<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VCs: What&#8217;s Your Failure Rate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Week - 12/2/07 - knowledge gain &#171; Using IT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1880567</link>
		<dc:creator>Week - 12/2/07 - knowledge gain &#171; Using IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1880567</guid>
		<description>[...] Good info from VC: Most venture backed investments fail because the venture capital is used to scale the business befor... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good info from VC: Most venture backed investments fail because the venture capital is used to scale the business befor&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Capitalists</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1817366</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Capitalists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1817366</guid>
		<description>Hi Wilson,

Your experience is honorable. I do agree with your thoughts on Entrepreneurs and VC's 

Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wilson,</p>
<p>Your experience is honorable. I do agree with your thoughts on Entrepreneurs and VC&#8217;s </p>
<p>Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1806228</link>
		<dc:creator>gaic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1806228</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Interesting article. Failure is the key of success, I heard a lot. I guess it is true. The most important is to learn from mistakes. But most of all dont repeat the same ones. 

I am building an Entrepreneurs Investors community. We would like to hear such experiences.  Our idea is to bring to entrepreneurs advice that will help t hem in the growth process (without crawling and begging for help). They can post their needs. Most entrepreneurs are too isolated and just don’t know what to do. They also do not have all the financial resources to ask for advice. We will be honored if you can participate to our community.

Thanks and good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Interesting article. Failure is the key of success, I heard a lot. I guess it is true. The most important is to learn from mistakes. But most of all dont repeat the same ones. </p>
<p>I am building an Entrepreneurs Investors community. We would like to hear such experiences.  Our idea is to bring to entrepreneurs advice that will help t hem in the growth process (without crawling and begging for help). They can post their needs. Most entrepreneurs are too isolated and just don’t know what to do. They also do not have all the financial resources to ask for advice. We will be honored if you can participate to our community.</p>
<p>Thanks and good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Griffyn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803855</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Griffyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803855</guid>
		<description>@ #25 Chris R.

TheFunded.com is a ratings &#38; review site for VC's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #25 Chris R.</p>
<p>TheFunded.com is a ratings &amp; review site for VC&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803501</link>
		<dc:creator>fred wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803501</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading all of these comments. It's clear from some of them that they did not read the two posts that Erick is citing data from. If you are interested in this topic, I suggest reading both of these

http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2007/11/failure_rates_i.html

and

http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2007/11/why_early_stage.html

and Erick, thanks for using my twivitar! very nice

Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading all of these comments. It&#8217;s clear from some of them that they did not read the two posts that Erick is citing data from. If you are interested in this topic, I suggest reading both of these</p>
<p><a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2007/11/failure_rates_i.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.unionsquareventures.....tes_i.html</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2007/11/why_early_stage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.unionsquareventures.....stage.html</a></p>
<p>and Erick, thanks for using my twivitar! very nice</p>
<p>Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RYK</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803385</link>
		<dc:creator>RYK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1803385</guid>
		<description>2/3 fail becuase instead of backing innovation most VCs are busy backing me too models, which are doomed because the only growth they have for themselves is money and not intelligence. The failure rate can be reduced if VC start specializing and are able to better recognize passion and innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2/3 fail becuase instead of backing innovation most VCs are busy backing me too models, which are doomed because the only growth they have for themselves is money and not intelligence. The failure rate can be reduced if VC start specializing and are able to better recognize passion and innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurado</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802616</guid>
		<description>I woud recommend adding a lil curry to the dogfood!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I woud recommend adding a lil curry to the dogfood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeInsider</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802574</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeInsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802574</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add the 2/3rds re-start probability.  The net new adjusted return is $430K--and probably after 6 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add the 2/3rds re-start probability.  The net new adjusted return is $430K&#8211;and probably after 6 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeInsider</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802517</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeInsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802517</guid>
		<description>If only entrepreneurs/founders knew these numbers going into the game.  Here's a rough swag-of-a-scenario on the potential return to founders:

Average Software Deal Size		 $90,000,000 
Revenue Sale Multiple		 5 
Revenue required for value		 18,000,000 
Capital required to capture revenue		 16,200,000 
    Plus Accrued Dividends @8%		 6,480,000 
Est Equity Stake at time of sale 		2.00%
Investor Ownership		70%

Net Value to Common		 $67,320,000 
Value of equity at sale		 1,346,400 
    Success Rate		80%
    Probability of common making money		60%
     Idiot CEO Index		
Probability Adjusted Return 		 $646,272</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only entrepreneurs/founders knew these numbers going into the game.  Here&#8217;s a rough swag-of-a-scenario on the potential return to founders:</p>
<p>Average Software Deal Size		 $90,000,000<br />
Revenue Sale Multiple		 5<br />
Revenue required for value		 18,000,000<br />
Capital required to capture revenue		 16,200,000<br />
    Plus Accrued Dividends @8%		 6,480,000<br />
Est Equity Stake at time of sale 		2.00%<br />
Investor Ownership		70%</p>
<p>Net Value to Common		 $67,320,000<br />
Value of equity at sale		 1,346,400<br />
    Success Rate		80%<br />
    Probability of common making money		60%<br />
     Idiot CEO Index<br />
Probability Adjusted Return 		 $646,272</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802416</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802416</guid>
		<description>VC failure rate? 92.875%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VC failure rate? 92.875%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no thanks mr. vc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802380</link>
		<dc:creator>no thanks mr. vc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802380</guid>
		<description>Majority of the investments fail because of VCs. If you want to succeed avoid raising money from mediocre VCs (majority of them), or just say NO to VC money. 

VCs don't build companies, entrepreneurs do. 

VCs should blame themselves before pointing fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majority of the investments fail because of VCs. If you want to succeed avoid raising money from mediocre VCs (majority of them), or just say NO to VC money. </p>
<p>VCs don&#8217;t build companies, entrepreneurs do. </p>
<p>VCs should blame themselves before pointing fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny C</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802333</guid>
		<description>Ha, does that mean that VC's with higher failure rates are more likely to invest in any cockamamy business plan you put together?  I'm in!

 - Jc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, does that mean that VC&#8217;s with higher failure rates are more likely to invest in any cockamamy business plan you put together?  I&#8217;m in!</p>
<p> - Jc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pandhe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802302</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pandhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802302</guid>
		<description>Wonder how many business failed due to bad VC interference?
I have heard of situations gotten worse due to VCs. Is it allways the business plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder how many business failed due to bad VC interference?<br />
I have heard of situations gotten worse due to VCs. Is it allways the business plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek And Poke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802298</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek And Poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802298</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Failure Rate...&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch requires VCs to publish their failure rate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Failure Rate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch requires VCs to publish their failure rate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802282</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802282</guid>
		<description>this is the not the right metric to look at.
Only success and the size of these sucess matter.

Failure is part of VC business and do not really count. They can only lose their money once. 
The idea is only to go for big wins that make up th emany loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the not the right metric to look at.<br />
Only success and the size of these sucess matter.</p>
<p>Failure is part of VC business and do not really count. They can only lose their money once.<br />
The idea is only to go for big wins that make up th emany loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pachinko</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802269</link>
		<dc:creator>Pachinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802269</guid>
		<description>Given that VCs have so much influence on the companies they invest in, their failure rate is also an indication if they have a golden touch or not. 

So yes, for all involved, VCs should give out their failure rates and lists of all the companies that failed and did not fail. 

But that is not going to happen.

This was a good article, TC has the potential to become no. 1 insight of what happens in the VC side of internet startups if you guys would want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that VCs have so much influence on the companies they invest in, their failure rate is also an indication if they have a golden touch or not. </p>
<p>So yes, for all involved, VCs should give out their failure rates and lists of all the companies that failed and did not fail. </p>
<p>But that is not going to happen.</p>
<p>This was a good article, TC has the potential to become no. 1 insight of what happens in the VC side of internet startups if you guys would want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802163</link>
		<dc:creator>MMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802163</guid>
		<description>Good article.  Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802098</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802098</guid>
		<description>Dear Fred,

I take back the couple of rough comments I've given you on your blog directly before. Though your posts were a bit in left field and you portrayed yourself as a "victim" (i.e. remember when you said you received to many emails and would not respond...). Hello, that's your job, guy!!!!

That said, I believe this is spot on. Your transparency is really appreciated and also brings additional credibility in a time when many entrepreneurs are looking to shy away from traditional VC investments. My company that is VC backed is failing for this exact reason. The VC's continue to throw money at a model that needed a new direction. The technology was/is really good but the lack of vision and market knowledge by the Board of Directors is just gross. The founders handed the direction that the company should head three years ago to the CEO. In turn the CEO I think was working on a better compensation package for himself and his lieutenants as well as probably could not articulate the story to the "moronic" board. 

Lesson #1 for entreprenuers - NEVER give up some type of operating control and NEVER EVER give up your right to sit on the Board of Directors of your company. Most of these guys that sit on the Board are just polished "politicians" who could not use Google maps - if there personal assistants didn't print out the direction for them.

I think there needs to be a yearly awards in the valley. 

1) Dumbest VC investment of the year.
2) Most idiotic VC advice received all year.
3) Worst outside CEO hire for a VC backed company.
4) Best VC investment of the year.
5) Best VC advice received (this will be one of three firms year in and year out)
6) Best outside CEO hire for a VC backed company

 
Just like fund managers are measured every year so should VC's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fred,</p>
<p>I take back the couple of rough comments I&#8217;ve given you on your blog directly before. Though your posts were a bit in left field and you portrayed yourself as a &#8220;victim&#8221; (i.e. remember when you said you received to many emails and would not respond&#8230;). Hello, that&#8217;s your job, guy!!!!</p>
<p>That said, I believe this is spot on. Your transparency is really appreciated and also brings additional credibility in a time when many entrepreneurs are looking to shy away from traditional VC investments. My company that is VC backed is failing for this exact reason. The VC&#8217;s continue to throw money at a model that needed a new direction. The technology was/is really good but the lack of vision and market knowledge by the Board of Directors is just gross. The founders handed the direction that the company should head three years ago to the CEO. In turn the CEO I think was working on a better compensation package for himself and his lieutenants as well as probably could not articulate the story to the &#8220;moronic&#8221; board. </p>
<p>Lesson #1 for entreprenuers - NEVER give up some type of operating control and NEVER EVER give up your right to sit on the Board of Directors of your company. Most of these guys that sit on the Board are just polished &#8220;politicians&#8221; who could not use Google maps - if there personal assistants didn&#8217;t print out the direction for them.</p>
<p>I think there needs to be a yearly awards in the valley. </p>
<p>1) Dumbest VC investment of the year.<br />
2) Most idiotic VC advice received all year.<br />
3) Worst outside CEO hire for a VC backed company.<br />
4) Best VC investment of the year.<br />
5) Best VC advice received (this will be one of three firms year in and year out)<br />
6) Best outside CEO hire for a VC backed company</p>
<p>Just like fund managers are measured every year so should VC&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vc for nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802026</link>
		<dc:creator>vc for nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802026</guid>
		<description>First, Isaac newton created calculus. He predict the world is going to end at 2060. As I was reading holy bible. I can foresee white sunlight or asteroid coming near earth. It's about to hit southern Mexico or California.

I tried to get money from VC to built first space defense spider clawer. They won't invest it. So I give up just like that. 


I will be 80 years staring sunlight ball at sky. You guys will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Isaac newton created calculus. He predict the world is going to end at 2060. As I was reading holy bible. I can foresee white sunlight or asteroid coming near earth. It&#8217;s about to hit southern Mexico or California.</p>
<p>I tried to get money from VC to built first space defense spider clawer. They won&#8217;t invest it. So I give up just like that. </p>
<p>I will be 80 years staring sunlight ball at sky. You guys will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802005</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1802005</guid>
		<description>interestings success/failure list from Lauder Partners:
http://www.lauderpartners.com/investments/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interestings success/failure list from Lauder Partners:<br />
<a href="http://www.lauderpartners.com/investments/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lauderpartners.com/.....index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paradise5000</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801982</link>
		<dc:creator>paradise5000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801982</guid>
		<description>Fred Wilson, honesty should be commended.   One thing that remains to be true is that a wise man learn from his failures, which in turns helps build character and makes us a little more cautious when choosing the right business venture, Affiliation or partnership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Wilson, honesty should be commended.   One thing that remains to be true is that a wise man learn from his failures, which in turns helps build character and makes us a little more cautious when choosing the right business venture, Affiliation or partnership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801899</guid>
		<description>I'm sure that Fred only meant to draw attention to the win / loss ratio as secondary to the total rate of return for the portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that Fred only meant to draw attention to the win / loss ratio as secondary to the total rate of return for the portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahar Nechmad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801878</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahar Nechmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801878</guid>
		<description>From my personal experience I think there is also one thing that VC should get better in.
As you say, 2/3 of the businesses will completely change their business plan during their life. That's mean that you actually need to invest in the people that can do this transformation and not just on the idea.
Now, All VC like to say in interviews that it's all about the people and people first marketing talk.
We met with several VC before taking our A round. I got to say that probably just one actually asked us "Why do you do it?" "What drives you, personally, to do it?".
Everyone else were so into just the idea and the business plan.

I think that VC should first understand the people they invest in. Try to see if the founders are the kind of people that can adopt to changes. If what drives them is something that will stil be when the times will get difficult (and they will).

Shahar Nechmad
CEO, NuConomy
blog: www.nechmads.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my personal experience I think there is also one thing that VC should get better in.<br />
As you say, 2/3 of the businesses will completely change their business plan during their life. That&#8217;s mean that you actually need to invest in the people that can do this transformation and not just on the idea.<br />
Now, All VC like to say in interviews that it&#8217;s all about the people and people first marketing talk.<br />
We met with several VC before taking our A round. I got to say that probably just one actually asked us &#8220;Why do you do it?&#8221; &#8220;What drives you, personally, to do it?&#8221;.<br />
Everyone else were so into just the idea and the business plan.</p>
<p>I think that VC should first understand the people they invest in. Try to see if the founders are the kind of people that can adopt to changes. If what drives them is something that will stil be when the times will get difficult (and they will).</p>
<p>Shahar Nechmad<br />
CEO, NuConomy<br />
blog: <a href="http://www.nechmads.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nechmads.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801844</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801844</guid>
		<description>I know it's exciting to get a VC on board but if you can build your model and even begin to generate business (revenue) you'll be much further a head of the VC game.  And if you at that time need to bring a VC in, you'll be in a much better position both in retaining ownership and in getting the VCs to take a serious look at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s exciting to get a VC on board but if you can build your model and even begin to generate business (revenue) you&#8217;ll be much further a head of the VC game.  And if you at that time need to bring a VC in, you&#8217;ll be in a much better position both in retaining ownership and in getting the VCs to take a serious look at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801843</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/30/vcs-whats-your-failure-rate/#comment-1801843</guid>
		<description>Why not create a website that keeps stats on VCs?
I bet it would get bought out by TC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not create a website that keeps stats on VCs?<br />
I bet it would get bought out by TC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.107 seconds -->
