<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Site Rankings (October, 2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: us army military</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1852700</link>
		<dc:creator>us army military</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1852700</guid>
		<description>The blogs pages are more common because the blogs are a useful and fast way to attract traffic for our pages. The U.S Army military is very well known through out the world as the most powerful military force of the world, in the number of soldiers as well as for the kind of technology used in its equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blogs pages are more common because the blogs are a useful and fast way to attract traffic for our pages. The U.S Army military is very well known through out the world as the most powerful military force of the world, in the number of soldiers as well as for the kind of technology used in its equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOHO Tech Podcast&#8217;s Monday Night Tech for 12/12/2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1837441</link>
		<dc:creator>SOHO Tech Podcast&#8217;s Monday Night Tech for 12/12/2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1837441</guid>
		<description>[...] The use of Social Networks and the Small Business TechCrunch Article  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The use of Social Networks and the Small Business TechCrunch Article  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1826041</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1826041</guid>
		<description>where is orkut..????
visit www.multiplyearnings.com for latest business news ,fun and masti..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is orkut..????<br />
visit <a href="http://www.multiplyearnings.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.multiplyearnings.com</a> for latest business news ,fun and masti..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Digest of the Social Networking Space: Dec 5, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1811013</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Digest of the Social Networking Space: Dec 5, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1811013</guid>
		<description>[...] Usage: Stats of Social Networks Great graphic from Comscore shows the top websites in the social sphere. Ranking by Overall headcount: MySpace, Facebook, Flickr, Windows, Webshots. In terms of growth: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Usage: Stats of Social Networks Great graphic from Comscore shows the top websites in the social sphere. Ranking by Overall headcount: MySpace, Facebook, Flickr, Windows, Webshots. In terms of growth: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumaphil.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1805416</link>
		<dc:creator>sumaphil.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1805416</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;24/7 - Der Wochenr&#252;ckblick (KW 48/07)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nach meinem 1. Gl&#252;hwein in diesem Jahr, blicke ich wieder zur&#252;ck auf die Woche vor dem 1. Advent, die neben einem Rekord-Jackpot auch noch andere Dinge zu bieten hatte:

Adobe erm&#246;glicht k&#252;nftig Context-sensitive Werbung in PDF-File...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>24/7 - Der Wochenr&#252;ckblick (KW 48/07)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nach meinem 1. Gl&#252;hwein in diesem Jahr, blicke ich wieder zur&#252;ck auf die Woche vor dem 1. Advent, die neben einem Rekord-Jackpot auch noch andere Dinge zu bieten hatte:</p>
<p>Adobe erm&#246;glicht k&#252;nftig Context-sensitive Werbung in PDF-File&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social site rankings - IUplanet: Indiana Hoosier forums, sports, photos, and Bloomington life</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1804012</link>
		<dc:creator>Social site rankings - IUplanet: Indiana Hoosier forums, sports, photos, and Bloomington life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1804012</guid>
		<description>[...] Social site rankings     Wonder how MySpace and Facebook compare with the others? Check it out...  Social Site Rankings (October, 2007) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social site rankings     Wonder how MySpace and Facebook compare with the others? Check it out&#8230;  Social Site Rankings (October, 2007) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzel Videolar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1800704</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzel Videolar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1800704</guid>
		<description>great list,
i didn't know "Linkedin" , you touch me :) they have been around a very very long time with features the others are just now adding..
Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great list,<br />
i didn&#8217;t know &#8220;Linkedin&#8221; , you touch me <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> they have been around a very very long time with features the others are just now adding..<br />
Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwords Info &#124; Seek and you shell find !!!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1800112</link>
		<dc:creator>Adwords Info &#124; Seek and you shell find !!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1800112</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Site Rankings (October, 2007), TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Site Rankings (October, 2007), TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forumer™</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798280</link>
		<dc:creator>Forumer™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798280</guid>
		<description>If sites like freewebs (free web hosting) is on the list, then our forumer.com should be there too (forum hosting is more social than web hosting).

But of course, like orkut, if you ignore outside of US traffic than we won't rank so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If sites like freewebs (free web hosting) is on the list, then our forumer.com should be there too (forum hosting is more social than web hosting).</p>
<p>But of course, like orkut, if you ignore outside of US traffic than we won&#8217;t rank so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798192</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798192</guid>
		<description>My bad... I meant #45.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad&#8230; I meant #45.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798190</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798190</guid>
		<description>#44 Arun - I had the same thought. Where is hi5? Then I remembered that these are US numbers. Though hi5 has a presence in the US, the majority of its traffic is generated from a variety of smaller countries...

I pulled some Alexa numbers (just for relative purposes):

Hi5.com traffic rank in other countries: 
Dominican Republic 1
Costa Rica 1
Peru 2
Thailand 2
Mexico 7

Cheers,
Aidan
www.MappingTheWeb.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#44 Arun - I had the same thought. Where is hi5? Then I remembered that these are US numbers. Though hi5 has a presence in the US, the majority of its traffic is generated from a variety of smaller countries&#8230;</p>
<p>I pulled some Alexa numbers (just for relative purposes):</p>
<p>Hi5.com traffic rank in other countries:<br />
Dominican Republic 1<br />
Costa Rica 1<br />
Peru 2<br />
Thailand 2<br />
Mexico 7</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Aidan<br />
<a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MappingTheWeb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798138</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798138</guid>
		<description>Hey, what about Hi5.com? Surely, the've got to be up there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, what about Hi5.com? Surely, the&#8217;ve got to be up there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose del Moral</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose del Moral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798135</guid>
		<description>Digg's growth is the most impressing, IMHO. It is almost 5 times bigger than one year ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg&#8217;s growth is the most impressing, IMHO. It is almost 5 times bigger than one year ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798132</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798132</guid>
		<description>Duncan! "WordPress.com doesn’t support your own URL (with a very very small number of exceptions)."

You said the same thing here, and the product manager of Typepad corrected you:

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/wordpress-traffic-passes-typepad-execs-getting-rich.html

It's not a small number of exceptions, it's hundreds of thousands:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22get+a+free+blog+at+wordpress.com%22+-site%3Awordpress.com

If you don't believe Google, you can ask Quantcast. The first numbers are just the ".wordpress.com" blogs, the second link includes parked domains:

http://www.quantcast.com/wordpress.com
http://www.quantcast.com/p-18-mFEk4J448M

I get the impression you really dislike us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan! &#8220;WordPress.com doesn’t support your own URL (with a very very small number of exceptions).&#8221;</p>
<p>You said the same thing here, and the product manager of Typepad corrected you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/wordpress-traffic-passes-typepad-execs-getting-rich.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alleyinsider.com/20.....-rich.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a small number of exceptions, it&#8217;s hundreds of thousands:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22get+a+free+blog+at+wordpress.com%22+-site%3Awordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q.....dpress.com</a></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe Google, you can ask Quantcast. The first numbers are just the &#8220;.wordpress.com&#8221; blogs, the second link includes parked domains:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quantcast.com/wordpress.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.quantcast.com/p-18-mFEk4J448M" rel="nofollow">http://www.quantcast.com/p-18-mFEk4J448M</a></p>
<p>I get the impression you really dislike us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcqd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798087</link>
		<dc:creator>mcqd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798087</guid>
		<description>Jaike,

Blackplanet would be included in the Community Connect sites, but I don't know if they are aggregating Migente and AsianAve also.  
But you are right, I HATE seeing others listed and they have been around a very very long time with features the others are just now adding..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaike,</p>
<p>Blackplanet would be included in the Community Connect sites, but I don&#8217;t know if they are aggregating Migente and AsianAve also.<br />
But you are right, I HATE seeing others listed and they have been around a very very long time with features the others are just now adding..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798056</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798056</guid>
		<description>I'd be interested in seeing numbers for multiply.com next time.  It's not on a lot of people's radar, but it's a social networking site, based in the US (Florida) and has been around for a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in seeing numbers for multiply.com next time.  It&#8217;s not on a lot of people&#8217;s radar, but it&#8217;s a social networking site, based in the US (Florida) and has been around for a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracyshaun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798054</link>
		<dc:creator>tracyshaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798054</guid>
		<description>You have imeem.com stats but nothing on last.fm?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have imeem.com stats but nothing on last.fm?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798045</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798045</guid>
		<description>This is good. I hope you will publish this kind of data every month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good. I hope you will publish this kind of data every month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798041</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1798041</guid>
		<description>What does "Classmates.com Sites" mean -- do the numbers include visits to affiliate sites promoting them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;Classmates.com Sites&#8221; mean &#8212; do the numbers include visits to affiliate sites promoting them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dizzy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797992</guid>
		<description>These numbers are basically worthless as they're US-only. Orkut and Friendster have huge global presences and aren't even listed here. And Facebook was bigger overseas before it got big stateside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These numbers are basically worthless as they&#8217;re US-only. Orkut and Friendster have huge global presences and aren&#8217;t even listed here. And Facebook was bigger overseas before it got big stateside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797969</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797969</guid>
		<description>I told you people that this whole social networking thing was a fad!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told you people that this whole social networking thing was a fad!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transformer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797932</link>
		<dc:creator>Transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797932</guid>
		<description>In capable hands, Geocities could become a real player in social networking due to name recognition. 

Sad to see it declining due to Yahoo's reverse Midas touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In capable hands, Geocities could become a real player in social networking due to name recognition. </p>
<p>Sad to see it declining due to Yahoo&#8217;s reverse Midas touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797921</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797921</guid>
		<description>The SixApart figures can never be accurate as TypePad supports your own URL; comScore has no way of tracking sites using the service with this setup, whereas WordPress.com doesn't support your own URL (with a very very small number of exceptions). Flawed comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SixApart figures can never be accurate as TypePad supports your own URL; comScore has no way of tracking sites using the service with this setup, whereas WordPress.com doesn&#8217;t support your own URL (with a very very small number of exceptions). Flawed comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797911</guid>
		<description>The problem with panel data...quantcast, for example (another panel data provider) puts Digg at 12 million US uniques / month and Bebo at 1.5 million. So for one, they say Digg is bigger, but Bebo is smaller.

Who do you believe? Well, I like to take all the panel metrics with a grain of salt.

And as for Orkut, they are huge, internationally, but in the US, even our bootstrapped social network gets more traffic (if their rumored 600K US uniques / month is real and not just another panel data error).

Eventually, I hope there will be a way to get a solid metric that's reasonably close to reality, and not highly suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with panel data&#8230;quantcast, for example (another panel data provider) puts Digg at 12 million US uniques / month and Bebo at 1.5 million. So for one, they say Digg is bigger, but Bebo is smaller.</p>
<p>Who do you believe? Well, I like to take all the panel metrics with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>And as for Orkut, they are huge, internationally, but in the US, even our bootstrapped social network gets more traffic (if their rumored 600K US uniques / month is real and not just another panel data error).</p>
<p>Eventually, I hope there will be a way to get a solid metric that&#8217;s reasonably close to reality, and not highly suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubai Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797889</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubai Trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/social-site-rankings-october-2007/#comment-1797889</guid>
		<description>The only thing is that Facebook has better quality users than Myspace. Most of   us here in the UAE/ Australia use Facebook versus Europe which many use Myspace. Go Dubai!!! Maybe ill start dubaibook.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing is that Facebook has better quality users than Myspace. Most of   us here in the UAE/ Australia use Facebook versus Europe which many use Myspace. Go Dubai!!! Maybe ill start dubaibook.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.093 seconds -->
