description>I realize that this is a move to try and break into PayPal's territory and I like that they are doing it.

Google has been taking serious blows into Microsoft with their search and web applications. I hope they will offer a similar blow to Paypal with this move and all that follow.

Good Work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that this is a move to try and break into PayPal&#8217;s territory and I like that they are doing it.</p>
<p>Google has been taking serious blows into Microsoft with their search and web applications. I hope they will offer a similar blow to Paypal with this move and all that follow.</p>
<p>Good Work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836076</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836076</guid>
		<description>When PayPal gave these offers, it did not try and leverage it's other areas - like adsense for Google. So, I think that these situations should not be compared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When PayPal gave these offers, it did not try and leverage it&#8217;s other areas - like adsense for Google. So, I think that these situations should not be compared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illustrious Bozo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836017</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustrious Bozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836017</guid>
		<description>Well, missy, time has not helped Google and Google Checkout.  Their free offer ran all of 2007 and they have not gained much, if any.  Good luck to them.  PayPal killer it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, missy, time has not helped Google and Google Checkout.  Their free offer ran all of 2007 and they have not gained much, if any.  Good luck to them.  PayPal killer it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelli</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836002</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/12/google-checkout-tries-to-ring-up-market-share-gains-with-free-transactions/#comment-1836002</guid>
		<description>Remember that Paypal did the same thing when it first started. If Google gets enough marketshare to get onto eBay, then it would become a serious competitor. eBay can ignore it only for so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that Paypal did the same thing when it first started. If Google gets enough marketshare to get onto eBay, then it would become a serious competitor. eBay can ignore it only for so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.073 seconds -->
