<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Gets Serious About Finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:51:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UX at the Top Financial Portals: Google vs. Yahoo vs. AOL Finance — Bankling</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2642460</link>
		<dc:creator>UX at the Top Financial Portals: Google vs. Yahoo vs. AOL Finance — Bankling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2642460</guid>
		<description>[...] no reason to be threatened. A year or so later, the &#8220;unthinkable&#8221; happened: AOL Money relaunched with a kick-butt product, and due to its high quality user experience it took over the top [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no reason to be threatened. A year or so later, the &#8220;unthinkable&#8221; happened: AOL Money relaunched with a kick-butt product, and due to its high quality user experience it took over the top [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Walls Come Down On AOL.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2518002</link>
		<dc:creator>The Walls Come Down On AOL.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2518002</guid>
		<description>[...] direct inks to third party news sources via Relegence, a company they acquired in 2006 and began integrating into AOL Finance in late [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] direct inks to third party news sources via Relegence, a company they acquired in 2006 and began integrating into AOL Finance in late [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2485437</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2485437</guid>
		<description>Hi Gents,

While I agree with you that there are some free charting as well as some historical data which can be downloaded sparingly, I would suggest that to do real trend analysis, modeling and systems development for algorithmic trading strategies, along with associative research and back testing.  You need a complete local database of historical data to use with your charting and analysis package of choice.  To see the dramatic difference involved between looking up symbol data online and havinga complete database try the free trial offered by these guys...
http://www.forextickdata.com

They have end of day data and intraday high frequency historical data, across multiple asset classes.

They support a very nice integration script for Amibroker Pro.

Happy research.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gents,</p>
<p>While I agree with you that there are some free charting as well as some historical data which can be downloaded sparingly, I would suggest that to do real trend analysis, modeling and systems development for algorithmic trading strategies, along with associative research and back testing.  You need a complete local database of historical data to use with your charting and analysis package of choice.  To see the dramatic difference involved between looking up symbol data online and havinga complete database try the free trial offered by these guys&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.forextickdata.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.forextickdata.com'>http://www.forextickdata.com</a></p>
<p>They have end of day data and intraday high frequency historical data, across multiple asset classes.</p>
<p>They support a very nice integration script for Amibroker Pro.</p>
<p>Happy research.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL Pulls The Trigger: Direct Access To Competing Services On AOL.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2464289</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL Pulls The Trigger: Direct Access To Competing Services On AOL.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2464289</guid>
		<description>[...] direct inks to third party news sources via Relegence, a company they acquired in 2006 and began integrating into AOL Finance in late 2007.   CrunchBase Information   AOL  Information provided by CrunchBase    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] direct inks to third party news sources via Relegence, a company they acquired in 2006 and began integrating into AOL Finance in late 2007.   CrunchBase Information   AOL  Information provided by CrunchBase    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agoracom: Small Cap Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2402902</link>
		<dc:creator>Agoracom: Small Cap Investment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2402902</guid>
		<description>[...] terms of both unique visitors and page views. The Canadian side hasn&#8217;t implemented all of the new tools from the U.S. side but it should only be a matter of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] terms of both unique visitors and page views. The Canadian side hasn&#8217;t implemented all of the new tools from the U.S. side but it should only be a matter of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socialinnovation3.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites After Year Long Revamping</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2230181</link>
		<dc:creator>socialinnovation3.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites After Year Long Revamping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2230181</guid>
		<description>[...] rebranding and redesign effort, noting that every key vertical site has been redesigned (see our coverage of AOL Finance, for example, and the almost immediate traffic surge that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rebranding and redesign effort, noting that every key vertical site has been redesigned (see our coverage of AOL Finance, for example, and the almost immediate traffic surge that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-2222918</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-2222918</guid>
		<description>[...] rebranding and redesign effort, noting that every key vertical site has been redesigned (see our coverage of AOL Finance, for example, and the almost immediate traffic surge that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rebranding and redesign effort, noting that every key vertical site has been redesigned (see our coverage of AOL Finance, for example, and the almost immediate traffic surge that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliebeckett.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial journalism - new media fun and games</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1806156</link>
		<dc:creator>charliebeckett.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial journalism - new media fun and games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1806156</guid>
		<description>[...] getting easier and more complicated at the same time. Thanks to Paul Bradshaw for this story from Techcrunch about an online financial reporting tool that shows just how multi-dimensional money journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting easier and more complicated at the same time. Thanks to Paul Bradshaw for this story from Techcrunch about an online financial reporting tool that shows just how multi-dimensional money journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1801839</link>
		<dc:creator>Peon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1801839</guid>
		<description>//Congrats to Marty and his team for a job well done on AOL Finance. The job may not be done yet but they’ve come a long way over the last two years.

So it took 2 years and a couple of acquisitions?! Yeah, at this rate of change AOL will sure blow Google away. LOL

As to @22.  those unhappy users pay some $20+ a month! They have all the right to expect to get what they want instead of the stuff somebody thinks is cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//Congrats to Marty and his team for a job well done on AOL Finance. The job may not be done yet but they’ve come a long way over the last two years.</p>
<p>So it took 2 years and a couple of acquisitions?! Yeah, at this rate of change AOL will sure blow Google away. LOL</p>
<p>As to @22.  those unhappy users pay some $20+ a month! They have all the right to expect to get what they want instead of the stuff somebody thinks is cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GStock chart picks are way so much better</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1798916</link>
		<dc:creator>GStock chart picks are way so much better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1798916</guid>
		<description>and so are the stock picks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and so are the stock picks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch40 Sponsor - Agoracom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1798665</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch40 Sponsor - Agoracom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1798665</guid>
		<description>Congrats to Marty and his team for a job well done on AOL Finance.  The job may not be done yet but they&#039;ve come a long way over the last two years.  Those who criticize AOL, rightly or wrongly, should take into account the rate of positive change at AOL Finance, vs. Yahoo and Google.  At this pace, AOL will blow both of them away within 12 - 18 months.

Regards,
George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to Marty and his team for a job well done on AOL Finance.  The job may not be done yet but they&#8217;ve come a long way over the last two years.  Those who criticize AOL, rightly or wrongly, should take into account the rate of positive change at AOL Finance, vs. Yahoo and Google.  At this pace, AOL will blow both of them away within 12 &#8211; 18 months.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1798034</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1798034</guid>
		<description>@ 3. Michael Arrington, in response to 2. Security

You think that&#039;s not true anymore? Then you have no clue what AOL users are really like. Try getting an onlsaught of emails and comments from them for oh, say, two years, like I have, then you&#039;ll see Security is right on the money. As he said:

&quot;They are not usually savvy searchers. So, these embellishments may not be appreciated by them - and it is possible in this competitive environment, that Google and Yahoo will encompass whatever features appear to have potential on other sites.&quot;

I&#039;m lucky if half the people who use AOL who write to me can read above a fifth grade level, and forget their spelling - none of them can spell decently for more than a sentence or two before they lose it. And they have no patience whatsoever. They want everything handed to them - answers to their questions, help for their problems, links for their reading - with no waiting, and they&#039;re not great about thanking you for your time and help while they&#039;re at it. If I can get them to turn off the damn CAPS LOCK key somewhere between the first email and the third one, I feel like I taught Helen Keller how to talk. Doesn&#039;t happen too often. Don&#039;t overestimate AOL users, you will either get laughed at or wind up laughing at yourself.

@5. The Hater

&quot;Why does it surprise you that Google Finance is doing so poorly? It looks like crap.&quot;

You mean you can find Google Finance? You&#039;re doing better than me. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen it once. As Henry Blodget pointed out today in his post (http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/aol-twx-relaunches-stock-quotes-slick-but-uphill-climb.html) there is no link to Google Finance on G&#039;s home page, so there is no way to tell there is such a thing, is there?

But I prefer it that way. I&#039;ve never seen anything from Google that didn&#039;t suck. Yahoo&#039;s search and finance pages are much better IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 3. Michael Arrington, in response to 2. Security</p>
<p>You think that&#8217;s not true anymore? Then you have no clue what AOL users are really like. Try getting an onlsaught of emails and comments from them for oh, say, two years, like I have, then you&#8217;ll see Security is right on the money. As he said:</p>
<p>&#8220;They are not usually savvy searchers. So, these embellishments may not be appreciated by them &#8211; and it is possible in this competitive environment, that Google and Yahoo will encompass whatever features appear to have potential on other sites.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m lucky if half the people who use AOL who write to me can read above a fifth grade level, and forget their spelling &#8211; none of them can spell decently for more than a sentence or two before they lose it. And they have no patience whatsoever. They want everything handed to them &#8211; answers to their questions, help for their problems, links for their reading &#8211; with no waiting, and they&#8217;re not great about thanking you for your time and help while they&#8217;re at it. If I can get them to turn off the damn CAPS LOCK key somewhere between the first email and the third one, I feel like I taught Helen Keller how to talk. Doesn&#8217;t happen too often. Don&#8217;t overestimate AOL users, you will either get laughed at or wind up laughing at yourself.</p>
<p>@5. The Hater</p>
<p>&#8220;Why does it surprise you that Google Finance is doing so poorly? It looks like crap.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean you can find Google Finance? You&#8217;re doing better than me. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen it once. As Henry Blodget pointed out today in his post (<a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/aol-twx-relaunches-stock-quotes-slick-but-uphill-climb.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/aol-twx-relaunches-stock-quotes-slick-but-uphill-climb.html'>http://www.alle...hill-climb.html</a>) there is no link to Google Finance on G&#8217;s home page, so there is no way to tell there is such a thing, is there?</p>
<p>But I prefer it that way. I&#8217;ve never seen anything from Google that didn&#8217;t suck. Yahoo&#8217;s search and finance pages are much better IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797990</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797990</guid>
		<description>AOL! AOL?
They are still around?

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL! AOL?<br />
They are still around?</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797713</link>
		<dc:creator>Peon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797713</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me?! Where are the Options quotes? Where are TA tools on the charts? Yahoo had both for ages.  FLASH chart widgets instead of DHTML? Who cares?! 

Majority of hits are coming from the AOL members.  Who are quite conservative audience.  They hate change. 

Real time integration of headlines? So instead of 5 minute delay a Press release or an AP wire story will be available immediately? That should make people switch from Yahoo? Give me a break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me?! Where are the Options quotes? Where are TA tools on the charts? Yahoo had both for ages.  FLASH chart widgets instead of DHTML? Who cares?! </p>
<p>Majority of hits are coming from the AOL members.  Who are quite conservative audience.  They hate change. </p>
<p>Real time integration of headlines? So instead of 5 minute delay a Press release or an AP wire story will be available immediately? That should make people switch from Yahoo? Give me a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797485</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797485</guid>
		<description>for the next generation of financial websites take a look at: 
http://www.socialpicks.com
http://caps.fool.com
http://www.gstock.com
http://www.bullpoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the next generation of financial websites take a look at:<br />
<a href="http://www.socialpicks.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialpicks.com'>http://www.socialpicks.com</a><br />
<a href="http://caps.fool.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://caps.fool.com'>http://caps.fool.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.gstock.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.gstock.com'>http://www.gstock.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bullpoo.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.bullpoo.com'>http://www.bullpoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797364</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797364</guid>
		<description>Edo is definitely one of the smartest people at AOL.

The site looks great. They&#039;ve been able to translate Relegence&#039;s expert-focused tools into something that works for a serious investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edo is definitely one of the smartest people at AOL.</p>
<p>The site looks great. They&#8217;ve been able to translate Relegence&#8217;s expert-focused tools into something that works for a serious investor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Simplified</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797319</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Simplified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797319</guid>
		<description>@16

Right ..as actually what would be useful is a Custom or &quot;What-if&quot; check form any date to any date.

You can do this visually over at the URL on Comment 15, Click on the chart when you entered the position and hold the cursor till the till to exit, and See the gain made on top right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@16</p>
<p>Right ..as actually what would be useful is a Custom or &#8220;What-if&#8221; check form any date to any date.</p>
<p>You can do this visually over at the URL on Comment 15, Click on the chart when you entered the position and hold the cursor till the till to exit, and See the gain made on top right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797306</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797306</guid>
		<description>&quot;Another feature that I haven’t seen elsewhere is a simple return-on-investment table that shows investment returns for given periods.&quot;

I&#039;ve never needed this before, but I was looking for something like this a few hours ago to calculate Cisco&#039;s total return over its prior fiscal year. Unfortunately, this AOL tool wouldn&#039;t do me any good because Cisco has an odd fiscal year. It started July 28 &#039;06 and ended July 27 this year, or something like that. 

Now why can&#039;t I just plug those dates in and calculate the return? 

No one buys stock for the periods they&#039;re using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Another feature that I haven’t seen elsewhere is a simple return-on-investment table that shows investment returns for given periods.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never needed this before, but I was looking for something like this a few hours ago to calculate Cisco&#8217;s total return over its prior fiscal year. Unfortunately, this AOL tool wouldn&#8217;t do me any good because Cisco has an odd fiscal year. It started July 28 &#8216;06 and ended July 27 this year, or something like that. </p>
<p>Now why can&#8217;t I just plug those dates in and calculate the return? </p>
<p>No one buys stock for the periods they&#8217;re using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market SImplified</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797286</link>
		<dc:creator>Market SImplified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797286</guid>
		<description>Feature Innovations does exist outside the big league too..

&quot;Another feature that I haven’t seen elsewhere is a simple return-on-investment table that shows investment returns for given periods. Or simply set the calendar to whatever dates you like.&quot;

Example :
http://www.marketsimplified.com/technical/index/AAPL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feature Innovations does exist outside the big league too..</p>
<p>&#8220;Another feature that I haven’t seen elsewhere is a simple return-on-investment table that shows investment returns for given periods. Or simply set the calendar to whatever dates you like.&#8221;</p>
<p>Example :<br />
<a href="http://www.marketsimplified.com/technical/index/AAPL" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.marketsimplified.com/technical/index/AAPL'>http://www.mark...ical/index/AAPL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rudloff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797148</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rudloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797148</guid>
		<description>AOL nailed it. Well done, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL nailed it. Well done, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyTalk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797109</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyTalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797109</guid>
		<description>Lame O AOL, Lame. Copy Copy Copy...BS. And it makes  the front page of TC? Simply Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame O AOL, Lame. Copy Copy Copy&#8230;BS. And it makes  the front page of TC? Simply Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnieBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797103</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnieBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797103</guid>
		<description>Wow, a huge leap forward.  The sleeping giant continues to quietly pump out great stuff.  Combine this with BloggingStocks.com and this is one heck of a product.

Go AOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a huge leap forward.  The sleeping giant continues to quietly pump out great stuff.  Combine this with BloggingStocks.com and this is one heck of a product.</p>
<p>Go AOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1797081</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1797081</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AOL Gets Serious About Finance...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AOL Gets Serious About Finance&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1796991</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1796991</guid>
		<description>AOL Money &amp; Finance also started a new site - Bloggingstocks.com - at the beginning of the year and then redesigned it this Fall and it is doing very well from the traffic charts while also reaching a new audience for AOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL Money &amp; Finance also started a new site &#8211; Bloggingstocks.com &#8211; at the beginning of the year and then redesigned it this Fall and it is doing very well from the traffic charts while also reaching a new audience for AOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-1796710</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/aol-gets-serious-about-finance/#comment-1796710</guid>
		<description>I think it all depends on Ambition, Many successful US comapnies dont expand in related products, Indian IT comapnies grow 40-45% on smaller base and US tech companies grow a few basis points even though they have deep pockets and scale.

http://tekno-world.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it all depends on Ambition, Many successful US comapnies dont expand in related products, Indian IT comapnies grow 40-45% on smaller base and US tech companies grow a few basis points even though they have deep pockets and scale.</p>
<p><a href="http://tekno-world.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tekno-world.blogspot.com'>http://tekno-wo...ld.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
