<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA Times Takes A Stake In Mixx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: InsaneIdea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Competitor Mixx Takes $2 Million Series B</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-2005060</link>
		<dc:creator>InsaneIdea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Competitor Mixx Takes $2 Million Series B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-2005060</guid>
		<description>[...] added the LA Times to its investor group in December. Total funding to date is $3.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] added the LA Times to its investor group in December. Total funding to date is $3.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixx Hits 100 Days Of Service; Reports Stats and Figures &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1926893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixx Hits 100 Days Of Service; Reports Stats and Figures &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1926893</guid>
		<description>[...] the sites they note is the LA Times. Of course they should be using Mixx considering that they have invested in the company last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the sites they note is the LA Times. Of course they should be using Mixx considering that they have invested in the company last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42mb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810414</link>
		<dc:creator>42mb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810414</guid>
		<description>It would be good to see that have digg features focused on other than tech users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be good to see that have digg features focused on other than tech users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin LaHay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810338</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin LaHay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810338</guid>
		<description>Digg is for tech users... I think after you give mixx time, the demographics will cater to soooo many more people that it has the possibility to outdo Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg is for tech users&#8230; I think after you give mixx time, the demographics will cater to soooo many more people that it has the possibility to outdo Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chimneydials</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810201</link>
		<dc:creator>chimneydials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1810201</guid>
		<description>I don't believe that moving to other sites will do any good. In the end, after they become big, they will still end up like Digg where there is heavy censorship. Also, Digg doesn't listen to its users. They took almost a year to get the simple images section done!

That's why I think we should have a social media that is transparent and owned by the community. In such an open social media, censorship will not occur and users themselves can request and implement features of the site. If you are interested in an open social media, read my post, 

http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/open-social-media/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that moving to other sites will do any good. In the end, after they become big, they will still end up like Digg where there is heavy censorship. Also, Digg doesn&#8217;t listen to its users. They took almost a year to get the simple images section done!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I think we should have a social media that is transparent and owned by the community. In such an open social media, censorship will not occur and users themselves can request and implement features of the site. If you are interested in an open social media, read my post, </p>
<p><a href="http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/open-social-media/" rel="nofollow">http://abcdefu.wordpress.com/2.....ial-media/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dguedo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809881</link>
		<dc:creator>dguedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809881</guid>
		<description>@4

dude, it is a social thing, you can really make the site your own (before it gets to big, like digg)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4</p>
<p>dude, it is a social thing, you can really make the site your own (before it gets to big, like digg)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809858</link>
		<dc:creator>sd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809858</guid>
		<description>I mean, i know some ppl game on Digg so ur posts aren't really voted on, but is this all? 

I just want to  know why would some users leave a site to go to a clone. and start all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, i know some ppl game on Digg so ur posts aren&#8217;t really voted on, but is this all? </p>
<p>I just want to  know why would some users leave a site to go to a clone. and start all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809854</link>
		<dc:creator>sd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809854</guid>
		<description>why are ppl leaving digg? is it just because of the design? can someone tell me? thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are ppl leaving digg? is it just because of the design? can someone tell me? thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I blog about everything!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809826</link>
		<dc:creator>I blog about everything!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809826</guid>
		<description>Looks nice. Very similar to Digg, but in my opinion, has some differences that make it stand out. Nice design, nice nav/options.
I'll definitely be watching this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice. Very similar to Digg, but in my opinion, has some differences that make it stand out. Nice design, nice nav/options.<br />
I&#8217;ll definitely be watching this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809823</link>
		<dc:creator>Shams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/04/la-times-takes-a-stake-in-mixx/#comment-1809823</guid>
		<description>I doubt whether mixx can do any competition with digg. Digg is digg. Digg will even digg mixx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt whether mixx can do any competition with digg. Digg is digg. Digg will even digg mixx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.045 seconds -->
