<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYTimes Surges, CNet Slumps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:25:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perde</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2572611</link>
		<dc:creator>perde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2572611</guid>
		<description>good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Universmedias &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gratuité des archives : le trafic du New-York Times explose</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2538811</link>
		<dc:creator>Universmedias &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gratuité des archives : le trafic du New-York Times explose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2538811</guid>
		<description>[...] le résultat est là : le trafic du site a explosé, vient de révéler [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] le résultat est là : le trafic du site a explosé, vient de révéler [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online trading brokers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2493269</link>
		<dc:creator>online trading brokers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2493269</guid>
		<description>Been reading for some time to learn about &#039;how to trade currencies&#039; Thanks for the great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been reading for some time to learn about &#8216;how to trade currencies&#8217; Thanks for the great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: racetalkblog.com &#187; How Will Farber Re-Shape CNET’s News.com to Compete with TechCrunch and GigaOm and even the Valleywag?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2427415</link>
		<dc:creator>racetalkblog.com &#187; How Will Farber Re-Shape CNET’s News.com to Compete with TechCrunch and GigaOm and even the Valleywag?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2427415</guid>
		<description>[...] how will Dan Farber save the sinking ship that is CNET?  News broke yesterday on News.com (or maybe Valleywag) that Jai Singh, senior vice president and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how will Dan Farber save the sinking ship that is CNET?  News broke yesterday on News.com (or maybe Valleywag) that Jai Singh, senior vice president and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book marketing - does giving them away for free sell books?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2418314</link>
		<dc:creator>Book marketing - does giving them away for free sell books?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2418314</guid>
		<description>[...] of the news sites had to acknowledge by shifting from paid walled-garden subscriptions to free and open access. Chris Anderson, godfather of the Long Tail, even coined Freeconomics as his latest paradigm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the news sites had to acknowledge by shifting from paid walled-garden subscriptions to free and open access. Chris Anderson, godfather of the Long Tail, even coined Freeconomics as his latest paradigm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-07-11 &#171; Network(ed)News Bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2405339</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-07-11 &#171; Network(ed)News Bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2405339</guid>
		<description>[...] NYTimes Surges, CNet Slumps In the several months after the NYTimes dropped TimesSelect, its traffic went through the roof. According to comScore, it gained 7.5 million readers worldwide from the end of August through the end of October, a 64% jump (to a total of 19.4 million). (tags: business comscore free nytimes traffic journalism news techcrunch timesselect paywall) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NYTimes Surges, CNet Slumps In the several months after the NYTimes dropped TimesSelect, its traffic went through the roof. According to comScore, it gained 7.5 million readers worldwide from the end of August through the end of October, a 64% jump (to a total of 19.4 million). (tags: business comscore free nytimes traffic journalism news techcrunch timesselect paywall) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visión. Un &#8216;blog&#8217; del grupo Joly. &#187; Archivo &#187; El número de visitantes únicos de &#8216;Newyorktimes.com&#8217; sube un 64%</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2404833</link>
		<dc:creator>Visión. Un &#8216;blog&#8217; del grupo Joly. &#187; Archivo &#187; El número de visitantes únicos de &#8216;Newyorktimes.com&#8217; sube un 64%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2404833</guid>
		<description>[...] En sólo tres meses, el número de visitantes únicos del website de The New York Times ha aumentado un 64%; exactamente, desde que hizo públicos todos sus contenidos, archivos incluidos. Ha pasado de 11,8 millones de visitantes únicos en agosto a 19,4 millones en octubre. El número de páginas vistas, a su vez, ha subido un 52%. Ahora está en los 181 millones. Son datos de Tech Crunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] En sólo tres meses, el número de visitantes únicos del website de The New York Times ha aumentado un 64%; exactamente, desde que hizo públicos todos sus contenidos, archivos incluidos. Ha pasado de 11,8 millones de visitantes únicos en agosto a 19,4 millones en octubre. El número de páginas vistas, a su vez, ha subido un 52%. Ahora está en los 181 millones. Son datos de Tech Crunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: how to get a six pack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2326493</link>
		<dc:creator>how to get a six pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2326493</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;how to get a six pack...&lt;/strong&gt;

How to get ripped abs!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>how to get a six pack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How to get ripped abs!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: December 11, 2007 &#124; TechTV Update</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-2069068</link>
		<dc:creator>December 11, 2007 &#124; TechTV Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-2069068</guid>
		<description>[...] put a stop to this.  The New York Times has meanwhile learned that free is beautiful, enjoying a massive surge in its global reach since eliminating subscription fees to access popular content.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] put a stop to this.  The New York Times has meanwhile learned that free is beautiful, enjoying a massive surge in its global reach since eliminating subscription fees to access popular content.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNET Changes Quarterbacks: Dan Farber Takes Over As Editor In Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-1999502</link>
		<dc:creator>CNET Changes Quarterbacks: Dan Farber Takes Over As Editor In Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1999502</guid>
		<description>[...] the reigns at CNET during a troubled time for the company. Traffic, at least according to Comscore, has slumped for their news properties. Private equity firms have made an effort to take control of the board of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the reigns at CNET during a troubled time for the company. Traffic, at least according to Comscore, has slumped for their news properties. Private equity firms have made an effort to take control of the board of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Time Running Out For CNET?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-1902184</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Time Running Out For CNET?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1902184</guid>
		<description>[...] recently noted that CNET traffic has slumped, particularly when compared to large gains made by the NYT and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently noted that CNET traffic has slumped, particularly when compared to large gains made by the NYT and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Journalism Iconoclast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-2/#comment-1886250</link>
		<dc:creator>The Journalism Iconoclast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1886250</guid>
		<description>[...] felt that they would make millions more if they ended the program. Since Times Select ended, the Times has seen a huge 64% spike in traffic to nytimes.com. The Journal will be giving up $50 million a year in subscriber fees because they believe they can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] felt that they would make millions more if they ended the program. Since Times Select ended, the Times has seen a huge 64% spike in traffic to nytimes.com. The Journal will be giving up $50 million a year in subscriber fees because they believe they can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carls konsumentblogg &#187; Succé för gratis nättidning</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1878972</link>
		<dc:creator>Carls konsumentblogg &#187; Succé för gratis nättidning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1878972</guid>
		<description>[...] läser jag i TechCrunch att satsningen blivit en succé. Mellan slutet av augusti och slutet av oktober ökade antalet läsare över hela världen med 64 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] läser jag i TechCrunch att satsningen blivit en succé. Mellan slutet av augusti och slutet av oktober ökade antalet läsare över hela världen med 64 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unhip</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1840564</link>
		<dc:creator>unhip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1840564</guid>
		<description>The revolution has never been led by Wired. It’s a company of slick hipster egos and precious little substance.

@9 somastud, you never got over the Hotwired fiasco, did you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revolution has never been led by Wired. It’s a company of slick hipster egos and precious little substance.</p>
<p>@9 somastud, you never got over the Hotwired fiasco, did you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1834909</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1834909</guid>
		<description>I agree that CNET seems old.  It&#039;s useful, but &quot;old&quot;.  

Concerning the NYT, I only seem to hear about friends who have canned their subscriptions.  I canned all newspapers about two years ago as I can see a variety of opinions on the web - not just a single viewpoint as you get with the NYT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that CNET seems old.  It&#8217;s useful, but &#8220;old&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Concerning the NYT, I only seem to hear about friends who have canned their subscriptions.  I canned all newspapers about two years ago as I can see a variety of opinions on the web &#8211; not just a single viewpoint as you get with the NYT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1834080</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1834080</guid>
		<description>Anyone see a correlation between NYT&#039;s traffic jumping in the July/August span and the iPhone being release at the same time?  Every iPhone advertisement shows it browsing the NYT website, and I&#039;m sure that has driven traffic as well as NYT&#039;s &quot;coolness&quot; factor simply by being associated with Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone see a correlation between NYT&#8217;s traffic jumping in the July/August span and the iPhone being release at the same time?  Every iPhone advertisement shows it browsing the NYT website, and I&#8217;m sure that has driven traffic as well as NYT&#8217;s &#8220;coolness&#8221; factor simply by being associated with Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyokon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832937</link>
		<dc:creator>hyokon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832937</guid>
		<description>@39 James: I don&#039;t read Enonomist regularly, but I believe you. But can you say that big media companies do better in maintaining the same style than niche blogs?

@44 mig: I don&#039;t disagree with you in the definition of a journalistic media. My only point is that &quot;if we define media as an entity that delivers news/facts and perspectives&quot;, TC is a media (and one of my favorites). And many other less known blogs are, too. Tagging is popular is because people can put different definition for the same thing. I often tag professional blogs &#039;media&#039;, in addition to blog, web2.0, etc. Should I not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@39 James: I don&#8217;t read Enonomist regularly, but I believe you. But can you say that big media companies do better in maintaining the same style than niche blogs?</p>
<p>@44 mig: I don&#8217;t disagree with you in the definition of a journalistic media. My only point is that &#8220;if we define media as an entity that delivers news/facts and perspectives&#8221;, TC is a media (and one of my favorites). And many other less known blogs are, too. Tagging is popular is because people can put different definition for the same thing. I often tag professional blogs &#8216;media&#8217;, in addition to blog, web2.0, etc. Should I not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pheonix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832749</link>
		<dc:creator>pheonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832749</guid>
		<description>Right, so let me get this straight, the TechCrunch figures include CrunchGear, but the cnet news.com numbers don&#039;t include the traffic from cnet.com. 

Wow, that&#039;s some amazing reporting, and a stunningly well researched piece of spin. 

I don&#039;t think anyone would claim news.com was perfect, or that cnet.com wasn&#039;t in some challenging times at the moment. But the CNET properties do offer some diverse content, including cnettv.com, ZDNET.com, TV.com, GameSpot and worldwide editions of cnet.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, so let me get this straight, the TechCrunch figures include CrunchGear, but the cnet news.com numbers don&#8217;t include the traffic from cnet.com. </p>
<p>Wow, that&#8217;s some amazing reporting, and a stunningly well researched piece of spin. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone would claim news.com was perfect, or that cnet.com wasn&#8217;t in some challenging times at the moment. But the CNET properties do offer some diverse content, including cnettv.com, ZDNET.com, TV.com, GameSpot and worldwide editions of cnet.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832705</link>
		<dc:creator>mig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832705</guid>
		<description>TC, I like reading you but I take all of what you say at face value.  This is a blog not a journalistic organization.  Some people here seem confused as to the difference.   I am not going to waste my time to explain it here.  Go wikipedia-it and learn for yourself why it is that BLOGS seem to be one step ahead on product reviews than CNET for example.  Ever heard of NDA&#039;s?  Well Blogs don&#039;t have to abide by certain &quot;journalistic standards&quot;.  This string of comments has a tinge of right winged flava&#039; to it.  I feel sick now.  Michael Arrington, you sound like a hater bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC, I like reading you but I take all of what you say at face value.  This is a blog not a journalistic organization.  Some people here seem confused as to the difference.   I am not going to waste my time to explain it here.  Go wikipedia-it and learn for yourself why it is that BLOGS seem to be one step ahead on product reviews than CNET for example.  Ever heard of NDA&#8217;s?  Well Blogs don&#8217;t have to abide by certain &#8220;journalistic standards&#8221;.  This string of comments has a tinge of right winged flava&#8217; to it.  I feel sick now.  Michael Arrington, you sound like a hater bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog.kmto.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832511</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog.kmto.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if this really means success for the NYT. I mean whenever you give something valuable for free people come. Price still is a signal for quality and will be. That would or could have make the NYT outstanding and differentiate from the &quot;crowd&quot;. You dont always have to fight to rule the whole world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this really means success for the NYT. I mean whenever you give something valuable for free people come. Price still is a signal for quality and will be. That would or could have make the NYT outstanding and differentiate from the &#8220;crowd&#8221;. You dont always have to fight to rule the whole world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Micheal Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832367</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Micheal Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832367</guid>
		<description>Ree, i agree with you.  Its a joke to me. TC is nothing more than a glorified forum nothing more.  I read and comment here because thats what people do on forum and chat rooms.

Just like everyone else they have their biases, but that doesn&#039;t bother me at all, since i don&#039;t really take any serious on here anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ree, i agree with you.  Its a joke to me. TC is nothing more than a glorified forum nothing more.  I read and comment here because thats what people do on forum and chat rooms.</p>
<p>Just like everyone else they have their biases, but that doesn&#8217;t bother me at all, since i don&#8217;t really take any serious on here anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ree Tanjuatco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ree Tanjuatco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832324</guid>
		<description>Are you seriously comparing TC to these reputable news organizations? LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you seriously comparing TC to these reputable news organizations? LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Schonfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832307</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832307</guid>
		<description>@21, that is correct.  The numbers in the post are just for CNet&#039;s News.com property,the most direct competitor to the other sites listed (including TC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21, that is correct.  The numbers in the post are just for CNet&#8217;s News.com property,the most direct competitor to the other sites listed (including TC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832257</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832257</guid>
		<description>@38 jason:  I try to read Tech Crunch Japan but my Japanese just isn&#039;t good enough. I would like to have articles in English. Plus, most of TechCrunch Japan is Japanese translations of the stories here.

@36 hyokon wrote &quot;blogs like TC are even better. Why I like TC? I like Mike’s perspectives. The incumbents are too big to have a strong character. Their articles are different depending on who the writer is.&quot;

What on earth are you talking about? All writers at a magazine like The Economist write in exactly the same character and style and stay on message. There is more diversity of character and quality at TC (and it&#039;s not exactly a good thing... ie. Duncan.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@38 jason:  I try to read Tech Crunch Japan but my Japanese just isn&#8217;t good enough. I would like to have articles in English. Plus, most of TechCrunch Japan is Japanese translations of the stories here.</p>
<p>@36 hyokon wrote &#8220;blogs like TC are even better. Why I like TC? I like Mike’s perspectives. The incumbents are too big to have a strong character. Their articles are different depending on who the writer is.&#8221;</p>
<p>What on earth are you talking about? All writers at a magazine like The Economist write in exactly the same character and style and stay on message. There is more diversity of character and quality at TC (and it&#8217;s not exactly a good thing&#8230; ie. Duncan.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/comment-page-1/#comment-1832178</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/10/nytimes-surges-cnet-slumps/#comment-1832178</guid>
		<description>Mitts Kane, read Tech Crunch Japan. 

Anyways, this isn&#039;t too fair of a judgment. Wired is for dumb fucks. I mean, that magazine couldn&#039;t even pull off a decent conference in L.A,  I was so embarrassed for their magazine. also, don&#039;t dog Cnet too bad, because it&#039;s not the original owners still. Kevin Wendle did a great job starting it and has no control over how they have screwed it up now. Just as tech crunch will sell one day, it will also turn into a piece of shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitts Kane, read Tech Crunch Japan. </p>
<p>Anyways, this isn&#8217;t too fair of a judgment. Wired is for dumb fucks. I mean, that magazine couldn&#8217;t even pull off a decent conference in L.A,  I was so embarrassed for their magazine. also, don&#8217;t dog Cnet too bad, because it&#8217;s not the original owners still. Kevin Wendle did a great job starting it and has no control over how they have screwed it up now. Just as tech crunch will sell one day, it will also turn into a piece of shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
