<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Out Of Left Field: Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results &#171; Ikatlah Ilmu dengan Ngeblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2072739</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results &#171; Ikatlah Ilmu dengan Ngeblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2072739</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 15 Monday Morning Stars of the Week, Dec 3 &#124; Scott Fillmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2050787</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 15 Monday Morning Stars of the Week, Dec 3 &#124; Scott Fillmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2050787</guid>
		<description>[...] on both TechCrunch and BlogStorm that Google Labs is experimenting with a new feature that will let users vote search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on both TechCrunch and BlogStorm that Google Labs is experimenting with a new feature that will let users vote search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Style Voting On Search Results - BevyHost Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2008369</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Style Voting On Search Results - BevyHost Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-2008369</guid>
		<description>[...] I'm a little late to discover this but I only came across it when I browse through TechCrunch  Straight Out Of Left Field: Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results  Maybe this might interests you. According to it, Google is in the stage of experimenting with digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m a little late to discover this but I only came across it when I browse through TechCrunch  Straight Out Of Left Field: Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results  Maybe this might interests you. According to it, Google is in the stage of experimenting with digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; New Google Experiment Allows Users To Vote Search Engine Optimization Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1926721</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; New Google Experiment Allows Users To Vote Search Engine Optimization Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1926721</guid>
		<description>[...] found this on TechCrunch today. If you saw this one coming, give yourself a very large prize. Google is experimenting with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this on TechCrunch today. If you saw this one coming, give yourself a very large prize. Google is experimenting with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry_T</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1814117</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry_T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1814117</guid>
		<description>AS long as this improves my own search results, then I am all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS long as this improves my own search results, then I am all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berto_s</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1809563</link>
		<dc:creator>berto_s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1809563</guid>
		<description>This move fits in perfectly with the data collection that Google was already doing for popular votes (stars), where they have been tallied up and used to determine whether sites should be ranked higher. 

In addition, with the recent influx of locally targeted results and local search tools, this seems to be a perfect fit. Google can now pick up on local search trend data and display results in the same area for that area. This can then be used to give higher rank to the little sites that may only be in one city. It can also be used to prevent click-fraud by simply not reflecting clicks from that hot spot or other country that may be ranking one site higher than is typical.

If you want to see another use of user input changing the Google result, check out Google maps and look on the left side where they have "Add or Edit your business: Learn more »". Now on the maps, you can move the pinpoint of a location. And they do have safeguards to prevent malicious changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This move fits in perfectly with the data collection that Google was already doing for popular votes (stars), where they have been tallied up and used to determine whether sites should be ranked higher. </p>
<p>In addition, with the recent influx of locally targeted results and local search tools, this seems to be a perfect fit. Google can now pick up on local search trend data and display results in the same area for that area. This can then be used to give higher rank to the little sites that may only be in one city. It can also be used to prevent click-fraud by simply not reflecting clicks from that hot spot or other country that may be ranking one site higher than is typical.</p>
<p>If you want to see another use of user input changing the Google result, check out Google maps and look on the left side where they have &#8220;Add or Edit your business: Learn more »&#8221;. Now on the maps, you can move the pinpoint of a location. And they do have safeguards to prevent malicious changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cezanne Huq</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808968</link>
		<dc:creator>Cezanne Huq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808968</guid>
		<description>I think it's worth testing but part of me thinks the democratization of "relevance" could hurt search but then the other half says this is the step in search development.

dunno but good to see that this type of experimenting is public and open...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s worth testing but part of me thinks the democratization of &#8220;relevance&#8221; could hurt search but then the other half says this is the step in search development.</p>
<p>dunno but good to see that this type of experimenting is public and open&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Raja</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo Raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808575</guid>
		<description>I am owner of &lt;a href="http://www.officialfootballcreditcard.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Official Football Credit Cards&lt;/a&gt; and I believe this system wont work well for.  In fact sites football wallpapers and graphics of star players would probably get "digged" or "dug" and sales sites would be burried.  If I type in 'football' and come across "American Football" sites, I would burrie every single one.  It doesnt necessarily mean these websites are rubbish.  It just means... thats wasn't what I was searching for 'on this occasion'.  I think a youtube style voting system would be better.  At least you will have organic results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am owner of <a href="http://www.officialfootballcreditcard.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Official Football Credit Cards</a> and I believe this system wont work well for.  In fact sites football wallpapers and graphics of star players would probably get &#8220;digged&#8221; or &#8220;dug&#8221; and sales sites would be burried.  If I type in &#8216;football&#8217; and come across &#8220;American Football&#8221; sites, I would burrie every single one.  It doesnt necessarily mean these websites are rubbish.  It just means&#8230; thats wasn&#8217;t what I was searching for &#8216;on this occasion&#8217;.  I think a youtube style voting system would be better.  At least you will have organic results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Saforo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808174</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Saforo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1808174</guid>
		<description>i would like to brand Google as the biggest copy cat ever. They have taken on paypal , skype, youtube and now digg. What will this monster do next? Google Air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to brand Google as the biggest copy cat ever. They have taken on paypal , skype, youtube and now digg. What will this monster do next? Google Air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1806926</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1806926</guid>
		<description>hmmm...sounds interesting..^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230;sounds interesting..^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seopat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1806177</link>
		<dc:creator>seopat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1806177</guid>
		<description>to improve results for yourself it's ok, but how about influence of a one's choice to natural lists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to improve results for yourself it&#8217;s ok, but how about influence of a one&#8217;s choice to natural lists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1805750</link>
		<dc:creator>Indus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1805750</guid>
		<description>Did you notice the URL of the experiment? The last part "a840e102" decodes as 'a double dose of cannabis produces a 100 times better search engine!' More analysis on my post at http://www.khaitan.org/mt/archives/000194.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice the URL of the experiment? The last part &#8220;a840e102&#8243; decodes as &#8216;a double dose of cannabis produces a 100 times better search engine!&#8217; More analysis on my post at <a href="http://www.khaitan.org/mt/archives/000194.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.khaitan.org/mt/archives/000194.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Marder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1802502</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1802502</guid>
		<description>As mentioned in one of the earlier comments, Eurekster launched its community-powered social search platform “swicki” close to 3 years ago, and explicit voting functionality in 2006.  To date, over 100,000 swickis have been built, each serving a community of users passionate about a specific topic.  Each swicki comes with a customizable widget that contains the searchbox and the “buzzcloud” widget, making it easy for swickis to be added to a topical site or blog and shared among the community.  A recognized innovator and leader in social search, Eurekster processes over 25,000,000 searches a month.  The key to Eurekster's success in improving relevancy here has been leveraging the explicit (and implicit) user behavior though at the group or community level, not individual or general. Check out www.eurekster.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned in one of the earlier comments, Eurekster launched its community-powered social search platform “swicki” close to 3 years ago, and explicit voting functionality in 2006.  To date, over 100,000 swickis have been built, each serving a community of users passionate about a specific topic.  Each swicki comes with a customizable widget that contains the searchbox and the “buzzcloud” widget, making it easy for swickis to be added to a topical site or blog and shared among the community.  A recognized innovator and leader in social search, Eurekster processes over 25,000,000 searches a month.  The key to Eurekster&#8217;s success in improving relevancy here has been leveraging the explicit (and implicit) user behavior though at the group or community level, not individual or general. Check out <a href="http://www.eurekster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurekster.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1802155</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1802155</guid>
		<description>I'm not a big fan of this concept.  If it ever went mainstream, I can only imagine everyone wanting to pay a big group of people to up their rank and downgrade their competitors.

I think this will only work well with each person's personal results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of this concept.  If it ever went mainstream, I can only imagine everyone wanting to pay a big group of people to up their rank and downgrade their competitors.</p>
<p>I think this will only work well with each person&#8217;s personal results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801829</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801829</guid>
		<description>This technology has been implemented earlier in the Russian search engine Google: http://wiki2.ru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This technology has been implemented earlier in the Russian search engine Google: <a href="http://wiki2.ru" rel="nofollow">http://wiki2.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salvo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801432</link>
		<dc:creator>Salvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801432</guid>
		<description>I did not predict this specifically would happen, but am not surprised. They have been testing it out with Google CO-Op haven't they? When I started getting better results by searching in Del.icio.us as opposed to Google, I did have an idea that Google would need to start adding a human element to keep up with the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not predict this specifically would happen, but am not surprised. They have been testing it out with Google CO-Op haven&#8217;t they? When I started getting better results by searching in Del.icio.us as opposed to Google, I did have an idea that Google would need to start adding a human element to keep up with the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviran's Place</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801189</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviran's Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801189</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google is experimenting with Digg style voting features on search results that allow users to vote up or bury search results they see.
The program, part of Google Labs, works like this:
    This experiment lets you influence your search experience by a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Experimenting With Digg Style Voting On Search Results&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google is experimenting with Digg style voting features on search results that allow users to vote up or bury search results they see.<br />
The program, part of Google Labs, works like this:<br />
    This experiment lets you influence your search experience by a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giga Promoters Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801144</link>
		<dc:creator>Giga Promoters Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1801144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Revolution coming up with Google soon...&lt;/strong&gt;

Looks like google is now out to improve its ranking algorithm real soon. Recently Google labs announced that they have started out the experiment to have additional functionalities with their search results page, which will enable end user to actually ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Revolution coming up with Google soon&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Looks like google is now out to improve its ranking algorithm real soon. Recently Google labs announced that they have started out the experiment to have additional functionalities with their search results page, which will enable end user to actually &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supaswag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800870</link>
		<dc:creator>supaswag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800870</guid>
		<description>The last thing Google will do, is to include a "vox populi" that's easy to subvert into their search algorithms. It's [at the moment] just a personal feature to attract "The Digg Crowd". Otherwise you'll have thousands of badly paid computer monkeys, typing in keyphrases and then giving company's direct competitor's listings bad ratings. Google is doing a very good job at the moment to make it as challenging as possible to influence search engine results. And they'll do everything to keep it like that.

http://supaswag.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last thing Google will do, is to include a &#8220;vox populi&#8221; that&#8217;s easy to subvert into their search algorithms. It&#8217;s [at the moment] just a personal feature to attract &#8220;The Digg Crowd&#8221;. Otherwise you&#8217;ll have thousands of badly paid computer monkeys, typing in keyphrases and then giving company&#8217;s direct competitor&#8217;s listings bad ratings. Google is doing a very good job at the moment to make it as challenging as possible to influence search engine results. And they&#8217;ll do everything to keep it like that.</p>
<p><a href="http://supaswag.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://supaswag.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800431</link>
		<dc:creator>clem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800431</guid>
		<description>I did see it coming actually...
I emailed Google some time ago offering my services and suggested this to them, amongst other things. Never heard back from them.

Where's my very large prize?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did see it coming actually&#8230;<br />
I emailed Google some time ago offering my services and suggested this to them, amongst other things. Never heard back from them.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s my very large prize?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahar Nechmad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800247</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahar Nechmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800247</guid>
		<description>Although it sounds really cool at start, think about it - How many sites you really don't want to see in search results? How many exact searches you do again and again if you don't like the top 3 results?
The only good thing here will be if Google will use it to better search results of everyone. But of course this will be almost impossible thing to do without getting into hell of SEO problems.

Shahar Nechmad
CEO, NuConomy
http://www.nechmads.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it sounds really cool at start, think about it - How many sites you really don&#8217;t want to see in search results? How many exact searches you do again and again if you don&#8217;t like the top 3 results?<br />
The only good thing here will be if Google will use it to better search results of everyone. But of course this will be almost impossible thing to do without getting into hell of SEO problems.</p>
<p>Shahar Nechmad<br />
CEO, NuConomy<br />
<a href="http://www.nechmads.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nechmads.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IdeaTagger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800107</link>
		<dc:creator>IdeaTagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800107</guid>
		<description>Taken from a blog post I wrote back in June:

"... a social search engine where users could own search phrases by being one of the first to rate results generated for them and then share in any advertising revenues resulting from those phrases."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taken from a blog post I wrote back in June:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; a social search engine where users could own search phrases by being one of the first to rate results generated for them and then share in any advertising revenues resulting from those phrases.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schnellschuss-Links am 29.11.2007 &#124; Werbeblogger - Weblog über Marketing, Werbung und PR &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Schnellschuss-Links am 29.11.2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800029</link>
		<dc:creator>Schnellschuss-Links am 29.11.2007 &#124; Werbeblogger - Weblog über Marketing, Werbung und PR &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Schnellschuss-Links am 29.11.2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800029</guid>
		<description>[...] Google macht auf Digg  Google experimentiert im Labor an einer Art Digg-Funktionalit&#228;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google macht auf Digg  Google experimentiert im Labor an einer Art Digg-Funktionalit&auml;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800022</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1800022</guid>
		<description>@51 @83 - I was actually really enjoying the comment thread until you had to pollute it with your self indulgent bullshit. Please find another blog to masturbate over you trolling idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@51 @83 - I was actually really enjoying the comment thread until you had to pollute it with your self indulgent bullshit. Please find another blog to masturbate over you trolling idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1799986</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/#comment-1799986</guid>
		<description>@71,
Even if Google says this will never influence general results, you'd have to think they'd be stupid to NOT be looking at these stats in that context...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@71,<br />
Even if Google says this will never influence general results, you&#8217;d have to think they&#8217;d be stupid to NOT be looking at these stats in that context&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.097 seconds -->
